Invent a draconian punishment for something that can happen today​

Answer:

Theodore Roosevelt

Explanation:

Answer:

The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 (habitually called the "court-pressing arrangement") was an authoritative activity proposed by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt to add more judges to the U.S. Incomparable Court so as to get great decisions with respect to New Deal enactment that the Court had dominated

Answer:

B. Both were examples of Arab-Israeli conflicts in the twentieth century.

Explanation:

The Six-Day War was fought by Israel against Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. This war was fought after the Arab-Israeli War where the relation between Israel with its neighboring nations soured.

The Yom Kippur War was fought between Syria and Egypt against Israel in an attempt to get back the lands lost during the Arab-Israeli War of 1967. This attack during the holiest day in the Jewish calendar led to a ceasefire between the warring nations.

The one similarity between these two wars is that they were both examples of Arab-Israeli conflicts in the 20th century.

Answer:

Explanation:

i got a 100%

Answer:

C. To reduce the number of nuclear weapons each country had

Explanation:

The START treaty was about reducing the number of nuclear weapons that the United States and Russia had.

The START treaty aimed to reduce nuclear weapons stockpiles to enhance global security amidst the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The purpose of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) that Russian and American leaders worked on immediately before and after the collapse of the Soviet Union was to reduce the number of nuclear weapons and stockpiles in their possession.

This treaty aimed to ensure global security by decreasing the risk of nuclear proliferation and preventing non-state actors, such as terrorist groups, from gaining access to these destructive weapons.

Through various iterations of the START treaty, both countries significantly reduced their nuclear arsenals, contributing to a more stable international environment.

Ralph Waldo Emerson , the nation’s leading transcendentalist, stressed individualism and challenged people to use their “inner light” to guide their lives and improve society .The correct answer is: D. Ralph Waldo Emerson

To calculate the answer, we first need to understand who each of these figures were:

A. Nathaniel Hawthorne - a novelist and short story writer known for works like "The Scarlet Letter" and "The House of the Seven Gables." While he explored themes of morality and individualism, he did not emphasize transcendentalist ideas as much as the other options.

B. Herman Melville - a novelist best known for his masterpiece "Moby D-i-c-k." Melville's works often delved into philosophical and existential themes, but he did not align himself closely with the transcendentalist movement.

C. Walt Whitman - a poet known for his collection "Leaves of Grass." Whitman celebrated the individual and the interconnectedness of all life, but he did so in a poetic style that was distinct from the transcendentalist philosophy.

D. Ralph Waldo Emerson - a philosopher, essayist, and lecturer who was one of the key figures of the transcendentalist movement. Emerson's essays, such as "Self-Reliance" and "Nature," emphasized individualism, intuition, and the importance of spiritual self-discovery.

Given this information, it is clear that the figure who stressed individualism and challenged people to use their "inner light" to guide their lives aligns most closely with Ralph Waldo Emerson. Therefore, the correct answer is option D.

Complete question:

______, the nation’s leading transcendentalist, stressed individualism and challenged people to use their “inner light” to guide their lives and improve society

A. Nathaniel Hawthorne

B. Herman Melville

C. Walt Whitman

D. Ralph Waldo Emerson

Answer:carter worker to end injustices around the world. Carter should have allowed other nations to choose their own futures

Explanation:

Looking at Jimmy Carter’s presidency, the best characteristics  are:

Carter worked to end injustices...

Carter should have allowed other nations to...

Jimmy Carter's presidency saw stagflation in America, which resulted in inflation and slow economic development.

Carter has aimed to advance human rights around the world.

He tried to end injustice in America based on discrimination toward African Americans.

For his foreign policies, Carter became known for the Camp David Accords.

Thus options B and D are the correct answer.

Learn more about Jimmy Carter here:

brainly.com/question/807624

Answer:

Explanation:

The success of empire’s centralized economy led to social harmony and to its fast expansion. The Inca’s central planning economy was, perhaps, the most efficient and successful ever seen. Collective labor from the ayllu was at the center of the economic productivity. Every member was obliged to contribute with his labor as tribute and in exchange they received food, clothing, housing, education and health care security.

The Inca economy did not use money as an exchange unit or markets to trade. However they did trade with other tribes outside their boundaries. Every unit of production was carefully planned and distributed where it was needed.

As an agricultural economy, the Incas made sure that they stored enough food in case of bad weather or war so they grew more food than they needed. They built storage buildings called tambos along roads for food to be distributed to nearby villages. The surplus would be kept in storage as a safety net.  Production was planned by the central government, each village would produce a specific product and be distributed to other villages the same way food was distributed. Read more =>

Answer: to settle the dispute if slavery between the southern and northern states.

Explanation:

Answer:

The President in the executive branch can veto a law, but the legislative branch can override that veto with enough votes. The legislative branch has the power to approve Presidential nominations, control the budget, and can impeach the President and remove him or her from office.

Explanation:

Answer:

Here is mine, i put it and got a hundred i dont know about the other persons but here is mine

Explanation:

Veto power

The President of the senate

The commander in chief

Recess appointments

Emergency Sessions of Congress

Adjournment of Congress

The President's Pay

Answer: After the advent of British rule, most of the huge families were a consequence of monsoonal delays along with the exploitation of the country's natural resources by the British for their own financial gain. Yet they did little to acknowledge the havoc these actions wrought.

Answer: · Despite the fact that Great Britain had been profiting greatly from its holdings in India for more than a century, the British stood aside and allowed millions of people in the British Raj to starve to death. This event was one of several that inspired calls for Indian independence, calls that would increase in volume over the first half of the twentieth century.

Explanation:

Answer:

Money, basically.

Explanation:

The major difference between communists and capitalists is that communists believe in a general conformity where everyone gets the same, and capitalists believe in a society where it's a race to get the most money, resources, and economic wealth.

Hope this helped. :)

Final answer:

Communism promotes common ownership of resources, while capitalism emphasizes private ownership and the free market.

Explanation:

A major difference between the fundamental beliefs of communists and capitalists is their approach to the ownership and distribution of resources. Communism promotes common ownership of property, means of production, and materials, with the government or the state controlling these aspects. On the other hand, capitalism emphasizes private ownership and the free market, where individuals and businesses have the right to own and control property and resources. In capitalism, resources are distributed based on supply and demand, whereas in communism, resources are distributed equally among the members of society.

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

The KKK never took control of the Southern government nor did it ever stay in political power. Hope this helps!

Answer:

C!!

Explanation:

The Sioux, Cheyenne, Crow, Comanche, Blackfoot and other Great Plains tribes all used tipis.

hope this helps!

Answer:

a and b

Explanation:

The system of slavery was based on hiring an overseer to control those enslaved. They had to follow separate slave codes which did house slaves have to do that enslaved field hands did not have to do. The correct options are A and B.

Slavery is a class system in which one person owns another as if it were property and exploits the slave's labor for economic gain. Slaves are at the bottom of any social hierarchy because they have no power or wealth of their own.

Slavery in ancient times was usually the result of debt, being born into a slave family, child abandonment, war, or as punishment for a crime. Slavery was not popular at first, and it was certainly not a thriving global business.

Thus, the ideal selection is options A and B.

Learn more about Slavery here:

https://brainly.com/question/9331183

#SPJ2

Among the options provided, appropriation bills are not included in the mandatory spending portion of the budget. They fall under discretionary spending, used to fund federal agencies and specific governmental activities.

In the context of the federal budget, mandatory spending is a type of spending that is required by law and typically covers long-term obligations. The parts of the budget that fall under mandatory spending typically include entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security, as well as veterans’ benefits. However, appropriation bills, are not part of mandatory spending. These are discretionary and are used to fund the various federal agencies and carry out specific governmental programs and activities.

https://brainly.com/question/30517242

#SPJ12

Answer:

Internal conflict and Political debates

Explanation:

One of the causes that describe the victory of half the period of the republic is the international conflict, because the Republican party does not need to be very scared by politics with other countries, for example with Russia. This way the republicans will be able to close international investigations. Another one of the causes that describe the victory in the middle of a period are the political debates because the republicans have a health policy that does not benefit the people with less resources, that a victory means the possibility of hiding the real politics of the party.

Answer:Personal scandals and policy debates

Explanation:

Answer:

today, what they have in common is the races that live there. In washington dc, richmond and virginia, there is 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.2% of hawaiian, pacific islanders

They're both capitols in the U.S.

Answer:

Explanation:

Hj

Jackson's presidency was marked by the Nullification Crisis, the veto against the national bank, and Maysville Road veto. He opposed South Carolina's stance in the Nullification Crisis, believed the national bank catered to the wealthy and vetoed the Maysville Road due to its unconstitutional nature.

The three chosen aspects of Andrew Jackson's presidency are the Nullification Crisis, National Bank veto, and the Maysville Road veto. Firstly, the Nullification Crisis was a conflict between South Carolina and the federal government. It involved disagreements over tariffs and state's rights. Jackson vehemently opposed South Carolina's stance and fought to preserve the Union.

Secondly, Jackson was against the national bank because he believed it catered to the wealthy and didn't benefit the common citizens. He vetoed the re-chartering of the national bank in 1832. Jackson's war on the bank was a significant aspect of his presidency.

Lastly, the Maysville Road veto was part of Jackson's fight against the congressional spending on local and state projects. He believed these projects were unconstitutional and demonstrated favoritism.

https://brainly.com/question/27920494

#SPJ12

Answer:

Situations that seem boring can sometimes lead to excitement.

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

I just did it on edge

Answer:

Industries in Florida have continued to strengthen their foothold in aerospace, life sciences, manufacturing, homeland security, and information technology.

Explanation:

Answer:

free trade zone

Explanation:

I think so hope this helps

The goal of NAFTA was to create a free trade zone between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Thus the correct option is D.

The term NAFTA stands for North American Free Trade Agreement which aims to produce free trade zones to promote trade activities between the United States, Canada, and Mexico and encourage growth.

Under NAFTA, the United States, Canada, and Mexico intended to establish a free trade area in order to lower the cost of doing business for American companies in Mexico and Canada.

NAFTA has had a disproportionately positive effect on the Canadian economy. It has enhanced principal elements and promoted the development of globally competitive businesses and foster development.

Therefore, option D's free trade zone is appropriate.

Learn more about free trade zone, here:

brainly.com/question/7458065

#SPJ7

Answer:hi there i hope you have a good day or night  the ANSWER is  they stabbed them at the back while the british were fighting total war against french empire.                                

thank you :D bye <3

Explanation:

Answer:

Hope this helps! If it doesn't let me know!

Explanation:

In 1949, the prospect of further Communist expansion prompted the United States and 11 other Western nations to form the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The Soviet Union and its affiliated Communist nations in Eastern Europe founded a rival alliance, the Warsaw Pact, in 1955. The alignment of nearly every European nation into one of the two opposing camps formalized the political division of the European continent that had taken place since World War II (1939-45). This alignment provided the framework for the military standoff that continued throughout the Cold War (1945-91).

A Divided Europe

Conflict between the Western nations (including the United States, Great Britain, France and other countries) and the Communist Eastern bloc (led by the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics or USSR) began almost as soon as the guns fell silent at the end of World War II (1939-45). The USSR oversaw the installation of pro-Soviet governments in many of the areas it had taken from the Nazis during the war. In response, the U.S. and its Western allies sought ways to prevent further expansion of Communist influence on the European continent. In 1947, U.S. leaders introduced the Marshall Plan, a diplomatic initiative that provided aid to friendly nations to help them rebuild their war-damaged infrastructures and economies.

 NATO continued its existence beyond the Cold War era and gained new member nations in Eastern Europe during the late 1990s. That development was not well received by leaders of the Russian Federation and became a source of post-Cold War tension between the East and the West.

Events of the following year prompted American leaders to adopt a more militaristic stance toward the Soviets. In February 1948, a coup sponsored by the Soviet Union overthrew the democratic government of Czechoslovakia and brought that nation firmly into the Communist camp. Within a few days, U.S. leaders agreed to join discussions aimed at forming a joint security agreement with their European allies. The process gained new urgency in June of that year, when the USSR cut off ground access to Berlin, forcing the U.S., Britain and France to airlift supplies to their sectors of the German city, which had been partitioned between the Western Allies and the Soviets following World War II.

The discussions between the Western nations concluded on April 4, 1949, when the foreign ministers of 12 countries in North America and Western Europe gathered in Washington, D.C., to sign the North Atlantic Treaty. It was primarily a security pact, with Article 5 stating that a military attack against any of the signatories would be considered an attack against them all. When U.S. Secretary of State Dean Acheson (1893-1971) put his signature on the document, it reflected an important change in American foreign policy. For the first time since the 1700s, the U.S. had formally tied its security to that of nations in Europe–the continent that had served as the flash point for both world wars.

The original membership of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) consisted of Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and the United States. NATO formed the backbone of the West’s military bulwark against the USSR and its allies for the next 40 years, with its membership growing larger over the course of the Cold War era. Greece and Turkey were admitted in 1952, the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) in 1955 and Spain in 1982. Unhappy with its role in the organization, France opted to withdraw from military participation in NATO in 1966 and did not return until 1995.

The formation of the Warsaw Pact was in some ways a response to the creation of NATO, although it did not occur until six years after the Western alliance came into being. It was more directly inspired by the rearming of West Germany and its admission into NATO in 1955. In the aftermath of World War I and World War II, Soviet leaders felt very apprehensive about Germany once again becoming a military power–a concern that was shared by many European nations on both sides of the Cold War divide.

In the mid-1950s, however, the U.S. and a number of other NATO members began to advocate making West Germany part of the alliance and allowing it to form an army under tight restrictions. The Soviets warned that such a provocative action would force them to make new security arrangements in their own sphere of influence, and they were true to their word. West Germany formally joined NATO on May 5, 1955, and the Warsaw Pact was signed less than two weeks later, on May 14. Joining the USSR in the alliance were Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, the German Democratic Republic (East Germany), Hungary, Poland and Romania. This lineup remained constant until the Cold War ended with the dismantling of all the Communist governments in Eastern Europe in 1989 and 1990.

In reaction to the fear of ongoing Communist growth, the United States and 11 other Western nations founded the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in 1949. (NATO).

In 1955, the Soviet Union and its Communist allies in Eastern Europe founded the Warsaw Pact, a rival organization.

Almost every European country aligned itself with one of the two opposing factions, formally recognizing Europe's longstanding political divide (1939-45).

This alignment framed the military standoff that lasted throughout the Cold War (1945-91).

Until the Korean War galvanized the organization's member states and a cohesive military structure was built up under the guidance of two US supreme commanders, NATO was little more than a political organization.

The Warsaw Pact, which was created in 1955, developed into a rivalry during the Cold War.

Doubts about the strength of the relationship between European states and the US ebbed and flowed, as did doubts about the NATO defense against a potential Soviet invasion.

Doubts led to the development of an independent French nuclear deterrent and France's 30-year withdrawal from NATO's military structure in 1966.

During the Cold War, the Warsaw Pact, also known as the Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation, and Mutual Assistance, was a collective defense treaty between the Soviet Union and seven other Soviet satellite republics in Central and Eastern Europe.

The Warsaw Pact was the military counterpart to the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (Comecon), a regional economic association for Central and Eastern European communist regimes.

The Warsaw Pact was formed in response to West Germany's accession to NATO in 1955, as a result of the Paris Pacts of 1954.

But it is also said to have been inspired by Soviet wishes to retain control over military troops in Central and Eastern Europe.

For more information about Warsaw Pact and NATO refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/26132771

#SPJ2

Answer:

To better understand who we are.

Explanation:

It would help us to know the past so, we couldn't repeat our mistakes too which occurred in past.