A box with a square base and open top must have a volume of 32,000 cm3. Find the dimensions of the box that minimize the amount of material used.(a) Sides of base (cm)(b) Height (cm)

Answer: the cost of one daylilies is $4

the cost of one ivy is $9

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the cost of one daylilies.

Let y represent the cost of one ivy.

Nicole and Kim bought their supplies from the same store. Nicole spent $99 on 9 daylilies and 7 pots of ivy. This means that

9x + 7y = 99 - - - - - - - -1

Kim spent $144 on 9 daylilies and 12 pots of ivy. This means that

9x + 12y = 144 - - - - - - - - -2

We will eliminate x by subtracting equation 2 from equation 1, it becomes

- 5y = - 45

y = - 45/-5 = 9

Substituting y = 9 into equation 2, it becomes

9x + 12 × 9 = 144

9x + 108 = 144

9x = 144 - 108 = 36

x = 36/9 = 4

To calculate the work required to pump the contents of a tank to a higher level, one needs to set up an integral using the weight of the fluid and the height difference.

A tank in the shape of a surface generated by revolving the parabolic segment y = x^2 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 3 about the y-axis will have a volume that can be determined using calculus and rotational solids concept. To calculate the work required to pump the contents of the tank to a level 5 feet above the top of the tank, we need to set up an integral using the weight of the fluid and the height difference.

Integral setup:

Answer:

[tex]\chi^2 =27.356[/tex]

[tex]p_v = P(\chi^2_{9} >27.356)=0.00122[/tex]

And we can find the p value using the following excel code:

"=1-CHISQ.DIST(27.356,9,TRUE)"

Since the p value is lower than the significance level assumed 0.05 we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance, and we can conclude that we have association between the two variables analyzed.

Step-by-step explanation:

A chi-square goodness of fit test "determines if a sample data matches a population".

A chi-square test for independence "compares two variables in a contingency table to see if they are related. In a more general sense, it tests to see whether distributions of categorical variables differ from each another".

Assume the following dataset:

                           Amusement Parks     Mexico    Home    Other    Total

Freshman                     23                         21            43          21         108

Sophomore                  34                         23            14          26        97

Junior                           25                         30            23         26        104

Senior                           27                         33             17         19         96

Total                            109                        107            97         92        405

We need to conduct a chi square test in order to check the following hypothesis:

H0: There is independence between the two random variables

H1: There is dependence between the two variables

The level os significance assumed for this case is [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex]

The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:

[tex]\chi^2 =\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{(O_i -E_i)^2}{E_i}[/tex]

The table given represent the observed values, we just need to calculate the expected values with the following formula [tex]E_i = \frac{total col * total row}{grand total}[/tex]

And the calculations are given by:

[tex]E_{1} =\frac{109*108}{405}=29.07[/tex]

[tex]E_{2} =\frac{107*108}{405}=28.53[/tex]

[tex]E_{3} =\frac{97*108}{405}=25.87[/tex]

[tex]E_{4} =\frac{92*108}{405}=24.53[/tex]

[tex]E_{5} =\frac{109*97}{405}=26.11[/tex]

[tex]E_{6} =\frac{107*97}{405}=25.63[/tex]

[tex]E_{7} =\frac{97*97}{405}=23.23[/tex]

[tex]E_{8} =\frac{92*97}{405}=22.03[/tex]

[tex]E_{9} =\frac{109*104}{405}=27.99[/tex]

[tex]E_{10} =\frac{107*104}{405}=27.48[/tex]

[tex]E_{11} =\frac{97*104}{405}=24.91[/tex]

[tex]E_{12} =\frac{92*104}{405}=23.62[/tex]

[tex]E_{13} =\frac{109*96}{405}=25.84[/tex]

[tex]E_{14} =\frac{107*96}{405}=25.36[/tex]

[tex]E_{15} =\frac{97*96}{405}=22.99[/tex]

[tex]E_{16} =\frac{92*96}{405}=21.81[/tex]

And the expected values are given by:

                        Amusement Parks     Mexico    Home    Other    Total

Freshman                   29.07                28.53     25.87     24.53      108

Sophomore                26.11                  25.63     23.23     22.03      97

Junior                         27.99                 27.48     24.91      23.62     104

Senior                        25.84                 25.36     22.99      21.81       96

Total                            109                      107         97           92         405

And now we can calculate the statistic:

[tex]\chi^2 =27.356[/tex]

Now we can calculate the degrees of freedom for the statistic given by:

[tex]df=(rows-1)(cols-1)=(4-1)(4-1)=9[/tex]

And we can calculate the p value given by:

[tex]p_v = P(\chi^2_{9} >27.356)=0.00122[/tex]

And we can find the p value using the following excel code:

"=1-CHISQ.DIST(27.356,9,TRUE)"

Since the p value is lower than the significance level assumed 0.05 we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance, and we can conclude that we have association between the two variables analyzed.

Answer:

[tex]P=\frac{40}{560}=0.0714[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Notation

[tex]n_{sales}=4, n_{manufacturing}=7, n_{accounting}=5 [/tex]

Total = n= 4+7+5=16 people

We are going to select 3 people and will be given gift certificates to a local restaurant so then r =3.

Determine the probability that two of those selected will be from the accounting department and one will be from the sales department.

For this case we can use combinatory nCx, since the selection is without replacment.  

