Answer:
Women in England for example began to work in factories because of the shortage of men who were off fighting, They learned to organize in unions for their labor rights and it also strengthened the suffragette movement and women getting the right to vote.
Explanation:
The biggest changes that were brought about by WWI on the home front were that women took up work in the factories and took up other jobs that were left vacant as the men were called off to war. Between 1914 and 1918, it is estimated that two million women took up jobs in place of men. In England there were companies which began to make munitions for the war effort and they were eventually forced to employ women because of the lack of men. These women were called "munitionettes," but unfortunately the work also involved exposure to dangerous chemicals and other toxic substances. These conditions led the women to unionize and in England women moving into public life and work realms is linked to winning the right to vote in 1918. David Lloyd George was elected Prime Minister in 1916 and he was more liberal toward women than the former Prime Minister Asquith. This led to the Representation of the People Act being adopted in 1918. Finally, women over the age of 30 who owned property had the right to vote in England.
World War I brought significant social changes for women on the homefront, including new opportunities in the workforce and a shift in gender roles and fashion.
Explanation:World War I brought significant social changes for women on the homefront. Women's involvement in the war effort and the absence of men led to new opportunities in the workforce. Women took up jobs traditionally held by men and experienced greater economic independence. Additionally, women's fashion and social norms started to shift, reflecting a desire for more freedom and a departure from traditional gender roles. These changes had a lasting impact on women's expectations and opportunities in society.
Learn more about Social changes for women on the homefront during World War I here:https://brainly.com/question/14324555
#SPJ11
What was NOT a warning in Washington’s farewell address?
A Do not give the people too much power B Do not take on too much debt C Do not form close ties with European countries D Do not form political parties
Answer:
A - do not give the people too much power.
What were nominating conventions?
A) private meetings where a select few party representatives chose the presidential candidates
B) public meetings where all citizens were allowed to nominate candidates for president
C) a group of meetings between the president and his cabinet, held prior to the election to choose campaign slogans
D) public meetings where delegates from each state were given an opportunity to cast their votes for political candidates
Answer:
d) public meetings where delegates from each state were given an opportunity to cast their votes for political candidates.
Explanation:
In United States political culture, every four years there is a political convenction held (United States presidential nominating convention) by political parties who decide the candidate for the elections.
Beside deciding the candidate for the President of the United States, parties propose a platform which represent party principles and goals for the following period. Each party has a proportional number of representatives from each state, depending on the size of the state. These representatives are also known as delegates. Delegates cast their votes for candidate for the President, mostly following the popular vote held before the convention.
The two biggest parties Democratic and Republican Party have their convention every four years.
Answer:
The answer to this queston is D, hope this helps! :)
Explanation:
How did King Menelik Il differ from other 19th-century African leaders?
Answer:
Menelik II differed from other 19th-century African leaders as he kept the independence of his kingdom intact.
Explanation:
Menelik II is considered to be one of the greatest kings of Ethiopia. His expansion campaigns and his defense strategies are praised and remembered until today because the present-day borders of Ethiopia are only up to where King Menelik II expanded them to. During his reign, he had to fight the Italian army. He did it and he succeeded in driving back the possible Italian invasion of Ethiopia.the egyptians referred to the land of Nubian as
"Ta-Seti"
Explanation:
Egyptians referred to Nubia as “Ta-Seti.” The Nubians were known to be expert archers and thus their land earned the appellation, “Ta-Seti”, or land of the bow.
Answer:
The Egyptians referred to the land of Nubian as “Ta-Seti”, or "Land of The Bow".
1863: John D. Rockefeller partners with Maurice B. Clark and Samuel
Andrews to open his first oil refinery
1871: J. P. Morgan becomes a partner in the banking firm Drexel, Morgan &
Co.
1875: Andrew Camegie uses money from earlier investments to open his first
steel mill.
1882: Rockefeller forms the Standard Oil Trust, which controls most U.S. oil
production
1889: Morgan merges several electricity companies to found General Electric
1892: Striking workers at Carnegie's mill in Homestead, Pennsylvania, clash
with hired security forces.
1895: Morgan takes over Drexel and restructures it to become J. P. Morgan &
Co.
1899: Carnegie combines several steel mills that he has purchased into
Carnegie Steel
1901: Morgan buys out Carnegie for $480 million and forms U.S. Steel.
1914: The United Mine Workers strike at a Rockefeller-owned coal mine in
Ludlow, Colorado, ends in a massacre.
The information in the timeline most clearly supports the idea that:
O
A. free enterprise slowed investment in private industry.
O
B. workers and owners built jointly owned corporations.
O
C. promising entrepreneurs benefited from political favors.
O
D. big-business growth led to conflicts with workers.
Answer:
The right answer is:
D. big-business growth led to conflicts with workers.
Explanation:
Divergent interests of investors and workers are a historical fact. Workers have usually demanded better pay and working conditions. Capitalism has evolved since the 19th century in the USA and in the world, workers have more rights now, but labor-capital conflicts are always present, it´s inevitable. All the remaining options shown here are not logical, only D. is a statement that conforms to events and facts provided.
Identify three cultural differences immigrants might have faced when they arrived in the United States
Answer:
Immigrants might have had to learn a new language when they came to the United States. They also may have had to change their style to fit into our culture. Also the food here is different so they may of had to find something new they liked.
Explanation:
Answer:
language
religion
education
food
jobs
holidays
traditions and customs
Explanation:
edge ￣▽￣
Why did Russia leave the war in 1917?
1: Russia was defeated by Germany.
2:Russia was defeated by France
3The Russian tsar negotiated a separate peace with the United States.
4:Tsar Nicholas II abdicated, Russia went communist and signed a peace treaty with the Central Powers.
Russia left the war in 1917 due to internal turmoil highlighted by the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II, the establishment of a shaky provisional government, and the Bolshevik Revolution. Under Lenin, the Bolsheviks, who were communists, signed a peace treaty with the Central Powers, taking Russia out of the war.
Explanation:The reason why Russia left the war in 1917 was primarily due to internal turmoil. The most noteworthy event was the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II following the February Revolution. This led to a provisional government being established which struggled to maintain control. Simultaneously, a worker's soviet, or council, emerged as a powerful force in Russian politics. The dual power structure caused instability and, ultimately, led to the Bolshevik Revolution in October of the same year. The Bolsheviks were communist and under the leadership of Vladimir Lenin, they negotiated a peace treaty with the Central Powers, thus making Russia leave the war.
Learn more about Russian withdrawal from World War I here:https://brainly.com/question/33508928
#SPJ6
is the United states justified in their decision to escalate their involvement in the Vietnam war?
Us entered Vietnam war in order to stop the spread of communism. It was justified as the whole nation was trying to follow the unrealistic principles of communism and especially Asia gave enormous support to Soviet Russia in spread of communism.
Explanation:
The Domino theory began in 1950s wherein it was feared that one Asian country when fallen as a victim to communism then it would spread its dominance over all other Asian countries and in order to strop that, US entered the Vietnam war.
Also there was red scare that prevailed in America, Mc Carthy' statement created fear among the people that communism may have its secret roots spread in America too. So these factors made US to enter Vietnam war. The conflict continued for a decade. Many millions of American served in Vietnam and out of which many in thousands lost their lives.
Who came up with the idea of the social contract
Answer:
Thomas Hobbes came up with the idea of the Social contract
Answer:
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Explanation:
What was one characteristic of South Africa's policy of apartheid?
A. Nonwhites were forced to live in separate areas from the white
minority
B. Europeans were able to freely immigrate to South Africa and claim
land.
O
C. All South African citizens were allowed to vote in general
elections
O
D. Whites had to pay reparations to nonwhites as punishment for
segregation.
Answer:
One characteristic of South Africa's policy of apartheid is 'Nonwhites were forced to live in separate areas from the white minority'.
Option: (A)
Explanation:
The notion of 'white supremacy' brought into practice by the white minority in South Africa gave birth to segregationist policies. These policies further strengthened to take the form of 'apartheid' which was the worst culmination of the segregationist mentality. Apartheid required the coloreds to live in separate areas other than where the whites lived and live a life devoid of most facilities provided by the state.Answer:
Nonwhites were forced to live in separate areas from the white
minority
how could the election of 1860 & President Abraham Lincoln have contributed to sectional differences between the North and the South prior to the civil war?
The election of 1860 and the subsequent presidency of Abraham Lincoln heightened tensions between the North and the South, ultimately contributing to the outbreak of the Civil War.
Lincoln's election was a significant event because he was a Republican who had campaigned on a platform of limiting the expansion of slavery, which was deeply unpopular among Southern slaveholders.
Southern states felt that Lincoln's victory signaled an existential threat to their way of life, as they believed that his policies would lead to the abolition of slavery altogether. In response, several Southern states seceded from the Union, forming the Confederacy, and initiating the Civil War.
Lincoln's election also highlighted the deep ideological differences between the North and the South, as the North was increasingly dominated by industrial interests and opposed to slavery, while the South was primarily agrarian and dependent on slave labor.
These differences had been brewing for decades, but Lincoln's election was a catalyst that escalated tensions to a breaking point, resulting in a devastating war that ultimately ended slavery in the United States.
Learn more about Abraham Lincoln here
https://brainly.com/question/30169446
#SPJ2
Which of the following benefited British exports to America?
A.
the absence of a uniform tariff rate
B.
the superior quality of British goods
C.
the economic recession in America
D.
the British alliance with some Native American tribes
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
B. the superior quality of British goods.
Explanation:
Goods produced in Great Britain had a high demand in the American colonies by the end of the 18th century. It had the advantage of being the colonial metropolis. Besides, the Industrial Revolution had started and was well under way in Britain.
What was a surprise to Americans and a shock to the British during the early fighting in the War of 1812?
Answer:
The small American navy fought well.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Communities of nuns 1. Monasteries 2.Convents 3.Clergy 4.Crusade
A convent is a community of nuns.
CONVENTA convent usually refers to the actual building where nuns live together; it can also sometimes refers to Christian community that is living according to religious vows.
Therefore option (2) is the correct answer.
To learn more about nuns, refer here;
https://brainly.com/question/18437109
#SPJ2
_____ was founded in 1860 with delegates from the border states of Maryland, Kentucky, And Missouri.
1) The constitutional union party
2) Green peace
3) NAFTA
4)NATO
1) The constitutional union party
Explanation:
The party was founded by John J. Crittenden and John Bell.It lasted for only a year.Bell was even a candidate for the president, and won around 12 percent of votes.Learn more on The constitutional union party on
https://brainly.com/question/480476
#learnwithBrainly
Which government system gives states the most power?
Group of answer choices
A federal
B parliamentary
C unitary
D confederal
Answer:
federal is central, parliament can be either, but confederacy states that the states involved are fully separate but in union, do the answer is confederacy
Explanation:
^
The government system that gives states the most power is a confederal system.
Which government system gives states the most power?In a confederal system, states or regions retain a high level of sovereignty and autonomy, with the central government having limited powers.
The confederal government exists primarily to coordinate and facilitate cooperation among the states on specific issues, but it does not have strong centralized authority. Decision-making authority and powers are concentrated at the state or regional level.
Learn more about confederal system at https://brainly.com/question/21318574
#SPJ6
What is the difference between nationalism and internationalism ?
Answer:
Nationalism denotes idea, feelings & action related to indigenous, patriotic essence; whereas, Internationalism holds up closeness with globalization. The senses of nationalism and internationalism are ordained from opposite poles. So, differences are inevitable between them
Explanation:
in what ways did the progressives offer an alternative to socialism, anarchism and communism
Answer: The answer is:
Progressives, tend to be wealthy. It promotes the idea of a large, centralized government which assumes responsibility for feeding, housing and caring for people in exchange for the wealth they generate via labor.
Explanation:
anarchism advocates this to offer individual empowerment through easier access to things such as tools or parts and a sharing of the commons while retaining respect for personal property.
Socialism is a socioeconomic system where the means of productions are owned socially.
Comunism movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of the communist society. An ideology of economic equality through the elimination of private property.
In 1938, when Hitler took over Austria, the ______________ ______ ______________ did nothing, so he attacked Czechoslovakia.
Final answer:
Western democracies, due to their appeasement policy, did not act against Hitler's annexation of Austria in 1938, leading to his subsequent attack on Czechoslovakia.
Explanation:
In 1938, when Hitler took over Austria, the western democracies did nothing, so he attacked Czechoslovakia. This lack of response is attributed to the appeasement policy that Great Britain and France were following in an attempt to prevent another major war. After the annexation of Austria, an event known as the Anschluss, and a sham election that showed support for the annexation, Hitler set his sights on the Sudetenland, a region in Czechoslovakia with a significant German-speaking population. Despite this aggressive move, Britain and France continued their policy of appeasement at the Munich Conference, agreeing to allow Germany to annex the Sudetenland. However, in 1939 Hitler broke his promise and German troops occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia, clearly showcasing that appeasement had failed.
In 1938, when Hitler took over Austria, the Western democracies did nothing, which encouraged him to annex the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia.
In March 1938, Germany annexed Austria in an event known as the Anschluss.
Though this annexation was a clear violation of the Treaty of Versailles, the Western democracies such as Great Britain and France did nothing in response. This emboldened Hitler, who then proceeded to demand the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia. The Munich Agreement of September 1938 saw Britain and France conceding to Hitler's demands in an effort to avoid conflict, allowing the annexation of the Sudetenland. Unfortunately, this policy of appeasement failed as Hitler went on to occupy the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939.how were louis xiv and james ii similar and different
They were both catholic kings, who wanted to rule as absolutists, but while Louis XIV was a prominent figure, James II could not establish his strong influence.
Explanation:
King James II from the Stuart dynasty was overthrown in 1688 in the so-called Glorious Revolution was replaced by Protestant champion William Orange, who had previously been ruler of the Netherlands. He had to flee to France with his family, and took refuge with the King Louis XIVHe was well received by Louis, who awarded him the castle of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, located not far from Paris. It was indeed a royal accommodation (Louis XIV himself was born in that castle, and he also served as his main residence before Versailles). James II had a real court organization at Saint-Germain-en-Laye, with courtiers and royalty.Learn more on Louis XIV on
https://brainly.com/question/9234537
https://brainly.com/question/727607
https://brainly.com/question/2823241
#learnwithBrainly
One of the results of the contact between the Europeans and the Native Americans was the spread of disease. Which of the following
statements best describes the effect disease had on European and Native American populations?
OA. Many Europeans who came to North and South America died from Native American diseases.
OB. Native American populations were decimated by diseases that had been brought by the Europeans.
OC. Europeans and Native Americans were equally affected by outbreaks of disease in the New World.
OD. The population in Europe drastically declined due to exposure to Native American diseases.
Native American populations were decimated by diseases that had been brought by the Europeans.
Explanation:
When the Europeans discovered and settled in the New World, lot of changes occurred on both sides of the Atlantic. Many things were positive, especially when it came to exchange of goods, plants, and animals. Unfortunately, there were some negatives in it, with the spreading of diseases being among the most influential. The exchange between the two sides is known as the Columbian exchange.
The Europeans and the Native Americans had some diseases that were unique about them, and their immune systems were adapted to them, but they didn't had response for the diseases of the opposite side. Both sides suffered from this, but the effect was much greater among the Native Americans, as the majority of their populations died out because of the spreading of European diseases among them, such as the common cold and the smallpox.
Other negatives that occurred were:
numerous warssystematic assimilation and genocideovertaking of territoryLearn more about the Columbian exchange https://brainly.com/question/2599432
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
B. Native American populations were decimated by diseases that had been brought by the Europeans.
Explanation:
Select all that apply.
Besides many deaths, other effects of the plague included _____.
persecution of Muslims and Jews for being the cause of the plague
little suffering by the peasants
peasant riots
the lessening of the Catholic Church’s influence
continuation of normal patterns of trade
increase in opportunities for skilled laborers
SELECT ALL THAT APPLY
persecution of Muslims and Jews for being the cause of the plague, increase in opportunities for skilled laborers.
Explanation:
One of the global devastating incidents that happened to Asia and Europe was Black Death. It is also known as the Black Plague that struck these continents in the mid 14th century.
It considered as God's divine punishment. The Christians ill-treated Muslims and Jews. Also, they massacred thousands of Jews. Considering that they were the reason for the plague.
It nearly killed 20 million people and more in Europe. That, in turn, increased the opportunity for skilled labors. Since a huge number of labors have died in the plague.
Answer: peasant riots, persecution of Muslims and Jews for being the cause of the plague, the lessening of the Catholic Church’s influence
Explanation:
IT IS WHAT IT IS
Which of these men was not a member of the Republican Party?
Warren Harding
Woodrow Wilson
William Howard Taft
Herbert Hoover
Answer:
Woodrow Wilson.
Explanation:
W. Wilson was a Democrat who became US president in 1913. He served for two periods and led the US during WWI.
Why was Birmingham chosen as the site for a
major civil rights campaign?
o It was home to the most civil rights leaders in
the country.
It was one of the most segregated cities in
America.
It was the least likely city to experience
resistance from whites.
Answer:
It was one of the most segregated cities in America.
Explanation:
Martin Luther King Jr. even called it the most segregated city in the country. A major event in Birmingham that shook the nation was when an African American Baptist church was bombed and four young girls were killed.
Birmingham was chosen for a major civil rights campaign due to its high levels of segregation and as a symbol of racial injustice.
Explanation:Birmingham was chosen as the site for a major civil rights campaign because it was one of the most segregated cities in America. The high levels of segregation made it a symbol of racial injustice and an ideal location to draw attention to the civil rights movement. By targeting Birmingham, civil rights leaders hoped to bring national and international attention to the racial inequality and discrimination that persisted in the city.
Thus, Birmingham, Alabama, was a strategic choice for a major civil rights campaign in the 1960s because it epitomized racial injustice and segregation in the South. The Birmingham Campaign, led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr., aimed to draw national attention to these issues and push for civil rights reform.
Learn more about civil rights movement here:https://brainly.com/question/31897973
#SPJ12
which goal of the civil rights movers was achieved soon after world war 2 ended
Answer: The desegregation of the U.S. military was the goal of the Civil Rights movement that was achieved soon after World War II ended
Answer:
The desegregation of the U.S. military was the goal of the Civil Rights movement that was achieved soon after World War II ended.
Explanation:
1. What might be the costs of having such a large national debt?
2. Did the promise that tax cuts would result in a growing economy that would pay for any
budget shortfalls come true during the Reagan years?
Answer:
1. What might be the costs of having such a large national debt?
When a country has a very large debt like the U.S., people may think that the country will not be able to pay off the debt. It's the same situation as a person who has a lot of debt, even more debt in a year than income in a year: people will believe that he or she will probably not be able to pay off the debt.
When this happens, people will invest less in the economy, the debt will become more expensive because the interest rate will be higher, and this in turn could lead Congress to enact policies such as tax hikes or debt renegotiations, which are always negative for an economy.
2. Did the promise that tax cuts would result in a growing economy that would pay for any budget shortfalls come true during the Reagan years?
Reagan's tax cuts did not lead to increases in tax revenue. On the contrary, tax revenue, as predicted by many, actually fell. This, in addition to increased military and social security spending, led to large budget deficits during the Reagan administration.
Answer:
A good answer should contain the following:
Possible Answers:
1. Unable to afford new/existing programs in the future
Higher taxes to pay off debt in the future
Inability to respond to crises that demand expensive solutions
2. No. Although the economy did grow, the growth wasn’t enough to overcome the revenue lost in the tax cuts. As a result, the national debt grew dramatically during the Reagan years.
=)
Why did Adam's plan to encourage advancements in literature, the arts, and science fail?
A) These efforts reached beyond the duties the Constitution gave to the president.
B) There was not enough money in the United States Treasury to finance these efforts.
C) Americans did not feel that arts and literature were important.
D) The United States' accomplishments in literature, art, and science already exceeded that of other nations.
Answer:
Explanation:
B) There was not enough money in the United States Treasury to finance these efforts.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
what were the constitutional crisis of 1954 to 1955
Constitutional crisis is something which the government is unable to resolve and the constitution does not give any clarity regarding the issue. Colored vote constitutional crisis happened in 1955.
Explanation:
Colored vote constitutional crisis is also called the colored vote case. The Federal government decided to remove colored voters from the common voters list. This caused a conflict between the judiciary and other branches regarding the power of Parliament to alter the entrenched clause in the act mentioned in the constitution or veto that the constitutional amendment is not legal.
The crisis at last got a final conclusion when the government decided to enlarge the senate and modify the process of election of its representatives and amending the constitution by giving franchising rights to the colored voters.
what is the social structure employed by hindus but rejected by buddhist that kept citizens in a rigid hierarchical state
The social structure employed by the Hindus but rejected by the Buddhists is the caste system.
Explanation:
There are several things that define India and that are unique to its society, and one of those trademarks is the caste system. This system is a social structure that has been practiced for thousands of year. The caste system has been implemented by the Hindus, and has been essential part of the Hindu society.
The Buddhist, on the other hand, became majority in India in one period, and the caste system was rejected by them, as it was a system that was discriminatory and restrictive, especially toward the members of the lower castes, and that was not what the Buddhism encourages. That didn't lasted long though, and once the Hindus became majority again, the caste system again became part of the whole subcontinent. It was only recently that the caste system has been outlawed and made illegal, as it was seen as a social structure that harms the society and its progress.
Learn more about Buddhism https://brainly.com/question/12315545
#learnwithBrainly
The social structure employed by Hindus, but rejected by Buddhists, is the caste system. Buddhism promotes equality and liberation from worldly attachments.
Explanation:The social structure employed by Hindus, but rejected by Buddhists, is the caste system. It is a hierarchical social system that assigns individuals to different social classes based on their birth, occupation, and privileges. The caste system is deeply rooted in Hindu religious beliefs, such as karma and reincarnation, and it aims to ensure that people fulfill their proper roles in society based on their past actions. Buddhism, on the other hand, rejects the caste system and promotes equality and liberation from worldly attachments.
Learn more about Caste system here:https://brainly.com/question/40214168
#SPJ11
Why did Massasoit help the Pilgrims?
Answer:Because the pilgrim wanted peace treaty.
Explanation:
Answer: Massasoit was told that King James of England saluted him with love and peace and accepted him as a friend and ally. Massasoit liked what he heard; the English would make powerful allies against his enemies in the region. The Pilgrims wanted a peace treaty, and so he willingly undertook the negotiations.