A depression refers to a significant economic downturn, while a compromise is an agreement through mutual concessions. The 'Great Compromise' was an essential agreement that shaped the U.S. bicameral legislature.
When we use the term depression in a historical context, it often refers to a period of especially low economic activity, characterised by rising unemployment and falling business productivity. For instance: 'The Great Depression of the 1930s led to widespread unemployment and economic hardship.'
On the other hand, compromise is a concept that can be understood as an agreement where each party involved consents to make concessions. An example sentence could be: 'In order to resolve the dispute, both parties came to a compromise, each giving up something in order to reach an agreement.
a. The economic depression of the 1930s led to widespread unemployment and hardship.
b. The two sides reached a compromise by agreeing to meet halfway on the terms of the contract.
- In the context of the sentence, "depression" refers to a severe and prolonged economic downturn characterized by low economic activity, high unemployment rates, and reduced consumer spending. The sentence demonstrates the meaning of "depression" by describing the economic hardship and challenges faced during the 1930s.
- On the other hand, "compromise" refers to reaching a mutual agreement or settlement in which both parties make concessions or adjustments to their original positions. The sentence illustrates the meaning of "compromise" by showing how two sides came to a resolution by finding a middle ground and making compromises to reach a mutually acceptable solution.
- Both sentences effectively demonstrate the meanings of "depression" and "compromise" in the context of their respective usage, providing clarity and understanding of these terms in the lesson.
the imaginary boundary that divided the Atlantic Ocean was the....
Answer:
Line of Demarcation
Explanation:
The Line of Demarcation was an imaginary line that was settled by the Portuguese and Spanish that divided the world into two parts between these two nations. First, the line was defined by Pope Alexander VI in 1493 and it changed to have its more common definition in 1494 by the Treaty of Tordesillas. The line determined that Spain controlled the lands that were discovered west of the line and Portugal controlled new lands to the east.
how does the author contrast zeus from cronus?
King Nebuchadnezzar did which of the following?
Rebuilt Babylon
Created a list of laws
Proposed that there was only one god
Conquered the Persian Empire
Answer:
a. rebuilt Babylon
Explanation:
HE REBUILT BABYLON, THAT IS A FACT :)
(i also took the final)
What was the role of the Ohio River valley in the growing conflict between the French, Native Americans, and British in the mid-1700s?
How did Mansa Musa affect the Mali Empire?
Answer:
The Mali Empire was located in present-day northern Guinea and southern Mali. It had a population of 50 million people. Mansa Musa was the tenth meek of the Mali Empire. He came to power in 1312. During his reign the empire had significant growth both economically and socially. The strength of the Empire was due to the decentralization of state administration.
An aspect that favored the economic flourishing of the empire during the Mansa Musa government was the wealth of these territories in minerals and gold, since the demand for these metals was high at the time.
Religion generated many transformations since Mansa Musa boosted the Muslim faith and mosques, madrasas (schools) were built throughout the territory.
Mansa Musa also promoted the flourishing of knowledge in the city of Timbuktu. During his reign, the University of Sankore emerged (it still exists).
Which of the following is a true statement about the map?
The border between Texas and Mexico is a thin, black line; this indicates an international boundary.
The border between California and Oregon is a blue line; this indicates an international boundary.
The border between California and Oregon is a thin, black line; this indicates a state boundary.
The border between Texas and Mexico is a thick, black line; this indicates a state boundary.
The correct answer is C. The border between California and Oregon is a thin, black line; this indicates a state boundary.
Explanation
According to the map and its conventions, the correct option is C. because the line that divides the states of Oregon and California in the west of the country is a thin line that according to the conventions of the map indicates a "State Boundary". Additionally, the other options are not correct, for example, option A. "The border between Texas and Mexico is a thin, black line; this indicates an international boundary" is incorrect because according to the conventions of the map, the "National Boundary" is indicated by two thick and continuous lines; in addition, option B. "The border between California and Oregon is a blue line; this indicates an international boundary" is incorrect because the state limit between Oregon and California is not a State River Boundary; finally, option D. "The border between Texas and Mexico is a thick, black line; this indicates a state boundary" is incorrect because the boundary between Mexico and Texas is an national boundary. So, the correct aswer is C. The border between California and Oregon is a thin, black line; this indicates a state boundary.