Where (nCx) means combinatory and it's given by this formula:

[tex]nCx=\frac{n!}{(n-x)! x!}[/tex]  

So then the definition of probability is given by :

[tex]P=\frac{Possible outcomes}{Total outcomes}[/tex]

Let's begin with the total outcomes, we have a total of n=16 people and we wan't to select 3 of them, so the possible outcomes are:

[tex]16C3= \frac{16!}{(16-3)! 3!}=560[/tex]

And now let's analyze the possible outcomes, we need that the group of 3 would be conformed by two people from the accounting department and one from the sales deparment. So then the possible outcomes are:

[tex](5C2)*(4C1)= \frac{5!}{(5-2)! 2!} \frac{4!}{(4-1)! 1!}=10*4=40[/tex]

And the reason is because we have a total of 5 people at the accounting and we want to select 2. And we have a total of 4 people at the sales department and we want to select just 1. And the multiplication it's because the order on the selection no matter (we assume this).

So then replacing into our formula of probability we got:

[tex]P=\frac{40}{560}=0.0714[/tex]

To calculate the probability, we need to determine the total number of ways to select 3 people out of all the employees and the total number of ways to select 2 people from the accounting department and 1 person from the sales department. The probability is then calculated by dividing the second calculation by the first.

To determine the probability that two of the selected people will be from the accounting department and one will be from the sales department, we need to first calculate the total number of ways to select 3 people out of the total number of employees. Then, we need to calculate the total number of ways to select 2 people from the accounting department and 1 person from the sales department. Finally, we divide the second calculation by the first calculation to get the probability.

Number of ways to select 3 people out of the total number of employees = 16C3 = 560

Number of ways to select 2 people from the accounting department and 1 person from the sales department = 5C2 * 4C1 = 10 * 4 = 40

Probability = Number of ways to select 2 people from the accounting department and 1 person from the sales department / Number of ways to select 3 people out of the total number of employees = 40 / 560 = <<40/560=0.0714>>0.0714

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ3

Answer:

0.1024

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that in a country there is only one of every 5 births is a girl.

i.e probability of a child born being a girl = 0.20

EAch birth is independent of the other and there are only two outcomes

Hence X no of girls will be binomial.

Required probability

= Probability that the first girl they have is the fourth baby

= Probability for first three children to be boys and fourth be a girl

Since each birth is independent of other, we have

Required probability

=[tex]0.8^3*0.2\\=0.1024[/tex]

Answer:

To test wether this is a significant decrease we have to perform a hypothesis test on the proportions.

The null hypothesis represents the past condition (the proportion of 0.23 accidents/day is equal or bigger) and the alternative hypothesis is what we claim that is happening now (the proportion have lowered).

We want to perform the test in order to know if there is enough evidence that it has changed. The result can be:

- The null hypothesis is rejected: there is enough evidence with this sample that the rate of accidents has lowered from 0.23.

- The null hypothesis failed to be rejected: there is not enough evidence to say that the rate of accidents has lowered, although the sample proportion is lower.

Step-by-step explanation:

Numerical solution:

We have to perform a hypothesis test on proportions. We want to know if there is enough evidence to claim that the number of accidents per day has lowered from 0.23.

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi\geq0.23\\\\H_1:\pi<0.23[/tex]

The significance level assumed is 0.05.

The proportion of the sample is:

[tex]p=\frac{3}{30}=0.1[/tex]

The standard deviation is calculated from the population proportion

[tex]\sigma=\sqrt{\pi(1-\pi)/N} =\sqrt{0.23*(1-0.23)/30} =0.077[/tex]

The z-value now can be calculated as

[tex]z=\frac{p-\pi+0.5/N}{\sigma}=\frac{0.10-0.23+0.5/30}{0.077}  =-1.475[/tex]

The P-value for z=-1.475 is P=0.07011. The P-value is greater than the significant level, so the effect is not significant and it failed to reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:

Please see the solution below:

Step-by-step explanation:

33)

Principal = $5,000

Interest Rate = 2.5% = 0.025

Time = 10 years

a)

Interest = Principal x Interest Rate x Time

Interest = $5,000 x 0.025 x 10

Interest = $1,250

b)

Total Balance = Interest + Principal

Total Balance = $1,250 + $5,000

Total Balance = $6,250

34)

Principal = $45,000

Interest Rate = 4.5% = 0.045

Time = 20 years

Interest = Principal x Interest Rate x Time

Interest = $45,000 x 0.045 x 20

Interest = $40,500

Answer:

We conclude that the residents of Wilmington, Delaware, have more income than the national average.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:  

Population mean, μ =  $50,000

Sample mean, [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = $60,000

Sample size, n = 10

Alpha, α = 0.05

Sample standard deviation, s = $10,000

a) First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis

[tex]H_{0}: \mu = 50000\text{ dollars}\\H_A: \mu > 50000\text{ dollars}[/tex]

We use one-tailed(right) t test to perform this hypothesis.

c) Formula:

[tex]t_{stat} = \displaystyle\frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} }[/tex]

Putting all the values, we have

[tex]t_{stat} = \displaystyle\frac{60000 - 50000}{\frac{10000}{\sqrt{10}} } = 3.162[/tex]

Now, [tex]t_{critical} \text{ at 0.05 level of significance, 9 degree of freedom } = 1.833[/tex]

b) Rejection Rule:

If the calculated t-statistic is greater than the the critical value, we rect the null hypothesis.

Since,                  

[tex]t_{stat} > t_{critical}[/tex]

We fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it.We accept the alternate hypothesis.

d) There is enough evidence to conclude that the residents of Wilmington, Delaware, have more income than the national average.

Answer:

1) A) II and III

2) A) Critical values: r = plusminus 0.396, significant linear correlation

3) Yi= 0.41 + 0.37Xi

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The objective of the linear correlation analysis is to test if there is an association between two study variables (X₁ and X₂).

Pearson's Coefficient of correlation

For Variables with a bivariate normal distribution (X₁, X₂)~N₂(μ₁; μ₂; σ₁²; σ₂²; ρ)

To do so, the study parameter is the population coefficient of correlation (ρ) - Rho- (If you were to make a graphic of the correlation line, Rho represents the slope)

Sample coefficient of correlation: r

It takes values between -1 and 1

This coefficient gives an idea of ​​the degree of correlation between the variables.

If ρ = 0 then there is no linear correlation between X₁ and X₂ Graphically, the slope is cero

If ρ < 0 then there is a negative association between X₁ and X₂ (i.e. when one variable increases the other one decreases) In a graphic, the slope of the line is negative.

If ρ > 0 then there is a positive association between X₁ and X₂ (i.e. Both variables increase and decrease together)

The closer to 1 or -1 the coefficient is, the stronger the association between variables. Using the absolute value of the correlation coefficients you can compare them, the greater the value, the stronger is the association between variables. For example, if you were to have two coefficients r₁= -0.24 and r₂= 0.67 then the absolute values are Ir₁I= 0.24 and Ir₂I= 0.67 you can see that the coefficient of the second sample is bigger than the first sample, that means that there is a stronger correlation in the second sample than the first one.

The non-parametric coefficient of correlation has the same characteristics.

1) Statements:

I: If the linear correlation coefficient for the two variables is zero, then there is no relationship between the variables. FALSE, when r=0 then there is no linear association between the two variables, this doesn't mean that there isn't any other type of association between them.

II: If the slope of the regression line is negative, then the linear correlation coefficient is negative. TRUE

The regression and correlation analyses are closely linked because for a regression equation to be reasonable, the sample points must be linked to the equation and the correlation coefficient between both variables must be large when the degree of association is high and small when The degree of association is low in addition to being independent of the units.

The regression analysis tests whether or not there is an association between both variables and the correlation analysis indicates the degree of that association.

If the slope of the regression is negative, then the correlation coefficient is negative.

III: The value of the linear correlation coefficient always lies between -1 and 1. TRUE, it is one of the characteristics of the correlation coefficient.

0.62 suggests a stronger linear relationship than a linear correlation coefficient of -0.82. FALSE, to check wich correlation coefficient shows a stronger correlation look at their absolute values, the one that is closer to 1 is the stronger, Ir₁I= 0.62 < Ir₂I= 0.82

Correct answer:

A) II and III

2) Given the linear correlation coefficient r and the sample size n, determine the critical values of r and use your finding to state whether or not the given r represents a significant linear correlation. Use a significance level of 0.05. r = 0.523, n = 25

For this, you have to use a Table of cumulative probabilities for the linear correlation coefficient. (I've used Pearson)

For a two-tailed test (H₀: ρ=0)

[tex]r_{n-2; \alpha/2}= r_{23; 0.025}=[/tex] ± 0.396

Against r = 0.523, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis. There is a linear correlation between the two study variables.

Correct answer:

A) Critical values: r = plus-minus 0.396, significant linear correlation

3) Construct a scatterplot for the given data. Check 1st attachment for Data and Scatterplot.

Use the given data to find the equation of the regression line. Round the final values to three significant digits, if necessary.

Equation of regression:

Yi= a + bXi

a= [tex](\frac{sum Yi}{n})[/tex]+b[tex](\frac{sum Xi}{n})[/tex]

b= [tex]\frac{sum XiYi*\frac{(sum Xi)(sum Yi)}{n} }{/(sumXi^2)-\frac{(sumXi)^2}{n} }[/tex]

Using the given Data:

∑Xi= -11

∑Xi²= 201

∑Yi= 0

∑Yi²= 176

Mean X= -1.10

Mean Y= 0

a= 0.41

b= 0.37

Yi= 0.41 + 0.37Xi

4) Managers rate empoyees acording to job performance and attitude. The results fro several randomly selected empoyees are given below.

Performance: 59; 63; 65; 69; 58; 77; 76; 69; 70; 64

Attitude: 72; 67; 78; 82; 73; 87; 92; 83; 87; 78

No question found?

I hope it helps!

Final answer:

The linear correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to 1, indicating strength and direction of a linear relationship. Statements II and III are true concerning the correlation coefficient. A calculated coefficient of 0.523 with a sample of 25 is significant given critical values of ±0.396 at a 0.05 significance level.

Explanation:

1. The linear correlation coefficient, known as the Pearson correlation coefficient and symbolized by r, provides a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. Statement II is true: If the slope of the regression line is negative, the linear correlation coefficient is also negative. Statement III is accurate as well because the value of the linear correlation coefficient lies between -1 and 1, inclusive.

For Statement I, although a correlation coefficient of zero indicates no linear relationship, there could be a non-linear relationship present. Regarding Statement IV, the strength of the relationship is determined by the absolute value of the correlation coefficient, so -0.82 indicates a stronger relationship than 0.62.

Therefore, the correct answer is A) II and III.

2. Using a Table of Critical Values for the Pearson correlation coefficient or technology like a calculator's LinRegTTest function, we compare the computed value of r to the critical values at a given significance level to determine whether the correlation is significant. For r = 0.523 and n = 25, the degrees of freedom are 23 (n - 2), and by referencing a table or using software, we find the critical values at a significance level of 0.05.

The correct answer is A) Critical values: r = ±0.396, significant linear correlation, because the reported r value of 0.523 exceeds the critical value.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We will use the product rule from combinatorics.

Answer:

n=543

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Notation and definitions

[tex]n[/tex] random sample (variable of interest)

[tex]\hat p[/tex] estimated proportion of interest

[tex]p[/tex] true population proportion of interest

A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".  

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.  

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".  

