Answer:
1. F = 45,458.17 N
2. P = 12,800,000 W
Explanation:
Part 1. The thrust force is the sum of the forces on the air and on the fuel.
For the air, 107 kg of air is accelerated from 281 m/s to 679 m/s in 1 second.
F = ma
F = (107 kg) (679 m/s − 281 m/s) / (1 s)
F = 42,586 N
For the fuel, 4.23 kg of fuel is accelerated from 0 m/s to 679 m/s in 1 second.
F = ma
F = (4.23 kg) (679 m/s − 0 m/s) / (1 s)
F = 2,872.17 N
So the thrust on the jet is:
F = 42,586 N + 2,872.17 N
F = 45,458.17 N
Rounded to three significant figures, the force is 45,500 N.
Part 2. Power = work / time, and work = force × distance, so:
Power = force × distance / time
Power = force × velocity
P = (45,458.17 N) (281 m/s)
P = 12,773,745.77 W
Rounded to three significant figures, the power is 12,800,000 W.
9. Would the maximin criterion achieve perfect income equality? a. Yes. There would be no way to reallocate resources to raise the utility of the poor. b. Yes. The maximin criterion would eliminate poverty. c. No. It is impossible for complete equality to benefit the worst-off people in society. d. No. Complete equality would reduce incentives to work, which would reduce total income, which would reduce the incomes of the worst-off people in society.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Although the maximin criterion emphasizes the worst-off person in society and it's targeted towards equalizing of the distribution of income by transferring income from the rich to the poor, it will not lead to a complete egalitarian society. Because this will make the people not to have incentive to work hard and the societal total income will substantially fall off and the least fortunate person will be worse off. Thus, this rule still allows disparities in income.
When the daughter nucleus produced in a radioactive decay is itself unstable, it will eventually decay and form its own daughter nucleus. If the newly formed daughter nucleus is also unstable, another decay will occur, and the process will continue until a nonradioactive nucleus is formed. Such a series of radioactive decays is called a decay chain.
A good example of a decay chain is provided by 232 90Th, a naturally occurring isotope of thorium.
What is the energy Q released in the first step of the thorium-232 decay chain? The atomic mass of 232 90Th is 232.038054 u and the atomic mass of 228 88Ra is 228.0301069 u.
Answer in (MeV) and show your work
Answer:
4.981 MeV
Explanation:
The quantity of energy Q can be calculated using the formula
Q = (mass before - mass after) × c²
Atomic Mass of thorium = 232.038054 u, atomic of Radium = 228.0301069 u and mass of Helium = 4.00260. The difference of atomic number and atomic mass between the thorium and radium ( 232 - 228) and ( 90 - 88) show α particle was emitted.
1 u = 931.494 Mev/c²
Q = (mass before - mass after) × c²
Q = ( mass of thorium - ( mass of Radium + mass of Helium ) )× c²
Q = 232.038054 u - ( 228.0301069 + 4.00260) × c²
Q = 0.0053471 u × c²
replace 1 u = 931.494 MeV/ c²
Q = 0.0053471 × c² × (931.494 MeV / c²)
cancel c² from the equation
Q = 0.0053471 × 931.494 MeV = 4.981 MeV
A 26-g steel-jacketed bullet is fired with a velocity of 630 m/s toward a steel plate and ricochets along path CD with a velocity 500 m/s. Knowing that the bullet leaves a 50-mm scratch on the surface of the plate and assuming that it has an average speed of 600 m/s while in contact with the plate, determine the magnitude and direction of the impulsive force exerted by the plate on the bullet.
Utilizing the principles of impulse and momentum, the magnitude of the impulsive force exerted by the steel plate on the bullet is approximately 40,576.47 N, and its direction is opposite to the bullet's initial motion.
Explanation:Impulsive Force on a Ricocheting Bullet
The problem involves finding the impulsive force exerted by the steel plate on a steel-jacketed bullet that ricochets off its surface. To determine the impulsive force, we utilize the concepts of impulse and momentum. The bullet has an initial velocity of 630 m/s and exits with a velocity of 500 m/s after ricocheting. While in contact with the plate, we are given an average speed of 600 m/s. The displacement during contact is 50 mm, equivalent to 0.050 meters.
To find the time of contact, we use the formula for distance, which is: distance = average speed * time, or time = distance / average speed. Hence, the time of contact is 0.050 meters / 600 m/s = 0.0000833 seconds (or 83.3 microseconds). Now, using the change in momentum (Δp = mass * change in velocity) and the impulse-momentum theorem (impulse = Δp), we can find the impulse. Considering the magnitude of the velocities and the mass of the bullet (26 g or 0.026 kg), the change in velocity is (500 m/s - 630 m/s) = -130 m/s. Therefore, Δp = 0.026 kg * -130 m/s = -3.38 kg*m/s. Given that impulse equals the average force times the time of the impact (Impulse = average force * time), we can find the average force as Impulse/time = -3.38 kg*m/s / 0.0000833 s = -40,576.47 N. The negative sign indicates that the force on the bullet is directed opposite to its initial motion, which is consistent with a ricochet.
The magnitude of the impulsive force exerted by the plate on the bullet is approximately 40,576.47 N, and its direction is opposite to the bullet's initial motion, demonstrating the principle of conservation of momentum during collisions.
Adam and Bobby are twins who have the same weight. Adam drops to the ground from a tree at the same time that Bobby begins his descent down a frictionless slide. If they both start at the same height above the ground, how do their kinetic energies compare when they hit the ground? a. Bobby has twice the kinetic energy as Adam More information is required to compare their kinetic energies. b. Adam has greater kinetic energy than Bobby. c. They have the same kinetic energy. d. Bobby has greater kinetic energy than Adam.
Answer:c
Explanation:
it is given that Adam and Boby starts from same height so their total Energy at top is [tex]T_t[/tex]
[tex](T_{top})_a=[/tex]Potential Energy of Adam
[tex](T_{top})_b=[/tex]Potential Energy of boby
when they fall a height h their speed at bottom will be
[tex]v=\sqrt{2gh}[/tex]
which will be same for both Adam and Boby
Energy at bottom
[tex](T_b)_a=[/tex]Kinetic Energy of Adam
[tex](T_b)_b=[/tex]Kinetic Energy of boby
Since velocity is same therefore kinetic Energy is same for Adam and boby
thus option c is correct
Ray baked a cake. The total mass of the cake was equal to the total mass of the ingredients. This is an example of what?
