Answer me quickly please

Louis XIV was known as the Roi-Soleil that meant the Sun King, he lived in the Palace of Versailles which was the symbol of the king and the wealth and everything that the poor did not have.

While France was in misery, Louis XIV lived formally, pomp, and grandeur, the court used to spend grand amounts of money with carriages, buildings, gambling, and feasts.

Later, Louis was afraid to lose power to the Protestant, so he revoked the Huguenots (Protestants) rights to worship their faith. This way, the Huguenot's class left the country and took with them the industrious segment of French Society.

There was a flood of emigration from France to other countries like England and Holland. This made French economy collapse and this paved the way to the French Revolution that erupted 74 years later.

Answer:The Palace of Versailles, built by Louis XIV in the late 17th century, was one of the most opulent and extravagant palaces in the world at the time. It was designed to be a symbol of the king's power and grandeur, and it served as the center of political and cultural life in France for over a century. However, the construction of Versailles and the lavish lifestyle of the French monarchy had significant economic, social, and political consequences that contributed to France's decline and eventual revolution in the 18th century.

One of the most significant ways in which Versailles contributed to France's decline was through its enormous cost. The palace was built at a time when France was already deeply in debt, and the construction and maintenance of the palace, along with the extravagant lifestyle of the king and his court, only added to the country's financial troubles. The cost of the palace was paid for through heavy taxation and borrowing, which created a significant burden on the French people, especially the lower classes. The burden of taxation fell disproportionately on the poor, who were already struggling to make ends meet, while the wealthy nobility and clergy were largely exempt from paying taxes.

The economic strain caused by Versailles and the French monarchy's lavish lifestyle contributed to widespread poverty and social unrest in France. The high taxes and debt burden led to food shortages, inflation, and a general decline in living standards for the majority of the French population. This economic hardship fueled resentment towards the monarchy and the wealthy elites, who were perceived as living in luxury at the expense of the common people. This resentment contributed to the growth of revolutionary sentiment in the 18th century, as more and more French people began to question the legitimacy of the monarchy and the social order it represented.

In addition to its economic impact, Versailles also had significant political consequences that contributed to France's decline. The palace was designed to centralize power in the hands of the king, and it served as the seat of government for much of the 18th century. However, the centralized power of the monarchy and the exclusion of other political actors from the royal court led to a lack of political representation and participation. The French people had little say in the decisions that affected their lives, and this lack of political representation contributed to a sense of alienation and disaffection from the government.

The political consequences of Versailles were compounded by the social and cultural impact of the palace. Versailles was a symbol of the French monarchy's grandeur and prestige, and it helped to reinforce the rigid social hierarchy that existed in France at the time. The palace was home to the wealthy nobility and clergy, who were exempt from taxation and enjoyed privileges and influence that were denied to the lower classes. The palace also served as a center of cultural life, promoting the values of the monarchy and the aristocracy and marginalizing alternative views and perspectives.

The social and cultural impact of Versailles contributed to a sense of social inequality and injustice in France, which fueled revolutionary sentiment in the 18th century. The palace helped to reinforce the traditional social order, which was characterized by vast disparities in wealth and power, and it helped to marginalize the voices and perspectives of the lower classes. This sense of exclusion and marginalization contributed to the growth of revolutionary movements in France, which sought to challenge the existing social and political order and promote greater equality and representation.

In conclusion, the Palace of Versailles played a significant role in France's decline after the death of Louis XIV and contributed to the French Revolution of the eighteenth century. The enormous cost of the palace, combined with the lavish lifestyle of the monarchy, contributed to widespread economic hardship and social unrest in France. The centralized power of the monarchy and the exclusion of other political actors from the royal court contributed to a lack of political representation and participation, while the social and cultural impact of the palace reinforced the existing social hierarchy and contributed to a sense of exclusion and marginalization among the lower classes. These factors all contributed to the growth of revolutionary sentiment in France, which eventually led to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of a new social and political order.

Explanation: hope this helps :)) good luck <3

C) Information about places to travel

Based on the title of the article, one can reasonably conclude that it would be about vacation spots and places to travel.  Stories about funny families, stories from a long time ago, and information about well-known people would not make sense according to the title.