The population proportion have the following distribution

[tex]p \sim N(p,\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}})[/tex]

2) Solution to the problem

In order to find the critical value we need to take in count that we are finding the interval for a proportion, so on this case we need to use the z distribution. Since our interval is at 98% of confidence, our significance level would be given by [tex]\alpha=1-0.98=0.02[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 =0.01[/tex]. And the critical value would be given by:

[tex]z_{\alpha/2}=-2.33, t_{1-\alpha/2}=2.33[/tex]

The margin of error for the proportion interval is given by this formula:  

[tex] ME=z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}}[/tex]    (a)  

And on this case we have that [tex]ME =\pm 0.05[/tex] (5% points means 0.05 on fraction) and we are interested in order to find the value of n, if we solve n from equation (a) we got:  

[tex]n=\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{(\frac{ME}{z})^2}[/tex]   (b)  

Since we don't have a prior estimate for [tex]\hat p[/tex] we can use 0.5 as the prior estimate, and replacing into equation (b) the values from part a we got:

[tex]n=\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{(\frac{0.05}{2.33})^2}=542.89[/tex]  

And rounded up we have that n=543

Answer:

13/9

y =-22x+32

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the functions f and g are differentiable for all real numbers x. The table below gives values for the functions and their first derivatives at selected values of x.

x f(x) f'(x) g(x) g'(x)

1 4 -3 5 2

2 -3 -1 4 6

3 π 8 -1 4

4 -5 unknown 0 3

a) [tex]h(x) = \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} \\h'(x) = \frac{g(x)f'(x)-f(x)g'(x)}{(g(x))^2}[/tex]

(using quotient rule)

Substitute 1 for x

[tex]h'(1) = \frac{g(1)f'(1)-f(1)g'(1)}{(g(1))^2}\\=\frac{9-(-4)}{9} \\=\frac{13}{9}[/tex]

b) [tex]r(x) = f(x) g(x)\\r'(x) = f(x) g'(x)+g(x)f'(x)[/tex]

when [tex]x =2, r(x) = r(2) = f(2) g(2) = -12[/tex]

point of contact is (2,-12)

Slope of tangent =[tex]r'(2) = f(2) g'(2)+g(2)f'(2)\\=-18+(-4) \\=-22[/tex]

Using point slope form, tangent is

[tex]y+12 = -22(x-2)\\y = -22x +32[/tex]

a. h'(1) = -23/25.

b. The equation of the tangent line to r(x) = f(x)g(x) at x = 2 is y = -22x + 32.

a. To find h'(1), you need to apply the quotient rule.

The quotient rule states that if you have a function h(x) = f(x) / g(x), then the derivative h'(x) is given by:

h'(x) = (f'(x) * g(x) - f(x) * g'(x)) / (g(x))^2

In your case, h(x) = f(x) / g(x), and you want to find h'(1), so:x = 1

f(1) = 4

f'(1) = -3

g(1) = 5

g'(1) = 2

Now, plug these values into the quotient rule formula:

h'(1) = (f'(1) * g(1) - f(1) * g'(1)) / (g(1))^2

h'(1) = (-3 * 5 - 4 * 2) / (5^2)

h'(1) = (-15 - 8) / 25

h'(1) = -23 / 25

So, h'(1) = -23/25.

b. To find the equation of the tangent line to r(x) = f(x)g(x) at x = 2, you need to follow these steps:

Find r(2):

r(2) = f(2) * g(2)

r(2) = (-3) * 4

r(2) = -12

Find r'(x) using the product rule. The product rule states that if you have a function r(x) = f(x) * g(x), then the derivative r'(x) is given by:

r'(x) = f(x) * g'(x) + f'(x) * g(x)

Plugging in the given values:

r'(2) = (-3) * 6 + (-1) * 4

r'(2) = -18 - 4

r'(2) = -22

Now, you have r(2) and r'(2). You can use the point-slope form of a line to find the equation of the tangent line. The point-slope form is:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

Where (x1, y1) is the point on the curve (in this case, (2, -12)), and m is the slope (in this case, m = r'(2)).

Plug in the values:

y - (-12) = -22(x - 2)

Simplify and solve for y:

y + 12 = -22(x - 2)

y + 12 = -22x + 44

y = -22x + 44 - 12

y = -22x + 32

So, the equation of the tangent line to r(x) at x = 2 is y = -22x + 32.

For similar question on tangent line.

https://brainly.com/question/7252502

#SPJ3

Answer:

Arc length [tex]=\int_0^{\pi} \sqrt{1+[(4.5sin(4.5x))]^2}\ dx[/tex]

Arc length [tex]=9.75053[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The arc length of the curve is given by [tex]\int_a^b \sqrt{1+[f'(x)]^2}\ dx[/tex]

Here, [tex]f(x)=\int_0^{4.5x}sin(t) \ dt[/tex] interval [tex][0, \pi][/tex]

Now, [tex]f'(x)=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x} \int_0^{4.5x}sin(t) \ dt[/tex]

[tex]f'(x)=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x}\left ( [-cos(t)]_0^{4.5x} \right )[/tex]

[tex]f'(x)=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x}\left ( -cos(4.5x)+1 \right )[/tex]

[tex]f'(x)=4.5sin(4.5x)[/tex]

Now, the arc length is [tex]\int_0^{\pi} \sqrt{1+[f'(x)]^2}\ dx[/tex]

[tex]\int_0^{\pi} \sqrt{1+[(4.5sin(4.5x))]^2}\ dx[/tex]

After solving, Arc length [tex]=9.75053[/tex]

Answer:

B. 0.0918

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this problem, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 18, \sigma = 1.5[/tex]

What proportion of batteries would be expected to last less than 16 hours?

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 16. So:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{16 - 18}{1.5}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.33[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.33[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.0918.

