In the 1500s, the Catholic Church believed that the Bible should be

Answer:

territory  in North America

all of frances territory in north america

Answer:

it is the biggest city and most popular

Because it’s the most populated area in Canada

It is probable that prehistorichumans thought of decorating the body before they thought of making use of anything that could suggest clothing. Before precious metals were discovered, people who lived along the seashore decorated themselves with a great variety of shells, fishbones, fish teeth, and coloured pebbles.

Answer:

To give knights standards of behavior.

Explanation:

The code of chivalry was intended to prevent lawlessness on the part of knights by appealing to their sense of honor.

hope this helps :)

Answer:

The answer would be (D)

Explanation:

Hope this helps

Answer:

The judge would not allow this evidence. I know this because first, it is doesn't have anything to do with his speeding or it is not relevant. Relevant evidence speaks to an issue before court in relation to the charge being heard. If you steal a sign, you are committing an act of theft. The student was not stealing anything when he was speeding. The police officer can technically get suspended because it wasn't right for him to go through the student's things. The officer was going into the person's things without any permission which is a crime. People just cannot take stuff without permission, and that’s the law by public policy and history. Although the student did commit a crime the crime would not be obtained.

Final answer:

A judge would likely allow the evidence to be used against the student as the stolen stop sign was in plain view during a lawful traffic stop, satisfying the plain view doctrine exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement.

Explanation:

In the given scenario, a judge would likely allow the evidence of the stolen stop sign to be used against the student. This is because the stop sign was in plain view, which is one of the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. When a police officer lawfully stops a vehicle and observes stolen property in plain sight, they are permitted to seize it without a warrant. The evidence was immediately apparent as being stolen or contraband, given the nature of a stop sign. This principle is supported by various Supreme Court rulings that maintain if illegal items are in plain view during a legal stop, they can be seized and used as evidence in court.

Additionally, the plain view doctrine applies only if the officer is lawfully present at the place where the evidence can be plainly viewed, the officer has a lawful right of access to the object, and the criminality of the object is immediately apparent. In this case, the traffic stop for speeding provided the lawful presence, the visibility of the stolen sign gives a lawful right of access, and the nature of the object as a roadway sign commonly bolted down gives apparent criminality.

Answer:

A is the right answer for the above question

Answer:

No solution.

Explanation:

Not enough information.

Answer:

The Native Americans supported the British in the American revolution because in this period there was unrest among the natives and the colonies due to the land which American settlers were taking away from the natives.

The British agreed to defend native lands from encroaching settlers. One of the famous Native American was  Joseph Brant, a leader of the Mohawk tribe also known as Thayendanegea who helped the British soldiers in the war.

Answer:

The British

Explanation:

Apex

Answer:

Dynamite invented in 1867 was invented by Alfred Nobel, who became a really powerful man because this was rapidly applied mining. The Nobel Price is in honor of Alfred Nobel, which was his last will in 1865.

First Transcontinental railroad completed in 1869, Utah. In this year was the last construction of this network that united all nation, being this achievement one of the reason for growing as Industrial Nation.

Internal combustion engine invented in 1876 by the German Nikolaus Otto, it's known also as Otto Engine.

Electric light bulb invented in 1879 by Thomas Edison. It's important to say that there are like 20 authors of this invention. But, all prototypes weren't efficient, so the patent was sold to Edison, whom worked hard to make the electric light bulb efficient.

First gasoline powered tractor invented in 1892 by John Froelich.

The events are placed in chronological order as follows:

1. Dynamite invented in 1866.

2. First Transcontinental railroad completed in 1869.

3. Internal combustion engine invented in 1876.

4. Electric light bulb invented in 1879.

5. First gasoline powered tractor invented in 1892.

Alfred Nobel invented dynamite in 1866 and experimented in making synthetic rubber, leather and artificial silk among many other things. Alfred got a patent or legal right of ownership on the material and he named it "dynamite."

The First Transcontinental Railroad in the United States was built across North America and was completed in 1869, this railroad linked the railway network of the Eastern United States with California on the Pacific coast.

The first modern internal combustion engine was invented in 1876 by Nicolaus Otto. This engine was also known as the Otto engine. An internal combustion engine is a heat engine in which the combustion of a fuel occurs with an oxidizer which is usually air in a combustion chamber.

Electric light bulb was invented by Thomas Edison in 1879. He made an incandescent bulb that burned long enough to be practical and long enough to light a home for many hours.