Which region on the map did the Hebrew people believe was the "Promised Land"?
A.
A
B.
B
C.
C
D.
D
The answer is B! Hope I could help! :)
Why did Americans want to control the Mississippi River
President Jackson introduced all of the following political procedures except
how might two tectonic plates interact with each other?
Tectonic plates interact at their boundaries as either divergent, convergent, or transform. Divergent boundaries create new crust or rift valleys, convergent boundaries can lead to mountain formation or subduction, and transform boundaries are characterized by lateral movement which can cause earthquakes.
Tectonic plates interact with each other in several significant ways, primarily at their boundaries. The outer crust of the Earth is made up of these plates, which fit together like a massive three-dimensional jigsaw puzzle. As they move, tectonic plates exhibit certain interactions that are crucial in shaping the Earth's geological structure. Three main types of plate boundaries describe the majority of these interactions:
Divergent boundaries: This is where two plates move away from each other. When this occurs on the ocean floor, new crust is created via volcanic activity, forming mid-oceanic ridges. When it occurs within a continent, it can create valleys or rift zones.
Convergent boundaries: At these boundaries, two plates move towards each other. Depending on the nature of the plates, they can either create mountains, as seen in the Himayalas, or form subduction zones, where one plate slides under another, leading to volcanic activity and the formation of deep ocean trenches.
Transform boundaries: Here, two plates slide past one another, resulting in significant friction that can lead to earthquakes.
The nature of these interactions can lead to various significant geological phenomena such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, mountain-building, and oceanic trench formation.
Look at the map. Which countries are the central powers? The choices are in the picture.
The Central Powers in World War I consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire, with Italy initially aligning with them before joining the Allied Powers in 1915.
Explanation:The countries that were part of the Central Powers during World War I included Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. Italy was initially part of the alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary, known as the Triple Alliance; however, Italy switched sides to join the Allied Powers in 1915. Other central powers such as Bulgaria joined later during the war.
Learn more about Central Powers here:https://brainly.com/question/21445196
#SPJ2
5 palabras que siempre lleven mayusculas
And is there any inhabitant in America so ignorant, as not to know . . . that this continent can make no laws but what the king gives it leave to; and is there any man so unwise, as not to see, that . . . he will suffer no law to be made here, but such as suit his purpose.
–Thomas Paine,
Common Sense,
1776
Which statement best explains what Paine says about the king?
He puts the interests of the colonists before his own when approving laws.
He allows the colonies to make their own laws.
He will only approve laws that are in his and Great Britain’s best interest.
He allows new laws to be made in the colonies.
He will only approve laws that are in his and Great Britain’s best interest.
He will only approve laws that are in his and Great Britain’s best interest is the statement best explains what Paine says about the king. Hence, option B is correct.
What is Paine says about the king?Paine argued that if a king is elected, all succeeding kings must also be selected in the same way; if the king ascended to the throne, the entire reign is void. From any perspective, hereditary succession is invalid. Hereditary succession has further disadvantages, according to Paine.
He puts the needs of the colonists before his own when approving laws. Thomas Paine reminded the colonies in Common Sense that in a free republic "the law is king" and that, if a day were to be set aside to remember the republic's accomplishments,
it should not be focused on a specific man but rather the law itself: But some people wonder.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about Paine say about the king, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11445106
#SPJ2
what did Justinian's code say or change about the role of emperor?
What was Alexander the Great's legacy?
Alexander the Great's legacy includes his military conquests, the spread of Greek culture, and the establishment of the Hellenistic period. His founding of new cities helped blend cultures and propagate Greek traditions, impacting areas such as Egypt, Gandhara, and Afghanistan.
Explanation:Alexander the Great's LegacyAlexander the Great's legacy is multifaceted, encompassing his remarkable military conquests, the spread of Greek culture, and the establishment of the Hellenistic period. As a military and political leader, Alexander the Great demonstrated his genius by successfully leading his armies against much larger forces and by using strategies that included forming alliances and respecting conquered territories. His policy of founding new cities and blending cultures fostered the spread of Greek culture far beyond the traditional borders of Greece, particularly in Egypt and Asia.
Spread of Greek CultureAlexander's campaigns led to the rise of the largest city of the Hellenistic Greek world, Alexandria in Egypt, which became a cultural hub. This, along with other cities founded by Alexander, facilitated a unique blending of Greek and local traditions, leaving a lasting imprint on the social and cultural landscape of the regions he conquered. Following Alexander's death, the Hellenistic period saw the continuation of his legacy through the establishment of Greek-style institutions and the persistence of Greek influence in art and learning.
The true testament to Alexander's legacy is not only seen in his military achievements but also in how he managed to inspire cultural and political changes across the territories he conquered. He is acknowledged for his role in the creation of a hybrid Greco-Egyptian culture and for setting a foundation for the subsequent political entities that arose post his death. His empire, though fragmented after his demise, still echoed his ideals and left lasting effects on the art and governance of places as diverse as Gandhara, Afghanistan, and Egypt.
An oligarchy can be like a dictatorship true or false and why?
An oligarchy can resemble a dictatorship in terms of control but they are not the same. An oligarchy is ruled by a small, elite group and a dictatorship is typically ruled by one person or a small group that wields absolute power.
Explanation:An oligarchy and a dictatorship can exhibit similar characteristics in terms of concentrated power, but generally, they operate differently. In an oligarchy, power is held by a small, elite group often because of their military might, or economic power. This is slightly distinct from a dictatorship where the power is mostly held by one individual or a very small group that imposes authority over the entire population often through intimidation and brutality.
Oligarchy can seem like a dictatorship when the few people in power exercise their authority without input from the citizens in a manner that resembles the unrestricted power usually seen in a dictatorship. However, a classic example of oligarchy could be seen in Russia, where groups of business owners control natural resources, expand wealth and political influence.
Dictatorships, on the other hand, are less subtle and more direct in their exercise of power, often resorting to military might and intimidation. Citizens' rights are generally limited, and political criticism or opposition is usually not tolerated.
Learn more about Oligarchy vs Dictatorship here:https://brainly.com/question/11302034
#SPJ6
Abraham Lincoln vs Julius Caesar
While Lincoln's leadership was democratic and inclusive, Caesar's was autocratic and unilateral. Lincoln valued moral integrity and empathy, whereas Caesar's approach was more strategic and ambitious.
Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865)
Leadership Style:
Democratic Approach: Lincoln believed in a government 'of the people, by the people, for the people.' He often sought input from his advisors and was known for his inclusive leadership style.Moral Integrity: Lincoln is remembered for his moral stance, particularly his opposition to slavery. This moral compass was essential in guiding his decisions during the Civil War.Communication Skills: Lincoln was an excellent communicator. His speeches, including the Gettysburg Address, were clear, impactful, and inspired many.Legacy:
Lincoln is most celebrated for his role in preserving the Union during the Civil War and for the Emancipation Proclamation, which paved the way for the abolition of slavery in the United States. His leadership helped shape the modern American nation.
Julius Caesar (100 BCE-44 BCE)
Leadership Style:
Autocratic Approach: Caesar often adopted an authoritarian style, asserting control and making unilateral decisions that concentrated power in his hands.Strategic Brilliance: He was a highly strategic thinker and an exceptional military leader, known for his conquests and expansion of the Roman Republic's territory.Political Acumen: Caesar was a shrewd politician, skilled in manipulating Rome's political systems to his advantage while maintaining a facade of loyalty to traditional republican institutions.Complete question-
How do the leadership styles and legacies of Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar compare and contrast?
The United States system of government is based on?
A-the Supremacy Clause.
B-financial and military powers.