So the correct answer is:

B. 0.0918

Answer: the correct option is B

Step-by-step explanation:

the durations of the batteries are normally distributed, we would apply the formula for normal distribution which is expressed as

z = (x - u)/s

Where

x = durations of the batteries in hours

u = mean time

s = standard deviation

From the information given,

u = 18 hours

s = 1.5 hours

We want to find the proportion or probability of batteries would be expected to last less than 16 hours. It is expressed as

P(x lesser than 16)

For x = 16,

z = (16 - 18)/1.5 = - 1.33

Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is 0.09176

Approximately 0.0918

Answer:

b. observing different participants one time in each group

[tex]SS_{between}=SS_{model}=\sum_{j=1}^p n_j (\bar x_{j}-\bar x)^2 [/tex]

If we analyze the formula for the sum of squares between we see that we are subtracting the mean for each group minus the grand mean. But in order to find the mean of each group we just need to observe just one time the dependent variable of interest for each group.

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) "is used to analyze the differences among group means in a sample".

The sum of squares "is the sum of the square of variation, where variation is defined as the spread between each individual value and the grand mean"

Solution to the problem

If we assume that we have [tex]p[/tex] groups and on each group from [tex]j=1,\dots,p[/tex] we have [tex]n_j[/tex] individuals on each group we can define the following formulas of variation:  

[tex]SS_{total}=\sum_{j=1}^p \sum_{i=1}^{n_j} (x_{ij}-\bar x)^2 [/tex]

[tex]SS_{between}=SS_{model}=\sum_{j=1}^p n_j (\bar x_{j}-\bar x)^2 [/tex]

If we analyze the formula for the sum of squares between we see that we are subtracting the mean for each group minus the grand mean. But in order to find the mean of each group we just need to observe just one time the dependent variable of interest for each group.

For this reason the best option on this case is:

b. observing different participants one time in each group

[tex]SS_{within}=SS_{error}=\sum_{j=1}^p \sum_{i=1}^{n_j} (x_{ij}-\bar x_j)^2 [/tex]

And we have this property :

[tex]SST=SS_{between}+SS_{within}[/tex]

Answer:

b. observing different participants one time in each group

Step-by-step explanation:

Between-subjects or groups design is a common experimental design used in psychology and other social science fields. Between-subjects is a type of experimental design in which the subjects of an experiment are assigned to different groups or conditions or participants in which each subject is being tested base on only one of the experimental conditions at a time. In Between-subjects experimental study, participants can be part of the treatment group or the control group, but cannot be part of both. A complete new group is required for each group, If more than one treatment is tested. The other way of assigning test to participants is Within-subjects design.

The major difference between Between-subjects design and Within-subjects design is that in Within-subjects design, the same participants test all the conditions of the experiment while in Between-subjects design different participants test each condition of the experiment.

Answer:

n=237

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".

Assuming the X follows a normal distribution

[tex]X \sim N(\mu, \sigma=112.2)[/tex]

We know that the margin of error for a confidence interval is given by:

[tex]Me=z_{\alpha/2}\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]   (1)

The next step would be find the value of [tex]\z_{\alpha/2}[/tex], [tex]\alpha=1-0.96=0.04[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2=0.02[/tex]

Using the normal standard table, excel or a calculator we see that:

[tex]z_{\alpha/2}=2.054[/tex]

If we solve for n from formula (1) we got:

[tex]\sqrt{n}=\frac{z_{\alpha/2} \sigma}{Me}[/tex]

[tex]n=(\frac{z_{\alpha/2} \sigma}{Me})^2[/tex]

And we have everything to replace into the formula:

[tex]n=(\frac{2.054(112.2)}{15})^2 =236.05[/tex]

And if we round up the answer we see that the value of n to ensure the margin of error required [tex]\pm=15 min[/tex] is n=237.

Answer:

[tex]n=\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{(\frac{0.0245}{1.96})^2}=1600[/tex]  

c. 1600

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".  

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.  

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".  

The population proportion have the following distribution

[tex]p \sim N(p,\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}})[/tex]

Solution to the problem

In order to solve this problem we need to assume a confidence level. Let's assume that is 95%

In order to find the critical value we need to take in count that we are finding the interval for a proportion, so on this case we need to use the z distribution. Since our interval is at 95% of confidence, our significance level would be given by [tex]\alpha=1-0.95=0.05[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 =0.025[/tex]. And the critical value would be given by:

[tex]z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96, z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96[/tex]

The margin of error for the proportion interval is given by this formula:  

[tex] ME=z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}}[/tex]    (a)  

First we need to find the margin of error from the original sample given by:

[tex] ME=1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.5 (1-0.5)}{400}}=0.049[/tex]

And on this case we have that [tex]ME =\pm 0.049/2=0.0245[/tex] and we are interested in order to find the value of n, if we solve n from equation (a) we got:  

[tex]n=\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{(\frac{ME}{z})^2}[/tex]   (b)  

And replacing into equation (b) the values from part a we got:

[tex]n=\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{(\frac{0.0245}{1.96})^2}=1600[/tex]  

c. 1600

The minimum sample size necessary to achieve a margin of error half as great as the original is Option c. 1,600.

To determine the minimum sample size necessary to achieve a margin of error that is half as great as the one produced by the initial sample, we need to understand the relationship between sample size and margin of error.

The margin of error for a confidence interval for a proportion is inversely proportional to the square root of the sample size, n. Specifically, if the margin of error for a sample size of 400 is E, then to achieve half that margin of error (E/2), we need a sample size n' such that:

E/2 = (E / √(n'))

Simplifying gives us √(n') = 2 × √(n). Squaring both sides, we get:

n' = 4 × n

Given n = 400, we find:

n' = 4 × 400 = 1600

Therefore, the minimum sample size necessary is Option c. 1,600.