Hope this helps!!

The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 was a legislative initiative proposed by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt to add more justices to the U.S. Supreme Court.  

He aimed to obtain favorable rulings regarding New Deal. This legislation was ruled unconstitutional by court. The president would have been granted power by the central provision of the bill in order to appoint additional justice to the Court of the United States, up to six for every member of the court who is older than 70 years and six month.

The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 (commonly called the "court-packing plan") was a legislative initiative introduced by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt to add more rules to the U.S. Supreme Court. Roosevelt's plan was to get positive rulings regarding New Deal legislation that the court had ordered unconstitutional. The primary provision of the bill would have given the President power to select an additional Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court, up to a maximum of six, for every member of the court over the age of 70 years and 6 months.

Also known as the Bill of rights established in 1689. This lays down the power of Monarchs and set out the rights of parliament including free elections an freedom of speech.

It sets out certain rights of individuals including the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment and reestablished the right of protestants to have arms for their defence within the rule of law.

The Great Compromise resulted in a bicameral Congress, comprised of the Senate with equal representation for each state, and the House of Representatives with representation based on state population. This created a balance of power between small and large states, establishing a democratic government and a system of checks and balances.

One effect of the Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, during the drafting of the U.S. Constitution was the formation of a bicameral Congress. This comprised of two separate legislative entities or houses — the Senate and the House of Representatives — which provided balanced representation for all states regardles of their size.

In the Senate, each state, regardless of its population size, was given equal representation with two senators. This arrangement allowed smaller states to have a voice and protected their interests. On the other hand, the lower house, the House of Representatives, offered representation based on the population in each state. This proportional representation ensured that states with larger populations had more voting power and thus protected the interests of larger states.

Moreover, this arrangement helped establish a system of checks and balances, with each house having different powers and duties. Together, they contributed to the codification of a democratic government that provided measures against the potential abuse of power.

https://brainly.com/question/6839536

#SPJ3

The Correct Answer is D) the State School Superintendent.

Hello!

Theory of scientific socialism was based on historical materialism where reality is a constant struggle between social classes and that this generated changes in society, in the same way it identified the collective subject of the socialist revolution with the industrial proletariat.

Scientific socialism is the name by which we sought to distinguish the Marxism of Karl Marx and Engels from other socialist currents of the mid-nineteenth century, which by not including theoretical-scientific premises are qualified as utopian socialism.

the theories of utopian socialism emerge in response to the same socio-economic context: the Industrial Revolution, the rule of the bourgeoisie and the rise of the workers' movement, events that were initially manifested in England at the end of the eighteenth century and that spread across the European continent during the nineteenth century.

I hope that it can help you!

Regards!

Free trade provides several advantages over mercantilism for individuals, businesses and nations. In a free trade system, individuals benefit from a greater choice of goods for purchase at affordable prices. Mercantilism restricts imports, which reduces the choices available to consumers in the marketplace.

Hope this Helps! Please mark me brainliest!

Final answer:

Mercantilism aimed to enhance a nation's wealth by achieving a favorable balance of trade through protectionist policies, which included tariffs, monopolies, and subsidies. These policies benefitted the home countries by boosting domestic manufacturing and military capabilities but often at the expense of the colonies, leading to conflicts such as the American Revolutionary War.

Explanation:

Benefits of Mercantilism

Mercantilism provided several benefits to the nations that adopted it during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, primarily in Europe. This economic theory and set of policies sought to maximize a nation's wealth by increasing its stock of precious metals like gold and silver. Nations aimed to achieve this by maintaining a favorable balance of trade, where they would export more than they imported, to avoid spending gold and silver on foreign goods. Domestic manufacturing was encouraged, protective tariffs were imposed, monopolies granted, industries subsidized, and colonies were acquired for their natural resources and markets.

European governments such as England, France, and the Netherlands increased their power by implementing mercantilist policies. They built up their merchant marines, monopoly over colonial trade, and expanded their navies. With enhanced shipping capabilities, these nations could fortify their economic and military positions globally. Additionally, the growth in population provided a larger workforce and more consumers for domestically produced goods. Furthermore, the system promoted domestic manufacturing, thus boosting home economies.