C-federal- and state-level powers.
D-the Bill of Rights and amendments
The United States system of government is indeed based on federal- and state-level powers, and this principle is known as federalism. Hence, Option (C) is correct.
Under this system, certain powers are delegated to the federal government, while others are reserved for the individual states.
The Constitution outlines the powers of the federal government, including the authority to regulate interstate commerce, conduct foreign relations, and establish a common defense.
Conversely, powers not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved for the states, allowing them to govern on matters such as education, public health, and intrastate commerce.
Thus, this division of powers ensures a balance between a strong central government and the autonomy of individual states.
Learn more about federalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/1951874
#SPJ5
An amicus curiae brief is __________.
a prior judicial decision that serves as a rule for settling subsequent cases of a similar nature
a legal document filed by interested parties to a case prior to a hearing or trial in order to influence the court's decision
a law passed by Congress that deals with the court system
a bureaucratic regulation that deals with the court system
An amicus curiae brief is a document submitted by non-parties to a court case, interested in the outcome, that seeks to influence the court's decision with additional perspectives.
Explanation:An amicus curiae brief is a legal document filed by non-parties, often interest groups, to a case who are nevertheless interested in the outcome. These briefs are submitted with the intention to influence the court's decision by presenting additional arguments, information, or perspectives that the court may consider when making its ruling. The phrase amicus curiae is Latin for "friend of the court," and these briefs are used both before and after a case has been granted certiorari, which is the court's agreement to review the case.
Which statement best describes the different ways Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt reacted to the "Bonus Armies" that marched on Washington during their presidencies? A. Hoover agreed to pay the veterans their bonus; Roosevelt had the leaders arrested for treason. B. Hoover sent in troops to break up their camp; Roosevelt sent his wife to their camp to meet with the marchers. C. Hoover invited the leaders to the White House; Roosevelt refused to acknowledge their presence. D. Hoover gave the marchers government jobs; Roosevelt said there was nothing he could do for them.
Answer:
B. Hoover sent in troops to break up their camp; Roosevelt sent his wife to their camp to meet with the marchers.
A Bonus March in 1933 toward the beginning of the Roosevelt organization was defused in May with an offer of occupations with the Civilian Conservation Corps at Fort Hunt, Virginia, which the greater part of the gathering acknowledged.
The individuals who decided not to work for the CCC by the May 22 due date were given transportation home. In 1936, Congress superseded President Roosevelt's veto and paid the veterans their reward nine years early.
Most of the readers of the Liberator were
Answer:
A. free African Americans
Explanation:
What job employed the most people in Egypt
James watt and Samuel Slater made important contributions to the industrial revolution. which is not true about Samuel Slater
a: he emigrated from England to the united states
b: he became a cotton farmer in the deep south
c: he possessed a thorough knowledge of textile machinery
d: he built Americas first cotton mill
Answer:
B. He became a cotton farmer in the deep south. The other three are all things that he had done.
Explanation: I did awesome on the test. And I got an A++
Please mark e brainliest.
James watt and Samuel Slater made important contributions to the industrial revolution. All statements are correct except he became a cotton farmer in the deep south. Option B is correct.
What is industrial revolution?The Industrial Revolution was the shift to new industrial techniques that took place in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States between roughly 1760 and 1820–1840.
This transition encompassed the switch from manual to mechanical production methods, the invention of new ways for producing chemicals and iron, the expansion of steam and water power, the creation of machine tools, and the growth of the mechanized factory system. Production significantly rose, which led to an exceptional rise in population and population growth rate.
However in terms of employment, output value, and capital invested, the textile sector dominated the Industrial Revolution. The adoption of contemporary production techniques was also pioneered by the textile sector.
Therefore Option B is correct.
Learn more about industrial revolution refer:
https://brainly.com/question/855594
#SPJ2
In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Territory from France. Someone might have argued against the purchase on the grounds that
1.Jefferson’s action was not expressly permitted by the U.S. Constitution
2.a majority of the Senate opposed the purchase of the Louisiana Territory
3.Jefferson violated states’ rights by his purchase of the Louisiana Territory
4.the purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France could lead to a war with Spain
Despite that President Thomas Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Territory from France, people may argued that the purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France could lead to war with Spain.
The Louisiana Purchase entails an acquisition of the Louisiana territory from Napoleonic France in the year 1803.
Hence, an opposition may argued that the purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France could lead to war with Spain.
Therefore, the Option D is correct
Read more about Louisiana Territory
brainly.com/question/20544210
In the media, what is the role of a "gatekeeper"?
to count how many newspapers are sold
to decide what kinds of stories will be covered
to make sure that all voters receive political mailings
to keep ordinary people from contacting government officials
B. to decide what kinds of stories will be covered
Who was Muslim, but they didn’t force it on their people. They were more concerned about stopping rebellions than spreading religion. Check all that apply. *
Mansa Musa
Sundiata Keita
Sunni Ali
Dinga Cisse
really need help
describe the sequence of events that resulted in the migration of nomads into north america from asia
The Whiskey Rebellion was significant in U.S history mainly because?
The correct answer is:
The federal government used force to enforce the laws of the land.
The Whiskey Rebellion was a protest against a tax applied to all distilled spirits, the first amount taxed on a domestic product by the recently established federal government. The Whiskey Rebellion proved that the new national government had the determination and capacity to overcome violent resistance to its laws, even though the whiskey tax continued difficult to obtain.
why was jackson able to win easily in 1828 after losing to adams in 1824
Andrew Jackson won the 1828 election easily by being portrayed as a defender of the common man and leveraging the backlash against the 'corrupt bargain' of 1824. Stronger party organization and broad popular support also contributed to his victory in the Electoral College and popular vote.
Andrew Jackson was able to win easily in the 1828 presidential election after losing to John Quincy Adams in 1824 due to several key factors. One significant change between the two elections was the portrayal of Jackson as a champion of the common man and a staunch defender of states' rights, which appealed to a wide spectrum of voters including urban workers, small northern farmers, southern yeomen, and southern planters. Jackson's image as a populist hero resonated with many Americans at the time, contrasting with Adams, who was seen as more elitist.
Additionally, the so-called "corrupt bargain" of the 1824 election, wherein Henry Clay, the Speaker of the House, worked to ensure Adams' victory in the House of Representatives, left many voters feeling that Jackson had been denied the presidency unjustly. This sentiment galvanized Jackson's base, leading to robust party organization and successful campaigning efforts. The election of 1828 reflected the increasing emphasis on party politics and the expansion of democracy, which allowed Jackson to harness broader popular support and secure his victory in both the popular and Electoral College votes.
Why might the Great Khan have wanted to make the roads pleasant?
The Great Khan improved the roads to aid navigation, encourage trade, and symbolize his power. These pleasant roads were part of a larger strategy for political stability and economic prosperity. It also reflected the Mongol's transition from conquerors to rulers invested in their empire’s infrastructure and wellbeing.
The Great Khan, or Genghis Khan, had multifaceted reasons for wanting to make roads pleasant and functional. First, by planting trees along the roadsides, he provided travelers with navigational aids and a respite from harsh conditions through shade, which was especially beneficial given the varying terrain that included both deserts and rocky mountains. Secondly, pleasant roads were part of a larger strategy to enhance trade and communication throughout the Mongol Empire, which in turn fostered political control and economic prosperity. This development was also a reflection of the change in the Mongols' attitude towards governance and infrastructure, indicated by their engagement in construction projects like canals and roads. These projects not only facilitated military movements but also played a significant role in symbolizing the presence and power of the emperor.
Lastly, the Great Khan's policies and infrastructure improvements were illustrative of the Mongols' broader transformation from conquerors to rulers who integrated into the societies they controlled, exemplified by the Ilkhans adopting Persian culture. These actions, including the building of roads, were part of a deliberate effort to consolidate and legitimize their rule, demonstrate benevolence to their subjects, and secure a lasting legacy.