Answer:

0.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that a club can select one member to attend a conference. All of the club officers want to attend. There are a total of four ​officers, and their designated positions within the club are President​ (P), Vice dash President (Upper V )comma Secretary (Upper S )comma nbspand Treasurer (Upper T ).

Sample space would be

a){ {P}, {V}, {S} {T}} is the sample space with notations standing for as given in the question

b) Each sample is equally likely.  Hence we have equal chances for selecting any one out of the four.

If probability of selecting a particular sample of size I is p, the by total probability axiom we have

[tex]4p =1\\p =0.25[/tex]

There are four possible samples, one for each club officer (P, V, S, T). The chance of drawing a particular sample is 1/4 or 25%, considering the selection is random and each officer has an equal chance of being chosen.

For a club with four officers designated as President (P), Vice President (V), Secretary (S), and Treasurer (T) that can send only one member to attend a conference, we first identify all possible samples of size 1. The possible samples are simply each officer as a single-member delegation, so we have:

Since there is an equal chance of each officer being selected, and there are four officers, the chance or probability of any one of them being selected for the sample is 1 divided by the total number of officers.

Probability = 1 / 4 = 0.25 or 25%

Thus, there is a 25% chance or probability that a particular sample of size 1 (one officer) will be drawn for the conference.

We want to find a solution to the initial value problem:

[tex]y'' + 18x = 0 \qquad,\qquad y(0) = 5 \qquad,\qquad y'(0)=1.[/tex]

We can start by integrating the equation once:

[tex]\dfrac{\textrm{d}^2 y}{\textrm{d}x^2} + 18 x = 0 \iff \dfrac{\textrm{d}^2 y}{\textrm{d}x^2} = -18 x \iff\\\\\iff \dfrac{\textrm{d}y}{\textrm{d}x} = -18\displaystyle\int x\textrm{ d}x \iff \dfrac{\textrm{d}y}{\textrm{d}x}=-18\dfrac{x^2}{2} + C \iff\\\\\iff \dfrac{\textrm{d}y}{\textrm{d}x} = -9x^2 + C.[/tex]

Using the initial condition [tex]y'(0) = 1[/tex], we can determine the integration constant [tex]C[/tex]:

[tex]\dfrac{\textrm{d}y}{\textrm{d}x}\Big\vert_{x= 0} = 1 \iff -9 \times 0^2 + C = 1 \iff C = 1.[/tex]

Therefore, we have:

[tex]\dfrac{\textrm{d}y}{\textrm{d}x} = -9x^2 + 1[/tex]

We can now integrate again:

[tex]y(x) = \displaystyle\int\dfrac{\textrm{d}y}{\textrm{d}x}\textrm{ d}x = \int\left(-9x^2+1\right)\textrm{d}x = -9\int x^2\textrm{ d}x + \int\textrm{d}x =\\\\= -9\dfrac{x^3}{3} + x + K = -3x^3 + x + K.[/tex]

The integration constant [tex]K[/tex] is determined by using [tex]y(0) = 5[/tex]:

[tex]y(0) = 5 \iff -3 \times 0^3 + 0 + K = 5 \iff K = 5.[/tex]

Finally, the solution is:

[tex]\boxed{y(x) = -3x^3 + x + 5}.[/tex]

By separation of variables, the solution is given by:

[tex]y(x) = -3x^3 + x + 5[/tex]

The differential equation is:

[tex]y^{\prime\prime}(x) + 18x = 0[/tex]

[tex]y^{\prime\prime}(x) = -18x[/tex]

Applying separation of variables:

[tex]\int y^{\prime\prime}(x) = -\int 18x dx[/tex]

[tex]y^{\prime}(x) = -9x^2 + K[/tex]

Since [tex]y^{\prime}(0) = 1, K = 1[/tex]

Thus:

[tex]y^{\prime}(x) = -9x^2 + 1[/tex]

To find y, another separation of variables is appled:

[tex]\int y^{\prime}(x) = \int(-9x^2 + 1)dx[/tex]

[tex]y(x) = -3x^3 + x + K[/tex]

Since y(0) = 5, K = 5, thus, the solution is:

[tex]y(x) = -3x^3 + x + 5[/tex]

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/13244107

Answer:

1 year

Step-by-step explanation:

The population as a function of time is:

[tex]P(t)  =177*4^{\frac{t}{2}}[/tex]

First, find the initial population at t=0:

[tex]P(0)  =177*4^{\frac{0}{2}}\\P(0) = 177[/tex]

Then, double it:

[tex]2P(0) = 2*177 = 354[/tex]

Finally, find the value of 't' for which the population is 354:

[tex]354  =177*4^{\frac{t}{2}}\\4^{\frac{t}{2}}=2\\log(4^{\frac{t}{2}})=log(2)\\\frac{t}{2} *log(4) = log(2)\\t=2*\frac{log(2)}{log(4)}\\t=1[/tex]

The alligator population will double afer 1 year.

To find the doubling time for the population of alligators, we set the population growth function equal to twice the original population and solve for t.

To find the doubling time for the population of alligators, we need to determine the time it takes for the population to double. In this case, the population growth function is given by P(t) = 177 * 4^(t/2), where t represents the number of years from the time of introduction. To find the doubling time, we set P(t) equal to twice the original population: 2 * P(0) = P(t).

Substituting the given population growth function, we have: 2 * 177 = 177 * 4^(t/2). To solve for t, we divide both sides of the equation by 177: 2 =

Next, we take the logarithm (base 4) of both sides of the equation to solve for t: log4(2) = t/2. Multiplying both sides by 2 gives us the doubling time: t = 2 * log4(2). Use a calculator to approximate this value.

https://brainly.com/question/33016649

#SPJ3

Answer:

[tex]P(0.26 \leq p \leq 0.43)=0.7204-0.0032=0.7172[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".