However, mercantilism also led to economic conflicts and was one of the precipitating factors leading to the American Revolutionary War. The exploitation of colonies and unfair trade practices resulted in numerous ethical concerns regarding colonial mercantilism. These controversial aspects of mercantilism often overshadowed its economic benefits, leading critics like Adam Smith to argue for freer trade and against the protectionist nature of mercantilism.

One of the reason of the Italians have resisted the exploration around the world is an interesting matter to explain. One reason  to mention is  the case of atlantic for example.

Some authors have explained that the Atlantics voyages mainly were for business reasons. The Portugueses and Spanish wanted to find an alternative  route to India where valuable spices were produced.

They wanted an alternative because the italians had a monopoly on the most direct route. For this reason the italians did not need look for a different route as they already had one.  

Every nation has a form of government that has authority within its territorial boundaries.

Nations can be view as a human population sharing a historic territory, common myths, historical memories, common economy and common legal rights and duties for all members. The modern concept says the government derives its legitimate authority from the people. An individual person has natural and inherent rights, and the purpose of the government is to protect those rights. And the power retained by the state is controlled by the people themselves.

Answer: c

Explanation:

The key difference is that human capital refers to personal investments in skills and education, enhancing labor quality, whereas capital goods involve investments in physical assets used in production, increasing quantity and quality of output.

The difference between human capital and capital goods is primarily in the types of investments they represent and the assets they constitute. Human capital represents the investment in the skills, knowledge, education, and health of individuals, which enhances their productivity and leads to higher future incomes. It is a form of labor quality investment that includes personal attributes such as competencies and creativity. On the other hand, capital goods are tangible assets like factories, machinery, and infrastructure that firms use in the production of goods and services, thus contributing to the quantity and quality of physical capital. Both forms of capital are vital for economic growth and productivity, and investments in them yield higher productivity in the future.

Option C from the given choices best represents the distinction between human capital and capital goods: Human capital is the investment in education and training for people in a given country, while capital goods are the investments in physical assets such as factories and technology.

Some of the factors that contributed to the Great War are entangling alliances that committed the major powers to come to the aid of others if attacked. The arms race between the powers and industrialization of the powers. Another is the history of previous wars in Europe and the perception that wrongs needed to be righted. Territorial losses and gains from previous European conflicts remained a large problem.

Well, for one, the centralized government that the British had implemented influenced an American revolution. As the American colonies did not have their own self-government and couldn't make their own laws, they had to pay high taxes to the king. In which, sparked a revolution.

The British ideas about government that influenced the attitudes of the colonists were representative government, limited government, and inspiration from the Magna Carta.

Some British ideas about government that influenced the attitudes of the colonists include the concept of representative government and the idea of limited government. The colonists believed that they should have a say in their own governance and that the power of the government should be restricted. They also found inspiration in the Magna Carta, which established the principle of the rule of law and protected individual rights.

https://brainly.com/question/31651979

#SPJ2

Hello!

Karl Marx has been a nineteenth-century theorist, his theory of society, economics and politics has been called Marxism. This author postulated a dialectical theory based on the critique of capitalism, societies advance in the dialectic of the class struggle. Capitalism is carried out by the classes that possess the means of production for their own benefit. For Marx, as well as in the preexisting socioeconomic systems that have ruled societies, there would be internal tensions in society that would lead to the replacement of capitalism by a new system under a new social class, the proletariat. He was in favor of socialism, since he believed that it would be ruled by the working class, and he thought that this at the same time would eventually be replaced by a stateless and classless society called communism.

I hope this helps.

regards! :)

A serf's life in feudal Europe was characterized by hard labor, poor living conditions, and limited personal freedoms. They served the local lord, providing labor on the lord's land, and received some protection in return, while their social and economic mobility was severely restricted. Regional differences existed, with some areas known for harsher forms of serfdom.

An accurate description of a serf's life during the feudal times in Europe reflects their difficult and often bleak existence. Serfs were the backbone of the agricultural workforce but lived under the strict control of the local lord, who had overarching authority over various aspects of their lives.

