I'll assume that's a thesis statement meant for argument or debate. An argument could be made on either side, depending on your point of view.
On the one hand, the United States and the Soviet Union had dramatically different worldviews. The US system of democracy and capitalism was at odds with the USSR system of totalitarian rule and communist collectivism. The two nations were allied only for the sake of defeating Germany and Japan in the Second World War, and were in opposition to each other in about every other way. Following the war, they became bitter opponents in the Cold War.On the other hand, the USA and the other Allies in World War II needed the help of the Soviet Union in order to defeat the combined threat of Germany and Japan. The USSR suffered millions of casualties due to the war -- more than any other nation. They bore the brunt of the fighting against Germany, even before the US entered the war. And President Roosevelt, while not in agreement with the governing philosophy of Joseph Stalin, still thought he was someone that could be worked with cooperatively. (When President Truman took over after Roosevelt's death, he did not share that same view of Stalin and the USSR.)So the matter can be argued from both sides. Pick your side and write a strong essay!
Explain how the location and makeup of nato and warsaw pact affected Europe druing the1950s and 1960s. How did these aiiiances affect cold war tensions ?
The NATO/Warsaw Divide essentially formed the boundary of what was known as the Iron Curtain, that is, the divide between democratic capitalist countries and authoritarian communist countries. This led to a tense border and a sense of a built in line that could and possibly might be added to as the countries engaged in geopolitical chess.
What dominant factor helped the Renaissance spread beyond Italy?
The idea of the Renaissance spread from Italy to the North European countries. Factors such as expanded trade, the growth and development of European cities, the invention of the printing press, the rising rich class who wanted to support art, contributed to this. Many kings experienced artistic achievements as a source of national pride. Also, artists fled the war in Italy in the late 1400's. The Catholic Church's lack of interest in participating in the real life of people played a major role, simply did not want the change.
Still, the main factor was trade and technological innovation that go together.
The invention of the printing press is the dominant factor. Around 1450. Johannes Gutenberg invented mobile printing press.
Ronald Reagan’s conservative message
A)made him popular with many Americans.
B)caused most people to question his leadership skills.
C)made him unpopular with evangelical Christians.
D)appealed to only a small group of Republicans.
Ronald Reagan (1980-1988) was a conservative Republican. His ideas couched in democratic ideology and republican values appeal to and were popular with many Americans.
Answer:
made him popular with many Americans.
Explanation:
Which action was not a precedent set by President George Washington? He served only two terms. He lived in the White House. He established dignity in office. He formed the cabinet.
George Washington served the post as the first US president during the year 1789 to 1797. Prior to it, he was a famous American soldier and Founding Father of the nation.
President George Washington removed the precedent that the US president should only serve his duties for terms. He was the one who established the Cabinet to Presidency post a powerful one. Thus, he was mostly involved in public service for the nation's welfare.
George Washington stipulated the construction of the White House for the president and monitored its construction. Thus, he died in the year after he 1800 before the final completion of the White House, which did not give him the opportunity to live in the white house.
Learn more about President George Washington here:
https://brainly.com/question/15705077
The precedent that George Washington did not set was living in the White House; this took place after his presidency.
Explanation:The action that was not a precedent set by President George Washington was that he lived in the White House. Washington set the precedent of serving only two terms as president, establishing the cabinet, and maintaining the dignity of the office. The White House was not the presidential residence during Washington's presidency; he lived first in New York and then in Philadelphia. The White House was not completed until after Washington's presidency, with John Adams being the first President to reside there.
What need drove the writing of the constitution?
A. People wished to have a local form of government that would be responsible to their needs.
B. The government was too powerful and needed to be reined.
C. The government's work was made difficult because the Articles of Confederation were too weak.
D. The United States was isolated diplomatically from other nations.
B. The government was too powerful and needed to be reined.
C. The government's work was made difficult because the Articles of Confederation were too weak. is your answer.
Remember, if the Articles of Confederations had worked, we would not need the Constitution.
The Articles of Confederation created an alliance of states, and a weak central body government that barely had any power (figure-head). This soon became a problem, and was solved by the creation of the Constitution, which created a 3 part main government made up of Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch, and a redistribution of power that allowed the National Government have more power over the State Governments.
~
This supreme court. Decision opened all of the territories to slavery and made the policy of polular sovereignty unconstitutional
On March 6th 1857 the United States Supreme Court issued a decision known as the "Dred Scott decision" affirming the right for all slave owners to take their slaves into the western territories freely because there was no such thing as a state where slavery was illegal, even though it was supposed to be. This means that it opened all of the territories to slavery. Therefore this decision overruled the policy of popular sovereignty that had to resolve this issue in the first place. Congress declared it unconstitutional.
Would you support President Roosevelt’s proposal? Explain.
“The need for collecting large campaign funds would vanish [go away] if Congress provided an appropriation [federal money] for the proper . . . expenses of each of the great national parties, an appropriation ample [large] enough to meet the necessity [the needs of the political parties]. . . . Then [the parties should agree that] no party receiving campaign funds from the [federal] Treasury should accept more than a fixed amount from any individual . . . and [detailed information about the money taken in and spent] could without difficulty be provided.”
—President Theodore Roosevelt, Annual Message to Congress, December
I know this is like a your own opinion question but im just confused can someone just make it a little bit more simple it sounds like to me that both parties will be receiving the same amount of money
President Roosvelt's proposal, as it is written here, refers to the congress giving a fixed and equivalent amount of money to each of the large parties that are postulated calculated large enough to cover the main needs of the campaign. In addition, the parties can receive a fixed amount of other individuals, as long as they give a detailed report of it. With this second contribution, not necessarily both parties have the same amount, but their campaign budget is reduced proportionally to their voters and does not lend itself to the appearance of incredibly large funds from a single donor that unbalance the campaign or give rise to to suspicions of corruption.
One exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause is that one state _____. cannot enforce the civil law of another state is required to recognize marriages and divorces in another state cannot enforce the criminal law of another state is required to enforce the criminal law of another state
One exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause is that one state _public policy____. cannot enforce the civil law of another state is required to recognize marriages and divorces in another state cannot enforce the criminal law of another state is required to enforce the criminal law of another state
One exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause is that one state is required to recognize marriages and divorces in another state .
Describe the different views between the federalists and the anti federalists regarding the constitution and its ratification.
The Federalists were a political party of the United States. The first one, actually. They were all about supporting the Constitution and attempting to convince all the States to ratify the document. They were led by Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton and James Madison (both founding fathers of the United States) did not believe that a Bill of Rights was needed. They argued that the Bill of Rights would end up limiting the rights of the people instead of protecting them.
The Anti-Federalists had many with them and they all opposed to the Constitution in the ratification debate, but they weren't an organized or very coordinated group. They protested against the new system and how, in their view, it threatened liberties. The Anti-Federalists also believed that the new system was not enough to protect individual rights.
In the end, the Anti-Federalist were not successful in their goal, which was the prevention of the adoption of the Constitution, but what they did was at least enough to cause some changes, being them responsible for the creation and the implementation of what we now know as the Bill of Rights, which was presented to Congress by, surprisingly, James Madison himself.
During the American Revolution, a process in which the Thirteen American Colonies became by winning the independence from Great Britain, the term federal was applied to any person who supported the colonial union and the government formed under the Articles of Confederation that served as its first constitution. In contrast, the term Anti-Federalism referred to the movement that opposed the creation of a federal government as well as the ratification of the Articles of Confederation as the United States of America’s Constitution.
By analyzing the different views of these groups, the federalists and the anti-federalists, regarding the constitution and its ratification, it could be said that federalists supported removing powers from the states to give it to the national government, while anti-federalists defended the political powers to remain in the states.
Similarly, whereas federalists favored dividing powers among different branches of government; anti-federalist wanted the legislative branch to have more power than the executive.
Finally, with respect to this executive branch of the government, Federalists proposed a single person to lead the executive branch while anti-federalists that this leading person of the executive branch might become a king or tyrant.
Read the excerpt from Loom and Spindle.
I was a "little doffer" until I became old enough to earn more money; then I tended a spinning-frame for a little while; and after that I learned, on the Merrimack corporation, to be a drawing-in girl, which was considered one of the most desirable employments, as about only a dozen girls were needed in each mill. We drew in, one by one, the threads of the warp, through the harness and the reed, and so made the beams ready for the weaver's loom. I still have the two hooks I used so long, companions of many a dreaming hour, and preserve them as the "badge of all my tribe" of drawing-in girls.
The narrator is proud because she
held a desirable job as women’s roles changed in factory work.
worked hard at the factory and was rewarded with an impressive wage.
was admired as the best among her group of “drawing-in” girls.
learned a practical skill that she later applied in her personal life.
The narrator in Loom and Spindle is proud of her desirable job as a 'drawing-in' girl, a position that required skill and was held by limited number of girls in each mill.
Explanation:The correct answer is: The narrator is proud because she held a desirable job as women's roles changed in factory work. From the excerpt, we gather that the narrator took pride in her transition from a 'little doffer' to a 'drawing-in' girl, an occupation which was considered desirable due to the limited girls required in each mill. The fact that she preserved her tools as the 'badge of her tribe' of 'drawing-in girls' also implies a sense of pride and honor associated with her work. This indicates that the narrator took pride in being part of a select group of skilled workers in the factory.
Learn more about Literary Analysis here:https://brainly.com/question/31411617
#SPJ2
What assumptions have been made about fingerprints? What are the problems with these assumptions?
Fingerprint matching is determined through unique characteristics. To achieve it must have certain ridges. loops and whorls. The characteristic points are then compared to the prints on the system. When forensics finds that there are enough similar matching points, they state whether they are fingerprints in which they match or not.
It is assumed that prints are one hundred percent positive, that is their use is one hundred percent successful with a zero error.
However, the prints are not considered scientific evidence, but it is still a presumption. There is never a hundred percent matching the prints, but just the similarity within the prints.
Fingerprints are assumed to be unique and unchanging, characteristics that are used in forensic analyses. However, these assumptions can lead to possible errors as fingerprints can be worn or distorted.
Explanation:Assumptions about fingerprints include their uniqueness and their unchanging nature. Each person has a unique fingerprint pattern formed during fetal development where cells of the stratum basale meet the papillae of the underlying dermal layer; these patterns do not change with age or growth.
This is similar to the concept of DNA fingerprinting, a forensic method used to determine whether two DNA samples are from the same or related individuals. However, these assumptions can be problematic as fingerprints can be worn down or distorted, leading to potential misidentifications in forensic investigations.
Learn more about Fingerprints here:https://brainly.com/question/33382174
#SPJ3
The blank lasted from 1850 to 1864 in China. Its leader, blank , called for the overthrow of the blank in China. However, the rebellion ultimately failed.
1.A. Taiping Rebellion
B. Boxer Rebellion
C. Meiji Restoration
2.A. Commodore Matthew Perry
B. Empress Ci Xi
C. Hong Xiuqan
3.A. spheres of influence
B. Tokugawa Shogunate
C. Qing dynasty
The TAIPING REBELLION lasted from 1850 to 1864 in China. Its leader, HONG XIUQANG, called for the overthrow of the QING DYNASTY in China. However, the rebellion ultimately failed.
The Taiping Rebellion was the bloodiest Civil War in history. It took control of southern China and commanded nearly 30 million people.
The TAIPING REBELLION lasted from 1850 to 1864 in China. Its leader, HONG XIUQANG, called for the overthrow of the QING DYNASTY in China. However, the rebellion ultimately failed.
During world world war 1, many American women helped gain supporr for the suffrage movement by
working in wartime industries
Who won the election of 1800?
Thomas Jefferson won the presidential election with;
73 votes to John Adams; 65 votes
Thomas Jefferson
Aaron Burr and Thomas Jefferson fought for the title of president in the election of 1800, and it was a split. They were tied, and turned to Alexander Hamilton, who ran the Treasury of State, for a final vote. Although, Hamilton and Burr were longtime friends, Jefferson was elected.
True or false the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the constitution in the declaration states goals or philosophy and the constitution puts the ideals into action
The answer is True
The declaration of independence states goals or philosophy's of the first American colonies with wishes of freedom, equality and the seek of the happiness and the constitution put this goals into action through the correct laws applied to real life and society.
how did the spartan government differ from the government in athens
In Sparta there was a diarchy monarchy, that means that there were two kings, one who dealt with the military and the other who was more concerned with religion and internal affairs, when the Agiads and the Euriponts reigned together. The assembly was not an important institution as there was no democracy.
In Athens, there was a monarchy at first, then the power passed to the aristocrats and little by little it became a democracy. There were three political organizations where citizens participated in numbers that exceeded hundreds and even thousands. It is about the assembly (in some cases with a quorum of 6000), the council of the 500 (Boule) and the courts (minimum of 200 people, but sometimes up to 6000). Of these three institutions, the Assembly and the courts are the true organs of power. In the middle of the IV century a. C. The judicial functions of the Assembly were greatly reduced, although it always kept a relevant role in the beginning of certain types of political trials.
The central events of Athenian democracy were the meetings of the Assembly (Ekklesia). Unlike in a Parliament, the members were not elected, but were citizens who could attend whenever they wanted. The democracy created in Athens was direct, not representative as it is today: any adult male who was a citizen and over 18 years of age could participate, and it was a duty to do so. The officials of the democracy were partly elected by the Assembly and partly by lot.
Frontier settlers did very little to help each other.
True
False
Helped to organize the African Methodist Episcopal Church in Georgia Helped organize Georgia's Republican Party Served in the Georgia Constitutional Convention Elected to the Georgia House of Representatives Based on the stated facts, who is being described? A) Nat Turner B) Thaddeus Stevens C) Henry McNeal Turner D) George Washington Carver
Answer:
C.) Henry Mcneal Turner
Henry Mcneal Turner helped in many more than just 1 organization. He was elected to the House of Representatives in Georgia as well. He was one of the most influential African American leaders in late-nineteenth-century.
*Hope this helped! Mark Brainliest if it did*
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Henry Mcneal Turner
In addition to blacks and women, three other often discriminated against groups staged movements in hopes of gaining equal rights. Who were the three groups? Chose one of those groups and explain how they fought back in order to gain rights.
How did the Townsend Plan influence President Roosevelt?
A. He tried to persuade the Supreme Court to support the plan.
B. He created the Works Progress Administration to implement it.
C. He responded to it by supporting the social Security Act.
D. He worked to convince Americans that a pension plan was not needed.
C. He responded to it by supporting the Social Security Act.
The Townsend Plan's main goal was to provide welfare for those who were over the working age, which, as seen today, is covered by Social Security, which started from the Social Security Act.
~
Answer:
it is c.
Explanation:
What was the outcome of the 1914 Battle of Tannenberg on the eastern front?
A) Russia suffered almost 80,000 casualties and 90,000 prisoners of war as compared to Germany’s 15,000 casualties.
B) The battle caused Russia to seek a peace treaty to end its conflict with Germany.
C) The battle resulted in a stalemate as both Russian and German armies suffered heavy losses.
D) Russia was decisively victorious, capturing more than 50,000 German troops and halting their advance.
Answer: A) Russia suffered almost 80,000 casualties and 90,000 prisoners of war, as compared to Germany's 15,000 casualties.
Additional notes:
The Battle of Tannenburg was a huge loss for Russia. The battle resulted in the near destruction of the Russian Second Army. The Scond Army's commander, General Alexander Samsonov, committed suicide, knowing that the tsar would hold him responsible for the devastating loss.
Answer:
The answer is A russia suffered almost 80,000 casualties and 90,000 prisoners of war as compared to Germany's 15,000 casualties.
Explanation:
What would have been the most serious negative effect in Sparta if it’s army had become weak? Would soilders leave Sparta and go fight somewhere else? Or would slaves have staged a successful rebellion? Pls help I have a test next week about this
I would probable say that the slaves would have mounted a successful rebellion, because Sparta was pretty much based off its military. not positive though so don't get mad if i'm wrong, I see what you people say and I can be one of them.
What were the circumstances of the lisbon earthquake of 1749, and what trauma did it pose for both orthodox christian theology and philosophical optimism? (what features are in common between the two outlooks, that you infer that voltaire is hostile to?)?
I believe you are referring to the 1755 Lisbon earthquake.
On November 1, 1755, the greater area of Lisbon was destroyed by an earthquake, which was followed by a tidal wave which destroyed the shipping in the river Tagus. Around sixty thousand people have lost their lives.
This occurrence sparked a lot of discussions involving both religious and philosophical questions. Two main point of views are Voltaire's and Rousseau's.
Voltaire examined evil and suffering related to the disaster. He had made the connection before, pondering onto previous earthquakes, such as prior earthquakes in China, Lima and Callao. He thought that God's rules were not meant for man's best good, asking if it has been the will of God or if could it have been vengeance. He also reflected on why Lisbon, if Lisbon was worse than other cities and if there were worse sins or more evil in Lisbon than other cities. Finally asking if god is the culprit of these catastrophes, even though he is supposed to be love and kindness.
Rousseau on the other hand had more systematic views of the world and man. Rousseau believed man is good by nature but is corrupted in contact with other men, the only solution being to return to nature. Rousseau represented the optimism views and and considered Voltaire's poem on the Lisbon earthquake both a personal attack on him and a lack of understanding and distortion of God's preponderant action.
The common ground is that neither one of them were atheists, both believed that God existed, but diverged on the nature of naturally good (Rousseau) and evil (Voltaire).
Briefly describe early exploration efforts of Europeans.
write 4 sentences that explain what factors contributed to the type of economy that characterized the New South?
The New South's economy was influenced by the wealth and power of southern planters, the profitability of cotton reliant on slave labor, and the rise of the domestic slave trade following the outlawing of the international slave trade.
Explanation:Several factors contributed to the type of economy that characterized the New South. Firstly, the wealthy southern planters wielded most of the region's economic and political power, shaping the culture and economy of the South. Their economic survival and prosperity relied on forced labor from the institution of slavery.
Secondly, the South's economy was largely centered on the production of cotton, and so, the international cotton market greatly influenced their economic situation. Their cotton's profitability relied on the use of slave labor, while its market value increased their economic dependency on other regions and countries.
Lastly, the outlawing of the international slave trade resulted in an explosion of the domestic slave trade, providing numerous economic opportunities for white people involved in various aspects of the trade.
Learn more about New South's Economy here:https://brainly.com/question/3360855
#SPJ3
Which court MOST LIKELY handles cases in which the death penalty is involved? A) The Supreme Court B) The Superior Court Eliminate C) The Magistrate Court D) The Court of Appeals of Georgia
How did new weapons affective fighting in World War I?
New weapons meant stronger weapons better defense etc
Basically, it meant they upgraded from older equipment
Throughout the first truly global war, we can see from the present the large technological advancement and impact that the war had brought, as well as the effects of each. Each weapon created was to realistically make the war shorter, but sadly, prolonged the war and resulted in high casualty rates. Some of the most influential weapons would be listed below.
Machine guns: While the Machine gun had been around for a long time (Since the Mexican-American War & American Civil War, in which the Maxim machine-gun was used, these weapons was able to evolve for the better (and much more later on in history), making it more lethal, lighter, be able to hold more rounds, faster cooling system and firing rate, and much more other improvements. the machine guns (MG) was used widely on both sides, and were used as defensive weapons, being able to mow down charges by the opposing side through "no-mans land".
Tanks: Tanks were created by the British, and later copied by Germany and the USA. They had their first frightening appearance during the Battle of Somme, which was described as heavy sheet metal that rolled across the fields and deflected rounds. However, the first few prototypes that were created were flimsy, non-practical, and "easily destroyable". By the time the USA joined in 1917, many sides had been extensively using tanks, which led to the US developing their own variant, one that had a turrent, based on a tank known as the "Renault FT". These tanks were produced in massive numbers, and had a great impact on the resource-drained Central Powers.
Gas: Gas such as mustard gas (which are already banned today through the Geneva Convention) was also used extensively throughout the war. They were generally used without warning, and would lead to symptoms such as gagging, watery eyes, burning sensation, and even death, blindness, and others. Usually birds were used on both sides to detect the usage of gas, and soldiers had seconds to put on their gas masks.
Airplanes: Warplanes had a lesser impact on the war, but they still had their debut with glory. Biplanes and triplanes were extensively used by both sides, and could be seen doing reconnaissance, dropping bombs on enemy locations, and even have dogfights.
Submarines: While these also have been around since the Revolutionary War (the "Turtle"), subs were greatly expanded upon, especially by Germany and Austrio-Hungary. They were used extensively in the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Ocean to sink battleships, battlecruisers, and especially transport ships that brought vital resources and even troops to the western front.
While there were much more "new" technologies, these were some of the weapons that had the greatest impacts, and also were the ones that (except for gas) greatly expanded on during the latter years.
~
Progressive reformers tried to remedy problems created by a0 and urbanization through political action.
The answer would be: Industrialisation
Answer:
Industrialization
Explanation:
Progressive reformers tried to remedy problems created by industrialization and urbanization through political action. These problems usually involved poverty and inequality. As cities became more industrialized, more people moved to these areas looking for work in factories and new businesses. New immigrants also came from abroad for the same reasons. This led to the creation of poor, urban communities in these new cities. The progressive reformers wanted to deal with these by using political means.
Before 1789, people in France lived under absolute rule—the king had total control of the government. The people fought the revolution to gain rights such as freedom of speech and greater participation in the government. The revolution was the start of a new era for France. But soon after, Napoleon Bonaparte came to power. He ruled with little input from others and conquered neighboring countries, while generally preserving the revolution’s changes, such as freedom of speech and religion. In a sense, the revolution came full circle—it started and ended with one leader having nearly total control of the country. What does this indicate about the revolution? Did it succeed or fail? Explain your views in a short paragraph of four or five sentences.
The French revolution, even when it started and ended with one leader, succeeded because allowed people to think that they could ask for something better; it presented the possibility that a government is about the people and not about the ruler, and this idea was reinforced with the basic civil rights that Napoleon continues to respect after the monarchy was overthrown.
Answer:
I think the French Revolution was a success. Although it started and ended with one leader having control, the common people were better off under Napoleon than under King Louis XVI. Napoleon was a better ruler than Louis because he allowed rights that the people didn’t have under the king, such as freedom of speech and religion.
This is the right answer for Plato and Edmentum users.
You can also write it like this, if you don't want to write down the whole answer.
It indicates that even if the people fought for their rights, someone came to power. But it doesn't mean it failed, I think it actually succeded. All their voices were heard and the government changed. For example, in the paragraph, it says that Napoleon even though he had the control; he was "preserving the revolution’s changes, such as freedom of speech and religion."
Like and Rate!
Where did the peasants get some of their ideas about equality and freedom?
Peasants simply decided that it was time to take a stand and support the ideas proposed by John Ball who encouraged peasants to plea their case before the king. Many were the reasons why the peasants get some ideas about equality and freedom and revolted:
1) They realized how unequal they were from anyone else - nobles were attempting to reimpose medieval dues.
2) They realized they were receiving an unfair treatment - peasants were starving and there was a lack of simpathy for poor.
Peasants acquire their ideas of equality and freedom from several sources including their involvement in rebellions against the nobility, the transition from feudal to capitalist and industrial societies, and the influence of socialist and communist ideals.
Explanation:The peasants in various eras and regions got their ideas of equality and freedom from several sources such as the uprisings they engaged in like the Jacquerie and English Peasants' Revolt, the societal transformation caused by major events such as the plague and the rise of capitalism, and the influence of political philosophies like socialism and communism.
For instance, during the Middle Ages, in response to economic pressure and limited opportunities, peasants organized rebellions that directly challenged the prevailing nobility's privileges. While the elites often prevailed, these upheavals slowly shaped a perception of equality and instilled in the peasants a sense of fight for justice, and thus began to evoke notions of freedom.
Moreover, the dawn of capitalism and the transition from feudal society to industrial society also brought about new ideas of equality and freedom. As peasants experienced a shift in their economic situation and became increasingly tied to the vicissitudes of the wider capital market, they started to crave for more equality and financial stability.
The spread of socialist and communist ideals, particularly those articulated by Karl Marx, further fueled peasants' aspirations for equality, freedom, and justice. These ideological frameworks highlighted the inequality innate in society and paved the way for the development of ideas of freedom and equality in the peasant class.
Learn more about Peasant Ideas of Equality and Freedom here:https://brainly.com/question/33937167
#SPJ3