The Z-score is "a numerical measurement used in statistics of a value's relationship to the mean (average) of a group of values, measured in terms of standard deviations from the mean".  

The population proportion have the following distribution

[tex]p \sim N(p=0.4,\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.4(1-0.4)}{91}}=0.0514)[/tex]

And we can solve the problem using the z score on this case given by:

[tex]z=\frac{p_o -p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

We are interested on this probability:

[tex]P(0.26 \leq p \leq 0.43)[/tex]

And we can use the z score formula, and we got this:

[tex]P(\frac{0.26 -0.4}{\sqrt{\frac{0.4(1-0.4)}{91}}} \leq Z \leq \frac{0.43 -0.4}{\sqrt{\frac{0.4(1-0.4)}{91}}})[/tex]

[tex]P(-2.726 \leq Z \leq 0.584)[/tex]

And we can find this probability like this:

[tex]P(-2.726 \leq Z \leq 0.584)=P(Z<0.584)-P(Z<-2.726)=0.7204-0.0032=0.7172[/tex]

Answer:

0.4

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the probability that a maintenance operation will take more than 2 hours and 15 minutes. We can first calculate the probability that ALL maintenance operation on 70 of the units will take less than 2 hours and 15 minutes, then subtract it from 1.

So the probability of a maintenance operation that would take less than 2 hours and 15 minutes, or 135 minutes is:

[tex]P(X \leq 135, \mu = 120, \sigma = 60) = 0.6 [/tex]

So the probability that a maintenance operation will take more than 2 hours and 15 minutes is:

[tex] 1 - 0.6 = 0.4[/tex]

Answer:

56 NOT -56

Step-by-step explanation:

That's just the answer

Answer:

56

Step-by-step explanation:

14 - (-21) + (-31) - (-25) - (-27)

= 14 +21 -31 + 25 +27

= 56

The statements that are true are;

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that function 1 has the table;

x  y

0 -2

2  0

3   1

5   3

Finding the slope of the linear function gives the rate of change of the function. In this case,

m=Δy/Δx

m=3-1/5-3 = 2/2 =1

The equation of the linear function is given as;

m=Δy/Δx

y-3/x-5= 1

y-3=x-5

y=x-5+3

y=x-2

y-intercept is -2

In function 2, the line passes through points (-2,0) and (0,4)

Finding the slope of the line,

m₁=Δy/Δx

m₁=4-0/0--2

m₁= 4/2 =2

Rate of change is 2

Finding the equation of the line

y-4/x-0 = 2

y-4=2(x-0)

y-4 =2x

y=2x+4

The y-intercept is 4

The statements that are true are;

Learn More

Linear functions :https://brainly.com/question/1505806

Keywords : functions, format, graph, line, ordered pair

#LearnwithBrainly

Function 2 has a greater rate of change with a slope of 2 compared to Function 1's slope of 1. Additionally, Function 2 has a greater y-intercept at y = 4, while Function 1's y-intercept is at y = -2.

When comparing the rates of change for Function 1 and Function 2, we look at the slope of the lines representing these functions. The slope is the ratio of the rise to the run (change in y over change in x). For Function 1, considering the points (0, −2) and (2, 0), the slope is (0 - (-2)) / (2 - 0) = 2 / 2 = 1. Looking at Function 2, which passes through (-2, 0) and (0, 4), the slope is (4 - 0) / (0 - (-2)) = 4 / 2 = 2. Therefore, Function 2 has a greater rate of change than Function 1. Regarding y-intercepts, Function 1 starts at y = -2 (since the point (0, -2) is included), while Function 2 passes through y = 4 when x = 0, indicating the y-intercept is 4. This means that Function 2 has a greater y-intercept than Function 1.

Answer:

a) [tex]z=\frac{0.554 -0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{377}}}=2.097[/tex]

[tex]p_v =P(Z>2.097)=0.018[/tex]  

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] we have [tex]p_v<\alpha[/tex] so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of  students reported experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is significantly higher than 0.5 or the half.

b) The 90% confidence interval would be given by (0.512;0.596)

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

Data given and notation

n=377 represent the random sample taken

X=209 represent the students reported experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS)

[tex]\hat p=\frac{209}{377}=0.554[/tex] estimated proportion of students reported experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS)

[tex]p_o=0.5[/tex] is the value that we want to test

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is higher than 0.5:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p\leq 0.5[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p > 0.5[/tex]  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion [tex]\hat p[/tex] is significantly different from a hypothesized value [tex]p_o[/tex].

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

[tex]z=\frac{0.554 -0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{377}}}=2.097[/tex]  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex]. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

[tex]p_v =P(Z>2.097)=0.018[/tex]  

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] we have [tex]p_v<\alpha[/tex] so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of  students reported experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is significantly higher than 0.5 or the half.

Part b

The population proportion have the following distribution

[tex]p \sim N(p,\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}})[/tex]

In order to find the critical value we need to take in count that we are finding the interval for a proportion, so on this case we need to use the z distribution. Since our interval is at 90% of confidence, our significance level would be given by [tex]\alpha=1-0.90=0.1[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 =0.05[/tex]. And the critical value would be given by:

[tex]t_{\alpha/2}=-1.64, t_{1-\alpha/2}=1.64[/tex]

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:  

[tex]\hat p \pm z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}}[/tex]

If we replace the values obtained we got:

[tex]0.554 - 1.64\sqrt{\frac{0.554(1-0.554)}{377}}=0.512[/tex]

[tex]0.554 + 1.64\sqrt{\frac{0.554(1-0.554)}{377}}=0.596[/tex]

The 90% confidence interval would be given by (0.512;0.596)

Answer:

1.14 s

Step-by-step explanation:

Time, [tex]t=\frac {d}{s}[/tex]

Here, d is the distance and s is the speed/velocity

Since we're given the velocity, s as 28 ft/s and the distance between the position of the rocket and ground as 32 ft then

[tex]t=\frac {32}{28}=1.142857143\approx 1.14 s[/tex]

Therefore, it needs 1.14 seconds

Note: As you missed to mention the given equation for t seconds and height h, so I am taking a sample equation h(t) =-16t² + 28t  + 40. So, I am explaining your question based on this equation, which would anyways clear your query.

Answer:

It will take 2 seconds for the rocket to return to the ground when is the rocket 32 feet above ground.

Note: Sample equation h(t) =-16t² + 28t  + 40 was used to solve this problem, as you had not mentioned the equation.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine:

How long will it take for the rocket to return to the ground when is the rocket 32 feet above ground?

Information Fetching and solution steps:

So,

Let us consider the equation h(t) = -16t² + 28t + 40

32 = -16t² + 28t + 40

To find out how long will it take for the rocket to return to the ground when is the rocket 32 feet above ground, plug in h(t) = 32ft, rearrange into quadratic form, and solve:

32 = -16t² + 28t + 40

0 = -16t² + 28t + 8

Step 1: Factor right side of equation

0 = −4(4t + 1)(t − 2)

−4(4t + 1)(t − 2) = 0

Step 2: Set factors equal to 0

4t + 1 = 0 or t − 2 = 0

t = -1/4 or t = 2

As t can not be negative, so t = 2 seconds.

Hence, it will take 2 seconds for the rocket to return to the ground when is the rocket 32 feet above ground.

Keywords: time, height, velocity

Learn more time and height measure from brainly.com/question/1580756

#learnwithBrainly

Answer:

I get z = +1.8

x= 79

m= 73;s= 4;z= (x-m)/s= 1.5

hope it helps you

Trina's new z-score is calculated using the z-score formula z = (x-μ)/σ where the raw score, mean, and standard deviation are 79, 70, and 5, respectively. Therefore, Trina's z-score on the standardized distribution of the calculus exam is +1.80.

The subject you are asking about is related to calculating the z-score on a standardized distribution in a calculus exam. The z-score, in simple terms, tells you how many standard deviations a given value is from the mean. It's a way of standardizing scores on different distributions.

Now, we know Trina's original z-score was +1.50 when the mean was 73 with a standard deviation of 4. This score was moved to a new distribution that has a mean of 70 and standard deviation of 5. We can calculate the new z-score using the formula: z = (x-μ)/σ, where x is the raw score, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

Plugging Trina's score into the formula we get z = (79-70)/5. Thus, Trina's new z-score on the standardized distribution of the calculus exam is +1.80.

https://brainly.com/question/34836468

#SPJ11

Answer: (30.49 years, 42.31 years)

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula to find the confidence interval is given by :-

[tex]\overline{x}\pm z^*\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}.[/tex]

, where [tex]\overline{x}[/tex] = Sample mean

z* = Critical value.

[tex]\sigma[/tex] = Population standard deviation.

n= Sample size.

As per given , we have

[tex]\overline{x}=36.4[/tex]

[tex]\sigma=14.5[/tex]

n= 40

We know that the critical value for 99% confidence interval : z* = 2.576 (By z-table)

A 99 percent confidence interval for µ, the true mean age of guests will be :

[tex]36.4\pm (2.576)\dfrac{14.5}{\sqrt{40}}\\\\ 36.4\pm (2.576)2.29265130362\\\\=36.4\pm5.90586975813\\\\\approx36.4\pm5.91\\\\=(36.4-5.91,\ 36.4+5.91)\\\\=(30.49,\ 42.31) [/tex]

∴ a 99 percent confidence interval for µ, the true mean age of guests  = (30.49 years, 42.31 years)

The 99% confidence interval for the true mean age of guests at the ski resort, with a sample mean of 36.4 years and standard deviation of 14.5 years from 40 guests, is approximately (30.5, 42.3) years.

The question is about calculating a 99 percent confidence interval for the true mean age of guests at a ski mountain resort, where the ages have a right-skewed distribution, and the population standard deviation is 14.5 years. Given a sample mean of 36.4 years from a sample of 40 guests, we can use the following formula to calculate the confidence interval:

CI = µ ± (z * (σ / √n))

Where CI is the confidence interval, µ is the sample mean, z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level, σ is the population standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

For a 99% confidence interval with a sample size of 40, we need to find the z-score that corresponds to the middle 99% of the normal distribution. The z-score for a 99% confidence level is typically 2.576. Then, the margin of error (ME) can be calculated as follows:

ME = 2.576 * (14.5 / √40) ≈ 2.576 * 2.29 ≈ 5.90

Thus, the confidence interval is:

CI = 36.4 ± 5.90

So, the 99% confidence interval for the true mean would be approximately (30.5, 42.3) years.

https://brainly.com/question/32278466

#SPJ3

Answer:

0.33

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this example we use this rule :

Δx/Δy

x is amount that changed. so Δx=0,99.

How we get 0.99.

Our storm is to 3 to 6 so we find difference for x : for 3rd and 6th member of table... 3.88-2.89=0.99

Now we have :

0.99/Δy

Because we need to find from 3 to 6 , Δy=3 ,

When we find both, we can find rate of change with :

0.99/3=0.33

Answer:

0.33 lol

Step-by-step explanation: