Answer:
The Hundred Years War inflicted untold misery on France. Farmlands were laid waste, the population was decimated by war, famine, and the Black Death (see plague ), and marauders terrorized the countryside.
Explanation:
The Hundred Years' War substantially reshaped medieval Europe, altering military tactics, economies, politics, social structures, and cultural pursuits. It marked the decline of feudalism, contributed to the rise of national identities, and enhanced the role of representative government in England while consolidating a strong monarchy in France
The Hundred Years' War, a prolonged conflict from 1337 to 1453 between England and France, had far-reaching consequences for medieval Europe. The war instigated a major shift in military tactics with the rise in prominence of infantry and the decline of cavalry, signifying an end to feudal militarism and the rise of professional armies. Economically, the war contributed to the development of a standard coinage system and the rise of modern banking, a departure from localized feudal economies.Politically, the conflict cemented the growth of national identities and centralized authority. In France, it consolidated a strong monarchy, whereas in England, it strengthened the role of Parliament and paved the way for representative government. The social fabric was also impacted, with skilled laborers becoming a distinct class and opportunities for social mobility increasing due to wage earning in military service.Amidst the backdrop of the Black Death, the war provoked both political strife and economic recession within Europe, while simultaneously fostering a redistribution of wealth and aiding in the creation of a unified French identity. Artistic and intellectual pursuits flourished despite the turmoil, leading to significant cultural developments and the patronage of the arts by new emerging classes.
The Great Migration" of the 20th century could best be described as
A) a mass movement of political refugees from Asia.
B) the political refugees from Cuba and Latin America.
C) the waves of immigrant from eastern and central Europe.
D) a movement of southern African Americans to the West and North.
Answer: the answer is :
. D
Explanation:
IT IS THE D BECAUSE IT WAS A MOVEMENT OF SOUTHERN
Final answer:
The Great Migration of the 20th century was a movement of southern African Americans to the West and North.
Explanation:
The Great Migration of the 20th century refers to the movement of over 1.5 million African Americans from the South to cities in the North and West between 1910 and 1930. This migration was driven by factors such as poor economic opportunities and social prejudice in the South, as well as the availability of well-paid jobs in industrial cities in the North. About half a million individuals migrated during World War I to take advantage of wartime employment in Northern factories.
Which of these men worked for the Freedmen’s Bureau?
Answers-
A) Ulysses S. Grant
B) Adolph E. Borie
C) Jay Gould
D) Hiram Rhodes Revels
Answer: Hiram Rhodes Revels
Explanation:In Mississippi, he worked with the Freedmen's Bureau to create schools for African American children. Both blacks and whites respected Revels and elected him to important jobs. He served as an alderman and state senator.
A part of the consmerism cycle is that manufacturers
Answer:
Part of the consumerism cycle involves manufacturers advertising goods to the general population to encourage them to buy the product.
Explanation:
Martin Luther king ,jr., embraced ideas of Jesus
don't understand u ooooo
Answer:
The correct answer is that yes Martin Luther King Jr, was a very religous man that broguht a lot of his christianity to the way he fought for civil rights.
Explanation:
As well it is important to remember he was a minister for the Baptist Church.
help please-
Freedom of speech issues happen all over the world. Explain and analyze two examples of freedom of speech issues that occur in the United States.
people use freedom of speech over debates like abortions because some say it’s a woman’s body meaning her choice and others say you are killing a child. Either way it’s there freedom of speech to say their opinion even though some get mad. Another example is freedom of speech over saying how students feel over dress codes for schools it causes issues because the school believes dressing appropriately and students believe it’s very strict and too harsh
Answer:
Im new to this app/web what is it what does it help you with ?
Explanation:
compare the basic role of women in China and Indian Hindu society during the classical era
Answer:
Explanation: There are many differences between the role of women in China and Indian Hindu Society during the classical era.
1. In classical era Chinese women were not forced to early marriage. So they at least could finish their study. But in Indian Hindu society women used to get married at early age. So they didn't have the right to inherit knowledge.
2. In China women in ruler family could indirectly rule on behalf of the under age prince. But in India women were not allowed to do so in classical era.
3.Chinese women were not prohibited from taking part in religious and social rituals. But in India women were only the part of household activities.
4. During Classical era Chinese women could inherit the property whereas Indian Hindu society didn't allow to have properties.
In the classical era, Indian Hindu women had significant roles in religious, spiritual and philosophical traditions but later were subjected to patriarchal societal norms. In contrast, Chinese women experienced a more egalitarian society, especially during the Neolithic era, and could enjoy certain freedoms, despite the patriarchal influence of Confucianism.
Explanation:During the classical era, women in China and Indian Hindu society played different roles.
In Indian Hindu society, it appears that women were highly considered and held significant roles in the religious and spiritual activities as demonstrated in Vedic writings. There were women figures who were seen as highly spiritual and knowledgeable sages. These women participated in important dialogues and even composed hymns for the Rig Veda, indicating that women had a role in the spiritual aspects of society.
However, eventually, the culture became more patriarchal, restricting women to more domestic roles and fully dependent on their male counterparts. An extreme example of this is the ritual of sati, practiced by widows, which emerged from the belief that a woman's life served no further purpose following the death of her husband.
In contrast, archaeological evidence suggests that early Chinese societies were more egalitarian, and women were treated almost on par with men, particularly during the Neolithic era. Women also participated in important economic activities like weaving and were allowed certain freedoms. Despite the influence of patriarchal Confucianism, Chinese women could enjoy some measure of independence and freedom through Buddhism and Daoism, which had a more liberal view on women's roles.
Learn more about Women in Classical Era here:https://brainly.com/question/28270050
#SPJ3
what conclusion is best supported by this graph?
Answer:
Russia transition from a command to market economy was slow and difficult
The correct answer is C) Russia transition from a command to a market economy was slow and difficult.
The conclusion that is best supported by the graph is that Russia transition from a command to a market economy was slow and difficult.
In the graph, you can clearly see that the economic change in Russia from 1990 to 2002 had its ups and downs. It was not easy, not fast, indeed was slow and faced complications. In 1990, Russia's GDP was at the highest, in the range of the 500 billion dollars. But it reached minimum lows in 1999, to 200 billion dollars. And after that, they had been growing at a slow rate. S yes, the conclusion that is best supported by the graph is that Russia transition from a command to a market economy was slow and difficult.
The Maya built large limestone pyramids with flat tops. The Aztec also made similar structures with long stairways leading to temples at the top. What were these structures most likely used for?
A. religious ceremonies
B. healing the sick
C. attracting tourists
D. classroom instruction
Answer:
the answer is A. religious ceremonies
Explanation:
A. Religious ceremonies
Political machines were most common in
a) Urban areas
b) Rural areas
c) The late 20th century
d) The early 19th century
Answer:
urban areas
Explanation:
What made Japan unique in the world as a major nation
Answer:
I am pretty confident its B. It was a major power without a corresponding military.
Plz give me brainliest if correct.
Explanation:
What is the main inference that can be drawn from Adam Smith’s book The Wealth of Nations?
A.
For an economy to work flawlessly, it shouldn’t have to serve any moral goals.
B.
The government must control a free-market economy, or economic problems will arise.
C.
A free-market economy works well only without the government’s interference.
D.
Free trade will only hurt economies and should be stopped by governments
Answer:
C. A free market economy works well only without the government interference
Over 300 languages are spoken in Africa, yet most Africans are able to communicate with each other. Why?
A. They use sign language.
B.They speak in European languages, such as English or French.
C.They only communicate using pictures.
D.They take the time to learn all the tribal languages in their region, as well as their own.
The answer is B. They typically speak English or French. The people of African nations typically know many languages.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
b
Explanation:
which outcome was a lesson learned at the first battle of bull run
Answer:
The war was going to be longer and costlier than had been thought.
Explanation:
https://brainly.com/question/1287611
9. Draw Inferences Describe the major goals of two of the following movements: women,
Latinos, Native Americans, people with disabilities, and consumers. Why do you think some
of the same people who helped with these movements also helped with the environmental
movement?
Answer:
The major goals of women’s movements and people with disabilities were to guarantee equality of rights and equal opportunities.
The same people that helped with these movements helped the environmental movement because they saw their causes were similar.
Explanation:
Women's movements goals are “equal rights for women” and equal opportunities. Which should guarantee access to education; to vote; to be in jobs and social positions that only white men could occupy mostly.
While people with disabilities had similar goals they demand some specific agenda, they also need opportunities to work; access to education or to be in jobs they were not allowed, but in their case it was required technological adjustments and architectural adaptations, or specific policies for accessing health treatments and prosthetics.
But both movements helped the environment movement because their fight led to establishment of civil rights and to further understanding of human rights and they saw the causes of the environment movement were similar to their fight. The fight to protect and conserve the environment was similar to the path to guarantee rights as the environment movement would have to go through protests; nonviolent acts; passing laws; educating people about their causes; getting actively politically and going to courts.
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE DO THIS
1. Great depression
2. new deal
3. prohibition
4. Manhattan project
5. rationing
6. rosie the riveter
7. pearl harbor
8. lend lease program
9. axis powers
10. island hopping
11. internment camps
12. D day
13. battle of midway
14. victory gardens
15. neutrality acts
16. fall of Berlin
17. allied powers
18. Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Which candidate in the presidential election of 1912 ran mostly to widen The audience for socialist ideas
Answer:
Eugene Victor Debs
Explanation:
The movement show in this poster was a reaction to:
Answer:
Im not sure but I think its D.
Explanation:
The increasing interest in farming among the urban Americans is the movement show in this poster was a reaction.
Why is the Netherlands so good at farming?The Dutch declared a big focus on sustainable agriculture over two decades ago, mobilizing under the slogan "Twice quite so much food, half as many materials." Since 2000, van den Borne and a few of his compatriots have cut their demand on water for essential crops by up to 90%.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about Netherlands so good at farming, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1632252
#SPJ2
How did the Federalists react to the Louisiana Purchase? Explain
Answer:
Not well
Explanation:
For years, the Democratic-Republicans had given the Federalists grief over the actions of the Federal government. Once they were in power, the Democratic-Republicans essentially did the same as what the Federalists did as evidenced with actions like that of the Louisiana Purchase.
How would war at sea affect U.S. trade?
A. Warring nations would stop Americans from sending supplies.
B. It would not bother the U.S. since they were neutral.
C. Producers would use other transportation sources.
D. Countries in Europe would not buy U.S. products because of its neutrality.
Answer:
Explanation:
It's either A or B. Is this based off of a book, past histories? Do we have any additional information?
Answer:
A
Explanation:
you are talking about ww1, i just had this question
How does the system of sharecropping make it difficult for a worker to make a profit?
The land owner must try to pay off debts as well as buy supplies for the next year.
A)The sharecropper's crops are destroyed by the landowner each year.
B)The land owner and sharecropper argue frequently.
C)The sharecropper must try to pay off debts as well as buy supplies for the next year.
D)There is not enough profit to do that, so he ends up borrowing again for the next year and
creating more debt.
Answer:C
Explanation:
Most sharecroppers were former slaves who after gaining freedom didn't really have the resources to buy this game needed plus rent the land.
What sign was there that the scots-Irish immigrants got along with their new neighbors ?
The majority of the Protestant colonists throughout Ireland but particularly in Ulster, fought on the Williamite side in the war against the Jacobites. ... Finally, another major influx of Scots into northern Ireland occurred in the late 1690s, when tens of thousands of people fled a famine in Scotland to come to Ulster.
In the fight against the Jacobites, the bulk of Protestant colonists in Britain, particularly in Ulster, fought on the Williamite side.
What is meant by immigrants?Immigrants are the people, who shifts from one place to another place the reason of migration can be anything but mostly people do migration because of good job and standard of living. The types of immigrants are citizens, residents, non-immigrants and undocumented.
Thus, In the fight against the Jacobites, the bulk of Protestant colonists
For more details about Immigrants, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13688875
#SPJ2
Hurry! Running out of time! Will mark brainliest!
Which describes a community of men dedicated to living holy life?
A. Jihad
B. Barbarian invasions
C. Crusades
D. Persian Wars
The answer would be A hope this helps ❤️
Why was the Reagan administration's support for the Nicaraguan Contras damaging for Ronald Reagan's image?
Answer:
Reagan's support for Nicaraguan Contras was damaging to his image since the money used to fund the contras was earned through the illegal sales of US arms to Iran.
Explanation:
During the 1980s Iran was part of a strict Embargo and sanctions, mostly by the United States and it's western Allies.
However, it was revealed that some in the Reagan Administration were illegally supplying the Iranian government with US weapons. The money earned through these sales was then being use to fund the Nicaraguan Contras. These were US-backed rebels in South America who were fighting America's proxy war.
The revelation was very damaging for Reagan's image as many Americans did not even know how close the US was with both Iran and the illegal rebels in Nicaragua.
Answer:
It violated a federal law banning the sale of weapons to contras
Explanation: apex
several generations living in one household
Several generations living in one household is known as Multigenerational households
"Multigenerational households" refers to living arrangements where several generations of a family, such as grandparents, parents, and children, reside together under one roof. This living arrangement can occur for various reasons, including cultural traditions, economic necessity, or a desire to provide mutual support and care within the family unit. Multigenerational households may offer benefits such as shared expenses, caregiving assistance, and the preservation of family ties and traditions.
which idea did NOT lead to fascism and the rise of the nazi party in germany?
belief in racial superiority
desire to expand into new territory
devotion to a strong central government
determination to support the treaty that had ended world war l
Answer:
determination to support the treaty that had ended World War I
Explanation:
The German people, as well as the majority of the German politicians hated the Treaty of Versailles. The reason for this was that this treaty was putting Germany in a very bad position where it was restricted economically and military, thus making the country poor and weak. There was almost no support for this treaty, yet alone to respect it, so it can not be seen as a reason that did not lead to fascism, instead it is one of the main reasons that lead to it in Germany.
What is the primary purpose of a proxy war?
Answer:
A proxy war is an armed conflict in which two countries use third parties as intermediaries or substitutes, so that they do not directly fight each other.
Although superpowers have often used national governments like proxies, insurgent groups or others are more commonly employed. It is hoped that such groups can defeat the opponent without escalating into a major war.
Proxy wars can also occur in parallel with major conflicts. During the Iran-Iraq War, for example, both nations armed rival factions in the Civil War of Lebanon and incited them against each other.
To allow powerful countries to engage in conflicts without directly fighting each other
Was President Roosevelt justified in ordering Executive Order 9066, which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citizens?
Write a clear claim that responds to this writing prompt.
Answer:
Explanation: He was not justified in doing so, no matter how much he was advised not to do so, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed that order under pressure brought by Secretary of War Henry Stimson to do so, without measuring the consequences that this would bring, such as the isolation in specific areas of American people of Japanese origin for considering them highly dangerous in the face of attacks in Pearl Harbor, as well as other subsequent hand attacks. This measure created xenophobia towards the Japanese because with it there was incitement to racial prejudices by the Americans.
Evaluating President Roosevelt's actions in ordering Executive Order 9066, which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citizens is shown below.
The Executive Order 9066 which was initiated by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was made after the Pearl Harbor attack by the Japanese navy which resulted in the war between Japan and America that led to the use of the H-bomb.
As a result of this, I do not believe that this action was justified because it led to the alienation of Japanese who lived in America and also denying them visas to the country. This caused widespread xenophobia against the legal Japanese American people who were living in the country and their alienation.
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/21957600
How did the Hartford Convention propose to end the War of 1812?
A) by issuing the Treaty of Paris to Great Britain
B) by establishing a law that allowed the president to declare war
C) by adding a set of amendments to the Constitution
D) by promoting interstate commerce through the elimination of tariffs
Answer:
The correct answer is C. The Hartford Convention proposed to end the War of 1812 by adding a set of amendments to the Constitution.
Explanation:
The Hartford Convention was a meeting held in Hartford, Connecticut, by delegates from several New England states in December 1814 and January 1815. It was to protest the War of 1812 between the United States and Great Britain. Shocked by the trade restrictions that harm the region's economy, New England federalist politicians used the convention to challenge what they perceived as the favoritism of the federal government to the south and the overall decline in state rights.
Members of the Hartford Convention have agreed on a number of amendments to the Constitution to remedy these wrongs. The cause was compromised when the War of 1812 ended at about the same time as the convention was in progress. In the wave of patriotism that followed the successful outcome of the war, the delegates were labeled as traitors and secessionists by the general public.
Which nation was actively involved in state sponsored terrorism in2008?
Answer:
Two decades after being designated a state sponsor of terrorism, North Korea was removed from the list in 2008 by the administration of President George W. Bush. It was a controversial move; then-Sen. Barack Obama was among those who supported it, calling the decision “an appropriate response.”
Explanation:
In 2008, Pakistan was implicated in an example of state-sponsored terrorism through its indirect support for the Mumbai attacks conducted by the group Lashkar-e-Taiba.
This organization executed the Mumbai attacks, targeting India's financial capital. While Pakistan officially banned the group, evidence suggests that there was tacit approval and support from the Pakistani government in the past, with affiliated groups continuing operations within the country.
The assistance model of state-sponsored terrorism can be seen in the support that non-state actors like Lashkar-e-Taiba receive from national governments, which can include a range of backing from financial support to logistical assistance.
If the United States removed state governments, which of the following would be the closest to the new type of government?
A) unitary
B) confederation
C) federal
D) democratic
Answer:
Federal
Explanation:
The federal would be the closest to the new type of government.
The reasons for the US would be the closest to forming a Federal government is as follows:
The US government is Federal in form.A federal government is a constitutes a form of government in which power is distributed between a central authority and a number of constituent territorial unitsOnly the federal government can regulate interstate and foreign commerce, declare war, and set taxing, spending, and other national policies.There are two types of Federation: Holding Together federation and Coming Together Federation.In federal systems, political authority is divided between two autonomous sets of governments, one national and the other subnational.Hence, option(c) Federal is the correct answer.
To learn more about federal, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/16163232
#SPJ2