Read this passage from an essay called “When Chocolate was Medicine.” What valid conclusion could you make based on the passage?
In the seventeenth century, Europeans who had not traveled overseas tasted coffee, hot chocolate and tea for the very first time. For this brand new clientele, the brews of foreign beans and leaves carried within them the wonder and danger of far-away lands. They were classified at first not as food, but as drugs—pleasant-tasting, with recommended dosages prescribed by pharmacists and physicians, and dangerous when self-administered. As they warmed to the use and abuse of hot beverages, Europeans frequently experienced moral and physical confusion brought on by frothy pungency, unpredictable effects, and even (rumor had it) fatality. Madame de Sévigné, marquise and diarist of court life, famously cautioned her daughter about chocolate in a letter when its effects still inspired awe tinged with fear: “And what do we make of chocolate? Are you not afraid that it will burn your blood? Could it be that these miraculous effects mask some kind of inferno [in the body]?”

Coffee, chocolate, and tea were native to the Western Hemisphere.

Most people in Europe were used to the taste of coffee before they tasted tea.

Coffee, chocolate, and tea were not native to Europe.

Europeans did not approve of taking any drugs.

The correct spelling of the underlined words is:

Patrit: patriot: a person who loves their country

Michygan: Michigan: one of the 50 states of United States of America

Parler: parlor: a room in a house used mainly as a reception for guests

Endeverin: endeavouring: to try very hard

Chawin: chewing: to masticate

Answer:

The correct spellings of the underlined as well as their meanings are given below

Explanation:

1) Patrit : Correct spelling - Patriot

Meaning : a person who is loyal to his country and or to a cause.

2) Michygan : Correct spelling - Michigan

Meaning : Michigan is one the states in the United States. It literally means a large body of water.

3) Parler : Correct spelling - Parlor

Meaning : A parlor is the sitting room or living room in a house.

4)  Endeverin : Correct spelling - Endeavoring

Meaning : Endeavoring is to make efforts at doing something

5) Chawin : Correct spelling - Chewing

Meaning : Chewing is the process by which food is broken down to smaller pieces by the teeth before the food is swallowed.

With the Internet and wireless access, almost anyone can connect anywhere.

The revised sentence clarifies that 'devices such as smartphones and computers' are what can connect almost anyone anywhere, instead of the vague pronoun 'it'.

To correct the indefinite, ambiguous, and general pronoun references, the sentence should specify what 'it' refers to. In this case, 'it' can refer to devices like smartphones or computers that have the capability to connect. Therefore, a rewritten version of the sentence could be:

'With the Internet and wireless access, devices such as smartphones and computers can connect almost anyone anywhere.'

This revision eliminates the confusion about what can connect and provides the reader with a clear subject (devices such as smartphones and computers).

Allegory is a figurative language used to express something usually unexpressable otherwise. The allegory can use many forms of communication, even paintings and theater.

In other words, the speaker tells "a" wanting the listener to understand "b". A good example of this is the story of the ant and the grasshopper. The ant worked in the summer preoccupied with the winter, while the grasshopper danced and sung all summer long. The winter came; the ant had food to survive all its duration while the grasshopper was dying of hunger and cold, and asked the ant for help. The allegory here is about time and preparation, the summer represents the human youth, while the winter its old age. The ant and the grasshopper both represent a human being; the ant taught how to age adequately, while the grasshopper showed what happens when we do not think about the future.

Answer: It occurs throughout the entire length of a story, it comments on an abstract theory or historical event, and it contains meanings of social or political significance.

Explanation: An allegory must always tell "a" so it can explain "b". It is impossible for an allegory to tell "a" 90% of the time then, suddenly, start to tell "b". That would destroy the idea of allegory. The allegory of the ant and the grasshopper would make no sense if, in the middle of the story, the ant started to tell it was a human and needed to prepare for its old age; it could get worse if she told its preparation consisted in going to college, marrying, and so on. Therefore, the allegory must be the entire story, not only part of it. Of course, there are, sometimes, stories inside stories, so the allegory can be just one of them.