The First gasoline powered tractor was invented by John Froelich in 1892. The machine was developed in a small village in Northeast Iowa. Froelich worked with his blacksmith in order to developed a vertical one-cylinder engine mounted on the running gear of a steam tractor engine and developed parts to make it all work together.  

Hence, the answer is given and explained above.

To learn more about Dynamite, Electric light bulb, and First Transcontinental railroad here:

https://brainly.com/question/14016925

https://brainly.com/question/15124415

#SPJ2

Answer:

Among the options given on the question the  correct answer is option C.

Doing so help raise support for their preferred candidate.

Explanation: In an election campaign except the political workers a citizen of the country can also canvass for their preferred candidate.

Because it is their one of the political rights to work for their preferred candidate. Because participating on the campaign will help their candidate to raise support for him. Because if a group of citizen works for their preferred man then their work will help to make the way to raise his/her support.

So it can be said that a citizen might participate in canvassing activities to help raising support for their preferred candidate.

Canvassing helps in raising support for the preferred political candidate and allows citizens to engage in the political process actively. It is not guaranteed to level the playing field for all candidates or serve as a source of unbiased information as it typically promotes a specific candidate or cause.

There are several reasons why a citizen might participate in canvassing activities. Firstly, canvassing activity helps in raising support for their preferred candidate (Option C). This can be through multiple means like creating awareness about the candidate's policies or helping people to register to vote. Secondly, canvassing helps in political engagement by allowing citizens to have their voices heard, contribute to political campaigns and bring about positive changes in their community.

Although it does not necessarily ensure that candidates with less money can still win (Option A), it can effectively disseminate the candidate's message to a wider audience. Furthermore, it does not make the playing field more level for all political candidates (Option B) as it generally favors the candidates who have more volunteers or better resources to facilitate canvassing.

Lastly, it does not serve as a source of unbiased political information for voters (Option D). The objective of canvassing is to promote a particular candidate or cause, which often involves highlighting their strengths and downplaying their weaknesses.

https://brainly.com/question/34172605

#SPJ6

It would be C. The passage infers that Native Americans dealt with I'll effects from the plants, which would be uncomfortable.

Answer: B)

Explanation:

He helped found the Indochinese Communist Party in 1930 and the League for the Independence of Vietnam, or Viet Minh, in 1941.

Conference held in Munich on September 28--29, 1938, during which the leaders of Great Britain, France, and Italy agreed to allow Germany to annex certain areas of Czechoslovakia.

Answer:

The Munich Conference came as a result of a long series of negotiations.

Answer:

The outcome of the Munich Conference was the signing of a treaty between France, the United Kingdom, Nazi Germany and Italy on the future of Czechoslovakia.

Explanation:

The treaty was concluded on September 30, 1938 at the Munich Conference where Czechoslovakia itself was not present. With the treaty, the aggressive annexation by Adolf Hitler of the Czech Sudeten territory was accepted by the major powers. The treaty was intended to guarantee peace in Europe and was designated by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain of the United Kingdom. Chamberlain expected that Hitler's annexation hunger would have been silenced with Sudetenland. Less than a year later, Germany invaded Poland, starting World War II.

Answer:

There are multiple settings in this movie such as the White House in the US, the US naval ships and the leading blockade, also the planes, and the main area of conflict: Cuba and the seas around it.

Explanation:

The movie "Thirteen Days" is set in Washington D.C., during the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 and focuses on the tense negotiations and decision-making within the Kennedy administration.

The movie "Thirteen Days" takes place primarily in the United States, specifically in Washington D.C. It revolves around the events of the Cuban Missile Crisis that occurred over 13 days in October 1962. This historical drama portrays the high-stakes negotiation and decision-making processes that took place within the Kennedy administration, as they sought to resolve a standoff that could have resulted in nuclear war. Scenes in the film depict locations such as the White House, meeting rooms, and various places around the world through news footage, reflecting on a global scale the tension of the crisis that involved the United States and the Soviet Union.

Answer:

handwash stations, minimum wage for everyone, security, health coverage

Explanation:

U.S. security can depend on the survival of an ally due to mutual protection offered by alliances, economic dependencies in trade relations, and the role international perception plays in global politics.

The security of the U.S. can greatly depend on the survival of an ally in several ways. First, alliances often offer mutual protection against common threats. For instance, if an ally country is overtaken by an aggressive entity, this could potentially shift the balance of power and pose a direct threat to the U.S.

Second, allies often engage in trade relations. This could involve essential goods or services that directly impact the U.S. economy. The loss of a trade partner due to instability or change in regime can have dire economic consequences and can threaten the country's economic security.

Lastly, in a world growing more interconnected, the image and relationships of a country in the global theatre are important. International perception can impact everything from trade agreements to diplomatic negotiations. So, if an ally, especially one that shares similar values and norms, falls, this could harm the standing and credibility of the U.S. within the international domain.

https://brainly.com/question/12163883

#SPJ3

The survival of an ally can be integral to U.S. security because it affects the U.S.'s ability to protect its interests, maintain international stability, and uphold its commitments around the world.

The security of the United States can depend on the survival of an ally due to several strategic, political, and economic reasons.

1. Strategic Interests: Allies often serve as strategic partners in maintaining regional stability, deterring aggression, and providing military bases or access. The survival of an ally ensures that the U.S. can project power, gather intelligence, and respond to crises in a region.

2. Collective Defense: Many alliances, such as NATO, are based on the principle of collective defense, as outlined in Article 5, which states that an attack on one member is an attack on all.

3. Nonproliferation: The survival of non-nuclear allies can be tied to U.S. nonproliferation goals. If an ally feels threatened and the U.S. is unable to assure its security, the ally might seek to develop its own nuclear weapons, which could destabilize a region and undermine global nonproliferation efforts.

4. Economic Interests: The economic health and stability of allied nations can directly impact the U.S. economy. Allies often engage in trade and investment with the U.S., and their economic survival can be crucial for American businesses and jobs.

5. Political Stability: The survival of democratic allies helps promote a rules-based international order, which aligns with U.S. values and interests. The loss of an ally could lead to political instability, which might be exploited by adversaries to expand their influence.

6. Deterrence: The credibility of U.S. security guarantees is a cornerstone of deterrence strategy. If an ally were to fall due to a lack of U.S. support, it would signal weakness and could embolden adversaries, potentially leading to further aggression.

Abraham lincoln

-believed slavery was a moral issue

Stephen douglas

-opposed kansas nebraska act

-introduced the kansas nebraska act

I only dont know the one of who wanted to allow slavery to continue but hope this helps

Stephen Douglas: wanted to allow slavery to continue, introduced the Kansas Nebraska act . Abraham Lincoln: believed slavery was moral issue, opposed the Kansas Nebraska act

Answer:

Tationia

Explanation:

B

The correct answer is B. The Supreme Court decided that authorities had unfairly singled him out because of his race.

Explanation:

Lee Yick was a Chinese immigrant who owned a laundry facility in a wooden building in California. During this time (end of the 19th century) there was a law that established it was not legal to own this type of business in a wooden building without a special permit. However, this permit was not approved for Chinese migrants who owned almost all laundry facilities.

Due to this, Lee Yick was fined for not owning a permit and he decided to sue. This case was analyzed by the U.S. Supreme Court and it was decided Lee Yick was fined by the authorities just due to his race (Option B) as most laundry facilities were placed in wooden buildings with no permit and the authorities did nothing about it.

As the Soviet Union dissolved and the cold war ended the balance of power in Europe and especially Eastern European changed forever.

While earlier, the Soviet Union held sway over much of Eastern Europe, that completely disintegrated overnight. The Soviet influence in the region was shattered.

On the edges of Eastern Europe were the NATO countries, who quickly became the dominant political and military force in the region without any rival.

Communism and socialist policies also ended as newly freed countries started to transition to market-based economy.

Answer:

the upcoming elections

Explanation:

Answer:

groups that were seeking freedom are the ones that settled in the American colonies.

Explanation:

Answer:

Africa

Explanation:

largest- smallest

1. Asia

2. Africa

3. North America

4. South America

5. Antarctica

6. Europe

7. Australia

Answer:

Colonialism and Nationalism in Southeast Asia. During the 1500s and 1600s the Europeans were able to take control of the international trade of Asia, thereby diverting the profits from this trade to Europe. As a result, the Europeans became stronger while Asian empires and kingdoms became weaker.

All European powers were motivated by the exploitation of resources and trade advantages, their methods of administration varied from indirect rule with local collaboration (Dutch and British) to direct rule with cultural assimilation (French) and a mix of direct rule with intentions of eventual self-governance (Americans in the Philippines).

The European administration of the colonies in Southeast Asia differed primarily in the extent of direct control and the methods of governance employed by the colonial powers. The key differences can be summarized as follows

1.  Dutch East Indies (present-day Indonesia):  The Dutch employed a system of indirect rule through local rulers, known as the Culture System. This system forced peasants to cultivate cash crops like sugar, coffee, tea, and indigo, which were then sold to the Dutch East India Company. The Dutch maintained control over the trade but allowed a degree of autonomy to local rulers in internal affairs.

2.  British Malaya (present-day Malaysia and Singapore):  The British established a Residential System, where a British Resident or Adviser was appointed to advise the local rulers. While the sultans remained the nominal rulers, real political power was exercised by the British. The British also developed the land for cash crop plantations, such as rubber and tin, and encouraged Chinese and Indian immigration to work on these plantations.

3.  French Indochina (present-day Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia):  The French implemented a direct rule system, where they abolished the traditional political structures and imposed a French administrative system. They introduced French law, education, and language, and sought to assimilate the local population into French culture. The French also invested heavily in infrastructure, such as roads and railways, to facilitate the exploitation of natural resources.

4.  Spanish Philippines (present-day Philippines):  The Spanish used a system of direct rule through the establishment of the Encomienda system, which was later replaced by the Hacienda system. The Spanish Crown granted large tracts of land to Spanish settlers, who were responsible for Christianizing and governing the native populations. The Spanish also introduced their own legal system, the Roman Catholic religion, and Spanish culture and language.

 5.  American Philippines (after the Spanish-American War):  The United States, after taking control from Spain, introduced a more benevolent form of governance with the intention of preparing the Philippines for eventual self-rule. The Americans established a public education system, improved sanitation and healthcare, and introduced democratic institutions and the English language.

Answer: Gilgamesh standing at edge of the Cedar Forest, ready to battle Humbaba

Explanation:

Answer:In the new English version, Gilgamesh was illustrated as a couragerous hero when he was standing at the edge of the Cedar Forest to battle Humbaba.

Explanation:

Gilgamesh is the main character of the "Epic of Gilgamesh", a Sumerian poem. In the poem , he is a strong and powerful demigod. He was considered a hero because he protected his people by building the walls of Uruk. In the new English version, Gilgamesh was illustrated as a couragerous hero when he was standing at the edge of the Cedar Forest to battle Humbaba.

Answer: Make sure to include this info down bellow.

Explanation:

Charles Darwin

Naturalist Charles Darwin developed groundbreaking theories on evolution following a five-year expedition on board HMS Beagle, 1831–36.

Darwin is England’s most celebrated naturalist and geologist, best known for his groundbreaking work On the Origin of Species, published in 1859. In it, he presented his theory of the evolution of species by means of natural selection. Darwin developed his theory from findings he made following a five-year expedition on board HMS Beagle.

Voyage on the Beagle

Charles Darwin was born on 12 February 1809 in Shrewsbury, England. From 1831 to 1836, Darwin – then a trainee Anglican parson – served as an unpaid naturalist on a science expedition on board HMS Beagle. He accompanied the Beagle’s captain, Robert FitzRoy, who wanted an enthusiastic and well-trained gentleman naturalist to join him on the Beagle’s second surveying expedition. At the end of 1831, the Beagle sailed for South America where she completed extensive surveys, returning via New Zealand in 1836.

Groundbreaking discoveries

The expedition visited many places around the world and Darwin studied the various plants and animals, collecting specimens for further analysis. In South America, Darwin found fossils of extinct animals that were similar to modern species. Furthermore, on the Galapagos Islands he noticed many variations of plants and animals that were similar to those he found in South America, suggesting that species adapted over time and to their environment.

Theory of evolution

Upon return to London, further analysis of the specimens collected on the voyage led Darwin to several related theories – namely that evolution did occur and it happened gradually over thousands of years.

Darwin's theory of evolutionary selection holds that variation within species occurs randomly, and that the survival or extinction of each organism is determined by that organism's ability to adapt to its environment. He first published these theories in 1859 in his book, On the Origin of Species.

Darwin’s legacy

Charles Darwin was not the first to propose a theory of evolution but his work had a great impact on society at the time. While other thinkers used his research to support their various (often opposing) views and ideas, Darwin avoided talking about the theological and sociological aspects of his work. He continued to write on botany, geology and zoology until his death in 1882. He is buried in Westminster Abbey.

Hope this helped:)

Final answer:

Charles Darwin's letter to his father would detail his experiences and observations aboard the H.M.S. Beagle, the extensive collection of specimens, and the implications these observations had on his emerging theory of evolution by natural selection.

Explanation:

Dear Father,
Amidst the vast and variegated landscapes of South America, I pen this letter with a descriptive account of my journey aboard the H.M.S. Beagle. Since our departure on the 27th of December, 1831, under Captain Fitzroy's guidance, my position as ship's naturalist has afforded me a multitude of opportunities for keen observation and collection of geological specimens and a diverse assembly of flora and fauna, many of which have never graced the catalogues of England's naturalists.

My daily endeavors include meticulous diary entries and drawings that encapsulate the essence of the environments we encountered. Particularly noteworthy are the Galápagos Islands, where the peculiar variations in specimens sparked the germination of a radical hypothesis concerning the transformation of species over time. Meanwhile, my valued mentor, Henslow, has been presenting my geological writings and fossils to the scientific community, bolstering my reputation as a naturalist of established regard.

As the expedition's tenure waxes, the experiences I acquire here have proven to be of immeasurable value. Assuredly, the practical knowledge and insights gained shall serve as the bedrock upon which I shall build a framework that may very well challenge the very pillars of our understanding of nature's law. Your decision to support this journey, despite initial reluctances, is one that I hold in the highest esteem and bear the utmost gratitude.

Your affectionate son,
Charles Darwin

a Democratic Republic is a form of government adopted from a republic and a democracy direct democracy was not what the farmers of the United States Constitution envisioned for the nation

Answer:

Prime minister

Explanation:

The United States is one of the few democracies that does not have a prime minister. In stead, the democracy has a president, elected by the people but determined by the Electoral College, a vice president and several advisers. After the advisors comes the governors or senators for the different states.

Answer:

The correct answer is

A; The United States is strong and will defend any nation facing communist aggression

Explanation:

The meaning of words given by Ronald Reagan in his speech is best summarized as the US country is strong and can defend itself from any type of communist rule.

Option A is the correct answer.

The Communist rule is the scenario where the income and the assets of the country are held by the communist party.

In the speech of Ronald Reagan, he said that the US country will not indulge in any kind of war rather it should maintain itself to be ready for stopping and defending from any communist rule. This will also preserve the freedom and harmony in the country.

Therefore, the summarization of Reagan's words given in part A is the most suitable answer.

Learn more about the communist rule in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/14338679

#SPJ2

Answer:

The correct answer is C) Schenck v. the United States (1919)

Explanation:

The Schenck v. the United States (1919) case has great importance in the history of the country. Two activists, Elizabeth Baer and Charles Schenck were writing against the military draft.

They even distributed pamphlets discouraging people from joining the military and promoted a rebellion against forceful draft.

They were charged under the Espionage Act  of 1917. In their defense, they stated how they were only practicing their right to free speech.

However, the Judge did not rule in their favour stating that a free speech is not protected under the first Amendment if it creates a 'clear and present danger'

The Supreme Court in Schenck v. the United States (1919) established that civil liberties may be restricted when speech poses a "clear and present danger" to national security or public safety.

In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that the government may restrict civil liberties when not doing so results in "clear and present danger." This landmark decision stated that free speech could be limited if the speech presented a significant threat to national security or public safety, exemplified by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's famous metaphor that one cannot yell "fire!" in a crowded theater when there is no fire due to the panic it would cause. The case set a precedent for how the First Amendment's free speech protections are interpreted, especially during times of war or national emergency.

Magistrate, because there are most of them.

Answer: B

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Magistrate, because there are the most of them.

Answer: Answer of 1st question

The Shay's Rebellion was a movement by the farmers of Massachusetts led by the Danial Shay who was American Revolutionary War vet.

The fight between the rebellion and the government army was limited in the Springfield. The rebels attacked the Springfield Armory in 1787 to seize the armory, but it was an unsuccessful attempt.

Basically, the protest was against the economic and civil right injustice. The Shay's rebellion demanded the more power to the central government and to form a new government.

Moreover, the reason behind for sparking off the Shay's rebellion was also the demand of Constitutional convention. There was a week national government under the Articles of Confederation. Because after getting the independence from the British monarchy, the founder fathers were not willing to form a type of central government which would held power more than the states. There was a fear of monopoly of power by the central government which would be same experience like as the British rule. So for this thinking the national government was weak under the Articles of Confederation.

Answer of 2nd question

There was a week national government under the Articles of Confederation. Because after getting the independence from the British monarchy, the founder fathers were not willing to form a type of central government which would held power more than the states. There was a fear of monopoly of power by the central government which would be same experience like as the British rule. So for this thinking the national government was weak under the Articles of Confederation.

Explanation: