If you add meoh to cocl2(alc)2, the cocl2(alc)2 concentration will change. what are the two reasons for this concentration change?

Answer:

D

Explanation:

The term falsifiable refers to the possibility that a theory or hypothesis can be proven wrong. Each theory has the capacity to be proven wrong through experimentation, however option D has no way of being proven wrong (even though it cannot be proven right), because this theory is about what happened before humans could keep records. So there is no way it can be proven wrong, and hence it is not a falsifiable hypothesis.

A three-step extraction procedure is more effective than a one-stage extraction. a) 21.11 g is the total malononitrile extracted. b) 18.07 g is the total malononitrile extracted.

In chemistry, the term "extraction" refers to the procedure of removing one or more components from a mixture based on the differences in their physical or chemical properties. This method is frequently employed to separate desired components from intricate combinations. Transferring the target substance from one phase (often a liquid phase) into another phase, where it can be more easily purified or analysed, is the aim of extraction.

Kd for malononitrile in ether/water = 20/13.3

                                                            = 1.5

(a) 1.5 = [(x/100)/(30 - x)/300]

0.15 - 0.005x = 0.01x

x = 10 g

amount left in water = 30 - 10

                                 = 20 g

1.5 = [(x/100)/(20 - x)/300]

0.1 - 0.005x = 0.01x

x = 6.67 g

amount left in water = 20 - 6.67

                                = 13.33 g

1.5 = [(x/100)/(13.33 - x)/300]

0.067 - 0.005x = 0.01x

x = 4.44 g

amount left in water = 13.33 - 4.44

                                 = 8.89 g

Total malononitrile extracted = 21.11 g

(b) 1.5 = [(x/300)/(30 - x)/300]

0.15 - 0.005x = 0.0033x

x = 18.07 g

amount of malononitrile extracted = 18.07 g

To know more about extraction, here:

https://brainly.com/question/34678893

#SPJ12

Final answer:

To recover malononitrile by ether extraction, multiple smaller extractions are generally more efficient due to the solubility dynamics and distribution ratio between ether and water. This efficiency is owing to the partition coefficient (K) that favors the transfer of malononitrile into the ether phase, allowing for better separation and recovery.

Explanation:

To calculate malononitrile recovery by extraction with ether, we utilize its distribution ratio (K) derived from solubility data in ether and water. The solubility of malononitrile in ether at room temperature is 20.0 g/100 ml, and in water, it's 13.3 g/100 ml, giving K = 20/13.3.

Part A: Three 100-mL Portions of Ether

For each 100-mL extraction, we calculate the weight of malononitrile extracted into the ether, x, using an iterative process:

Mathematically, this considers solute partitioning for each step and re-calculates the residual amount in water.

Part B: One 300-mL Portion of Ether

The extraction with one 300-mL portion uses the total volume of ether to extract the malononitrile at once. This method may not be as efficient as multiple extractions due to the diminishing marginal returns on mass transferred per unit of solvent as the solvent becomes saturated.

Ultimately, the mass of malononitrile recovered is influenced by the distribution ratio, the volume of ether, and the strategy of extraction, showing that multiple smaller extractions are generally more efficient than a single, large-volume extraction.

Answer: Epipelagic zone

Explanation:

The epipelagic zone is the zone which exists over the surface of water. It is also called as the sunlight zone as it receives the maximum and direct sunlight from the sun. It is also called as photosynthetic zone as the sunlight is utilized by the plants and small phytoplanktons to conduct photosynthesis. This zone exhibit lowest water pressure as it lies in the superficial layers of the water body.

The reaction is limited by the amount of Lithium available. With the given amount of Lithium and Nitrogen gas, the maximum amount of Li3N that could be produced is 4.726 moles.

The question is looking for the maximum amount of Li3N that can be produced from given amounts of Li and N2. According to the chemical equation 6 Li + N2 → 2 Li3N, six moles of Li react with one mole of N2 to produce two moles of Li3N. Hence, the Li:N2:Li3N mole ratio is 6:1:2. If you have 14.18 moles of Li and 16.37 moles of N2, the reaction is limited by Li because it would require 16.37 moles of N2 to entirely consume 98.22 moles of Li (16.37 moles * 6). But since you only have 14.18 moles of Li, this will limit the formation of Li3N. Therefore, the maximum amount of Li3N that could be produced is 2/6 * 14.18 moles, which equals to 4.726 moles of Li3N.

https://brainly.com/question/34137415

#SPJ2

Answer:

the arrangement and types of atoms

Explanation:

A rain puddle drying up is a physical change, known as evaporation, which occurs when liquid water turns into vapor due to higher temperatures and varying humidity levels.

When a rain puddle dries up, this is an example of a physical change, specifically, the process of evaporation. In this process, water transforms from a liquid state to a gaseous state; this occurs when the temperature is warm, which facilitates the movement of water molecules faster, allowing them to escape into the air. The amount of water vapor the air can hold increases with higher temperatures, and the evaporation rate is also influenced by how saturated the air is with moisture. On the other hand, sublimation is a physical change where ice turns directly into vapor without going through the liquid stage, which can occur during cold, dry conditions. Similarly, transpiration involves the physical change of water moving through a plant and evaporating into the atmosphere, and condensation is the process where water vapor turns back into liquid, such as when moisture forms on the outside of a cold water bottle.

Answer: 175.10 g

Explanation:

Total weight of the package = 1.33 lbs

[tex]1 lbs=454 g[/tex]

So, 1.33 lbs =[tex]1.33\times 454=603.82g[/tex]

Amount of fat in the given weight = 29%

Hence fat in grams in package =[tex]\frac{29}{100}\times 603.82=175.10 g[/tex]

Final answer:

The student observed a chemical reaction characterized by a color change and the formation of a new substance, indicating an energy transfer. Such changes signify that the original red powder has chemically altered into a new material.

Explanation:

Based on the description of the red powder that darkens before changing into a shiny silvery liquid upon heating, the student can conclude that a chemical reaction has occurred. This conclusion is supported by several indications that a chemical change has taken place. Color change and the formation of a new substance (silver liquid from a red powder) provide evidence that original substances have been transformed into different materials with distinct properties.

Furthermore, such changes are also indicative of the possibility that energy transfer has occurred, evidenced by the exothermic reaction that produces heat. This would be consistent with the visual clues that suggest a chemical reaction is likely taking place according to provided reference summaries.

The Mg element is the reducing agent and the Fe element is the oxidizing agent

The oxidation-reduction reaction or abbreviated as Redox is a chemical reaction in which there is a change in oxidation number

3 basic theories explain this Redox concept:

The oxidation reaction is the binding of a substance with oxygen. (O₂)

For example:

2SO₂ + O₂ ----> 2SO₃

The reduction reaction is the release of oxygen from a substance.

For example:

2CuO → 2Cu + O₂

Oxidation is an electron release event

Example:

2F ---> 2Fe³⁺ + 6e⁻

The reduction is an electron capture event

Example:

3O₂ + 6e⁻ ---> 3O²⁻

Oxidation is an increase/increase in oxidation number, while reduction is a decrease in oxidation number.

In the redox reaction, it is also known

Reducing agents are substances that experience oxidation

The oxidizing agent is a substance that is reduced

The formula for determining Oxidation Numbers in general:

1. Single element atomic oxidation number = 0. Examples of Ar, Mg, Cu, Fe, N₂, O₂, etc. = 0

Group IA (Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, and Fr): +1

Group IIA (Be, Mg, Ca, Sr and Ba): +2

H in compound = +1, except metal hydride compounds (Hydrogen which binds to IA or IIA groups) oxidation number H= -1, for example, LiH, MgH₂, etc.

2. Oxidation number O in compound = -2, except OF2 = + 2 and in peroxide (Na₂O₂, BaO₂) = -1 and superoxide, for example KO₂ = -1/2.

3 The oxidation number in an uncharged compound = 0,

Total oxidation number in ion = ion charge, Example NO₃⁻ = -1

Redox reactions are reactions that are accompanied by changes in oxidation numbers, so what must be examined is whether there are elements that experience changes in oxidation numbers in the reaction

Let's look at the reaction

Mg(s)+Fe²⁺(aq)→Mg²⁺(aq)+Fe(s)

Let see the change in the oxidation number of each element

Mg on the left = 0 (single element)

Fe²⁺ on the left = +2 ( ion charge)

Mg on the right = +2 ( ion charge)

Fe on the right = 0 (single element)

Means that the element Mg has increased oxidation number from 0 to +2 so that it experiences an oxidation reaction and acts as a reducing agent

While Fe has decreased the oxidation number from +2 to 0, so it has a reduction reaction and acts as an oxidizer

an oxidation-reduction reaction

brainly.com/question/2973661

a reducing agent

brainly.com/question/2890416

element is reduced

brainly.com/question/4924694

Keywords: oxidation-reduction, an oxidizing agent, a reducing agent

The compound described is a fatty acid with a chain of 26 carbons, known as hexacosanoic acid, unless there are unsaturations not mentioned in the question.

Based on the information provided, the compound with a long chain of 26 carbons, a methyl group on one end, and an acid group on the other end, and without any nitrogen or sulfur atoms, can be regarded as a fatty acid. Fatty acids are carboxylic acids with long hydrocarbon chains. With 26 carbons, this compound can be considered a type of saturated or unsaturated fatty acid, depending on whether there are any double bonds in the hydrocarbon chain. The methyl group (CH3) indicates the end of the hydrocarbon chain, which is known in organic chemistry as the omega (ω) end. The acid group is the carboxylic acid functional group (COOH) at the other end of the molecule. Since the longest chain in this question is 26 carbons in length, with no double bonds mentioned, we might name it using the prefix for 26 carbons, which would be 'hexacos', followed by 'anoic acid' for the acid group, resulting in hexacosanoic acid. However, without more details on the nature of the hydrocarbon chain (specifically, its saturation), this nomenclature could change.

Final answer:

The percent composition of Fe in the ferroaluminum alloy is approximately 33.82%.

Explanation:

To find the percent composition of the ferroaluminum, we need to determine the mass of iron and aluminum in the alloy. Based on the balanced chemical equations given, 1 mole of Fe is produced for every 2.07 g of the alloy, and 3 moles of H2 are produced for every 2.07 g of the alloy. From the molar mass of Fe (55.85 g/mol) and H2 (2.02 g/mol), we can calculate the mass of Fe and H2 produced. So, the percent composition of Fe in the alloy is:

mass of Fe / mass of ferroaluminum × 100%

= (0.70 g / 2.07 g) × 100%

= 33.82%

Therefore, the percent composition of Fe in the ferroaluminum is approximately 33.82%.

Option A= mass/volume

Density is a measurement that compares the amount of matter an object has to its volume. An object with much matter in a certain volume has high density. An object with little matter in the same amount of volume has a low density. Density is found by dividing the mass of an object by its volume.

The symbol most often used for density is ρ.

The formula for density is d = M/V, where d is density, M is mass, and V is volume.  

Answer: 3808 ml

Explanation:

According to avogadro's law, 1 mole of every substance occupies 22.4 L at STP and contains avogadro's number [tex]6.023\times 10^{23}[/tex] of particles.

Standard condition of temperature (STP)  is 273 K and atmospheric pressure is 1 atm respectively.  

To calculate the moles, we use the equation:

[tex]\text{Number of moles}=\frac{\text{Given mass}}{\text {Molar mass}}=\frac{4.03}{24}=0.17moles[/tex]

[tex]2Mg+O_2\rightarrow 2MgO[/tex]

2 moles of magnesium react with= [tex[2\times 22.4=44.8L[/tex] of oxygen at STP

Thus 0.17 moles of magnesium react with=[tex]\frac{44.8}{2}\times 0.17=3.8L=3808ml[/tex]

Thus the volume of oxygen required to react with 4.03 g of magnesium at STP is 3808 ml.

A hummingbird weighing 10^-2 kg contains approximately one trillion cells, assuming the average cell is ten times the mass of a bacterium. For a human weighing 70 kg with the same assumption, it would contain around 7 quadrillion cells.

To calculate the number of cells in a hummingbird assuming it weighs 10-2 kg and considering the mass of an average cell is ten times the mass of a bacterium, we first need to establish the average mass of a bacterium. From the reference information given, we understand that the mass of a bacterium is on the order of 10-15 kg. Therefore, the average cell mass would be 10 times this, which is 10-14 kg.

Next, we divide the total mass of the hummingbird by the mass of one of its cells to determine the number of cells:

Number of cells = Mass of hummingbird / Mass of one cell
Number of cells = 10-2 kg / 10-14 kg
Number of cells = 1012

Therefore, a hummingbird that weighs 10-2 kg contains approximately one trillion (1012) cells.

To address part (b) of the question, assuming a human weighs about 70 kg and also assuming the mass of a human cell is ten times the mass of a bacterium (10-14 kg), we can perform a similar calculation:

Number of cells in a human = Mass of human / Mass of one cell
Number of cells in a human = 70 kg / 10-14 kg
Number of cells in a human = 7 x 1015

This suggests that a human has around 7 quadrillion (7 x 1015) cells.

The average net charge on methionine at a pH of 8.00 will be slightly positive, as the pH is below the pKa of the α-amino group (9.21), leading to a higher proportion of protonated amino groups compared to deprotonated carboxyl groups.

To calculate the average net charge on methionine at a pH of 8.00, we consider the ionization states of its functional groups based on their pKa values. The pKa of the α-carboxyl group is 2.28, which is significantly lower than the pH of the solution, implying that this group is in its deprotonated (negatively charged) state, -COO-. The pKa of the α-amino group is 9.21, which is higher than the pH, meaning this group is in its protonated (positively charged) form, -NH3+. For a pH between the pKa values of the two ionizable groups, the molecule carries both charges.

Using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, we determine the fraction of methionine molecules with a protonated amino group:
-Protonated amino group (positive charge):
pH = pKa + log([A-]/[HA])
Rearranging for [HA]/[A-], we get [HA]/[A-] = 10(pH - pKa)
[HA]/[A-] = 10(8.00 - 9.21) = 10(-1.21) = approximately 0.061.

The fraction of deprotonated carboxyl groups (-COO-) is essentially 1, since the pH is well above its pKa. Thus, nearly all methionine molecules will have one negative charge. Considering the ratio for the protonated amino group, there would be more neutral (-NH3) than positively charged (-NH2) amino groups, leading to an overall net charge that is slightly positive.

Therefore, the average net charge on methionine in a solution of pH 8.00 will be slightly positive, since the amount of protonated amino groups will outweigh the deprotonated carboxyl groups, but not by as significant an amount as if the pH were equal to the isoelectric point.

The interaction which is a direct result of chemical weathering is rust

forming on rocks.

Chemical weathering involves the interaction of rocks with chemical

substances such as minerals. In this process, the composition of the rocks

are usually changed.

Rusts forms on rocks during this process which hastens the breakdown of

rocks into tiny particles.

Read more about Chemical weathering here https://brainly.com/question/974321

Final answer:

To calculate the amount of AlBr3 produced from 3.0 g of Al and 6.0 g of Br2, first, the limiting reactant is determined, which is Al. The theoretical yield of AlBr3 is 29.61 g, with no bromine remaining and some aluminum unreacted. For a 72% yield, 21.3192 g of AlBr3 would be collected.

Explanation:

To calculate the theoretical yield of AlBr3 produced from 3.0 g of aluminum (Al) and 6.0 g of bromine (Br2), first, we need to determine the limiting reactant. The balanced chemical equation for the reaction is:

2 Al + 3 Br2 → 2 AlBr3

Using molar masses (Al = 26.98 g/mol, Br2 = 159.808 g/mol), we calculate the moles of each reactant:

Al: 3.0 g / 26.98 g/mol = 0.111 moles

Br2: 6.0 g / 159.808 g/mol = 0.0375 moles

Based on the stoichiometry of the equation, 2 moles of Al react with 3 moles of Br2, making aluminum the limiting reactant.

The theoretical yield of AlBr3 can be calculated using the molar ratio from the balanced equation, from which 0.111 moles of Al would produce 0.111 moles of AlBr3. The molar mass of AlBr3 (266.693 g/mol) gives us a mass of 29.61 g.

No bromine would remain as all of it reacts, but some aluminum will remain unreacted.

For a 72% yield, the actual yield of AlBr3 = theoretical yield × percentage yield = 29.61 g × 0.72 = 21.3192 g.