If one of the satellites is at a distance of 20,000 km from you, what percent accuracy in the distance is required if we desire a 2-meter uncertainty

The greatest possible distance from the mirror to the point where the reflected rays meet is infinite for a flat mirror, as the reflected rays never actually converge, creating a virtual image.

The greatest possible distance d from the mirror to the point where the reflected rays meet would be when the object distance do approaches the focal length f of the mirror from the right side, causing the image distance d to approach negative infinity, indicating that the reflected rays would never converge in real space. This situation describes the formation of a virtual image where the rays appear to come from. In a flat mirror, the focal length is technically at infinity since parallel rays remain parallel after reflection and never actually converge. Therefore, in a practical sense, when considering a flat mirror, the reflected rays appear to converge at a distance behind the mirror equal to the object's distance in front of the mirror, which is defined as d = -do.

The greatest possible distance (d) from the mirror to the point where the reflected rays meet is [tex]\( \frac{L}{2} \)[/tex], which is the focal length of the mirror when it is at the center of the spherical surface.

To understand why the greatest possible distance (d) from the mirror to the point where the reflected rays meet is [tex]\( \frac{L}{2} \)[/tex], let's consider the behavior of light rays reflecting off a mirror.

When a light ray reflects off a mirror, the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection. This means that the path of the light ray before and after reflection are symmetric with respect to the normal to the mirror surface at the point of incidence.

For the reflected rays to meet at a point, they must converge. The best way to visualize this is to consider a light ray that travels parallel to the mirror's surface. After reflection, this ray will appear to come from a point behind the mirror, known as the focal point. The distance from the mirror to this focal point is the focal length of the mirror.

In the case of a flat mirror, the focal length is infinite because parallel rays remain parallel after reflection and do not converge to a single point. However, if we consider a spherical mirror, the focal length (f) is finite and is related to the radius of curvature (R) of the mirror by the equation [tex]\( f = \frac{R}{2} \)[/tex].

Now, let's consider the scenario where the mirror can be moved horizontally. The greatest possible distance (d) from the mirror to the point where the reflected rays meet would occur when the mirror is at the center of the spherical surface it is a part of. At this point, the focal point of the mirror would be at a distance equal to the focal length (f) from the mirror's surface.

Given that the length of the mirror is (L), and the radius of curvature (R) is equal to (L) (since the mirror is a segment of a sphere), we can substitute (R) with (L) in the focal length equation. Thus, the focal length (f) is [tex]\( \frac{L}{2} \)[/tex].

Final answer:

When a plastic comb is run through hair, the comb gains electrons and becomes negatively charged due to the transfer of electrons, which is a result of static electricity caused by friction. The hair loses electrons but does not gain protons or lose protons, as protons do not move freely like electrons.

Explanation:

When people use plastic combs on their hair, the combs can become negatively charged due to static electricity. This happens due to the transfer of electrons from one object to another. In this case, the true statements about the situation are:

The comb gains electrons.

The hair loses electrons.

Protons are not exchanged in static electricity because they are located within the atomic nucleus and do not move freely. Therefore, it is the gain or loss of electrons that causes the static charge. The friction between the comb and the hair can cause electrons to be transferred from the hair to the comb, which is why the comb becomes negatively charged.

The maximum height is: hmax  = v0² sin² α / 2 g
The horizontal range is: x = v0² sin 2 α / g

So we are given that:

x = 14.5 hmax

v0² sin 2 α / g = 14.5 v0² sin² α / 2 g
7.25 sin² α = 2 sin α cos α    
7.25 sin α = 2 cos α  
7.25 tan α = 2
tan α = 0.27586
α = tan^(-1) 0.27586
α = 15.42°
The angle of projection is 15.42°

Archimedes' principle states that a completely submerged object always displaces its own volume of water, creating an upward buoyant force.

In physics, an object that is completely submerged underwater will always displace its own volume of water.

This is known as Archimedes' principle, which states that the buoyant force acting on an object is equal to the weight of the fluid it displaces.

For example, if a 1 liter object is submerged in water, it will displace 1 liter of water. This displacement results in an upward force, called the buoyant force, that opposes the weight of the object.

https://brainly.com/question/36883204

#SPJ6

a force must act on it

During the launch, the person was accelerating against the gravity, therefore the equation we use in this case is:

F = m * (g + a)

where m is mass = 60 kg, g is gravity = 9.81 m/s^2, a is acceleration = 4 * g

therefore:

F = m * (g + 4 g)

F = m * 5 g

F = 60 kg * 5 * (9.81 m/s^2)

F = 2943 N

The apparent weight of a 60 kg rider during the launch of a power tower ride experiencing 4g of acceleration is 2940 N. This is calculated by adding the force due to the rider's weight and the force due to the ride's acceleration.

To calculate the apparent weight of a rider during the launch, we need to consider the gravitational force (weight) and the additional force due to the 4g acceleration of the ride. The weight of the rider is calculated using the formula: Weight = Mass x Gravity, where mass is 60 kg and gravity is 9.8 m/s². This gives a weight of approximately 588 N (Newton).

The force due to the ride's acceleration is calculated using the formula: Force = Mass x Acceleration, where in this case acceleration is 4g or 4 x 9.8 m/s², which gives approximately 2352 N.

The apparent weight of the rider is therefore the sum of these two forces: 588 N + 2352 N = 2940 N.

So a 60 kg rider's apparent weight during the launch is 2940 N.

https://brainly.com/question/14323035

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

A hypothesis or system of hypothesis is the core of a research. It's the possible solution to a problem that researchers established when looking for theories or events to prove it.

Final answer:

The chemical formula for mercury(I) nitrate is Hg2(NO3)2, featuring a Hg₂²+ dimeric cation.

Explanation:

The chemical formula for mercury(I) nitrate is Hg2(NO3)2. This compound is created when a large excess of mercury reacts with dilute nitric acid. Mercury(I) compounds are unique because they contain a Hg₂²+ ion, which is a dimeric cation where two mercury atoms are bonded together, each with a +1 oxidation state, giving the overall molecule a +2 charge. It's important to note that the compound must be handled with care due to the toxicity of mercury compounds.

The percent uncertainty in this question refers to how much measured values could deviate from a standard or expected value. For this example, considering a good-quality measuring tape that can be off by 0.50cm over a distance of 20m, the percent uncertainty is calculated as 0.0025%

The concept this question is referring to is percent uncertainty, which is a quantitative measure of how much measured values deviate from a standard or expected value. It's widely used in physics and engineering. In a practical context, when you're using a measuring tape, it's unlikely you'll get a perfect measurement every time. This could be due to factors like the smallest division on the tape or the person using it having bad eyesight. In this particular example, measuring tape error was 0.50 cm over a distance of 20 m (or 2000 cm).

The percent uncertainty is calculated by dividing the uncertainty (the amount the measurement could be off by) by the measured value, and then multiplying by 100% to express it as a percentage.

So, percent uncertainty = (uncertainty/measured value) * 100%.
For this scenario, percent uncertainty = (0.50 cm / 20000 cm) * 100% which equals to 0.0025%.

So, in this example, the percent uncertainty is 0.0025%.

https://brainly.com/question/30298257

#SPJ12

The percent uncertainty of the measuring tape is 0.025%.

To find the percent uncertainty of a measurement, you use the following formula:

[tex]\text{Percent Uncertainty} = \left( \frac{\text{Absolute Uncertainty}}{\text{Measured Value}} \right) \times 100 \%[/tex]

Given:

First, convert the Measured Value to centimeters because the absolute uncertainty is given in centimeters.

[tex]20 \text{ m} = 2000 \text{ cm}[/tex]

Now, plug the values into the formula:

[tex]\text{Percent Uncertainty} = \left( \frac{0.50 \text{ cm}}{2000 \text{ cm}} \right) \times 100 \%[/tex]

Calculate the result:

[tex]\text{Percent Uncertainty} = \left( \frac{0.50}{2000} \right) \times 100 \% = 0.025 \%[/tex]

The maximum theoretical flow rate through a supersonic nozzle is determined by the nozzle's design and the properties of the fluid flowing through it.

In supersonic flow, the flow properties change drastically, and the flow behavior is described by compressible fluid dynamics equations, including the Mach number.

The maximum Mach number that can be achieved in a supersonic flow is 1, also known as Mach 1.

Any Mach number greater than 1 corresponds to supersonic flow. The design of the nozzle, specifically its converging and diverging sections, determines how well the flow can be accelerated to supersonic speeds and how efficiently it can expand to match the downstream pressure.

Learn more about theoretical flow rate here: https://brainly.com/question/29437529

#SPJ2

Final answer:

To avoid hitting the ledge when jumping from a cliff, calculate the time of flight using the height of the cliff and gravity, then use that time to find the minimum horizontal velocity needed to clear the ledge width.

Explanation:

Minimum Speed to Miss the Ledge

To find the minimum speed required for a person to miss the ledge when jumping from a cliff, one must analyze the motion in two dimensions: vertical and horizontal. The vertical distance (h) and the width of the ledge (w) are crucial to determine the time in the air and the minimum horizontal velocity needed.

The vertical motion is independent of the horizontal motion and can be analyzed using the formula for the time of flight under gravity which is t = [tex]\sqrt(2h/g)[/tex], where g is the acceleration due to gravity. Once the time of flight is calculated, we use this time to find the minimum horizontal velocity (vmin) necessary to travel the width of the ledge w by the formula vmin = w/t. This is the minimum speed the person needs just as they leave the edge of the cliff.

For a ledge 1.75m wide and cliff 8.00m high, first, calculate the time of flight with t = [tex]\sqrt((2*8.00m)/9.81m/s2)[/tex]. Then, use this time to calculate the horizontal velocity with v min = 1.75m / t.

Considering a box sitting in the back of a pickup. The pickup accelerates to the right, and because the bed of the pickup is sticky, the box does not slide around the truck when this happens. But the force acting on the box is left.

Force is responsible for the motion of an object. it produces acceleration in the body. According to newton's second law force is mass times acceleration i.e. F =ma. Its SI unit is N which is equivalent to kg.m/s².

There are two types of forces, balanced force and unbalanced force.

When Net force acting on a body is zero then we call it as balanced force. .

Unbalanced forces are those when resultant of all the forces is not equal to zero is called as unbalanced force. unbalanced force is responsible for the motion of the body.

Whatever we are talking about force in this problem is called as pseudo force, it same as we feel in the bus when we are standing in the bus suddenly driver brakes we go ahead in the bus or we feel forward force.

Pseudo force is not actual force but it can felt, centrifugal force is a type of pseudo force.

In this problem, as pickup accelerates, according to newtons first law box in the pickup tend to have its original velocity(0 if pickup is at rest or v when it is in motion). because of this when pickup accelerates right, box feel pseudo force in the opposite direction(Left).

Hence left is correct.

To know more pseudo force :

https://brainly.com/question/30076572

#SPJ2.

Final answer:

Explanation of calculating the distance between two deer in a field using trigonometry and the Pythagorean theorem.

Explanation:

Given information:

Deer b is 64.9 m from deer a at an angle of 53.4° north of west. Deer c is 77.9 m north of east relative to deer a. The distance between deer b and c is 96.8 m.

To find: Distance between deer a and c.

Calculation:

Using trigonometry, we can find the distances and then apply the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the distance between deer a and c.

Distance between deer a and c is approximately 59.2 meters.

By replacing a 40 W incandescent bulb with an 8 W LED bulb and leaving the lights on for 24 hours, you would be saving 768 Wh of energy per day.

The question is asking how much energy you can save by switching from a 40 W incandescent lightbulb to an 8 W LED bulb. The energy use of a bulb is determined by its power (wattage) and the time it is turned on. To calculate the energy saved, we need to compare the energy use of the two different bulbs, when they are turned on for the same time.

Step 1: We start by calculating the daily energy consumption of the 40 W incandescent light bulb. Energy (E) in watt-hours (Wh) can be calculated using the formula E = P*t, where P is the power in watts (W) and t is the time in hours. Therefore, for the 40 W incandescent bulb used 24 hours a day: E1 = 40 W * 24 hours = 960 Wh/day.

Step 2: Then we calculate the daily energy consumption of the 8 W LED bulb. For the LED bulb: E2 = 8 W * 24 hours = 192 Wh/day.

Step 3: To find the daily amount of energy saved, we subtract the energy use of the LED bulb from the energy use of the incandescent bulb: E saved = E1 - E2 = 960 Wh/day - 192 Wh/day = 768 Wh/day. Therefore, by replacing a 40 W incandescent lightbulb with an 8 W LED bulb and leaving the lights on for 24 hours a day, you can save 768 Wh of energy each day.

https://brainly.com/question/36600770

#SPJ2

Answer : Distance, d = 40 mi.

Explanation :

It is given that,

Fiora starts riding her bike at 20 mi/h. after a while, she slows down to 12 mi/h and maintains that speed for the rest of the trip. the whole trip of 70 mi takes her 4.5 h.

Let for t hours she traveled at 20 mi/h. So, for ( 4.5 - t) h she has traveled with a speed of 12 mi/h.

We know that,

distance covered = speed × time

20 mi/h × t +12 mi/h (4.5 h - t) = 70 mi

t = 2 h

So, the distance covered in 2 h is, d = 20 mi/h × 2 h = 40 mi.

Hence, this is the required solution.

Answer:

For a: The original speed of the truck is 4.76 m/s

For b: The acceleration of the truck is [tex]-0.23m/s^2[/tex]

Explanation:

Speed is defined as the rate at which an object moves with respect to time.

To calculate the time taken for the given speed, we use the equation:

[tex]s=\frac{d}{t}[/tex]

where,

s = speed of the truck

d = distance traveled = 40.0 m

t = time taken by truck = 8.50 s

Putting values in above equation, we get:

[tex]s=\frac{40.0m}{8.50s}=4.76m/s[/tex]

Hence, the original speed of the truck is 4.76 m/s

Acceleration is defined as the rate of change of velocity with respect to time.

Mathematically,

[tex]a=\frac{v-u}{t}[/tex]

where,

v = final velocity  of the truck = 2.80 m/s

u = initial velocity  of the truck = 4.76 m/s

t = time taken  = 8.50 s

Putting values in above equation, we get:

[tex]a=\frac{2.80-4.76}{8.50}=-0.23m/s^2[/tex]

Negative sign represents slowing down or deceleration.

Hence, the acceleration of the truck is [tex]-0.23m/s^2[/tex]

The number of electrons flowing in a current can be found by multiplying the current by the time, and then dividing by the charge of a single electron. Use the value of 50 microamps for current, 60 seconds for time, and 1.6x10^-19 Coulombs for the charge of an electron.

To answer this question, we first need to understand a couple key concepts such as electric current and the charge of an electron. Electric current is defined as the rate at which charge is flowing, and in this case, 50 microamperes microamps) means that there are 50 microCoulombs of charge flowing each second. The charge of an electron is approximately 1.6x10^-19 Coulombs.

Now, we can use these values to calculate how many electrons are flowing in a minute. The first step is to convert minutes to seconds, giving us 60 seconds. Multiply the current (50 microCoulombs or 50x10^-6 Coulombs per second) by the time in seconds (60 seconds). This will tell you how much charge flows in one minute. Finally, divide the total charge by the charge of a single electron (1.6x10^-19 Coulombs) to find the number of electrons. Remember to round your final answer to two significant figures as requested.

https://brainly.com/question/3478825

#SPJ3

Final answer:

The atomic mass unit is based on the carbon-12 atom, where 1 atomic mass unit is equal to one-twelfth of the mass of a carbon-12 atom.

Explanation:

The universal standard that serves as the basis for the atomic mass unit is the mass of a carbon-12 atom. An atomic mass unit (usually abbreviated as amu or u) is defined as one-twelfth of the mass of a single carbon-12 atom. This provides a convenient scale for measuring atomic masses, as it results in both protons and neutrons having masses very close to 1 u, given their similar mass. Electrons have a much smaller mass and thus make a negligible contribution to the atomic mass. To express this in more familiar units, 1 u is equivalent to 1.6605×10-27 kilograms.