Islamic law limits a woman's opportunity to _________.

A) work and earn wages
B) inherit as much as her brother
C) buy and sell property
D) All of the above

The correct answer is World War II.

The formation of the UN was done in order to keep a world war from happening again.

Peace was its goal

The United Nations was formed to promote international peace and stability after World War II.

The original purpose for forming the United Nations was to promote international peace and stability after World War II. The United Nations was founded in 1945 by 51 countries committed to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations, promoting social progress, better living standards, and human rights. It aimed to prevent future conflicts, promote cooperation among nations, and address global challenges collectively.

Answer:

A number of authors have carried out comparisons of Nazism and Stalinism in which they have considered the similarities and differences of the two ideologies and political systems, what relationship existed between the two regimes, and why both of them came to prominence at the same time. During the 20th century, the comparison of Nazism and Stalinism was made on the topics of totalitarianism, ideology, and personality cult. Both regimes were seen in contrast to the liberal West, with an emphasis on the similarities between the two.[1] The political scientists Zbigniew Brzezinski, Hannah Arendt and Carl Friedrich and historian Robert Conquest were prominent advocates of applying the "totalitarian" concept to compare Nazism and Stalinism.

Explanation:

Answer: Article I of the United States Constitution deals with the Legislative Branch. The correct option among all the other options given in the question is option "A) Article I". The United States Congress is actually a bicameral legislature that consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Answer:

Christianity

Explanation:

I think it's:

The Revolution of 1848 failed in its attempt to unify the German-speaking states because the Frankfurt Assembly reflected the many different interests of the German ruling classes. Its members were unable to form coalitions and push for specific goals. The first conflict arose over the goals of the assembly.

Hope this helps! :)

Hello there,

Revolutions of 1848. Revolutions of 1848, series of republican revolts against European monarchies, beginning in Sicily, and spreading to France, Germany, Italy, and the Austrian Empire. They all ended in failure and repression, and were followed by widespread disillusionment among liberals.

I hope this helped my love and enjoy ur marvelous day!

If this is incorrect plz correct me if not plz mark this as brainest thx my love!!

Just looked it up n I got December 15, 1791

The soviet red army

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

the invasion and occupation of North Korea by the Soviet Union during World War II

Explanation:

The peninsula was ruled by the Korean Empire until it was conquered and colonized by Japan after the Russo-Japanese war of 1905. In 1945 - just after World War II - the peninsula was divided into two zones, the north occupied by the Soviet Union and the southern part occupied by the United States. In 1948, North Korea refused to participate in the elections held under the United Nations, finally creating two independent governments in each of the occupied areas. Both states claimed the entire peninsula as their own territory, which would lead them to the Korean war in 1950, which ended with the signing of an armistice in 1953; officially, the two countries are still at war, as a peace treaty has not yet been signed.

Answer:

Explanation:

Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) introduced the idea of the social contract into modern philosophy.  Hobbes believed kings should have strong power, but did not see that power being bestowed on them directly by God.  Rather, he viewed having governments as an arrangement people entered into as a way of having better security and stability for their lives.

John Locke (1632-1704) is often seen as the philosopher who began the Enlightenment era in philosophical thought.  Locke also argued for the idea of a "social contract."  According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed.  This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler.  Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his First Treatise on Civil Government.  Then, in his Second Treatise on Civil Government,  Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property.

Other Enlightenment philosophers followed the new pattern of political thought begun by Locke.  Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), in his landmark book, The Social Contract, strongly championed the sovereignty of the people (rather than thinking of kings as the "sovereign" ones). Rousseau contended that the "general will" of the people is always right -- in the sense that the people will, collectively, make decisions that are good for them as a society.

The correct answer is - Four.

Girija Prasad Koirala was a Nepalese politicians, the most prominent one, and the most dominant on the political scene in this Himalayan nation. He was politically active for over sixty years, serving as a Prime Minister of Nepal on four occasions, 1991-1994, 1998-1999, 2000-2001, 2006-2008. He was in charge of the country as Nepal was going through the transition from monarchy to republic.

His political carrier has seen multiple successes and downfalls, as the situation in Nepal was far from good, and there was almost constant unrest in the country. The feelings about his political career are mixed among the Nepalese population, with some considering him as a great man and politician, while some despise him and think of him as a terrible man and politician.

In appointing a new justice to the Supreme Court ...

The way that Supreme Court justices are put into office is stated in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution:

Answer:

To answer question 1...

In the opening of the article the reporter escribes how Mussolini carries himself, and his physical features. It makes Mussolini seem like a powerful, confident man.

Explanation:

Quote from the New York Times article...  “standing in a characteristic attitude, with his chin thrust out and his head thrown back, leaning on his clenched fists placed on the table in front of him, seeming to fix intently with his compelling dark eyes in turn each man in the hall.”

Final answer:

The reporter in the New York Times depicted Mussolini as an authoritarian promoting a totalitarian Fascist state. Mussolini's first warning to Parliament was significant as it marked the move toward a one-party system. The 'peculiar position' of Parliament indicates its reduced role to only formally endorsing Mussolini's decisions.

Explanation:

Depiction of Mussolini in the New York Times

The reporter in the New York Times likely depicted Mussolini based on his actions and policies, focusing on his authoritarian regime and the way he established a totalitarian state. Mussolini, also known as Il Duce (the leader), was characterized by his promotion of Fascism, and his government may have been described as oppressive and nationalistic.

Significance of Mussolini's First Warning to Parliament

Mussolini's first warning to the Parliament signified the beginning of his transformation of Italy into a single-party state, removing all political opposition and democratic institutions that could challenge his power. This move was significant as it marked the shift towards a totalitarian regime, where the Parliament found itself in a "peculiar position" of subordination to Mussolini's will.

The "Peculiar Position" of the Parliament

The "peculiar position" referred to the Parliament's loss of power and influence under Mussolini's regime. With Mussolini's ascent to power and the creation of a single-party state, the Parliament was effectively stripped of its ability to govern, serving merely as an instrument to rubber-stamp Mussolini's dictates, thus undermining the democratic essence of parliamentary governance.

Many college students, including potentially Tim, were part of the antiwar movement opposing the Vietnam War. The vast protests and symbolic acts depicted a strong opposition, and the divisiveness on campuses reflected the depth of sentiment against the war.

While Tim's feelings toward the Vietnam War during his college years are not explicitly detailed in the question, the broader antiwar movement in colleges during that time period indicates that many students, including possibly Tim, harbored significant opposition to the war. College students felt strongly about the Vietnam War because their peers were being drafted. They organized protests on campuses, culminating in actions like the erection of crosses to represent fallen soldiers, symbolizing both remembrance and protest.

By 1967, the nation was sharply divided between the doves, who strongly opposed the war, and the hawks, who supported it. This polarization was evident in the protests and counterprotests on university campuses. The language used by antiwar activists and the scale of the protests suggest a deep aversion to the war, which could be consistent with an opinion of 'hating' it.

It is evident that student activists were deeply invested in the outcome of the war, and their actions on campuses significantly contributed to the public discourse on the subject, indicating a likelihood that Tim's sentiments followed a similar disapproving view of the war, as reflected by a large section of the student population at the time.

The best decision for Country A would depend on various factors, including its available resources, economic conditions, market demand, and long-term sustainability goals.

Each option has its advantages and disadvantages, and the best decision would be one that maximizes economic growth, employment opportunities, and overall prosperity for the country. However, without more context and information about Country A's specific situation, it is challenging to determine the ideal choice definitively.

a) Focus both on its petroleum and seafood industries:

This option might be suitable if Country A has significant reserves of petroleum and a well-established seafood industry. Diversifying its economic activities can help reduce reliance on a single sector and provide a more stable revenue base. It can also help in generating foreign exchange earnings through exports and contribute to economic growth.

b) Focus on the seafood industry only:

If Country A has a comparative advantage in seafood production and the global demand for seafood is high, focusing on the seafood industry exclusively could be a viable option. Specializing in a single industry can lead to increased efficiency and competitiveness in the international market.

c) Focus on the petroleum industry only:

If Country A possesses substantial petroleum reserves and has the necessary infrastructure to extract and export petroleum efficiently, concentrating on the petroleum industry might bring significant revenues. However, relying heavily on a single non-renewable resource like oil can lead to economic vulnerability when global oil prices fluctuate.

d) Decide to find another industry to focus on:

If Country A's current industries are facing challenges, declining demand, or dwindling resources, exploring and investing in new industries might be a sensible choice. Identifying emerging sectors with growth potential and fostering innovation can lead to long-term economic development and job creation.

In reality, countries often pursue a mix of these strategies, diversifying their economies while also capitalizing on their unique strengths and resources. Governments and policymakers typically conduct thorough assessments and engage in strategic planning to determine the best course of action based on their country's specific circumstances and goals.

To know more about seafood here

https://brainly.com/question/33620936

#SPJ6

The best decision for Country A is:

c) focus on the petroleum industry only.

To determine the best decision for Country A, we need to analyze the production choices and opportunity costs for both petroleum and seafood for Country A and Country B.

Country A:

- 1 unit of cost produces 16 units of petroleum.

- 1 unit of cost produces 8 units of seafood.

Country B:

- 1 unit of cost produces 8 units of petroleum.

- 1 unit of cost produces 8 units of seafood.

Opportunity Cost Analysis:

For Country A:

- The opportunity cost of producing 1 unit of petroleum is [tex]\( \frac{8}{16} = 0.5 \)[/tex] units of seafood.

- The opportunity cost of producing 1 unit of seafood is [tex]\( \frac{16}{8} = 2 \)[/tex] units of petroleum.

For Country B:

- The opportunity cost of producing 1 unit of petroleum is [tex]\( \frac{8}{8} = 1 \)[/tex] unit of seafood.

- The opportunity cost of producing 1 unit of seafood is [tex]\( \frac{8}{8} = 1 \)[/tex] unit of petroleum.

Comparative Advantage:

- Country A has a lower opportunity cost for producing petroleum (0.5 units of seafood) compared to Country B (1 unit of seafood).

- Country B has a lower opportunity cost for producing seafood (1 unit of petroleum) compared to Country A (2 units of petroleum).

Based on this analysis, the best decision for Country A would be to focus on the petroleum industry, as it has a comparative advantage in producing petroleum.

Therefore, the best decision for Country A is:

c) focus on the petroleum industry only.

What best describes how the Arab Empire unified regions of North Africa and the Middle East?

The Arab Empire unified feuding tribes under the religion of Islam.

~Hope this answers your question!~

The correct answer is D) the Arab empire unified feuding tribes under the religion of Islam.

The statement that best describes how the Arab empire unified regions of North Africa and the Middle East is: "the Arab empire unified feuding tribes under the religion of Islam."

One of the smartest things Arabs did during the spread of its empire was to integrate the new territories under the same religious principles. Arabs used Islan as a way to unify people into the new empire and that way they could best control regions in the Middle East and North Africa. Using the teachings of prophet Muhammad, the Arabs did with religion, what other empires did violence.

Answer:

Explanation:

The war in Iraq was pursued beginning in 2003 as a preemptive strike against the regime of Saddam Hussein and the perception that he had stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction that could be used for terroristic purposes. That perception did not turn out to be a full reality, but the war pursued regime change in Iraq nonetheless.  Saddam Hussein was removed from power.  Later, in 2006, Hussein was convicted of crimes against humanity by the Iraqi Special Tribunal.  He was executed by hanging.  

Answer:

Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.

Explanation:

Answer:

U.S. and Canada

Explanation:

From the options that are given there are two clear pairs of nations that are very similar, China and Mexico, and Canada and the USA, but Canada and USA are closer in the plus minus thatn China and Mexico, with the next standard of living:

USA:                  $47,200 15.1% 80/1000 78.4

Canada:             $39,400 9.4% 76/1000 74.7

Plus/minus:        $7800   5.7%    4/1000  3.7

Mexico             $13,900 18.2%   13/1000     76.5

China                 $7,600 2.8%    1.31/1000    74.7

Plus/Minus:       $6,300 15.4% 12.69/1000   1.8

as you can see in the total plus minus Canada and USA have better percentage and are closer together.

Answer:

usa and canda

Explanation:

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be A). a state that sues another for violating interstate trade

____________________________________________________

The case that the Supreme Court would hear through its original jurisdiction power is a state that sues another for violating interstate trade.

____________________________________________________

Definitions:

Jurisdiction power:

Jurisdiction power is the power for the jury to hear a case for the first time, this means that the court is the first to hear about the case.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why answer choice "A).  a state that sues another for violating interstate trad" is the correct answer because this is a big case that needs to be sent to the Supreme Court as soon as possible.

This is a cause that wouldn't be seen first by the lower courts, or courts that are below the ranking of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court would use its jurisdiction power to hear this case first. A state suing another state involves the government, since they're the ones that have the power to sue for the state. This case would pretty much involve the government, which the Supreme Court needs to make sure that it could be solved as soon as possible. Interstate trade is pretty much known as trades that are from one state to another state, and in the answer, it's saying that a state is suing another state for violating state to state trading. Trading is very important in the U.S, and it's more important to get trades from other fellow states, if there is a problem between the states, it needs to be focused on to reduce the tension of hatred.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

The reason why answer choice "B). a man convicted of a crime based on false evidence " is incorrect because:

This is the type of case that would first be seen by the lower courts, and doesn't need to Supreme Court to be involved, since this is a case that would happy in a local community. The community court will deal with this case first. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

The reason why answer choice "C). a teacher prohibited from praying in a school cafeteria" is incorrect because:

This is another case that would be first seen the the lower court, or local court. This is also a case that doesn't need the Supreme Court to be involved in. The lower court will deal with these types of cases, since it's not ideal to the whole country. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

The reason why answer choice "D). a reporter whose First Amendment rights are violated" is incorrect because:

This is also another case that would first be seen the the lower courts. If someone's amendment rights were violated, then they would see a local court. They wouldn't see the Supreme Court be cause the Supreme Court wouldn't want to deal with a case like this, since it's not their job to deal with a case like that, that's the job for the lower courts. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

If you see the trend, all of the answer choices are wrong because they do not need the involvement of the Supreme Court for the case. Those types of cases should be dealt with the lower courts; they're the ones that are suppose to see this case first.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

The case that the Supreme Court can hear through its original jurisdiction power is:

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/14368704

The goal was to eliminate the legal segregation of Mexican Americans

Answer:

Congressional leaders form select committees when they want to take up issues that fall outside the jurisdictions of existing committees, to highlight an issue, or to investigate a particular problem.

Explanation:

Select committees conduct hearings and function as focal points for the issues they are assigned for considering.  

These committees are granted the right to sit at any time and anywhere in the United States, whether or not Congress is in session. They have the right to call witnesses and demand the provision of necessary documentation. Committee hearings are usually held openly. For refusing to answer the questions of the committee members, the persons summoned to the hearings can be fined up to $1,000 or imprisoned for up to one year. The reports of the special and investigation committees are heard by the chambers that formed them. After hearing reports, special committees are usually disbanded.

The correct answer is - Stalin used intimidation and fear, while Gandhi used civil disobedience.

Stalin and Gandhi had totally different methods of achieving their goals to make changes in their respective countries.

Stalin used intimidation, fear, and elimination of everyone he saw as opponent, critic, or was just not suitable for the society in his eyes. He was a textbook brutal dictator.

Gandhi was encouraging civil disobedience, but without using violence. He was promoting peace and love, and was not interested in bloodshed. Gandhi was a person that used peaceful disobedience to achieve changes in India.

Stalin used intimidation and fear, while Gandhi employed civil disobedience as a means of enacting change, illustrating a stark contrast in their methods.

Stalin and Gandhi went about bringing about change in very different ways. Stalin used coercion and terror to stay in power, and he frequently used force and persecution to put down resistance. Gandhi, on the other hand, promoted the use of nonviolence and civil disobedience as strategies for bringing about social and political change.

Gandhi focused on nonviolent resistance and moral persuasion, while Stalin relied on compulsion and dictatorship. Despite the fact that both leaders supported civil disobedience, their strategies were essentially different. Stalin's strategies depended on centralised power and raw force, whereas Gandhi's techniques centred on mobilising mass movements and appealing to the conscience of oppressors.

Thus, the easiest way to sum up the differences between Stalin's and Gandhi's approaches is to say that the former employed intimidation and terror, while the latter used civil disobedience.

Germany, Italy, and Japan.

Answer:

germany italy japan

Explanation: just did it nd got it right

The 1920s in America saw the rise of motion pictures and radio shaping national culture around consumerism, while the 1950s were marked by the introduction of television and computers, significantly impacting daily lives and signaling a shift to a Postmodern era.

In the 1920s, the United States experienced rapid technological advancements that changed the cultural landscape of the nation. These technologies included motion pictures and radio, which played significant roles in shaping cultural attitudes by providing uniform content nationwide, thus creating a more cohesive national culture.

Americans embraced consumerism, as mass production allowed for the widespread distribution of goods like clothing, food, and entertainment. Technology also fueled the popularity of jazz music and the 'flapper' image, reinforcing the consumer identity. Meanwhile, the 1950s were characterized by technological innovations that made American life more convenient, such as household appliances.

During this era, television joined books, radio, and film as a primary medium, further influencing culture and introducing a more homogeneous image of American life across the country. The computer emerged as a transformative invention, altering both work and leisure practices and setting the stage for future technological integration into daily life. The rise of new media also contributed to a growing sense of 'textuality' of experience, where life is increasingly mediated through signs and images, heralding the arrival of a Postmodern era.

Contrasting the two, while both decades saw technological advancements that altered American lives and societal values, the 1920s focused more on consumerism and entertainment, whereas the 1950s introduction of television and computers began to influence Americans' daily lives in a more integral and transformative way.

It made the world seem like a smaller place to many people.

The key word in this question is international, indicating that every country, or nearly every country, participates in pop culture. Focusing on this word allows the second, third, and fourth answers to be eliminated because they all discuss some idea of separation. Separation is the opposite of a shared type of culture as by definition, a shared culture brings people together. In this case, the shared, international pop culture brings countries together.

Drawing borders without understanding local politics or ethnicities can lead to ethnic conflict, reinforce ethnocentric bias and cultural imperialism, and complicate the handling of transnational issues.

When an outside country draws borders without understanding the local political or ethnic situations, it can lead to a variety of problems. One primary concern is the potential for ethnic conflicts. These conflicts can arise when borders drawn by outside powers separate members of the same ethnic group into different countries, or when they force rival ethnic groups into the same territory, under the same government. This has been seen notably in Africa, where borders drawn for the benefit of imperialist powers have led to a legacy of violent ethnic conflict.

Ethnocentric bias and cultural imperialism often accompany the process of external border-drawing. Such bias can distort outsiders' views and understanding of local culture and societies, leading to policies and military actions that do not achieve desired results and often exacerbate local tensions. Cultural imperialism, the imposition of one's own cultural values on another culture, can further complicate matters, leading to misunderstanding, stereotyping, conflict, and even violence.

Another potential problem is related to transnational issues. These issues, such as terrorism or environmental crises, do not respect country-specific borders. Arbitrary borders drawn by outside powers can inhibit transnational effort towards resolving these issues, as we have seen in cases like the U.S. war against terrorism.

https://brainly.com/question/31050120

#SPJ3

Communism

Seeks a classless society.

Communism

Seeks to eliminate religion.

Communism

No private ownership of land or property.

Communism

Seeks an international revolution.

Communism

Has a socialist economy.

Fascism

Wears uniforms usually of a certain color.

Fascism

Condemns socialism and supports private property.

Fascism

Has a special salute.

Fascism

Views women as inferior despite its public rhetoric.

Fascism

Defends private property

Fascism

Each class in society has a place and function.

Fascism

The state must struggle to survive even if it means war.

Fascism

Does not follow a predefined ideology.

Fascism

Appeals to the middle-class and industrialists.

Fascism

Use of ancient myth of racial superiority incorporated into society

germany was a major sufferer because the usa borrowed money from germany and when the usa couldnt pay back germany's economy buckled

They actually needed really heavy machinery to be built so they would open even more jobs due to the need for machines. They also raised wages

The term casualty is used to describe someone who has been injured or killed in a war.

The term “casualty” is used to describe military personnel who were hurt, killed, captured, or went missing while serving, as well as the army as a whole who suffered numerous severe losses.

Therefore, A person that has been wounded or killed in a war is referred to as a casualty.

Learn more about the casualty, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/13814906

#SPJ2

Answer:

Casualty

Explanation:

The other person is right