Also, the allegory always wants to say something beyond what is told. So this meaning that transcends the text (or painting, music etc.) usually has a social or political significance and comments on an abstract theory or historical event. Such is the case of the ant and grasshopper, that has a social meaning and, at the same time, is a comment on an abstract theory that tells how one must conduct life.

Answer:

BDE

Explanation: quizlet

The answer is A a phone book

The answer is B. This is correct i did this problem yesterday and got it right Please mark Brainliest.

Which features of epic poetry does this passage contain? Check all that apply.

a vast setting

a supernatural force that brings harm

a hero with great strength

an elevated style

a supernatural force that brings help

The Answer Is: B,D.,E

Answer:

Explanation:

The supernatural force that brings harm in the story is an eagle that attacks one of the characters, while the supernatural force that brings help is Shamash - the character that the speaker refers as "our lord" and is bound to bring protection from the eagle.

Since the text contains no slang terms (it is written in formal language), the style is consider elevated.

In George Bernard Shaw's 'Pygmalion', Eliza Doolittle conforms at Professor Higgins's home via rigorous language lessons, etiquette training, and continuous strict scrutiny. Despite facing emotional unrest, these drastic changes ultimately allow her to pass in high society.

In the classic story Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw, Eliza Doolittle, a flower girl with a distinct Cockney accent, is taken under the wing of phonetics professor Henry Higgins. To conform at Professor Higgins's home, Eliza undergoes significant lifestyle changes and embarks on a rigorous journey to present herself as a duchess at an ambassador's garden party.

Firstly, Higgins’s lessons primarily involve proper pronunciation and vocabulary, transforming Eliza's crude accent into refined speech. Secondly, Eliza is taught social etiquette and manners as part of her personal development. This includes how to dress, converse, and behave like a lady – a vast contrast to her previous uncultivated conduct.

Lastly, through constant monitoring and strict rules laid by both Higgins and his friend Colonel Pickering, Eliza's every move and speech are under scrutiny. Despite facing emotional unrest and an identity crisis, Eliza is made to adhere and conform to the high societal standards expected of her to pass for a lady in high society.

https://brainly.com/question/25840113

#SPJ3

Eliza Doolittle is made to conform at Professor Higgins's home through strict speech lessons, controlled interactions, and rigorous adherence to societal standards.

In George Bernard Shaw's play, Pygmalion, Eliza Doolittle is initially taken to Professor Henry Higgins’s home to improve her dialect and manners so she can pass as a duchess. Eliza is made to conform through a series of strict and often harsh lessons in speech, etiquette, and behavior. One notable scene involves her initial trials with pronunciation exercises where Higgins and Pickering work tirelessly to correct her 'gutter' speech.

Her transformation involves both her appearance and manners to meet upper-class expectations, yet it raises questions about the true nature of this change. Higgins's often harsh and demanding methods emphasize perfection over empathy.

Eliza's daily routine and personal interactions are controlled rigorously by Higgins, who supervises everything with a critical eye, often showing little patience or empathy.

For instance, Higgins’s adamant approach is evident when he insists Eliza repeat vowel sounds correctly before moving on to more complex sentences, emphasizing his demand for perfection. Moreover, Higgins provides specific instructions on her clothing, grooming, and how she should present herself in society to ensure she meets upper-class standards.

Furthermore, there are instances where Higgins's treatment of Eliza borders on dehumanizing, as he occasionally forgets to treat her with the courtesy due to an individual. The frequent high-pressure scenarios Eliza faces push her to conform to Higgins’s expectations, yet it also stirs a profound internal conflict about her identity and independence.

While Eliza does go through a significant transformation, the play critically explores whether this conformity is beneficial or merely superficial in its true impact on her character and self-worth.

Answer:

He is afraid that the prince or his elders might find out about his deception.

Explanation:

Correct modifier placement is essential for clarity in sentence construction, and dangling modifiers should be revised to ensure the intended meaning is communicated effectively.

