How many colonies sent people to the stamp act Congress?

The Senate's primary defense against a filibuster is the cloture rule, which requires a super majority of 60 votes to invoke. Exceptions to the cloture rule exist for certain types of legislation.

The Senate's primary defense against a filibuster is the cloture rule. Cloture is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to end a filibuster and proceed to a vote on a bill. In order to invoke cloture, a super majority of 60 votes is required.

For example, if senators are filibustering a bill and the majority party wants to end the debate and move forward, they can call for a cloture vote. If at least 60 senators vote in favor of cloture, the filibuster is broken and the bill can proceed to a vote.

However, it's worth noting that there are certain exceptions to the cloture rule. Filibusters are not permitted on the annual budget reconciliation act, and for judicial nominations, only 51 votes are needed to invoke cloture.

It is reasonable because Jose Gutierrez de Lara was a Revolutionary War fighter. As a result, the right response to this question is Option (C).

José Gutiérrez de Lara was brought up in Texas.  He was fiercely independent because of his frontier upbringing and the revolutionary principles that were permeating society as a result of the American Revolution. He devoted most of his life to the struggle to extricate Texas and all of Mexico from Spanish rule.

As the first legal governor of the state of Tamaulipas and a native of Revilla, present-day Ciudad Guerrero, Mexico, José Bernardo Maximiliano Gutiérrez de Lara was a proponent and organizer of Mexican independence.

In order to start the process of liberating Mexico from Spanish rule, Gutiérrez enlisted and armed twenty-one soldiers in Spanish Texas. He interacted with the Indians and persuaded them to join him in the war against the Spanish, along with José Menchaca.

Hence, Option (C ) is the right answer.

Learn more about José Gutiérrez de Lara, from:

brainly.com/question/18694372

#SPJ2

Current U.S. immigration policies, reflecting trends towards more exclusionary approaches reminiscent of pre-1965 policies, have sparked debates over the balance between national interests and immigrants' rights. These policies, including those leading to the separation of families and the construction of barriers, underscore a pivotal moment in the evolving discourse on immigration.

Immigration Policies in the 21st Century

The question of whether the United States should prioritize policies of pluralism, assimilation, or amalgamation is central to contemporary debates on immigration. Given the recent policies involving incarcerating undocumented children and separating them from their parents, as well as the construction of 'the wall', it appears that current U.S. immigration policies may lean towards a more exclusionary stance. This approach reflects a shift reminiscent of the pre-1965 era, which was characterized by restrictive immigration policies.

In conjunction with the global political climate, including Great Britain's Brexit and the rise of far-right ideologies in Europe, the U.S. seems to be part of a larger trend of questioning open immigration policies. This shift has ignited debates on whether the nation should prioritize the rights and opportunities for immigrants or focus on national interests first, underpinned by concerns over national identity and economic security.

However, the dynamics of immigration are complex, involving challenges and benefits that span economic, cultural, and humanitarian dimensions. The discourse often contrasts the historical view of the U.S. as a 'nation of immigrants' with more recent concerns over legal and illegal immigration, underscoring the ongoing evolution of immigration policy and its impact on both immigrants and the nation.

Answer:

It was one of the first battles of the French and Indian War

Explanation:

Final answer:

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 and the Mississippi Territory Land Ordinance of 1798 were two successful ordinances created under the Articles of Confederation. The Northwest Ordinance established a process for admitting new states and prohibited slavery, while the Mississippi Territory Land Ordinance organized the territory and generated revenue through land sales.

Explanation:

One successful ordinance created under the Articles of Confederation was the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. It established a process for admitting new states to the Union, and it prohibited slavery in the Northwest Territory. This ordinance ensured that new states would have the same rights as the original thirteen states and laid the foundation for westward expansion.

Another successful ordinance was the Mississippi Territory Land Ordinance of 1798. It organized the Mississippi Territory and provided for the sale of land to finance the federal government. This ordinance helped to raise revenue and stimulate economic growth in the newly acquired territory.

Answer:

C. The Church created a list of Forbidden Books to stop the spread of Protestant ideas.

Explanation:

The Index Librorum Prohibitorum, in English "Index of prohibited books", is a list of those publications that the Catholic Church classified as pernicious books for the faith and that Catholics were not authorized to read; It also established, in its first part, the norms of the Church regarding the censorship of books. It was promulgated for the first time at the request of the Council of Trent by Pope Pius IV on March 24, 1564 - printed in Venice by Paolo Manuzio. The Index knew more than forty editions, in charge of the Congregation of the Index, created by Pope Pius V in 1571. The last edition was that of 1948 until on February 8, 1966, Pope Paul VI suppressed it.

This order was applied especially when the rupture of Western Christianity occurred on the occasion of the dissemination of the Protestant Reformation that found a formidable ally in print. Thus, in 1523 the king Carlos V prohibited the diffusion of the works of Martin Luther in all his domains, including the Hispanic Monarchy and the Germanic Empire, which was ratified the following year for the entire Catholic orb by Pope Clement VII.

In this context of religious and political crisis, some Catholic authorities and institutions - faithful to Roman and papal orthodoxy against Protestants, supporters of Luther's ideas, and other reformers - make lists or "indexes" of books forbidden for being considered heretical.

In 1559, Pope Paul IV promulgated the Index librorum prohibitorum of the Roman Inquisition, but the one that covered the entire field of Catholic Christianity was promulgated at the request of the Council of Trent by Pope Pius IV on March 24, 1564.

Final answer:

The Model T was the most successful passenger car due to mass production, the use of vanadium steel alloy, and affordability.

Explanation:

The Model T was the most successful passenger car for several reasons:

D. they believed in many gods and goddesses, associated with nature

Hope This Helps ^_^

Answer:

It built roads, railways, and other types of infrastructure.

It imposed a tariff on trade to raise money.

It increased the amount of exported goods.

Explanation:

After World War 2, Mexican goverment faced a period of modernization, while building roads, railways and key infrastructure was needed in order to conect North to South and East to West. The driving force behind was the increase of trade exports. Railways have been developing since Porfirio Diaz became this process but his ruling had favored certain regions while leaving other areas unattended. His rule ended in 1910, as civil war in Mexico rose further reconstructing took place.

Following administrations got closer ties to the US in order to follow some macroeconomic indicators.

To increase goverment funds, a tariff was imposed.  Still the goverment contracted international debt to assume that the economy would be fueled.

The increase in exports made significant trade balance with the US and Canada, the main importing countries from raw materials and labor force.

Questionable details add interest to a text because they cause readers to ask questions and make personal connections with the text.

I had the same question the answer is:

-The assemblies had gained experience and confidence.

-The assemblies believed the colonists had a right to representation under their royal charters.

-The governor frequently could not control the assembly.

Hope this helped :)

In the 1750-1760 period, colonial assemblies gained experience and confidence, believed in the colonists' right to representation, and often defied the control of governors.

In the years 1750-1760, the relationship between governors and colonial assemblies went through several changes. First, the assemblies were gaining experience and confidence, becoming more effective in their roles. Second, the assemblies believed that the colonists had a right to representation under their royal charters, showing a growing sense of self-governance. And finally, the governors frequently could not control the assemblies, indicating a weakening of their authority.

https://brainly.com/question/31682497

#SPJ6

Answer:    A. Governments should respect the fundamental rights of  

                 humans

Explanation:  John Locke (1632-1704) was an enlightening philosopher who advocated the thesis that all people were born free and that they all had guaranteed natural rights, such as the right to life, freedom and property. These natural rights are the foundation that belongs to everyone, irrespective of social order, or the dogma determined by someone else according to their interests. In this sense, people have a legitimate right to choose their own government and transfer these rights to it. Thus, the government would protect the interests of citizens, thus creating stable and safe conditions for free life and realization of their natural rights. This means that if the government does not protect the interests of the citizens, it can be replaced, and in that sense Locke advocated even a revolution as a means of realizing natural rights. It is clear that this way through their elected government, in essence the majority rule, and in order to make the government easier to control, it should be separated into executive and legislative ones. Today's vocabulary would mean that the government is divided into different offices. Although this is one of the options offered, and it could also be the correct answer to the question, however, this argument is also in the service of providing a government which should respect the  fundamental rights of citizens.