Living conditions for serfs were harsh; they dwelled in modest hovels with their families, facing dangers from indoor fires and poor air quality. They had very little in the way of personal belongings or clothing and suffered from diseases due to a lack of sanitation and medicine. Additionally, women faced a high mortality rate in childbirth, and child mortality rates were steep.

Under the manorial system, serfs were required to provide labor on their lord's land, known as the corvée, and were not allowed to leave the land, marry, or take up other work without their lord's consent. Despite such challenges, the serfdom system offered some protection of their lives and properties by the lords in return for their service and goods.

The condition of serfdom varied by region, with serfs in northern and eastern Europe, particularly of Slavonic descent, experiencing a harsher existence compared to those in more favored districts. Additionally, the economic structure was set up such that serfs worked on estates for their lords, contributing as servants, farmers, artisans, and shepherds.

In a market economy, the interaction of supply and demand determines the quantity and equilibrium price of the goods and services traded. Likewise, the market is responsible for the distribution of income through the possession of productive factors (capital, labor, etc.). In a market economy, the key signals are prices, which indicate the relative scarcity of resources.

In a market economy, prices serve as signals to allocate goods, services, and resources by transmitting information about demand and supply. Each consumer and producer reacts to price changes based on their interests, balancing the market. However, problems like inflation can blur these signals.

In a market economy, prices act as signals to allocate goods, services, and productive resources. Prices exist in various markets, including those for goods and services, labor, and financial capital. They serve as a social mechanism to collect, combine, and transmit relevant market information, such as the relationship between demand and supply.

When a price changes, each consumer reacts according to their preferences and budget, and each profit-seeking producer reacts to the impact on their expected profits. No government agency oversees these responses. Thus, prices guide the allocation of resources in the economy, ensuring goods, and services go where they're most desired. However, factors like inflation can blur these 'price messages,' leading to unclear signals about market conditions.

https://brainly.com/question/8311981

#SPJ3

In 907 the Tang dynasty was ended when Zhu Wen, now a military governor, deposed the last emperor of Tang, Emperor Ai of Tang, and took the throne for himself (known posthumously as Emperor Taizu of Later Liang). He established the Later Liang, which inaugurated the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period.

Answer:

a. The shogunate asserted military control when called to put down a peasant revolt.

Explanation:

With the death of Hideyoshi in 1598, shortly after the Council of the Five Regents was formed, the balance of power between them began to crumble. Among the vassals of Hideyoshi, the first signs of impatience to obtain effective power appeared: Hideyori was barely a child and the power was concentrated in the regency. Ieyasu, during the next two years, would patiently get help from various daimyō who supported his cause or who were unhappy with the Toyotomi clan.

The seizure of power accelerated more in 1599 when the regent Toshiie died. This caused Ieyasu to take Osaka Castle, where Hideyori was located, and proclaim Tenka Dōno (Lord of the Country). That title was nominal, as there was still severe opposition from the three remaining regents and from several clans that did not accept Ieyasu as chief, including Ishida Mitsunari, a powerful daimyō who did not belong to the regency. At the end of 1599 and much of 1600, all samurai and daimyō of Japan were grouped into two rather defined sides: the eastern bloc, made up of clans that supported Ieyasu; and the western one, formed by those who backed Mitsunari and the three regents.

The crisis reached its climax on October 21, 1600 (15th day of the ninth month of year 5 of the Keichō era), when one of the largest battles between clans recorded in Japan occurred: the battle of Sekigahara . Occurred in the province of Mino, 88 888 soldiers from the eastern bloc fought against 81 890 from the west. The battle lasted between 8 a. m. and 5 p. m. of that day. The betrayal of some clans of the western block, such as the Kobayakawa, resulted in the defeat of the latter. This battle, in which about half of the Western forces succumbed, led to the disappearance of 87 clans and a significant reduction of four others (including the Toyotomi clan). It also provided the profit of 7572 million koku (a koku was equivalent to 180 liters of rice, and was used as a monetary reference) to the eastern bloc, the cessation of the aspirations of the regents and, above all, confirmed the legitimacy of Ieyasu as Tenka Dōno.

