How long did it take to build the Titanic?

Answer:

true

Explanation:

began writing this column (originally in the form of a blog) in 2009, at the very beginning of Barack Obama’s presidency. His election filled me with both hope and trepidation: I admired his eloquence and visible intelligence, and I shared some of his foreign-policy instincts, but my early columns also expressed misgivings about his overly ambitious foreign-policy agenda.

Now, in his final week in office, it’s only natural to take a look back and offer an assessment. And when it comes to foreign policy, I regret to say my verdict is not particularly favorable.

Let’s start with the positive side of the ledger. Here one must begin by recalling the dire circumstances when Obama took office. The world economy was in the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, and the United States was teetering on the brink of a complete economic meltdown. Unemployment was soaring, and millions of Americans were losing their homes to foreclosures. The United States was mired in two unwinnable wars, Osama bin Laden was still at large, and America’s image in many parts of the world was at historic lows.

What has happened since? Here at home, the U.S. economy recovered faster than any of the other major industrial democracies, we’re now at full employment, and the deficits that resulted from the 2009 bailouts and stimulus package have shrunk dramatically. Wall Street was at near-record levels even before the recent post-election surge. More than 20 million Americans who lacked health care coverage now have it (for the moment), and we have seen important progress on civil rights for gay Americans and some other minorities. Moreover, Obama managed these important economic and social achievements in the face of extraordinary opposition from the Republican Party, which seemed more interested in thwarting Obama than in doing anything to help the American people.

In foreign policy, the Obama administration successfully negotiated a deal that halted Iran’s progress toward a nuclear weapon. He fulfilled the George W. Bush administration’s plan to get U.S. troops out of Iraq and significantly reduced the U.S. role in Afghanistan. Bin Laden was found and eliminated on his watch. The Paris agreement was an important step forward on climate change, and the pivot to Asia began a much-needed reorientation of America’s strategic focus. Ending the spiteful and counterproductive ostracism of Cuba was equally overdue and will do more for the Cuban people than our lame-brained embargo ever did.

In both foreign and domestic policy, therefore, this administration notched some genuine wins. And throughout his presidency, Obama conducted himself with the same dignity, humor, grace, intelligence, forbearance, respect for American values and traditions, and above all class that were on display in his farewell speech. Contrast that with the tone of Donald Trump’s first post-election press conference, held the day after Obama’s speech, which was bombastic, deceptive, abusive, defiant, contemptuous of traditional norms — and entirely consistent with Trump’s campaign and business career. (If you think Jan. 20 isn’t a watershed moment for political leadership, think again.) No matter how petty or two-faced his opponents were, Obama rarely paid them back in kind. One suspects Americans will appreciate these qualities even more as Trump’s egomaniacal circus act wears thin and his plutocratic policies leave his working-class supporters out in the cold.

Yet Obama’s presidency is in other respects a tragedy — and especially when it comes to foreign policy. It is a tragedy because Obama had the opportunity to refashion America’s role in the world, and at times he seemed to want to do just that. The crisis of 2008-2009 was the ideal moment to abandon the failed strategy of liberal hegemony that the United States had been pursuing since the end of the Cold War, but in the end Obama never broke with that familiar but failed approach. The result was a legacy of foreign-policy missteps that helped propel Donald Trump into the White House

The correct answer is True.

It is true that keeping the peace was the number one issue framing the foreign policy of Barack Obama.

For President Barack Obama, keeping the peace was a priority. He supported the presence of troops in the Middle East, specifically in Afghanistan, he supported the NATO intervention in Lybia to keep the peace. He negotiated the nuclear weapons reduction with Russian President Putin. He also managed to slowly retire US troops from Iraq, and order the operation to caught and kill Osama bin Laden.

Answer: They worried that dictators would be replaced by extremists.

American leaders were hesitant to support some Arab revolutions because they were worried that dictators would be replaced by extremists.

Extremism is "the quality or state of being extreme" or "the advocacy of extreme measures or views". The term is primarily used in a political or religious sense. These religious dictators beliefs are profound convictions that oppose the fundamental values of society, the laws of democracy and universal human rights by advocating the supremacy of a particular religious group.

Therefore, first option is the correct answer.

To learn more about extremist, refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/1727540

#SPJ2

The most formal tone among the options is Memos correct option is d.

Memos exemplify the utmost formality among the choices due to their structured, concise nature and formal language. These internal documents are designed for professional communication within organizations.

They strictly adhere to a prescribed format, often including headings, bullet points, and a direct, impersonal tone. Memos convey information efficiently, focusing on clarity and brevity to address specific issues or disseminate directives among staff.

Their content typically maintains a professional demeanor, devoid of personal or informal language. As a result, memos uphold a consistently formal tone, serving as a crucial tool for official communication within businesses or institutions, distinguishing them as the most formal option among letters, podcasts, proposals, and webinars.

complete the question

Which of the following is more formal in tone?

Select one:

a. Letter

b. Podcast

c. Proposals

d. Memos

Answer:

The answer is B!!!!!!!

Explanation:

because its right

This graph depicts that the  US unemployment rate will continue to rise.

There are a lot of  reasons why there is an increase in the rate of unemployment.

Some are due to change in the number of people seeking for jobs. The unemployment rate is influenced by the change in the size of the labor force and this changes can lead to increase in unemployment.

Learn more about  US unemployment rate from

https://brainly.com/question/14629507

The correct answer is B) deeply divided.

The statement that best describes the Democratic Party heading into the election of 1968 is "deeply divided."

The Democratic party was deeply divided in 1968 and elections were coming soon. They held their Democratic Convention in Chicago on August 26-29 in Chicago, Illinois. They were at the National Amphitheater to nominate a candidate when thousands of people gathered in the streets of Chicago to protest against the Vietnam War and the political situation in the United States. People lost control of the protests and the Chicago police department had to send policemen to control the riot.

Answer:

This is so the other person can  have brainliest

Explanation:

Learn more about American Literature here:

https://brainly.com/question/1560852

#SPJ2

Answer:

Among the given options , option D is the answer.

The effect of the court's ruling was to choose the next president.

Explanation: A divided Supreme Court rule said that the ruling Florida court which stated to manual recount of ballot in Florida was unconstitutional during the presidential election of 2000. The case was named as Bush v. Gore who were the candidates of the election. However this ruling of Supreme court remained as a controversial one among the people. Many said that this ruling had established the equal right of voting and electing. The supreme court said that Florida Supreme court is giving more protection to some ballots which unconstitutional. But the critics said that the ruling of supreme court was partial because it was a ruling that determined the president of the US. They said that the ruling was partial and and the Justices had political goal.

Answer:

The effect of the Court's ruling was to choose the next president.

From the statement ''As a women, she had not been raised to rule Austria'', we can see that the nobility and ruling was not in the hands of the women, but almost exclusively in the hands of the man. The man were the ones that were raised and thought how to rule when they grow up, while the women were largely neglected in that department, as they were not seen as good rulers, but more as a support for the ruler.

Despite all this, when a women came to power and to rule over the people, she actually proved all of that wrong, despite not being thought and raised to rule, she managed to make the country prosperous, peaceful, and nice for living, unlike some of her male successors.

Answer:

The results of the air war and the Battle of the Atlantic were that Allied leaders could go forward with their plans to invade France; American troops and supplies reached Europe; and that by 1945 Allied bombers had reduced Germany's capability to produce war materials.

Explanation:

The Battle of the Atlantic was the part of the Second World War that was fought on the North and South Atlantic as well as after the Soviet Union's entry into the war also on the Northern Arctic Ocean. The struggle was primarily between Nazi Germany and Britain, which were later allied with the United States. By far the most significant parties were the British fleet and the German submarines.

The United Kingdom was completely dependent on maritime traffic for the island's supply and the war on the Atlantic therefore developed into a force measurement between the British fleet and the German submarines trying to stave off transport to Britain. Fighting at sea already existed from the day the British declared war on Germany (September 3, 1939), but apart from the first half of the war, fighting between surface ships (battleships, cruisers and fighters, etc.) played a minor role. In the spring of 1941, Germany's foremost battleship Bismarck was sunk, and after that the German surface ships were no major threat to the Allies' ships and convoys. However, the submarines would prove to be a much worse opponent.

After Hitler's plan to invade Britain failed, the Germans decided to start the total war at sea. The goal was to starve the British to defeat and therefore all vessels on the way or suspected of being on their way to the UK were lowered. This, of course, also went beyond ordinary passenger ships. The Germans benefited from controlling the entire Atlantic coast from northern Norway to southern France. From there, the submarines were able to go out to sea and without warning attack all vessels belonging to the Allies.

This situation finally ended with the defeat of Germany, which allowed the British to be resupplied, and France to be liberated.

Answer:

A, C, D

Explanation

here you go

Answer:

decrease price.

Explanation:

If a business owner wants to increase demand for quantity, what this means is that he wants people to buy more of whatever he is selling. There are various ways in which this can be achieved, but one of them is by decreasing the price. Doing so will allow the customer to acquire a higher number of products with less money, which is likely to increase demand for the product, if everything else remains the same.

Because they would need a new leader in the Soviet Union and because of Stalins death the US would have to still fight with them. I think and hope that helps

Stalin's death had a profound impact on tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States. Following the passing of Stalin in March 1953, the Soviet Union began a phase of collaborative leadership in which a small group of leaders shared authority.

This period of leadership change resulted in an indefinite thaw in Cold War conflicts, and the Soviet Union proceeded on a path of forgiveness and greater openness.

President Dwight Eisenhower advocated increased psychological warfare to exploit leadership of discontent in Eastern Europe, and the United States maintained a containment strategy towards the Soviet Union.

As a result, the significance of the tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on Soviet Union, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30463937

#SPJ2

Answer:  yorktown virginia

Explanation:

on october 19, 1781

General Cornwallis surrendered to American and French forces at Yorktown, Virginia, on October 19, 1781, marking the end of major hostilities in the American Revolution.

General Cornwallis surrendered to the American and French forces commanded by George Washington at Yorktown, Virginia, on October 19, 1781.

The siege of Yorktown was meticulously planned with combined American and French armies amassing at Williamsburg, followed by a strategic march to Yorktown, leading to the entrapment of Cornwallis's army on the peninsula.

This major confrontation marked the last major action of the American Revolution, leading to the end of the war and American independence, which was later recognized in the Treaty of Paris in 1783.

Answer:

I would say b, because jim crow and the south's poor ecomomy are the two biggest reasons for the migration and better jobs in the north seems like a pretty big incentive. Hope this helps.

Explanation:

Answer:

1999

Explanation:

Lance Armstrong is a very interesting and very controversial person in the world of the sports, especially in his discipline, the cycling. When he started with cycling in the early 1990's Armstrong was showing nice potential, managing to win several tours, and parts of the Tour de France. Than he got a terrible news as he was diagnosed with testicular cancer. Luckily he managed to survive and returned to cycling. In the year of 1999, Armstrong won his first Tour de France, and after that he was dominating Tour de France for several years. Little that the other's knew that he was actually doping and that was the primary reason why he managed to dominate so easily. In 2012, Armstrong was stripped of his medals as it was officially confirmed that he was using substances that are not allowed. While this is very bad from sporting perspective, Armstrong actually became a hero, as he used his money and reputation in order to create centers for people who have cancer, and raised very big sum of money for the people who have this disease and for their curing.

Answer:

they all deal with the war in vietnam.

Explanation:

Answer:

Songs like "Fortunate Son" by Creedence Clearwater Revival, "Give Peace a Chance" by John Lennon and "I feel like I´m fixin´to Die Rag" by Country Joe and the Fish were just 3 popular songs out of 100 that dealt with the rejection of war and were composed to promote the ideals of peace.

Explanation:

Answer: It stopped the expansion of Islam into Europe.

In 732 CE, Charles Martel and his troops defeated the Muslims in France in the Battle of Tours. His victory prevented the Muslims to further expand into Europe.

Answer: Japan was defeated.

Explanation: Six months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States defeated Japan in one of the most decisive naval battles of World War II.

I am 99.99% sure the answer is D. I learnt this like last semester or something, so I’m 100% sure, but I’m very confident that it is D. Hope I gave you the right answer!

Answer:

deed

Explanation:

Answer: All those countries that accepted the aid and were not related to communism  or a dictatorship

The Marshall Plan (originally called the European Recovery Program, ERP) was announced by George Marshall, who was the United States Secretary of State in 1947.

The purpose of this plan was to help economically the European countries after the end of the Second World War and to prevent the growth of the communist movement that was gaining ground in post-war Occidental Europe.

Russia (then called the Soviet Union) immediately declined aid and ordered its allied countries to decline as well, considering it an imperialist strategy to seize the country's economic independence.

However, 18 countries accepted this aid, which was approved by the US Congress in April 1948 and lasted for 5 years:

It should be noted that Spain, which was under Franco's dictatorship, was excluded from the recovery plan.

The Marshall Plan offered economic aid to Western European countries after World War II, including France, West Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Italy, and Belgium, aiming to rebuild their economies and prevent the spread of Communism. The Soviet Union and its satellites rejected the aid. The Plan's success contributed to the recovery and political stabilization of Western Europe.

The European countries that could receive aid through the Marshall Plan included nations in Western Europe affected by the devastation of World War II. The United States launched the plan, officially known as the European Recovery Program, in 1948 and provided economic aid to help rebuild these countries and prevent the spread of Communism by fostering a stable and prosperous business climate. Notably, the countries of France, West Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Italy, and Belgium directly benefited from this aid. The Marshall Plan was also offered to the Soviet Union and its satellite states, but they rejected it and were thus excluded from the benefits.

Nevertheless, the aid extended to the Western European countries laid the groundwork for economic recovery and played a critical role in the establishment of the Common Market, which eventually led to the creation of the European Union (EU). The plan's implementation also benefited US businesses by opening new markets for their products in Europe's recovering economies.

The program's success was evident in the substantial recovery of Western Europe, especially in Germany, and the overall decline in support for Communist parties in the region by the early 1950s.

Answer: China

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Answer:

The date the United States entered the war = On April 6, 1917

The date of Treaty of Versailles = 28 June 1919

Explanation:

USA started fighting for it allies ( Britain, France, and Russia ) on April 6, 1917.

Over 2 million USA soldiers fought on the battle fields. US citizens were not in favour of entering the war. The date of the Treaty of Versailles is 28 June 1919 and it is the most important of the peace treaties that brought World War I to an end.

Hello There!

To prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia is why did President Kennedy get the United States involved in the Vietnam War so the reason was the usage of containment policy.

Answer:

B is the answer, To prevent the spread of communism.

Explanation:

The USA hates communism, yunno.

Hello,

There were several different factors that allowed for the persecution and extermination of minority groups. For example: Hitlers feelings about these groups were expressed in the book he wrote and his speeches to the German people. Since he had absolute control over the government and military, he could have individuals he didn't like killed at any time he would like. Also keep in mind economic problems were the Jewish people. These posters and speeches were spread so often that people started to believe them. This allowed for the extermination and persecution of individuals in Germany, as average citizens saw nothing wrong with getting rid of these people who were causing the problems.

Answer:

This armistice signed on July 27, 1953, formally ended the war in Korea.

The Korean Armistice Agreement was signed on July 27, 1953, creating a DMZ between North and South Korea. The Paris Peace Accords ending the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War were signed in January 1973. World War I was concluded with an armistice on November 11, 1918.

Historical Cease Fire Agreements

The question poses an inquiry about the exact timing of a cease fire agreement, which requires historical context to provide an accurate response. Various cease fire agreements were signed at different times in history related to specific conflicts. The Korean Armistice Agreement, which ended active hostilities of the Korean War, was signed on July 27, 1953. This established a Demilitarized Zone between North and South Korea near the thirty-eighth parallel. During the Vietnam War, after strenuous conflict and negotiation, the Paris Peace Accords were signed in January 1973, marking the end of the United States' military involvement in Vietnam. Additionally, World War I was concluded with an armistice signed on November 11, 1918.

Each of these cease fire agreements had significant political and social implications, often leading to complex post-war situational analyses. The Korean agreement resulted in ongoing tensions and a technical state of war, as no peace treaty has been signed to date. The Paris Peace Accords led to a temporary peace, which eventually collapsed, resulting in the unification of Vietnam under communist control. The World War I armistice ended four years of brutal combat and set the stage for the Treaty of Versailles.

The Zimmermann Telegram proposed an alliance between Germany and Mexico if the U.S. got involved in World War I. It suggested that Mexico could regain lost territories with German support. However, its discovery led to increased U.S. support for entering the war.

The Zimmermann Telegram, sent in 1917, came from Germany and proposed an alliance with Mexico in the event of U.S. involvement in World War I. Even though the hope was for the U.S. to remain neutral, the telegram hinted at a plan for Mexico to ally with Germany, receive financial support, and regain lost territories, including Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona if the U.S. entered the war. However, rather than any of the options provided, the telegram's discovery led to D. It engaged Americans and generated U.S. popular support for the declaration of war. This is because the revelation of the telegram's contents incensed the American public towards Germany and pushed the U.S. towards entering World War I.

https://brainly.com/question/22240342

#SPJ3

Final answer:

The Zimmermann Telegram suggested a German-Mexican alliance against the US and promised Mexico the return of lost territories. Upon its public release, it caused US outrage, influencing American public opinion to support a declaration of war against Germany, leading to option D being the correct response.

Explanation:

The incident involving the Zimmermann Telegram had a significant impact on the United States and its stance in World War I. The telegram was a message from German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmermann to the German ambassador in Mexico, suggesting that Mexico ally with Germany if the United States entered the war on the side of the Allies.

The telegram also promised that Germany would support Mexico in regaining territories lost to the United States, such as Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona.

When the British intercepted and made this telegram public, it caused outrage in the United States. The public sentiment shifted, and it generated popular support for the United States to declare war.

This shift in public opinion was crucial as it influenced President Woodrow Wilson's decision to ask Congress for a declaration of war against Germany. It is important to note that the correct answer to the student's question is option D: It engaged Americans and generated U.S. popular support for the declaration of war.

Answer:

What was the biggest turning point of the French and Indian war? The Battle of the Plains of Abraham ( or siege of Quebec) was certainly the turning point in the French and Indian war, against the French in particular. General James Wolfe defeated the French army under Louis-Joseph de Montcalm.

Explanation:

Answer:

They refused to pay the tax

Answer:

Ancient Egypt

Explanation:

The Ancient Egyptians had their empire roughly on the territory of what is the modern day nation of Egypt, and small parts of Sudan at certain times. This civilization is well known for worshiping the god Ra, the Sun god. This was actually crucial when it came to the creation of their calendar, as they were worshiping the Sun, its cycles, and they were very well aware of all of them. Since the Earth needs approximately 365 days to circle around the Sun, that is also the amount of time needed for the Sun to be in the same position as the position in which it was on the sky taken as a starting point, thus the Egyptians made their calendar 365 days.

1876 was an important year for America because it was America's 100th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. This signifies the unity amongst Americans which establishes a strong centripetal force.

The year 1876 was important for America because of the contested presidential election, the Compromise of 1877, and the economic downturn caused by the Panic of 1873.

The year 1876 was important for America for several reasons. It marked the contested presidential election between Republican Rutherford B. Hayes and Democrat Samuel J. Tilden, which resulted in the Compromise of 1877. This compromise removed federal troops from the South, allowing Southern Democrats to regain control and effectively end Reconstruction. Additionally, the economic downturn caused by the Panic of 1873 had a significant impact on the political landscape, causing the Republicans to lose ground.

https://brainly.com/question/33726506

#SPJ3