Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law.
Explanation:
The equality before the law is the primary focus of the Magna Carta. Magna Carta still has a great respect in the legal communities of British and Americans. The legal fraternity’s term this has one of the supreme constitutional documents of all times which laid the foundation of freedom for the individual.
The US Constitution is one oldest constitution which has a major influence of the Magna Carta and formulation the legislation on the basis of the rights of the individuals, right to justice and right to have a fair trial.
The declaration of independence reflects the principle of
Answer:
Popular Sovereignty.
Explanation:
The principle of popular sovereignty state that it is the consent of the people that creates and sustains the state and its government through the elected representatives.
The people are source of all political power. this principle is associated with Thomas Hobbs, Rousseau and John Locke, all three were social contract philosophers. Declaration of independence also reflects this principle because it declare that it is the prole who instituted the government for themselves and it derives power from their consent.
Jack has been released from confinement early and placed on probation. He found a job and rented an apartment in his hometown. One day, he responded to a knock on the door and sees his probation officer, Stephanie Stone. She tells him that she has decided to conduct a surprise inspection of his home. Jack insists that he has been a very good citizen and is no longer involved in any criminal behavior. Stephanie has no evidence that this is not true, but insists on conducting a complete search of the home anyway. Stephanie finds nothing out of the ordinary, but asks if Jack will follow her to the office for a drug test, just in case. Jack says, "Sure, I have nothing to hide." Unfortunately for Jack, the drug test is positive for an illegal substance and his parole is revoked.
Was Parole Officer Stone's search of Jack's apartment lawful?
Answer:
Yes it is lawful.
Explanation:
A sentence of probation is actually an alternative of a jail sentence. The Courts have found that probationers have reduced expectations of privacy so they don't have the same Fourth Amendment rights as others. Courts can require probationers to submit to warrantless searches not supported by probable cause. The goal is only to help rehabilitate the probationer, protect society, or both.
Although officers usually need warrants or probable cause before they can search a person or home, a search condition eliminates this requirement. In some states, an officer must have reasonable suspicion before conducting a probation search, but in others, an officer can conduct searches at any time, even without reason to believe that the probationer committed a crime. Some of these search conditions allow only probation officers to search, while others authorize both probation and police officers to do the same
The Fourth Amendment typically prevents police from searching someone’s body, belongings, or home without a warrant or probable cause. But judges gives a condition of sentencing someone to probation, that the probationer agree to warrantless searches. Since this condition does not entitled the probationer’s normal Fourth Amendment rights, it’s sometimes called a “Fourth waiver.”
The legality of Parole Officer Stone's search of Jack's apartment depends on the specific conditions of Jack's parole arrangement. While parolees often have conditions that allow searches by a parole officer without the need for a warrant or probable cause, the exact terms of Jack's parole would need to be assessed to determine the lawfulness of the search.
While on parole, individuals may have conditional rights compared to the general public, often subject to terms that can include regular searches by a parole officer. With no evidence of ongoing criminal behavior by Jack, the legality of the search could depend on the specific conditions of Jack's parole, which typically allow for searches without the need for a warrant or probable cause.
In a similar educational context, school officials were found justified by the District Court to conduct searches based on reasonable suspicion, as per the question's reference to the search of Savanna's belongings. This principle may extend to parole scenarios where the law provides parole officers certain liberties to conduct searches to ensure parole compliance. However, it's vital to consider whether the search was in accordance with the conditions stipulated in Jack's parole agreement, as well as state and federal laws concerning parolee rights. If the conditions did allow such searches, Officer Stone's action could potentially be lawful. Nevertheless, without specific information on Jack's parole conditions, a definitive answer cannot be provided.
Four surgeons conducted their medical practices through an LLC they owned. The LLC obtained a $1.5 million loan from Emprise Bank. It was secured by personal guarantees of the four doctors, each for $200,000, plus an additional joint $375,000. Two doctors then moved away. When the LLC failed to pay, Emprise moved to enforce the personal guarantees by the two remaining doctors and won a judgment. Those two doctors contended that they had the right to sue the doctors who left as they injured the LLC. Are all four doctors liable?
Answer:
Yes all are liable.
In many states, LLCs can have a limited life. When a member joins or leaves an LLC, some states may require the LLC to be dissolved and re-formed with new membership — unless they have already an agreement in place within the LLC for buying, selling, and transferring ownership.
Explanation:
An LLC has advantage of both the corporation and partnership business structures.
LLCs protect business owners from personal liability in most instances, their personal assets — like vehicles, house, and savings accounts — won't be at risk in case LLC faces bankruptcy or lawsuits.
Profits and losses can get passed through to your personal income without facing corporate taxes. But, the LLC members are considered self-employed and must pay self-employment tax contributions towards Medicare and Social Security.
in many states, LLCs can have a limited life. Some states may require the LLC to be dissolved and re-formed with new membership when a member joins or leaves an LLC. This will not be required however if there is already an agreement in place within the LLC for buying, selling, and transferring ownership.
LLCs are a good choice for medium- or higher-risk businesses, owners with significant personal assets that they want to be protect, and owners who want to pay a lower tax rate than they would with a corporation.
How does murder differ from euthanasia? Do the courts treat the two differently?
Although both murder and euthanasia result in the death of a person, these are very different concepts.
Euthanasia is a practice in which a person's life is purposely ended with the intention of relieving pain and suffering. Euthanasia, therefore, is usually administered to people in terrible conditions, insufferable pain or who suffer terminal diseases. This is a difference with murder, which can take place regardless of the conditions of the person.
Another important difference is that for a death to be considered euthanasia, the person has to consent for his life to be ended. This can also be called assistive sui.cide.
In terms of the law, courts treat these two situations very differently. Virtually all nations that have a code of law condemn murder and punish those who engage in such a practice. Most countries also consider euthanasia to be illegal. However, a number of countries have passed laws to make euthanasia legal under certain circumstances.
In order to obtain a search warrant, a law enforcement officer must show probable cause by reasonably establishing three issues. Which of the following is NOT one of them?
A. a crime has been committed
B. the item to be seized is contraband
C. evidence of the crime exists
D. the evidence presently exists in the place to be searched
Answer:
C. Evidence of the crime exists.
Explanation:
To obtain a search warrant, law enforcement must prove a crime has occurred, evidence of the crime exists, and that the evidence is in the place to be searched. The existence of contraband is not a necessary component to secure a warrant.
Explanation:In order to obtain a search warrant, a law enforcement officer must reasonably establish three issues, which are often referred to as the 'triad of necessity'. The three components of this triad are:
A crime has been committed.Evidence of the crime exists.The evidence presently exists in the place to be searched.Therefore, option B, 'the item to be seized is contraband', is NOT one of the requirements for obtaining a search warrant. It's important to note though, that while contraband might be sought, its existence doesn't specifically need to be proven for a warrant to be issued.
Learn more about Search Warrant here:https://brainly.com/question/36902912
#SPJ3
Although principally conducted to evacuate U.S citizens, Non-combatant Evacuation Operations (NEO's) also may include citizens from the host nation as well as citizens from other countries. NEO's are directed by the President and managed by:__________a. The Joint Staff b. Combatant Commanders c. Chief of the Diplomatic Mission d. Department of State
Answer:
D. Department of State.
Explanation:
Non combatant evacuation operations are carried out to evacuated nonessential military personnel and civilians from and overseas country to a safe haven. These operations are carried out in case of military uprising, civil unrest, natural disaster and environmental issues. These operations are managed by the Department of the State and directed by the president of the US. Initially it was conducted exclusively for US citizens but now NEO's can include citizens from the host country or any other country.
Non-combatant Evacuation Operations (NEOs) are directed by the President of the United States of America and managed by Department of State.
What is NEO?
NEO is an acronym for Non-combatant Evacuation Operations and it can be defined as an operation that involves the planning, coordinating, and executing of the evacuation of civilians from a particular country, especially due to war, crisis or a deteriorating security situation.
Non-combatant Evacuation Operations (NEOs) are directed by the President of the United States of America and managed by Department of State.
Read more on NEOs here: https://brainly.com/question/13639340
What is the difference between an executive agreement and a treaty
Answer:
an executive agreement is the agreement between 2 or more executives where as a treaty is the agreement between the states
Explanation:
The primary difference between an executive agreement and a treaty lies in their formation and ratification process. A treaty is a formal agreement between countries that requires negotiation by the president, consent by a two-thirds vote in the Senate, and ratification by the president. An executive agreement, which is more commonly used in recent times, is negotiated and approved by the president alone, or in the case of congressional-executive agreements, requires a simple majority vote in both the House and Senate.
The U.S. Constitution outlines a specific process for treaty-making in Article II, stressing the formalities involved, including Senate approval by a two-thirds vote. However, the majority of international agreements the U.S. enters today are in the form of executive agreements because they are less onerous to enact. Executive agreements have the same force as treaties while in effect, but unlike treaties, they do not require the Senate's approval, making them more flexible and easier to implement or rescind by subsequent administrations. For instance, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Paris Climate Agreement were both executive agreements rather than treaties. In the landmark United States v. Pink case, the Supreme Court deemed executive agreements as legally equivalent to treaties, as long as they do not change federal law.
What is an exclusive power of the house of representatives?
Answer:
POWERS GIVEN TO THEM TO INITIATE BILLS AND REMOVE OFFICIALS
Explanation:
The U.S state House of Representatives, who form the national legislature of the country with the senate, are made up of 425 members duly elected across the fifty states of the nation.
These members of the lower house of the congress of U.S have certain powers exclusively given to them to initiate revenue bills, remove federal officials via impeachment and to elect the president when there seems to be a tie at the electoral college.
Answer:
The house of representatives has exclusive powers to: initiate revenue bills , dismiss federal officials and elect the President in case of a tie in the elections.
Explanation:
The House of Representatives is part of the legislative power of the federal government. These representatives serve for a period of two years. The number of representatives for each state is based on the population of that state. The bills originate in the House of Representatives but need to be approved with a majority of votes, that is, 2/3 (two thirds) of the Senate to become law.
In addition, it has exclusive powers, such as initiating revenue bills, dismissing federal officials and electing the President in case of a tie in the elections.
Think about how the media can be used to portray an image of a political candidate. How could the video give citizens a more favorable opinion of kennedy?
Answer:
In the video, the image of Kennedy looks much more favorable since it gives the impression of security when speaking directly to the camera without hesitation and with the conviction that he is speaking with the truth.
Explanation:
In the video, the image of Kennedy looks much more favorable since it gives the impression of security when speaking directly to the camera without hesitation and with the conviction that he is speaking with the truth. He moves his hands in a natural way and in general his body language seems secure. On the other hand, his opponent Nixon, seems nervous and expresses himself with a little of insecurity, it is possible to see when he speaks that his lips are dry and he tries to moisten them at all times, in addition, his hands seem tied to the lectern which sends an unconscious message to the spectators of their fear before the camera.
In the video, Nixon appeared to be nervous and uncomfortable. Those who listened to the debate on the radio would not have seen this as clearly. On the other hand, Kennedy appeared to be confident and comfortable, and he spoke clearly while focusing on the camera.
What are the recent trends in American juvenile justice, and how has this portion of the American criminal justice system improved or gotten worse?
Final answer:
Recent trends in American juvenile justice indicate a complex system with growing incarceration rates, a history of racial bias, and debates on whether to be harsher or more rehabilitative. Despite this, the crime rate is decreasing, and efforts to improve the justice system continue.
Explanation:
Recent trends in American juvenile justice have sparked significant debate. Some argue that a harsher justice system deters crime, yet others contend that it fails to rehabilitate and unfairly targets certain demographics. Notably, juvenile justice has seen shifts with the Supreme Court influencing the legal use of the death penalty and sentencing of minors.
The American criminal justice system is notorious for its approach to mass incarceration, leading to the highest number of imprisoned individuals globally. Since the 1980s, 'get tough on crime' campaigns have substantially increased the incarcerated population, peaking in 2017 with over two million people. This system faces criticism for being overly punitive, having racial biases, and ignoring holistic methods of crime prevention like addiction treatment.
Despite high incarceration rates and the persistence of social challenges, recent trends show a declining crime rate and proactive attempts to remedy the system's deficiencies. The inequitable enforcement of laws remains a problematic issue, with ongoing efforts to improve these outcomes.
Criminal trials for charges of murder and other serious crimes would be conducted in the
Answer: state court system
Explanation:
The state courts can be defined as the courts of general jurisdiction. These courts can hear all the cases not specifically selected for the federal courts. The trials for both civil and criminal cases can be conducted in the state courts. The state court follow and interpret the state laws. This helps the state to retain it's power in jurisdiction. Cases involving multiple states, foreign ambassador and non-citizen immigrants do not come under the jurisdiction of the state court.
Answer:
state court system unless the charges involved multiple states, non citizen immigrants or a foreign ambassador
Explanation:
A
What is the leader of the house of representatives called?
Answer:
Speaker of the House
Explanation:
A fraternity brother stole a valuable piece of jewelry during a sorority rush party. His brothers do not want to get in trouble, so they do not turn him over to the police or university. However, they cannot permit such a violation of their values and norms. Their solution is to submit the offender to their own tribunal and devise a fitting punishment that reassures the community. This is an example of:a. Hegemony. b. Alternative legal structure. c. Agency. d. Civil society.
Final answer:
A fraternity handling a theft internally with their own tribunal instead of turning to formal law enforcement illustrates an example of an alternative legal structure.
Explanation:
The situation described where a fraternity brother who has stolen a valuable piece of jewelry is judged and punished by his peers rather than by formal legal authorities is an example of an alternative legal structure. This type of system operates alongside or outside the official legal system and relies on the community or group to enforce its own rules and norms. It stems from the society's desire to maintain order and address wrongdoings based on shared values rather than relying exclusively on formal laws and external enforcement. Such informal systems can be effective in small, close-knit groups where there is a strong consensus about values and expectations.
The traditional crime of embezzlement by low-level employees has been replaced by: a. thefts masterminded by outsiders. b. low-level employees engaging in stock fraud. c. company owners building up companies and selling them to the highest bidder with consequent job loss. d. mismanagement and looting by upper-level management.
Answer:
B. Low-level employees engaging in stock fraud
Explanation:
A: The reason A is an incorrect option is because the question specifically refers to employees of the company. Meaning that interference by outsiders does not count as embezzlement.
C: This option is incorrect because this option involves company owners, which does not refer to low-level employees, and therefore is incorrect.
D: Also does not refer to low-level employees due to the referencing to upper-level management.
In a dissenting opinion, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated, that ______ laws are a tool for suppressing minority votes. Select one: a. civil rights legislation b. affirmative action c. Voter ID d. strict scrutiny test e. reasonable basis test
Answer:
The correct answer is c: Voter ID laws.
Explanation:
To begin with, it is necessary to define what voter ID laws are. They are laws which require voters to evidence their identity before a ballot is cast. In other words, the voter must provide some kind of official identification in order to be allowed to vote. Many say that this system avoids fraud. Others, like Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, claim that these laws are used as a tool so as to discourage the poor and disabled from voting. Requiring a voter ID discriminates against minority groups, such is the case of African Americans, Hispanic people, the elderly, and transgender individuals, among other minorities. It appears that it is not as easy as it seems to get an ID or another type of document you need to present when you vote.
Some states require a Photo ID, others a Non-Photo ID, and some others states do not require any ID whatsoever.
When investigators take a statement from witnesses as part of the evidence-gathering process, they have the witness put a digital signature on a digital copy of the statement. Which of the following refers to ensuring that the signer cannot later deny what was signed?
(A) Authenticity
(B) Confidentiality
(C) Integrity
(D) Non-repudiation
Non-repudiation refers to ensuring that the signer cannot later deny what was signed.
Option D
Explanation:
During the collecting of the evidence from the witness’s proper procedure will be carried out according to the law. And while collecting the evidence the witnesses will briefed about the how the information are to be collected digitally and also the value of the digital signature its authenticity.
Non-repudiation is a legal setting which means the author of the statement cannot deny the validity of the contract associated.
According to the available clauses in the law, witness is examined and collected evidence is being authenticated by the digital signature of the witnesses which are submitted for prosecution before the court. Later the authenticated documents or evidence cannot be denied by the witness.
Answer:
(D) Non-repudiation
Explanation:
This is an example of the legal concept of non-repudiation. When investigators take a statement from witnesses, they require them to provide a digital signature. The main reason for this is to ensure that the validity of this document is not later questioned. Paper signatures can be forged relatively easily. However, digital signatures are much harder to break. This is why such certificates provide non-repudiation.
When the united states’ use of military force is successful in maintaining national security, it means to say that the ________
Answer: It means the United States has determined towards improving how to take over all states or countries
Explanation:
When the united states' use of military force is successful in maintaining national security, the United States : It means the United States has determined towards improving how to take over all states or countries by Occupying them.
The military force did this purposely to prevent any occurrence of threat, war or destruction in the nearest future. After the national security has been duly maintained, fixing of the problems shall follow suit in a peaceful way.
What is meant by ""insure domestic tranquility"" in the preamble of the u.S. Constitution?
Law enforcement agencies such as the fbi are part of
Answer: the Department of Justice.
Explanation:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is the independent intelligence security service in the United States it works under the jurisdiction of Department of Justice, US. It is a principle law enforcement agency. FBI is assigned with duties like protection against terrorist activity, protection against cyber attacks, protection of civil rights, detection of white-collar crime, detection of organized crimes and also helps in criminal detection proceedings.
Answer:The Federal Bureau of Investigation is the domestic intelligence and security service of the United States and its principal federal law enforcement agency.
Explanation:
Which of the following documents has served as a model for human rights protections for many newly democratic nations around the world?Geneva Conventions and ProtocolsThe Bill of Rights to the U.S. ConstitutionUniversal Declaration of Human RightsCharter of the United Nations
Answer:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Explanation:
The Universal Declaration of Human Right was first published in 1948 by the United Nations.
It consists of 30 articles expressing individuals rights, and has been used as a model for human rights around the world since them.
So the correct answer is:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Describe your 5 layers of citizenship (home, school, city, state, nation).
List examples of rights at each layer
List examples of responsibilities at each layer
Identify the source of rights and responsibilities at each level.
Answer:
Home:
Follow and respect the rules Do your part in taking care of the environmentVolunteer in community organizationsBe respectful to your friends, neighbors, family, etc.Help people in need.Have a good understanding of the government.Be a good personSchool:
being respectful of other people and their property.being respectful of school property.following school rules.displaying good character (responsibility, honesty, good listening, kindness)City:
Volunteer to be active in your community.Be honest and trustworthy.Follow rules and laws.Respect the rights of others.Be informed about the world around you.Respect the property of others.Be compassionate.Take responsibility for your actionsState:
basically the same thing as for the city.
Nation:
Support and defend the Constitution.Stay informed of the issues affecting your community.Participate in the democratic process.Respect and obey federal, state, and local laws.Respect the rights, beliefs, and opinions of others.Participate in your local community.Hope I helped answer the question!
A construction worker has been away from home doing commercial blasting. When he finishes a job, he realizes that he has a case of dynamite left over that isn't accounted for. He could really use that to blow some stumps on his farm when he gets home, but he obviously can't take it with him on the airline. He considers shipping it via air freight, declaring it as household goods. What are the possible adverse consequences of such an ac
Adverse consequences of the given act:
According to the Explosives law, the possession of explosive material like dynamite is considered to be punished under the federal explosives laws.
The law clearly states that those who possess explosives without the ATF licence will be arrested and produced before the court and the court will pronounce the quantum of punishment according type of explosives the person had at the time of arrest.
According to the federal explosive law the person arrested in this clause will be fined for $10,000 or 10 years of imprisonment or both according to the special court verdict.
How did the kellogg-briand pact of 1927 promote international peace?
The correct statement is that the Kellogg-Briand pact promoted international peace, as it was a step in curbing war as a form of foreign national policies of the nations.
This pact between Briand and Kellogg was signed between the US and France before the countries worldwide were on the verge of breaking the World War II. during the mid-Twentieth Century.
Kellogg-Briand Pact There were a lot of wars happening between the US and European nations and signing of this pact was a historic step in promoting non-violence between US and France. This pact was signed between US and France in the year 1928 by the foreign ministers of the respective countries in a hope that France will get backing from US in case of European War.
Hence, the Kellogg-Briand pact of 1927 between France and the US promoted international peace by signing an agreement that the two nations will not indulge in war activities.
Learn more about Kellogg-Briand pact here:
https://brainly.com/question/3178345
Final answer:
The Kellogg-Briand Pact sought to promote peace by outlawing war as a tool of foreign policy, but it lacked enforcement mechanisms and did not prevent future conflicts.
Explanation:
The Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1927 was an international agreement that aimed to promote peace by renouncing war as an instrument of national policy. The pact was signed initially by fifteen nations in 1928, led by U.S. secretary of state Frank Kellogg and French foreign minister Aristide Briand, and was eventually endorsed by a total of more than sixty countries. However, the pact lacked enforcement mechanisms and failed to prevent future conflicts, including the outbreak of the Second World War. Despite these shortcomings, the Kellogg-Briand Pact represented an early attempt at collective security and played a role in the development of later international laws designed to prevent war, such as those embodied in the United Nations Charter.
List and discuss the various clues that flames and smoke can offer the investigators in the arson investigation.
One of the main clues that it gives are what caused the fire, and could give if the fire was started on purpose or was accidental. This, in turn, can provide them with what caused the fire, and then they can figure out who had the product which the fire was started by.
I hope this helped. If so, please mark brainliest!
Flames and smoke are probably two of the main things that investigators use to judge an investigation. The color of the flames can indicate many different things like temperature and use of particular accelerants. The direction of the burn patterns left by the flames can also tell a great deal.
What determines whether the crime of arson has occurred?The "willful or malicious" part of the definition for arson is what truly determines whether the crime of arson has occurred.
What does a preliminary investigator look for in a fire? Matches Gas Lighterscigarettes bombsThey also look for things like the direction of the smoke, the flames, and the distance.
Learn more about arson investigation here-https://brainly.com/question/14317242
#SPJ2
____ is a legal proceeding for distributing to creditors the assets of those unable to pay their debts
Answer: Bankruptcy
Explanation:
Bankruptcy is a legal process for someone or an organization that can not repay its debts and seek opportunities for part or all of the debt to be forgiven so the person can start afresh.
Bankruptcy can be filled by a creditor or someone can personally declare bankruptcy.
Legal proceedings for declaring bankruptcy differs from one country to another.
In the united states, bankruptcy cases are heard in a federal court.
illinois will grant all of the following licensing authorities to non-resident's, EXCEPT:(A) The non-resident must be licensed in their home state for a minimum of 2 years before Illinois will grant non-resident producer status.(B) The non-resident must file an affidavit naming the Director to receive service of process on the non-resident's behalf.(C) There is a $250 license fee due and payable every two years.(D) The non-resident producer must be in good standing in their home state with reference to their resident producer status.
Answer:
A: The non-resident must be licensed in their home state for a minimum of 2 years before Illinois will grant non-resident producer status.
Explanation:
For a non-resident, there isn't a requirement that one must meet a particular minimum licensing experience, but then holding a license in good standing their home state makes it, in relation to granting a non-resident licensing status is 'Illinois'.
The question asks which of the given options Illinois does not grant to non-resident licensing authorities. The correct answer is option (A): The non-resident must be licensed in their home state for a minimum of 2 years before Illinois will grant non-resident producer status.
This is not a requirement for Illinois to grant licensing authority to non-residents. Instead, Illinois focuses on ensuring that non-resident producers are in good standing in their home state and comply with procedural requirements such as filing an affidavit for service of process and paying the relevant license fee.
Options (B), (C), and (D) reflect actual requirements, where a non-resident must indeed file an affidavit, pay a licensing fee, and be in good standing in their home state. These regulations aim to maintain professional and ethical standards within the industry, ensuring that only qualified and reputable professionals are granted license privileges. This adherence to quality and legal compliance is crucial in fostering trust and safeguarding interests within the sector.
The size of the copycat crime pool is affected both by the level of media distribution of the criminogenic content and by other social context factors such as all of the following EXCEPT:
a. Social norms regarding deviance and violence
b. The lack of social conflicts
c. The number of opportunities available to the potential offender to copy a crime technique
d. The nature, credibility, and pervasiveness of the mass media
Answer: Option B -- The lack of social conflicts
Explanation:
Copycat crime is defined as one of the criminal acts, that's imitated by the previous crime committed. Copycat effect started in 1916 when a crime was imitated or modeled by Jack the Ripper. It was affected by the level of media distribution of the criminogenic content and by social context factors, which include:
(i) Social norms regarding deviance and violence
(Ii) The number of opportunities available to the potential offender to copy a crime technique
(iii) The nature, credibility, and pervasiveness of the mass media
The Sedition Act of 1798 which punished individuals for publishing “false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government is now infamous and thought to have violated the right of freedom of expression. What agency had the responsibility for enforcing the Sedition Act when it was in effect?
1.the Secret Service
2.the US Marshals Service
3.the local police
4.the United States Postal Inspection Service
Answer:
2) The US Marshals Service
Explanation:
Timothy Pickering was in charge of enforcing the Sedition Act. The US Marshals Service is a federal agency in charge of enforcing laws. Therefore you could assume that Pickering worked for the US Marshals Service.
Final answer:
The US Marshals Service was responsible for enforcing the Sedition Act of 1798, which targeted material deemed harmful to the government.
Explanation:
The agency responsible for enforcing the Sedition Act of 1798 was the US Marshals Service. When the act was in effect, it was enforced by the federal government primarily through its judicial system and the marshals who executed the arrest and imprisonment of individuals charged under the act. Notably, the Sedition Act of 1798 is often confused with the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, the latter of which did involve the United States Postal Inspection Service in its enforcement. However, regarding the 1798 act, the US Marshals played a central role in taking action against those who published material deemed 'false, scandalous and malicious' against the federal government.
Which of the following fiscal policies would most likely reduce unemployment?A. Increasing funding for local grantsB. Lowering reserve requirementsC. Raising taxes on small businessD. Selling more government securities
Answer:
I think your answer is A, but as I'm not sure of the answer I will leave some other actions that can be done.
Fundamental will also be to adopt unemployment mitigating measures, with actions that:
a) retain young people in schools for some time with some kind of income (scholarship);
b) mobilize temporary occupation - employment of public and / or community interest - for services (health, education, etc.) and works of collective interest (construction, paving, sanitation, etc.), which generate a good or service and income;
c) offer credit and support to micro and small enterprises;
d) encourage and support popular and solidary initiatives of economic activities in the production of goods and services;
e) mobilize resources and rules for debt renegotiation of companies and families, under appropriate conditions;
f) extend the protection of unemployment insurance.
Measures like these need to be put in place to help workers and businesses in this difficult transition
Hope this helps :) -Mark Brainiest Please :)
The first visual media criminals were descendants of street gang members, often portrayed in dime novels.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
The answer would be b. false.
I hope this helped!
Answer:
b. False
Explanation: