f the polygon is translated 4 units down and 5 units right, what will the coordinates of the new image be

We are finding the volume of a solid obtained by rotating a region bounded by specific curves about the x-axis. This involves the method of disk washers and the calculation of an integral. However, the calculation is impossible with this exact set of curves due to the undefined values at x = π/2 and x = -π/2.

To answer your question, let's first understand what is happening. We are taking the region between the curves y=sec(x), y=1, x=-1, and x=1 and rotating it about the x-axis. This creates a type of solid shape called a solid of revolution. We can find the volume of such a shape using the method of cylindrical shells or disk washers.

The volume V of the solid obtained by rotating about the x-axis the region confined by the given curves is given by the formula:

V = ∫ (from a to b) π [R(x)² - r(x)²] dx

where R(x) is the distance from the x-axis to the outer curve (y=sec(x)), and r(x) is the distance from the x-axis to the inner curve (y=1).

However, calculating the integral ∫ (from -1 to 1) π [sec(x)² - 1] dx directly can be difficult because the function sec(x) is undefined at x = π/2 and x = -π/2.

A typical way around such difficulties is to use a suitable trigonometric substitution, but in this case, the function sec(x) is periodic with a period of 2π, so we can't avoid these points, both of which lie in the interval from -1 to 1. Hence, it is impossible to find the volume of the solid as stated by rotating about the x-axis the region between the curves y = sec(x), y = 1, x = -1, and x = 1.

https://brainly.com/question/34470221

#SPJ3

Answer:

Fall 7°F

Step-by-step explanation:

By using the continuous compound interest the balance is growing $4,673.56 after 6 years.

Interest that compounded continuously to the principal amount. This interest rate provides exponential growth to period of time.

Formula of continuous compound interest rate;

[tex]P(t) = P_0e^{rt}[/tex] , where P₀ is the principal amount, r is the interest rate and t is the time period.

Given that the principal amount is $20000 and and interest rate 3.5% in a year.

And here we use formula of continuous compound interest rate;

[tex]P(t) = P_0e^{rt}[/tex]

Here, we have the value P₀ = $20000 , r = 3.5 % / 100 = 0.035% in a year and t = 6 years

Substitute these above values in the formula;

p(t) = $20000 × [tex]e^{0.035}[/tex] ×[tex]e^{6}[/tex]

P{t} = $24673.56

P{t} = $24673.56 nearest one cent

The final balance is $24673.56.

Therefore, the total continuous compound interest is $4,673.56.

To learn more about the continuous compound interest;

https://brainly.com/question/18722165

#SPJ5

Answer:

Length of half marathon = 7 x 10⁴ feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Length of marathon is given as 1.4 x 10⁵ feet

            Length of full marathon = 1.4 x 10⁵ feet

Length of half marathon is half the length of full marathon.

[tex]\texttt{Length of half marathon = }\frac{\texttt{Length of full marathon}}{2}\\\\\texttt{Length of half marathon = }\frac{1.4\times 10^5}{2}=0.7\times 10^5\\\\\texttt{Length of half marathon = }7\times 10^4feet[/tex]

Length of half marathon = 7 x 10⁴ feet

Answer:

180

Step-by-step explanation:

A 15-year mortgage requires 180 monthly payments.

The Patels took out a 15-year mortgage. To determine the number of monthly payments, we need to consider the total number of payments over 15 years. Since there are 12 months in a year, the number of monthly payments for a 15-year mortgage would be: 15 years x 12 months = 180 monthly payments.

Defective rate can be expected to keep an eye on a Poisson distribution. Mean is equal to 800(0.02) = 16, Variance is 16, and so standard deviation is 4.
X = 800(0.04) = 32, Using normal approximation of the Poisson distribution Z1 = (32-16)/4 = 4.
P(greater than 4%) = P(Z>4) = 1 – 0.999968 = 0.000032, which implies that having such a defective rate is extremely unlikely.

If the defective rate in the random sample is 4 percent then it is very likely that the assembly line produces more than 2% defective rate now.

The probability that the defective rate exceeds 4% in the sample is approximately 0.0006, indicating a significant deviation from the expected 2%.

To solve this problem, we need to use the concept of binomial distribution and the normal approximation to the binomial distribution due to the large sample size.

Step 1: Understanding the problem

- The assembly line historically has a defective rate of 2%.

- A random sample of 800 components is drawn.

- We are interested in the probability that the defective rate is greater than 4%.

Step 2: Calculate the parameters

- Population defective rate (historical rate): [tex]\( p = 0.02 \)[/tex]

- Sample size: [tex]\( n = 800 \)[/tex]

- Sample defective rate (given): [tex]\( \hat{p} = 0.04 \)[/tex]

Step 3: Probability that defective rate is greater than 4%

- We need to find [tex]\( P(\hat{p} > 0.04) \).[/tex]

Since [tex]\( \hat{p} \)[/tex] is approximately normally distributed (by the Central Limit Theorem because [tex]\( n \)[/tex] is large), we can use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.

Step 4: Calculate standard error of sample proportion

The standard error of the sample proportion [tex]\( \hat{p} \)[/tex] is given by:

[tex]\[ SE(\hat{p}) = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})}{n}} \][/tex]

Substitute the values:

[tex]\[ SE(\hat{p}) = \sqrt{\frac{0.04 \cdot 0.96}{800}} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ SE(\hat{p}) = \sqrt{\frac{0.0384}{800}} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ SE(\hat{p}) \approx 0.0062 \][/tex]

Step 5: Z-score calculation

To find the Z-score for [tex]\( \hat{p} = 0.04 \)[/tex]:

[tex]\[ Z = \frac{\hat{p} - p}{SE(\hat{p})} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ Z = \frac{0.04 - 0.02}{0.0062} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ Z \approx 3.23 \][/tex]

Step 6: Find the probability

Now, find the probability that [tex]\( \hat{p} > 0.04 \)[/tex]:

[tex]\[ P(\hat{p} > 0.04) = P(Z > 3.23) \][/tex]

Using the standard normal distribution table or a calculator:

[tex]\[ P(Z > 3.23) \approx 0.0006 \][/tex]

Conclusion:

The probability that the defective rate in the sample is greater than 4% is approximately [tex]\( 0.0006 \)[/tex], or [tex]\( 0.06\% \)[/tex].

Interpretation:

Since the probability is very low, it suggests that a defective rate of 4% in the sample is highly unlikely to occur if the true defective rate on the assembly line is 2%. This could indicate a potential issue or change in the process affecting the defective rate, warranting further investigation or quality control measures.

To find the probability that the drone will fly less than 4.66 hours, calculate the z-score and look up the corresponding probability in the standard normal distribution. A z-score of -2.5 indicates a probability of about 0.62%.

To calculate the probability that the drone will fly less than 4.66 hours, we need to convert the flight time of 4.66 hours into a z-score. The z-score represents how many standard deviations an element is from the mean.

The formula to calculate the z-score is:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

Where:
X = Value we're interested in (4.66 hours)
μ = Mean (4.76 hours)
σ = Standard deviation (0.04 hours)

Calculating the z-score:

Z = (4.66 - 4.76) / 0.04 = -2.5

Now, we look up the z-score in the standard normal distribution table or use a calculator to find the probability to the left of that z-score, which gives us the probability that the drone will fly less than 4.66 hours. Typically, a z-score of -2.5 corresponds to a probability of approximately 0.0062 or 0.62%.

Therefore, the probability that the drone will fly less than 4.66 hours is about 0.62%.

To find the lower sum, divide the interval into subintervals, evaluate the function at the left endpoint of each subinterval, and sum up the areas of the rectangles with those minimum values as heights.

To approximate the area of the region using lower sums, we need to calculate the lower sum by dividing the interval into subintervals of equal width, finding the minimum value of each subinterval, and summing up the areas of the rectangles with those minimum values as heights.

In this case, we have the function y = sqrt(1-x^2). Let's say we divide the interval into n subintervals. The width of each subinterval would be (b-a)/n, where a and b are the lower and upper limits of the interval.

To find the minimum value of each subinterval, we can evaluate the function at the left endpoint of each subinterval. Let's call these points x1, x2, x3,..., xn. Then, the lower sum is given by: Lower Sum = (b-a)/n * (f(x1) + f(x2) + f(x3) + ... + f(xn)).

To check if the lower sums you calculated are correct, make sure you are using the left endpoints of the subintervals and that the calculation is accurate.

The solutions to the quadratic equation x² = 7x + 4 are found by using the quadratic formula, which results in two solutions: [tex](\frac{7 + \sqrt{65}}{2 },\frac{7 - \sqrt{65}}{2 })[/tex]

The solutions to the quadratic equation x² = 7x + 4 can be found by first rewriting the equation in standard form as x² - 7x - 4 = 0. To solve this quadratic equation, we can factor it, complete the square, or use the quadratic formula. In this case, let's factor the equation if possible. Unfortunately, this quadratic does not factor neatly. Therefore, we apply the quadratic formula which is [tex]x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/tex] , where a = 1, b = -7, and c = -4.

After substitution, we get [tex]x = \frac{7 \pm \sqrt{49 + 16}}{2}[/tex]. This simplifies to x = [tex]\frac{7 \pm \sqrt{65}}{2}[/tex], resulting in two solutions: [tex]x = \frac{7 + \sqrt{65}}{2 }[/tex]and [tex]x = \frac{7 - \sqrt{65}}{2 }[/tex]. Therefore, the solution set is [tex](\frac{7 + \sqrt{65}}{2 },\frac{7 - \sqrt{65}}{2 })[/tex]

To calculate the expected return, multiply each amount that can be won by its corresponding probability, and sum these values. The expected return of the game is $1 1/6, which corresponds to answer choice (b).

The student is asking how to calculate the expected return in a game with different probabilities of winning different amounts. To find the expected return, you multiply each outcome by its probability and then sum these products. The possible wins are $1, $5, and $0, with probabilities of 1/3, 1/6, and 1/2, respectively.

To calculate the expected return:

Add up these expected values to get the total expected return:

$1/3 + $5/6 + $0 = $2/6 + $5/6 = $7/6

The expected return is $7/6, which simplifies to $1 1/6. Therefore, the correct answer is (b).

Final answer:

The probability that a randomly selected blue marble came from the first box is 7/31, which is approximately 0.2258 when rounded to four decimal places.

Explanation:

The probability that the blue marble came from the first box can be found using Bayes' theorem and the concept of conditional probability. First, we need to determine the probability of drawing a blue marble from either box (P(Blue)). Then, we calculate the probability of drawing a blue marble from the first box (P(Blue|First box)). Finally, we apply Bayes' theorem to find the probability that the blue marble came from the first box (P(First box|Blue)).

Here are the relevant probabilities:

P(First box) = 1/2 (since there are only two boxes)

P(Second box) = 1/2

P(Blue|First box) = 3/5 (3 blue out of 5 total marbles)

P(Blue|Second box) = 2/7 (2 blue out of 7 total marbles)

Using these probabilities, we calculate P(Blue):

P(Blue) = P(Blue|First box) * P(First box) + P(Blue|Second box) * P(Second box) = (3/5) * (1/2) + (2/7) * (1/2) = 3/10 + 1/7 = 21/70 + 10/70 = 31/70

Now, we apply Bayes' theorem to get P(First box|Blue):

P(First box|Blue) = [P(Blue|First box) * P(First box)] / P(Blue) = [(3/5) * (1/2)] / (31/70) = (3/10) / (31/70) = (3/10) * (70/31) = 21/310 = 7/31 or approximately 0.2258 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, the probability that the marble came from the first box is 7/31.

Answer:

there isn't a number to multiply

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of x is 5/2 for expression 6(2x-3)-2(2x+1)

An expression is combination of variables, numbers and operators.

The given expression is 6(2x-3)-2(2x+1)

By applying distributive property we can simplify this.

x is the variable, plus and minus is the operators.

6(2x-3)-2(2x+1)

12x-18-4x-2

Add the terms with variable x

12x-4x-18-2

8x-20

8x=20

Divide both sides by 8

x=20/8

x=5/2

Hence, the value of x is 5/2 for expression 6(2x-3)-2(2x+1)

To learn more on Expressions click:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ2

To find the coterminal angles with -5π/18, we have to add or subtract multiples of 2π. By doing so, we find out that the coterminal angles are −23π/18, 13π/18, and -41π/18. So, the correct option is c.

To find angles that are coterminal with a given angle, we have to add or subtract multiples of 2π. This is because a full rotation around the unit circle is 2π radians. Angles that differ by an exact multiple of 2π radians are considered as coterminal.

Therefore, we can get the coterminal angles of −5π/18 by adding and subtracting multiples of 2π. This gives us the angles, −23π/18 and 13π/18 (for positive angles) and −41π/18 (for a negative angle). Thus, the option (c) −23π/18, 13π/18, 31π/18 is correct.

https://brainly.com/question/32003007

#SPJ2