Shortly after, Ieyasu addressed the redistribution of the power of all Japanese clans, those who had supported the Tokugawa clan since before Sekigahara, called fudai daimyō, gained greater power and rank than the Tozama daimyō, who were the survivors who did so after of the transcendental battle. Finally, Ieyasu consolidated his power in 1603, when he received from the Go-Yōzei emperor the title of Seii Taishōgun, commander in chief of the military forces of Japan, and thus began a period of dominance on the part of the Tokugawa clan for the next two centuries.

Final answer:

The Tokugawa shogunate rose to power in Japan primarily through assertion of military control and unification of the country under Tokugawa Ieyasu's rule, following victory in the Battle of Sekigahara. The correct option that best explains how the Tokugawa shogunate rose to power is option c. The shogunate achieved military success by using firearms to defeat rival daimyo, thereby consolidating power and establishing a long-lasting government.

Explanation:

The Tokugawa shogunate's ascent was marked by a strategic blend of military innovation, political skill, and diplomatic acumen. Tokugawa Ieyasu, the founder of the Tokugawa shogunate, capitalized on the chaotic Sengoku period, a time when numerous warlords (daimyo) fought for control of Japan. After aligning with various factions and leveraging the latest technological advancements in firearms, Ieyasu claimed victory at the decisive Battle of Sekigahara in 1600. This battle was the turning point that allowed the Tokugawas to centralize power and effectively set up a bakufu, a military government, with the shogun as the ultimate ruler. The emperor remained a figurehead while the shogunate implemented policies to maintain peace, such as the sankin-kōtai system, which kept the daimyo under close surveillance. One of the key aspects of Tokugawa rule was its isolationist foreign policy (sakoku), limiting external influence and maintaining strict control over domestic affairs.

Final answer:

Jon is a dynamic character because he undergoes significant changes from being perceived as weak and naive to becoming the antagonist in the story.

Explanation:

Jon, in the context provided, seems to exhibit traits that change significantly throughout the story, shifting from a portrayal of weakness and naivety to that of an antagonist. This transformation indicates that Jon does not remain a simplistic figure with unchanging characteristics, which would make him a flat or static character. Rather, he shows development and complexity, aligning more closely with the definition of a dynamic or round character. Dynamic characters are those who go through significant internal changes as a response to the events of the narrative, while round characters are complex and possess a range of traits that make them more relatable and lifelike. Considering these distinctions, Jon falls under the category of a dynamic character, as he experiences essential changes over the course of the story.

Cleaner-burning gas had to be used in cars.

Explanation:

It's C: The building were tottering.

Explanation:

In the text, it says "The buildings round us were already tottering. . . . This finally decided us to leave the town." Meaning that the buildings tottering convinced them to leave. :-)

The CPI is important for determining the changes in the prices paid by a urban consumers on a wide range of consumer goods. It gives a good sense of the fluctuation in pricing over a period of time.

The Consumer Price Index determines the changes over time of a market basket of consumers goods and services. It calculates the prices of food, transportation, medical care or any other service purchase by a regular household over time and calculates the average price.

Answer:

gave them someone to paint

Explanation:

i beleve the answer is d

Argument:

The creation of the Constitution represented a remarkable example of constructive compromise because it is a compromise between the government and the people, that states that people should act in a certain way to maintain peace and that the government should protect the people's interests and rights.

A historical example that proves that the Constitution represented an example of constructive compromise is the Three - Fifths Compromise, where the framers of the Constitution reached to an agreement to represent three out of every five slaves in a state to determine their total population for legislative representation and taxes purposes. This Compromise was constructive because both slave states that had little free population and free states with a bigger population would be equally represented by the United States House of Representatives by the next ten years.

The term that best describes the idea that a kings power is granted to him by god is Divine right of Kings.

The correct answer is Israel. As far as I'm aware,the Israeli citizens have the best personal freedoms in the Middle East.

Answer:

shifts from northern to southern

Explanation:

A. Unless the damages exceed the $5000 limit in our small claims court it would be tried there as a breach of contract.