Using modifiers correctly in sentences is crucial to convey the intended meaning clearly and precisely. Modifiers should be placed close to the word they modify to avoid confusion or misinterpretation. A dangling modifier occurs when a modifier is not clearly and logically related to the word it is supposed to modify. This can lead to ambiguity or a change in the intended meaning of the sentence. It is essential to revise such sentences to make sure that the modifier is correctly placed and the meaning is clear.

Here are a few examples of how to correct dangling modifiers:

It's important to ensure that the placement of modifiers in a sentence is logical and that they are related in a sensible way to what they are modifying.

according to google, hypochondriac is a person who is abnormally anxious about their health. meaning the girl in the sentence is very concerned on if she gets sick or not and would like to always be safe than sorry

It is known as a literary canon to the set of classic works that are part of high culture. These works, either because of their formal characteristics, their originality or their quality, have managed to transcend times and borders, becoming universal and always valid.

The criterion for choosing the works of the literary canon should be aesthetic excellence, but this concept is very subjective because what a person can consider attractive another person may find boring. On the other hand, those who limit themselves to consume the books established in the list of the canon lose the opportunity to know an endless number of works that could please them more, and even contribute more to them intellectually and emotionally.

It is true that it is important for students to know classical works of literature such as the odyssey, the divine comedy or more recent works as a hundred years of solitude, however, it is necessary not to marginalize other literary works equally good and profitable for students only because they are not on the list of the literary canon.

The current society has evolved, we no longer have the same thought that we had at the time when the classic works were written. A clear example of this is the role played by women in today's society, the importance of women was a taboo subject and little mentioned in many of the works that are in the list of the literary canon by which many schools are governed, and this can lead to students not exploring and understanding this important topic.

In conclusion, the literary canon is a list of classical works because of their importance at the time they were written and therefore it is important that students know them, because through these works they can understand the behavior and thought that people had in other times.  However, it is equally important that students read recent works of current interest that allow them to compare current society with the old one, and the evolution that has occurred in the literature.

The Western literary canon is the body of works of art (literature, music, philosophy, etc.) that are considered to be classics. These books are valued for being influential to culture, civilization and development throughout history.

The canon is subject to ample debate. I believe that considering certain books as canon can have a negative influence in the artistic world. First, it causes people to only focus on particular works of art, even in cases where other books might be of equal quality or influence. Second, canons should change with time. For example, in the past, it was virtually impossible to be part of the canon if you were a woman or a minority. Although this is changing nowadays, glorifying the canon does not help. Finally, artistic canons can sometimes give too much importance to works of the past and neglect significant contributions of the present.

The correct answer for the question is: The connection between an event or action and the resulting event or action in a story's plot.

A causal relationship as its name hints is the correlation between two events, in this case within a text. As for to say that one event produces a change in the other. For example, Andrew was supposed to pick up Andrea to go to the airport but he lost his car keys so they missed their flight. There is a casual relationship between the event of Andrew loosing his car keys and them losing their flight because one event caused the other.

Answer:

B)

Explanation:

B) The connection between an event or action and the resulting event or action in a story's plot

The best summary based on key words for the sentence is "Patrician senators were rich and important, and also powerful; the common people had their political rights in assembly".

A best summary ought to be thorough, succinct, cohesive, and objective.

The abovementioned sentence contains most of the key words such as "patrician", "senators", "rich", "important", "powerful", "common people", "political rights", and "assembly" given in the passage that must be in a good summary. The more the key words, the better the summary as they will help the learner to remember important details and words that are to be used.

Hence, the correct option is C.

To learn more about summary here

https://brainly.com/question/28052614

#SPJ2

In ancient Rome, the patricians held initial control of the Senate while plebeians fought for equal rights through the Struggle of the Orders, ultimately gaining the ability to hold office and create laws. A new nobility emerged with both patrician and ennobled plebeian families, and despite political evolutions, the Centuriate Assembly retained critical powers such as declaring war.

In Roman society, there were deep socio-political divisions, notably between the patricians and plebeians. Initially, the patricians, Rome's aristocratic elite, exercised exclusive control over the Senate, maintaining significant political power. The plebeians created the Plebeian Council and elected tribunes to advance their interests, fighting for parity in what became known as the Struggle of the Orders.

Plebeians made considerable strides, securing rights to hold public office and sit in the Senate, after various concessions and legislations throughout centuries of conflict. As the Republic evolved, the control of political power shifted, and a new nobility emerged, including wealthy plebeian families who had attained political rank and were thus ennobled.

The late Republic saw the government comprised of multiple assemblies and a complex network of patrons and clients, with the patricians and the newly risen noble families playing central roles. Economic class structures also formed, distinguishing the nobles, equestrians, and other citizens. However, the Centuriate Assembly, consisting of both plebeians and patricians, maintained the authority to declare war and held significant influence.

I think whoever said/wrote this was really religious. He has strong faith in God and really believes in him, that he is almighty and really wise. He portrays him, as many do, as someone who should be praised, worshipped, and loved, which many do as well, and also says it in a way of subtly saying 'You should worship him too'.

This is just my interpretation, no offence to anyone.

The excerpts discuss the notion that God's wisdom is beyond human wisdom and chooses what is weak or foolish in the world to reveal deeper truths, underscoring the limitations of human reason in understanding divine matters and emphasizing the need for trust in divine wisdom.

The excerpt discusses the paradoxical Christian belief that God's wisdom and strength is so superior to that of humans that what is considered foolish or weak in the world can actually be used by God to confound the seemingly wise and strong. The text suggests that God has chosen what the world considers lowly or insignificant to reveal deeper truths and challenge human understanding. This reflects a recurring theme in Christianity which values humility and divine wisdom over worldly power and intelligence.

In a more philosophical context, the excerpt reflects on the limitations of human reason in matters concerning the existence of God and spiritual truths. It touches on the idea of faith being beyond the realm of empirical evidence and reason, referencing 'a game played at the extremity of this infinite distance'. It suggests that faith and belief in God might be a wager beyond rational proof, an act and test of faith in itself.

The complexities of human understanding and the divine are further illustrated through examples where God's wisdom is believed to transcend all and the state of living 'with God' leads to a true perception of reality. Whether wisdom is shared, or how divine providence operates, makes clear that human understanding is limited, and trust in divine wisdom is central to faith.

Answer:

Explanation:The novel's title is a quote from a poem by the Irish poet W.B. Yeats called "The Second Coming": "Things fall apart; the center cannot hold; / Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.” Much of the novel centers on Umuofia traditions of marriage, burial, and harvest. Achebe's decision to use a third-person narrator instead of writing the book from Okonkwo's perspective demonstrates just how central the idea of tradition is to the book, since the third-person narrator can more objectively describe facets of Umuofia society—their love of proverbs or how they make judicial decisions, for example—to the reader than Okonkwo could as an insider to these rituals. As the quote in the epigraph suggests, though, these traditions that form the center of Umuofia society cannot survive in the face of major changes occurring around them. As the white men enter the clans and impose their world order upon them, Umuofia society spirals apart.

The theme of tradition vs. change is explored in the novel Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe, which is set in Nigeria during the 19th century. The conflict between tradition and change is evident in the relationships between characters and the impact of colonization on the Igbo society. Achebe highlights the devastating effects of change imposed by colonialists on traditional African cultures.

The theme of tradition vs. change is prominent in Chinua Achebe's novel Things Fall Apart. The story is set in Nigeria during the late 19th century, during a time when European colonization was beginning to encroach upon traditional African cultures. The protagonist, Okonkwo, represents the traditional values of his society, while the arrival of the British colonialists introduces change and modernity. One example of tradition vs. change is seen in the conflict between Okonkwo and his son, Nwoye. Okonkwo follows the strict rules and customs of his tribe, while Nwoye is more open to the influence of Christianity brought by the white missionaries. This leads to a rift between father and son, representing the clash between tradition and change. Another example is the decline of the traditional Igbo society due to colonization. The arrival of the British disrupts the social and cultural order of the Igbo people, leading to their loss of power and independence. This demonstrates the devastating effects of change imposed by colonialism on traditional societies.

The central idea of this passage from Animal Farm (1945) by George Orwell is that the pigs are socializing with humans and behaving like them.

In this allegorical novel, the author gives human characteristics to the animals in the farm, especially to the pigs. In this excerpt, the pigs, which take the leadership role in the story, are spending time with the neighbouring farmers at the same time they are acting like them. Napoleon and the other pigs play cards, drink beer, and they even look relaxed while sitting in chairs.   

The central idea of this passage is that:

According to the given excerpt, we can see that the animals are having a round table discussion among themselves.

This shows that they are already behaving like humans and acing like them, even though they said they wanted to be free from them and do whatever they liked which turned out to be false in the end.

Therefore, the correct answer is option D

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/16638050

The correct answer is the third sentence: “We had a heavy hot meal and soon wanted warm snuggly naps.”

In this particular sentence a comma is not needed as the coordinating conjunction “and” joins an independent clause (“We had a heavy hot meal”) and a phrase which is not a complete clause; that is to say, it has not subject and verb, and it does not convey a complete thought (“soon wanted warm, snuggly naps.”)

Answer:

The Answer is B.

Explanation:

The line "Ghosts had followed him home and turned him into..." makes the reader think that Robert is different, changed, and haunted. He seems almost inhuman because the author describes him almost like a corpse, "No warmth in his touch...hollow shell that looked like someone I used to know."

I hope this helps you~!

Michiko~

The prepositional phrase is used as an adverb indicating location. The deeper structure is a "that noun clause" (The frisbee that is on the roof is Jerod's).

The Frisbee on the roof is Jerod's.

A. adjective

'The Frisbee is on the roof' is treated just like 'The Frisbee is black.'

Terry is running up the hill.

B. adverb

The phrase 'up the hill' describes the running motion, not Terry.

Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/2774869#readmore

Final answer:

The irony of Rip Van Winkle's dog being named 'Wolf' exists in the natural expectations of a wolf's wildness versus a domesticated dog's loyalty and companionship. This contrast is underscored by various references in literature where the relationships between man and dog are pivotal to survival, further highlighting the peculiarity of the dog's name.

Explanation:

The name Wolf for Rip Van Winkle's dog is interesting and perhaps ironic, as wolves are typically portrayed as wild and untamed, whereas dogs are domesticated and loyal companions. The irony in naming a domesticated dog Wolf lies in associating the animal with a wild nature that is contrary to its behavior and the relationship it has with its owner. Interestingly, in literature, dogs often symbolize faithfulness and protection, which is fitting for Rip Van Winkle's devoted companion.

The irony deepens when considering the environments described in the provided references. In Jack London's stories, for example, the relationship between man and dog highlights their survival and adaptation to the harsh environment, which stands in contrast to the dog's name, suggesting a return to primal instincts which an actual wolf would embody. Similarly, the descriptions of the wolf and the contrasts with the domesticated dog in different literary works underline the significance and the irony of naming a devoted, domesticated dog Wolf.

The word is disdainful.  

Shere Khan is not able to abide by the Jungle Law; he has no honor and is viewed as deceptive and manipulative, using others for personal gain and vengeance. The author has no sympathy for him and portrays the tiger as a criminal and a coward, not able to hunt anymore. The death of Shere Khan is also dishonorable.

The correct answer is A: Bloody Sunday

The historical event that this passage is most reminiscent of is A: Bloody Sunday

This refers to the events that occurred in the past that is used in a literary work to show similar characteristics or to narrate a story.

Hence, we can see that from the given text, there is the use of narration to show the events in the allegory, Animal Farm when there was violence in the meeting as Mr. Jones shot at the barn and broke up a meeting and this is similar to events of Bloody Sunday.

Read more about historical events here:

https://brainly.com/question/14907018

#SPJ2

The correct answer is “child”(D). In order to recognize the subject complement, it is posible to state  that the word  “child” is followed by the linking verb “is” . Besides, the subject of the sentence “Ethan” refers or identifies with “child”.

assuming that this is the sentence you're referring to  : 

Sentence 1: As I turned onto Bryce Road, I saw the Parkers’ cat crouched under a tree, hissing at something on the ground. 

Sentence 2: I decided to ride my skateboard to school this morning.

Sentence 3: I shooed the cat away and called my older stepbrother, a veterinarian, because he would know just how to help them. 

Sentence 4: Approaching the cat, I noticed that a nest full of tiny birds was on the ground; it must have fallen from a branch. 

The most logical  way to sequence these into logical narratives would be : 

Sentence 2 , Sentence 1, Sentence 4, sentence 3

Answer:

The option that supports the claim that Aesop was considered clever is: (D) Aesop was able to escape punishment for his actions by standing up to his accusers. He used fables to point out their faults and hypocrisy, pointing out the behavior of people who do things that they tell others not to do.

Explanation:

Aesop was a Greek storyteller, to this day famous for his fables. In his stories, animals and inanimate objects present human emotions and the ability to speak. By the end of each story, there is always a "moral", a lesson to be learned as to what is right and what is wrong.

Since we are looking for support to the claim that Aesop was clever, the first three options given in the question can be eliminated. They don't prove his cleverness. A talks of his possible death, B of his being considered a fool, and C of his being born a slave.

Option D, however, talks of his intelligence and wit. Aesop was clever enough to escape punishment for his actions. He was witty enough to point out his accusers' hypocrisy by means of his fables. He showed, in a veiled manner, his accusers' own faults and got away with it.

Look at this flea and see how insignificant is what you have denied to me. It sucked my blood, then yours and in this flea, our blood has mixed. But this cannot be considered a sin or a loss of honor. The flea is swollen, filled with our blood and this is more than we would do.

Here, the poetic voice is comparing the flea and their blood mixing inside of it with sexual intercourse. He is implying that since their blood has been already mingled inside the flea, there is no sin or loss of honor if they have sexual relations.

     Mark but this flea, and mark in this,

Look at what this flea represents,

     How little that which thou deniest me is;

You won't give in to such a small union;

     Me it sucked first, and now sucks thee,

The flea sucked both our blood,

     And in this flea our two bloods mingled be;

Our blood is mixed in the flea;

     Thou know'st that this cannot be said

     A sin, or shame, or loss of maidenhead;

You can agree that the flea has not done anything wrong or shameful.

     And pampered swells with one blood made of two;

     And this, alas, is more than we would do.

The flea is free to enjoy both of our blood, and it is indulging more than we are.

The author's use of sensory details in "An Election Day Surprise" helped develop the text because:

B - The use of sensory details highlights Anthony's internal conflict over the election.

E The use of sensory details entertains the reader by highlighting Anthony's whimsical quirks as a character.

The use of sensory details in a story gives to the reader more detailed information about the character feelings and shows deeply the circumstances that were going on.

Answer:

B. The use of sensory details highlights Anthony's internal conflict over the election.

E. The use of sensory details entertains the reader by highlighting Anthony's funny quirks as a character.

Explanation:

Sensory details are used in this except to show that Antony has an internal conflict with the elections and this reason why he emphasizes his whimsical quirks. The author has therefore employed the use of sensory details intending to provide the reader with particular information about the feelings of the character. Consequently, the sensory details were essential to the author on the surprise on Election Day.

Third person point of view?????????

The answer would be C acting during Shakespeare's time.

Answer:

Based on the story, the research topic that Izzy might be inspired to learn more about is acting during Shakespeare’s time

Explanation:

The story shows how passionate is Izzy toward theater, acting and his favorite author William Shakespeare, she has to make a decision about what career to follow, but all her thought go around the stage and the marvels of acting and print emotions in each and every word, she compares herself to the Shakespearean actors and the way she supposed they lived their lives.

The bolded verb in this sentence is written in the conditional mood. Option C is correct.

A conditional mood is the form of a verb which is employed in order to make requests or expression of under what condition something would happen. It uses helping or auxiliary verbs including might, would, should and could. Sometimes it is connected to a clause which is in the subjunctive mood.

The conditional mood is made from the auxiliary verb would (also should with I and we) and the infinitive of the other verb without to

Answer:

The bolded verb in this sentence is written in the conditional mood. Option C is correct

Explanation:

Second person stories tend to make the reader a/an