Answer:
The Law of Conservation of Mass-Energy
Explanation:
It states that nothing can be created or destroyed, which is why the cakes mass is the same as the ingredients.
Answer : This is an example of law of conservation of mass.
Explanation :
Law of conservation of mass : It states that mass can neither be created nor destroyed but it can only be transformed from one form to another form.
The balanced chemical reaction always follow the law of conservation of mass.
Balanced chemical reaction : It is defined as the reaction in which the number of atoms of individual elements present on reactant side must be equal to the product side.
For example :
[tex]2H_2+O_2\rightarrow 2H_2O[/tex]
This reaction is a balanced chemical reaction in which number of atoms of hydrogen and oxygen are equal on the both side of the reaction. So, this reaction obey the law of conservation of mass.
As per question, the total mass of the cake was equal to the total mass of the ingredients. That means, they obey the law of conservation of mass.
Hence, this is an example of law of conservation of mass.
Bored, a boy shoots his pellet gun at a piece of cheese that sits, keeping cool for dinner guests, on a massive block of ice. On one particular shot, his 1.3 g pellet gets stuck in the cheese, causing it to slide 25 cm before coming to a stop. If the muzzle velocity of the gun is 73 m/s and the cheese has a mass of 109 g, what is the coefficient of friction between the cheese and ice?
To calculate the coefficient of friction between the cheese and ice, we can use the work-energy theorem. By calculating the work done on the cheese by the friction force, we can determine the coefficient of friction. By plugging in the given values, the coefficient of friction is found to be 0.047.
Explanation:To find the coefficient of friction between the cheese and ice, we can use the concept of work-energy theorem. The work done on the cheese by the friction force is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the cheese. The work done by friction is given by the equation:
Work = Force x Distance
In this case, the force is the friction force and the distance is the distance the cheese slid. We can express the friction force as:
Friction Force = coefficient of friction x Normal Force
Since the cheese is in contact with the ice, the normal force exerted on the cheese is equal to its weight:
Normal Force = mass of cheese x acceleration due to gravity
Substituting the expressions for friction force and normal force into the work equation, we get:
Work = (coefficient of friction x mass of cheese x acceleration due to gravity) x distance
Since the work done is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the cheese, we have:
0.5 x mass of cheese x final velocity^2 - 0.5 x mass of cheese x initial velocity^2 = (coefficient of friction x mass of cheese x acceleration due to gravity) x distance
Simplifying the equation, we can solve for the coefficient of friction:
coefficient of friction = (0.5 x mass of cheese x (final velocity^2 - initial velocity^2)) / (mass of cheese x acceleration due to gravity x distance)
Plugging in the given values, we find that the coefficient of friction between the cheese and ice is 0.047.
The answer is [tex]\mu \[/tex]approx 0.0153.
The coefficient of friction between the cheese and the ice can be determined by analyzing the conservation of momentum and the work-energy principle.
First, let's calculate the initial momentum of the pellet:
[tex]\[ p_{pellet} = m_{pellet} \cdot v_{pellet} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ p_{pellet} = 0.0013 \, \text{kg} \cdot 73 \, \text{m/s} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ p_{pellet} = 0.0949 \, \text{kg} \cdot \text{m/s} \][/tex]
When the pellet gets stuck in the cheese, the momentum is transferred to the cheese-pellet system. By conservation of momentum:
[tex]\[ m_{pellet} \cdot v_{pellet} = (m_{pellet} + m_{cheese}) \cdot v_{cheese} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 0.0013 \, \text{kg} \cdot 73 \, \text{m/s} = (0.0013 \, \text{kg} + 0.109 \, \text{kg}) \cdot v_{cheese} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ v_{cheese} = \frac{0.0013 \, \text{kg} \cdot 73 \, \text{m/s}}{0.1103 \, \text{kg}} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ v_{cheese} = \frac{0.0949 \, \text{kg} \cdot \text{m/s}}{0.1103 \, \text{kg}} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ v_{cheese} \approx 0.8608 \, \text{m/s} \][/tex]
Now, we use the work-energy principle to find the coefficient of friction. The work done by friction is equal to the kinetic energy lost by the cheese as it slides to a stop:
[tex]\[ W_{friction} = f \cdot d \][/tex]
[tex]\[ f = \mu \cdot N \][/tex]
[tex]\[ N = m_{cheese} \cdot g \][/tex]
[tex]\[ W_{friction} = \mu \cdot m_{cheese} \cdot g \cdot d \][/tex]
The kinetic energy lost by the cheese is equal to its initial kinetic energy:
[tex]\[ KE_{initial} = \frac{1}{2} m_{cheese} \cdot v_{cheese}^2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ KE_{initial} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 0.109 \, \text{kg} \cdot (0.8608 \, \text{m/s})^2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ KE_{initial} \approx 0.0396 \, \text{kg} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{s}^2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ KE_{initial} \approx 0.0396 \, \text{J} \][/tex]
Setting the work done by friction equal to the kinetic energy lost:
[tex]\[ \mu \cdot m_{cheese} \cdot g \cdot d = KE_{initial} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \mu \cdot 0.109 \, \text{kg} \cdot 9.81 \, \text{m/s}^2 \cdot 0.25 \[/tex], [tex]\text{m} = 0.0396 \, \text{J} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \mu \cdot 2.5963 \, \text{kg} \cdot \text{m/s}^2 = 0.0396 \[/tex], [tex]\text{J} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \mu \approx \frac{0.0396 \, \text{J}}{2.5963 \, \text{kg} \cdot \text{m/s}^2} \] \[ \mu \approx 0.0153 \][/tex]
The correct format for the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\mu \approx 0.0153} \][/tex]
A baseball catcher extends his arm straight up to catch a fast ball with a speed of 40 m/s. The baseball is 0.145 kg and the catcher’s arm length is 0.5 m and mass 4.0 kg. (a) What is the angular velocity of the arm immediately after catching the ball as measured from the arm socket? (b) What is the torque applied if the catcher stops the rotation of his arm 0.3 s after catching the ball?
To solve the problem, we require an understanding of physics concepts like angular velocity, moment of inertia, and torque. The catcher catching the ball changes its angular momentum, resulting in an angular velocity. The torque experienced when the arm stops the rotation can be computed using known equations.
Explanation:This question involves concepts of physics like angular velocity, moment of inertia, and torque. Initially, with the catcher's arm at the ready position, the system (arm and ball) has zero angular velocity. Then when the catcher catches the ball, he applies an impulse to it and changes not just the linear momentum but the angular momentum about the shoulder as well.
The change in angular momentum (angular impulse) will be equal to the product of the mass of the baseball, its velocity, and the arm's length, i.e., 0.145kg × 40m/s × 0.5m= 2.9 kg m²/s. This change in angular momentum over time will induce an angular velocity, which can be calculated by dividing the change in angular momentum by the moment of inertia of the system (arm and ball).
For part (b), the torque experienced by the arm when it stops the rotation can be computed from the known equation Torque = (Moment of Inertia × Angular Acceleration). The angular acceleration is determined by the change in angular velocity divided by the time taken which in this case is 0.3 seconds. Taking all these physics concepts into account will yield the correct numerical solutions for parts (a) and (b).
Learn more about Physics - Angular Momentum here:https://brainly.com/question/29716949
#SPJ11
To find the angular velocity of the arm after catching the ball, conservation of angular momentum was used, resulting in an angular velocity of 7.85 rad/s. The torque needed to stop the arm's rotation in 0.3 seconds is -9.66 N - m, calculated using the angular deceleration. The answer involves concepts of angular momentum and torque.
A baseball catcher extends his arm straight up to catch a fast ball with a speed of 40 m/s. The baseball is 0.145 kg and the catcher’s arm length is 0.5 m and mass 4.0 kg.
(a) What is the angular velocity of the arm immediately after catching the ball?
To find the angular velocity of the arm immediately after catching the ball, we need to use the principle of conservation of angular momentum. The initial angular momentum of the ball can be calculated using:
L_initial = m_ball * v_ball * r_arm
where m_ball = 0.145 kg, v_ball = 40 m/s, and r_arm = 0.5 m.
L_initial = 0.145 kg * 40 m/s * 0.5 m = 2.9 kg·m²/s
The moment of inertia of the arm plus the ball (approximated as point mass at the end) is:
I_total = I_arm + m_ball * r_arm²
Using the formula for the moment of inertia of a rod about one end: I_arm = (1/3) * m_arm * (r_arm)², where m_arm = 4.0 kg and r_arm = 0.5 m:
I_arm = (1/3) * 4.0 kg * (0.5 m)² = 0.333 kg·m²
Adding the moment of inertia of the ball:
I_total = 0.333 kg·m² + 0.145 kg * (0.5 m)² = 0.333 kg·m² + 0.03625 kg·m² = 0.36925 kg·m²
Since angular momentum is conserved, L_initial = I_total * ω, where ω is the angular velocity:
ω = L_initial / I_total = 2.9 kg·m²/s / 0.36925 kg·m² = 7.85 rad/s
(b) What is the torque applied if the catcher stops the rotation of his arm 0.3 s after catching the ball?
Torque (τ) can be calculated using the relationship between torque, angular deceleration (α), and moment of inertia (I):
τ = I_total * α
First, we find the angular deceleration. The arm stops, meaning final angular velocity is 0.
Using the angular kinematic equation: ω_final = ω_initial + α * t, where ω_final = 0 and t = 0.3 s:
0 = 7.85 rad/s + α * 0.3 s
α = -7.85 rad/s / 0.3 s = -26.17 rad/s²
Now, calculate torque:
τ = 0.36925 kg·m² * (-26.17 rad/s²) = -9.66 N·m
The negative sign indicates that the torque is in the direction opposite to the rotation.
A glass column is filled with mercury and inverted in a pool of mercury. The mercury column stabilizes at a height of 735 mm above the pool of mercury. What is the pressure of the atmosphere?
Answer:
[tex] 735 mm Hg = 0.967 atm= 97991.940 Pa=97.992Pa[/tex]
Explanation:
Previous concepts
Atmospheric pressure is defined as "the force per unit area exerted against a surface by the weight of the air above that surface".
Torricelli shows that we can calculate the atmosphric pressure with a glass tube inside of a tank and with the height we can find the pressure with the relation
[tex]P_{atm}=\rho_{Hg} g h[/tex]
Solution to the problem
For this case we can use the following conversion factor:
[tex]1 atm = 760 mm Hg[/tex]
And if we convert the 735 mm Hg to atm we got this:
[tex]735 mm Hg * \frac{1atm}{760 mm Hg}=0.967 atm[/tex]
And also we can convert this value to Pa and Kpa since we have this conversion factor:
[tex] 1 atm =101325 Pa[/tex]
And if we apply the conversion we got:
[tex]0.967 atm *\frac{101325 Pa}{1 atm}=97991.940 Pa[/tex]
And that correspond to 97.99 Kpa.
Finally we can express the atmospheric pressure on different units for this case :
[tex] 735 mm Hg = 0.967 atm= 97991.940 Pa=97.992Pa[/tex]
The atmospheric pressure (atm) resulting from the mercury column is 0.967 atm.
The given parameters;
the height of the mercury column, h = 735 mm HgThe atmospheric pressure (atm) resulting from the mercury column is calculated as follows;
760 mmHg ------- 1 atm
735 mmHg -------- ?
[tex]= \frac{735 \ \times \ 1 atm}{760} \\\\= 0.967 \ atm[/tex]
Thus, the atmospheric pressure (atm) resulting from the mercury column is 0.967 atm.
Learn more here:https://brainly.com/question/9165035
The surface of the Sun has a temperature of about 5 800 K. If the radius of the Sun is 7 × 108 m, determine the power output of the sun. (Take e = 1, and σ = 5.67 × 10−8W/m2⋅K4).
a. 3.95 × 1026 W
b. 5.17 × 1027 W
c. 9.62 × 1028 W
d. 6.96 × 1030 W
Answer:
a. [tex]3.95\times10^{26} [/tex]W
Explanation:
[tex]T[/tex] = temperature of the surface of sun = 5800 K
[tex]r[/tex] = Radius of the Sun = 7 x 10⁸ m
[tex]A[/tex] = Surface area of the Sun
Surface area of the sun is given as
[tex]A = 4\pi r^{2} \\A = 4(3.14) (7\times10^{8})^{2}\\A = 6.2\times10^{18} m^{2}[/tex]
[tex]e[/tex] = Emissivity = 1
[tex]\sigma[/tex] = Stefan's constant = 5.67 x 10⁻⁸ Wm⁻²K⁻⁴
Using Stefan's law, Power output of the sun is given as
[tex]P = \sigma e AT^{4} \\P = (5.67\times10^{-8}) (1) (6.2\times10^{18}) (5800)^{4}\\P = 3.95\times10^{26} W[/tex]
Blood flows through a section of a horizontal artery that is partially blocked by a deposit along the artery wall. As a hemoglobin molecule moves from the narrow region into the wider region, its speed changes from v2 = 0.800 m/s to v1 = 0.630 m/s. What is the change in pressure, P1 - P2, that it experiences? The density of blood is 1060 kg/m3.
Answer:
[tex]\Delta P=128.843\ Pa[/tex]
Explanation:
given,
speed of blood = v₂ = 0.800 m/s
v₁ = 0.630 m/s
density of blood = 1060 kg/m³
Atmospheric pressure = 8.89 ✕ 10⁴ N/m²
Using Bernoulli equation
[tex]P_1 - P_2 = \dfrac{1}{2}\rho (v_2^2-v_1^2)[/tex]
[tex]\Delta P= \dfrac{1}{2}\rho (0.8^2-0.63^2)[/tex]
[tex]\Delta P= \dfrac{1}{2}\times 1060\times (0.8^2-0.63^2)[/tex]
[tex]\Delta P=128.843\ Pa[/tex]
the change of pressure is equal to [tex]\Delta P=128.843\ Pa[/tex]
A disk is rotating with angular speed ω1=2.0 rad/s about axle. The moment of inertia of disk & axle is 0.47 kg m2. A second disk of moment of inertia 0.31 kg m2 is dropped onto first. If dropped disk is rotating in opposite direction of ω1 with angular velocity ω2=1.0 rad/s, find magnitude of angular velocity of combination of two disks. Express your answer in rad/s.
Answer:
w = 0.808 rad / s
Explanation:
As indicated by the moment of inertia t the angular velocity of the disks we use the concept of conservation of the angular momentum, for this we define the system as formed by the two discs, therefore the torque during the crash is internal and the angular momentum is conserved
Let's write in angular momentum
Initial. Before impact
L₀ = I₁ w₁ + I₂ w₂
Final. After the rock has stuck
[tex]L_{f}[/tex] = (I₁ + I₂) w
The two discs are rotating in opposite directions, we consider the rotation of the first positive disc, so the angular velocity of the second is negative
L₀ =[tex]L_{f}[/tex]
I₁ w₁ - I₂ w₂ = (I₁ + I₂) w
w = (I₁ w₁ - I₂ w₂) / (I₁ + I₂)
Let's calculate
w = (0.47 2.0 - 0.31 1.0) / (0.47+ 0.31)
w = 0.63 / 0.78
w = 0.808 rad / s
in the direction of disc rotation 1
A person is trying to judge whether a picture (mass = 1.05 kg) is properly positioned by temporarily pressing it against a wall. The pressing force is perpendicular to the wall. The coefficient of static friction between the picture and the wall is 0.720. What is the minimum amount of pressing force that must be used?
Answer:
the minimum amount of pressing force P will be 14.29 N
Explanation:
the friction force Fr will be
Fr = μ*N
where μ= coefficient of static friction , N= force normal to the plane
then N=P (force applied by the person)
from Newton's first law
net force = F = 0
Fr - weight = 0
μ*P - m*g =0
P = m*g/μ = 1.05 kg*9.8 m/s² / 0.720 = 14.29 N
P = 14.29 N
Helium-oxygen mixtures are used by divers to avoid the bends and are used in medicine to treat some respiratory ailments. What percent (by moles) of He is present in a helium-oxygen mixture having a density of 0.518 g/L at 25 ∘ C and 721 mmHg ?
Answer:
The percentage by mole of Helium present in the Helium-Oxygen mixture is = 66.6%
Explanation:
From General gas equation.
PV = nRT............................... Equation 1
Where n = number of moles, V = volume, P = pressure, T = temperature, P = pressure, V = volume.
n = mass/molar mass .................. Equation 2
substituting equation 2 into equation 1.
PV = (mass/molar mass)RT
⇒ Mass/molar mass = PV/RT..................... Equation 3
But mass = Density × Volume
⇒ M = D × V.................... Equation 4
Where D = density, M = mass
Substituting equation 4 into equation 3
DV/molar mass = PV/RT............ Equation 5
Dividing both side of the equation by Volume (V) in Equation 5
D/molar mass = P/RT .............. Equation 6
Cross multiplying equation 6
D × RT = P × molar mass
∴ Molar mass = (D × RT)/P.................. Equation 7
Where D = 0.518 g/L , R = 0.0821 atm dm³/K.mol,
T = 25°C = 25 + 273 = 298 K,
P =721 mmHg = (721/760) atm= 0.949 atm
Substituting these values into equation 7
Molar mass = (0.518 × 0.0821 × 298)/0.949
Molar mass = 13.35 g/mole
The molar mass of the mixture is =13.35 g/mole
Let y be the mole fraction of Helium and 1-y be the mole fraction of oxygen.
∴ 13.35 = 4(y) + 32(1-y)
13.35 = 4y + 32 - 32y
Collecting like terms in the equation,
32y - 4y = 32 - 13.35
28y = 18.65
y = 18.65/28
y =0.666
y = 0.666 × 100 = 66.6%
∴The percentage by mole of Helium present in the Helium-Oxygen mixture is = 66.6%
The percent (by moles) of He in the helium-oxygen mixture with a density of 0.518 g/L at 25 ∘C and 721 mmHg is 13.6%.
Explanation:To determine the percent (by moles) of He in the helium-oxygen mixture, we need to use the Ideal Gas Law equation:
PV = nRT
Where:
P is the pressure (721 mmHg)V is the volume (0.518 L)n is the number of moles of the gas we're interested in (He in this case)R is the ideal gas constant (0.0821 L·atm/mol·K)T is the temperature in Kelvin (25 + 273 = 298 K)Rearranging the equation to solve for n:
n = PV / RT
Substituting the values:
n = (721 mmHg * 0.518 L) / (0.0821 L·atm/mol·K * 298 K)
n = 0.136 mol
Since the total number of moles in the mixture is 1 (as it is a binary mixture), the percent (by moles) of He can be calculated as:
Percent of He = (0.136 mol of He / 1) * 100%
Percent of He = 13.6%
Learn more about Helium-oxygen mixture here:https://brainly.com/question/34707926
#SPJ3
For many years Colonel John P. Stapp, USAF, held the world's land speed record. He participated in studying whether a jet pilot could survive emergency ejection. On March 19, 1954, he rode a rocket-propelled sled that moved down a track at a speed of 632 mi/h. He and the sled were safely brought to rest in 1.40s
(a) Determine the negative acceleration he experienced.
__ m/s2
(b) Determine the distance he traveled during this negative acceleration.
__ m.
Answer:
(a) -202 m/s²
(b) 198 m
Explanation:
Given data
Initial speed (v₀): 283 m/s[tex]\frac{632mi}{h} .\frac{1609.34m}{1mi} .\frac{1h}{3600s} =283m/s[/tex]
Final speed (vf): 0 (rest)Time (t): 1.40 s(a) The acceleration (a) is the change in the speed over the time elapsed.
a = (vf - v₀)/t = (0 - 283 m/s)/ 1.40s = -202 m/s²
(b) We can find the distance traveled (d) using the following kinematic expression.
y = v₀ × t + 1/2 × a × t²
y = 283 m/s × 1.40 s + 1/2 × (-202 m/s²) × (1.40 s)²
y = 198 m
A team of dogs drags a 53.9 kg sled 1.62 km over a horizontal surface at a constant speed. The coefficient of friction between the sled and the snow is 0.234. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s 2 . Find the work done by the dogs. Answer in units of kJ.
Answer:
200.24 kJ
Explanation:
[tex]m[/tex] = mass of sled = 53.9 kg
[tex]d[/tex] = distance traveled by the sled = 1.62 km = 1620 m
[tex]\mu[/tex] = Coefficient of friction between sled and snow = 0.234
frictional force acting on the sled is given as
[tex]f = \mu mg[/tex]
[tex]F[/tex] = Applied force by the dogs on the sled
Since the sled moves at constant speed, the force equation for the motion of the sled is given as
[tex]F = f \\F = \mu mg[/tex]
[tex]W[/tex] = Work done by the dogs on the sled
Work done by the dogs on the sled is given as
[tex]W = F d\\W = \mu mg d\\W = (0.234) (53.9) (9.8) (1620)\\W = 200237.64 J\\W = 200.24 kJ[/tex]
The work done by the dogs is 200.238 kJ.
The work done by the dog is equal to the work done to move the sled through the distance and the work done against friction.
Formula:
W = dma+μmgd............. Equation 1Where:
W = work done by the dogsm = mass of the sleda = acceleration of the sledg = acceleration due to gravityμ = coefficient of frictionFrom the question,
Given:
m = 53.9 kga = 0 m/s² (move with constant speed)d = 1.62 km = 1620 mg = 9.8 m/s²μ = 0.234Substitute these values into equation 1
W = (53.9×0×1620)+(53.9×9.8×0.234×1620)W = 2002378 JW = 200.238 kJHence, The work done by the dogs is 200.238 kJ.
Learn more about work done here: https://brainly.com/question/8119756
An 80 kg astronaut has gone outside his space capsule to do some repair worlc Unfortunately, he forgot to lock his safetytether in place, and he has drifted 5.0 m away from the capsule. Fortunately, he has a 1000 w portable laser with freshbatteries that will operate it for 1.0 hr His only chance is to accelerate himself toward the space capsule by firing the laser inthe opposite direction. He has a 10-h supply of oxygen. How long will it take him to reach safety?
Final answer:
The question involves using the principles of conservation of momentum and kinematics in space to rescue an astronaut adrift from their space capsule using a laser for propulsion. However, the time required for the astronaut to reach safety cannot be calculated without the thrust or force specifics of the laser.
Explanation:
The scenario described involves the principles of conservation of momentum and the astronaut's ability to utilize a laser as a propulsion device. The astronaut's mass is 80 kg, and they need to use the laser to accelerate towards the space capsule. Without any external forces, momentum is conserved, and hence, the astronaut can generate thrust in space by expelling photons in the opposite direction of the desired movement, albeit very weak thrust. To determine how long it will take him to reach safety, we would need to calculate the actual propulsion force of the laser and the resulting acceleration. This can be derived from the conservation of momentum and Newton's second law of motion. However, with the current information provided, it is impossible to provide an accurate estimate without knowing the momentum or thrust provided by the laser.
Without such crucial information, assuming an ideal scenario and if the astronaut could somehow generate a constant force to obtain a tangible acceleration, we can use kinematics equations to estimate travel time once the acceleration is known. Yet in this specific situation, it's not feasible to calculate the time required for the astronaut to reach the space capsule without additional details about the actual force the laser can exert on the astronaut.
I place a 500-g ice cube (initially at 0°C) in a Styrofoam box with wall thickness 1.0 cm and total surface area 600 cm2 .
If the air surrounding the box is at 20°C and after 4 hours the ice is completely melted, what is the conductivity of the Styrofoam material? (Lf = 80 cal/g)
a. 9.6 × 10−5cal/s⋅cm⋅°C
b. 2.8 × 10−6cal/s⋅cm⋅°C
c. 1.15 × 10−2cal/s⋅cm⋅°C
d. 2.3 × 10−4cal/s⋅cm⋅°C
Final answer:
The conductivity of the Styrofoam material is found using the heat required to melt the ice and the conduction formula, resulting in 2.8 × 10^⁻⁶cal/s·cm·°C.
Explanation:
To find the conductivity of the Styrofoam material, we need to calculate the amount of heat transferred to the ice cube to melt it completely and then relate this to the conductivity formula. First, we calculate the total heat required to melt the 500-g ice cube using the latent heat of fusion (Lf). The total heat (Q) required is the mass (m) of the ice times the latent heat of fusion (Lf).
Q = m × Lf = 500 g × 80 cal/g = 40000 cal
Next, we use the formula for heat conduction, which is Q = (k × A × ΔT × t) / d. Here, Q is the heat transferred, k is the thermal conductivity, A is the area through which heat is transferred, ΔT is the temperature difference between the inside and outside of the box, t is the time, and d is the thickness of the walls.
Since all values except k are known, we rearrange the equation to solve for k:
k = (Q × d) / (A × ΔT × t)
k = (40000 cal × 1.0 cm) / (600 cm² × 20°C × (4 × 3600 s))
Upon calculation, we find the conductivity k equals 2.8 × 10-6cal/s·cm·°C, which corresponds to option (b).
I take 1.0 kg of ice and dump it into 1.0 kg of water and, when equilibrium is reached, I have 2.0 kg of ice at 0°C. The water was originally at 0°C.
The specific heat of water = 1.00 kcal/kg⋅°C, the specific heat of ice = 0.50 kcal/kg⋅°C, and the latent heat of fusion of water is 80 kcal/kg.
The original temperature of the ice was:
a. one or two degrees below 0°C.b. −80°C.c. −160°C.d. The whole experiment is impossible.
Answer:
.c. −160°C
Explanation:
In the whole process one kg of water at 0°C loses heat to form one kg of ice and heat lost by them is taken up by ice at −160°C . Now see whether heat lost is equal to heat gained or not.
heat lost by 1 kg of water at 0°C
= mass x latent heat
= 1 x 80000 cals
= 80000 cals
heat gained by ice at −160°C to form ice at 0°C
= mass x specific heat of ice x rise in temperature
= 1 x .5 x 1000 x 160
= 80000 cals
so , heat lost = heat gained.
The original temperature of the ice was a. one or two degrees below 0°C.
Explanation:Heat transfer is the process by which thermal energy is exchanged between systems. It occurs through conduction, where heat moves through materials, convection, involving the movement of fluids, and radiation, which involves electromagnetic waves. Understanding heat transfer is essential in fields like physics, engineering, and environmental science.
To find the original temperature of the ice, we need to calculate the heat transferred during the process. First, we need to bring the ice up to 0°C and melt it. This requires a heat transfer of 4.74 kcal. This will lower the temperature of the water by 23.15°C. After the ice has melted and the system reaches equilibrium, the final temperature of the water is 20.6°C. Therefore, the original temperature of the ice was one or two degrees below 0°C.
Two parallel disks of diameter D 5 0.6 m separated by L 5 0.4 m are located directly on top of each other. Both disks are black and are maintained at a temperature of 450 K. The back sides of the disks are insulated, and the environment that the disks are in can be considered to be a blackbody at 300 K. Determine the net rate of radiation heat transfer from the disks to the environment.
To solve this problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to the Stefan-Boltzmann law which establishes that a black body emits thermal radiation with a total hemispheric emissive power (W / m²) proportional to the fourth power of its temperature.
Heat flow is obtained as follows:
[tex]Q = FA\sigma\Delta T^4[/tex]
Where,
F =View Factor
A = Cross sectional Area
[tex]\sigma =[/tex] Stefan-Boltzmann constant
T= Temperature
Our values are given as
D = 0.6m
[tex]L = 0.4m\\T_1 = 450K\\T_2 = 450K\\T_3 = 300K[/tex]
The view factor between two coaxial parallel disks would be
[tex]\frac{L}{r_1} = \frac{0.4}{0.3}= 1.33[/tex]
[tex]\frac{r_2}{L} = \frac{0.3}{0.4} = 0.75[/tex]
Then the view factor between base to top surface of the cylinder becomes [tex]F_{12} = 0.26[/tex]. From the summation rule
[tex]F_{13} = 1-0.26[/tex]
[tex]F_{13} = 0.74[/tex]
Then the net rate of radiation heat transfer from the disks to the environment is calculated as
[tex]\dot{Q_3} = \dot{Q_{13}}+\dot{Q_{23}}[/tex]
[tex]\dot{Q_3} = 2\dot{Q_{13}}[/tex]
[tex]\dot{Q_3} = 2F_{13}A_1 \sigma (T_1^4-T_3^4)[/tex]
[tex]\dot{Q_3} = 2(0.74)(\pi*0.3^2)(5.67*10^{-8})(450^4-300^4)[/tex]
[tex]\dot{Q_3} = 780.76W[/tex]
Therefore the rate heat radiation is 780.76W
The net radiation heat transfer from the disks to the environment is computed by applying the Stefan-Boltzmann law for the radiation heat transfer of black bodies. The area of one side of the disk and the given temperatures are substituted into the law's formula to obtain the desired value.
Explanation:The physical concept relevant to the question is the Stefan-Boltzmann law related to radiation heat transfer. Since both disks are black, they are considered perfect black bodies with an emissivity (e) of 1.
Firstly, we calculate the area (A) of one disk as A = π(D/2)² (because the back sides are insulated on both disks, we only need to consider the radiation from one side of each disk). Then, using Stefan-Boltzmann law formula: Qnet = 2σeA(T₁⁴ - T₂⁴) (the factor 2 is due to having two disks), where T₁ = 450K (temperature of the disks) and T₂ = 300K (temperature of the surrounding environment) is used to find the desired rate of heat transfer (Qnet). The Stefan-Boltzmann constant (σ) is known to be 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ J/s.m².K⁴.
With the value of A calculated from the given diameter and the above values substituted, we can calculate Qnet.
Learn more about Stefan-Boltzmann law here:https://brainly.com/question/31676048
#SPJ3
Two 4.0-kg blocks are tied together with a compressed spring between them. They are thrown from the ground with an initial velocity of 35 m/s, 45° above the horizontal. At the highest point of the trajectory they become untied and spring apart. About how far below the highest point is the center of mass of the two-block system 2.0 s later, before either fragment has hit the ground?
Answer:
The distance is 20 m.
Explanation:
Given that,
Mass of two blocks = 4.0 kg
Initial velocity = 35 m/s
Angle = 45°
Time = 2 sec
After, they become untied, center of mass trajectory will not change:
We need to calculate the distance
Using equation of motion
[tex]s=ut-\dfrac{1}{2}gt^2[/tex]
Where, u = initial velocity
g = acceleration due to gravity
t = time
[tex]s=0\times2-\dfrac{1}{2}\times9.8\times2^2[/tex]
[tex]s=-19.6 = -20\ m[/tex]
[tex]|s|=20\ m[/tex]
Hence, The distance is 20 m.
The center of mass of the two-block system is approximately 4.4 meters below the highest point 2.0 seconds later.
Explanation:First, we need to determine the initial vertical velocity of the two-block system. We can use the initial velocity and the launch angle to find the vertical component of the velocity:
Vertical velocity = initial velocity * sin(angle) = 35 m/s * sin(45°)
Then, we can use the formula for vertical displacement to find how far below the highest point the center of mass is:
Vertical displacement = (initial vertical velocity * time) - (0.5 * acceleration * time^2)
Since the blocks are at their highest point, the vertical displacement is equal to zero. We can rearrange the formula to solve for time:
Time = (initial vertical velocity) / acceleration
Finally, we can substitute the values into the formula for vertical displacement:
Vertical displacement = (initial vertical velocity * time) - (0.5 * acceleration * time^2)
The center of mass of the two-block system is approximately 4.4 meters below the highest point 2.0 seconds later.
Learn more about Center of mass here:https://brainly.com/question/33607198
#SPJ11
Question:The mechanical properties of cobalt may be improved by incorporating fine particles of tungsten carbide (WC). Given that the moduli of elasticity of these materials are, respectively, 200 GPa and 700 GPa, plot modulus of elasticity vs. the volume percent of WC in Co from 0 to 100 vol% using both upper- and lower-bound expressions to form a performance envelope into which the material will fall. Remember that the isostrain case is the upper-bound case and the isostress is the lower-bound case.Mechanical Properties:Mechanical properties help to identify and classify the materials. The most common Mechanical properties are ductility, tenacity, strength, impact resistance, hardness. The mechanical property does not depend on the quantity of the material.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Final answer:
To explore how the incorporation of tungsten carbide (WC) into cobalt (Co) affects the composite material's modulus of elasticity, the moduli values are calculated for a range of WC volume percentages under both isostrain and isostress conditions, illustrating the performance envelope and guiding material design in engineering applications.
Explanation:
To plot the modulus of elasticity vs. the volume percent of WC in Co from 0 to 100 vol%, we use both upper- and lower-bound expressions to form a performance envelope. For the isostrain (upper-bound) case, the mixture's modulus of elasticity (Ecomposite, isostrain) can be calculated using the rule of mixtures formula: Ecomposite, isostrain = ECoVCo + EWCVWC, where E represents modulus of elasticity, and V represents volume fraction. For the isostress (lower-bound) case, the inverse of the composite's modulus of elasticity can be expressed as 1/Ecomposite, isostress = VCo/ECo + VWC/EWC. Here, ECo = 200 GPa is the modulus of elasticity for cobalt, and EWC = 700 GPa is for tungsten carbide.
As the volume percent of WC increases from 0 to 100%, the calculated Ecomposite, isostrain values will show a trend of increasing modulus due to the higher modulus of WC compared to Co. Conversely, the Ecomposite, isostress values will also follow an upward trend but at a different rate, illustrating the material's variation within the performance envelope depending on the volume fraction of WC. This graphical representation will help to visualize how incorporating tungsten carbide into cobalt affects the composite's mechanical performance, underlining the importance of material design and engineering applications.
An empty capacitor is capable of storing 1.0 × 10-4 J of energy when connected to a certain battery. If the distance between the plates is halved and then filled with a dielectric (κ = 4.3), how much energy could this modified capacitor store when connected to the same battery?
Answer:
Explanation:
Energy stored in a capacitor
= 1/2 C₁V²
capacity of a capacitor
c = εK A / d
k is dielectric and d is distance between plates .
When the distance between the plates is halved and then filled with a dielectric (κ = 4.3)
capacity becomes 4.3 x 2 times
New capacity
C₂ = 8.6 C₁
Energy of modified capacitor
1/2 C₂ V²= 1/2 x 8.6 c x V²
Energy becomes
8.6 times.
Energy stored = 8.6 x 10⁻⁴ J
Unpolarized light with intensity S is incident on a series of polarizing sheets. The first sheet has its transmission axis oriented at 0°. A second polarizer has its transmission axis oriented at 45° and a third polarizer oriented with its axis at 90°. Determine the fraction of light intensity exiting the third sheet with and without the second sheet present.
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
Initial Intensity of light is S
when an un-polarized light is Passed through a Polarizer then its intensity reduced to half.
When it is passed through a second Polarizer with its transmission axis [tex]\theat =45^{\circ}[/tex]
[tex]S_1=S_0\cos ^2\theta [/tex]
here [tex]S_0=\frac{S}{2}[/tex]
[tex]S_1=\frac{S}{2}\times \frac{1}{(\sqrt{2})^2}[/tex]
[tex]S_1=\frac{S}{4}[/tex]
When it is passed through third Polarizer with its axis [tex]90^{\circ}[/tex] to first but [tex]\theta =45^{\circ}[/tex] to second thus [tex]S_2[/tex]
[tex]S_2=S_0\cos ^2\theta [/tex]
[tex]S_2=\frac{S}{4}\times \frac{1}{2}[/tex]
[tex]S_2=\frac{S}{8}[/tex]
When middle sheet is absent then Final Intensity will be zero
Final answer:
The first polarizing sheet reduces the intensity of unpolarized light to 50%. The second polarizing sheet further reduces the intensity to 25%. The third polarizing sheet, with the second sheet present, does not allow any light to pass through.
Explanation:
When unpolarized light passes through a polarizing sheet, the intensity of the light reduces by half. The first polarizing sheet reduces the intensity to 50% of the original intensity. The second polarizing sheet, oriented at an angle of 45° to the first sheet, further reduces the intensity by 50%. So, the intensity exiting the second sheet is 25% of the original intensity (50% x 50% = 25%).
However, the third polarizing sheet, oriented at an angle of 90° to the first, does not allow any light to pass through because the transmission axis of the third sheet is perpendicular to the polarization direction of the light. Therefore, the fraction of light intensity exiting the third sheet, with the second sheet present, is 0%.
You are comparing two diffraction gratings using two different lasers: a green laser and a red laser. You do these two experiments
1. Shining the green laser through grating A you see the first maximum 1 meter away from the center
2. Shining the red laser through grating B, you see the first maximum 1 meter away from the center
In both cases, the gratings are the same distance from the screen.
(a) What can you deduce about the gratings?
(b) What would you observe if you shone the green laser through grating B:?
a. (a) grating A has more lines/mm; (b) the first maximum less than 1 meter away from the center
b. (a) grating B has more lines/mm; (b) the first maximum less than 1 meter away from the center
c.(a) grating B has more lines/mm; (b) the first maximum more than 1 meter away from the center
d. (a) grating B has more lines/mm: (b) the first maximum 1 meter away from the center
e. (a) grating A has more lines/mm; (b) the first maximum more than 1 meter away from the center
f. (a) grating A has more lines/mm; (b) the first maximum 1 meter away from the center
Answer:
a. (a) grating A has more lines/mm; (b) the first maximum less than 1 meter away from the center
Explanation:
Let n₁ and n₂ be no of lines per unit length of grating A and B respectively.
λ₁ and λ₂ be wave lengths of green and red respectively , D be distance of screen and d₁ and d₂ be distance between two slits of grating A and B ,
Distance of first maxima for green light
= λ₁ D/ d₁
Distance of first maxima for red light
= λ₂ D/ d₂
Given that
λ₁ D/ d₁ = λ₂ D/ d₂
λ₁ / d₁ = λ₂ / d₂
λ₁ / λ₂ = d₁ / d₂
But
λ₁ < λ₂
d₁ < d₂
Therefore no of lines per unit length of grating A will be more because
no of lines per unit length ∝ 1 / d
If grating B is illuminated with green light first maxima will be at distance
λ₁ D/ d₂
As λ₁ < λ₂
λ₁ D/ d₂ < λ₂ D/ d₂
λ₁ D/ d₂ < 1 m
In this case position of first maxima will be less than 1 meter.
Option a is correct .
Final answer:
Comparison of the diffraction patterns for two lasers and two gratings reveals that Grating B must have more lines per millimeter, and if the green laser were shone through Grating B, the first maximum would be more than 1 meter away from the center.
Explanation:
To analyze this problem, we need to apply our knowledge of diffraction gratings and wavelength of light. The position of the maxima on the screen depends on the grating spacing (number of lines per millimeter) and the wavelength of the light. The formula for the angle of the maxima for a diffraction grating is:
nλ = d sin θ,
where:
When comparing two diffraction gratings with different lasers:
A green laser (shorter wavelength) producing a first maximum at 1 meter suggests that the spacing between lines (d) in grating A supports this particular maximum for that wavelength.A red laser (longer wavelength) producing a first maximum at the same distance suggests that grating B must have a smaller d (more lines per mm) to compensate for its longer wavelength to produce a maximum at the same distance.Hence, the answer is (c):
a) Grating B has more lines/mm; because it compensates for the longer wavelength of the red light to still create a maximum at the same position as the green light with grating A.
b) If the green laser (shorter wavelength) were shone through grating B (more lines/mm), the first maximum would be more than 1 meter away from the center, since a grating with more lines per millimeter spreads the maxima further apart for the same wavelength, compared to a grating with fewer lines per millimeter.
wo parallel-plate capacitors have the same dimensions, but the space between the plates is filled with air in capacitor 1 and with plastic in capacitor 2. Each capacitor is connected to an identical battery, such that the potential difference between the plates is the same in both capacitors. Compare the magnitudes of the electric fields between the plates, ????1 and ????2, and the magnitudes of the free charges on the plates, ????1 and ????2.
Final answer:
The electric field between the plates will be the same in both capacitors, but the charge on the plates of capacitor 2 with plastic between the plates will be greater than the charge on the plates of capacitor 1 with air between the plates.
Explanation:
When comparing the magnitudes of the electric fields between the plates, we can use the formula E = Q / (ε0 * A), where E is the electric field, Q is the charge on the plates, ε0 is the permittivity of free space, and A is the area of the plates. In this case, since the capacitors have the same dimensions and the same charge, the electric field between the plates in both capacitors will be the same.
Regarding the magnitudes of the free charges on the plates, we know that Q = C * V, where Q is the charge, C is the capacitance, and V is the potential difference. Since the capacitance is directly proportional to the dielectric constant of the material between the plates, and the charge is the product of the capacitance and potential difference, the charge on the plates of capacitor 2 with plastic between the plates will be greater than the charge on the plates of capacitor 1 with air between the plates, because the dielectric constant of plastic is greater than 1.
The energy E of the electron in a hydrogen atom can be calculated from the Bohr formula: =E−Ryn2 In this equation Ry stands for the Rydberg energy, and n stands for the principal quantum number of the orbital that holds the electron. (You can find the value of the Rydberg energy using the Data button on the ALEKS toolbar.) Calculate the wavelength of the line in the emission line spectrum of hydrogen caused by the transition of the electron from an orbital with =n10 to an orbital with =n8. Round your answer to 3 significant digits.
The energy change in an electron's transition in a hydrogen atom can be calculated using the Bohr formula. This energy corresponds to the energy of the emitted photon in the transition, and can be used to calculate the wavelength of the light emitted during this transition.
Explanation:The energy change associated with the transition of an electron between two energy levels in a hydrogen atom can be calculated using the equation E = 13.6 eV/n². In this equation, 'E' represents the energy of the electron, and 'n' is the quantum number of the orbit that the electron occupies. If we consider a transition of an electron from an orbital with n = 10 to an orbital with n = 8, we can calculate the energy change (∆E) using the difference in energies of these two states. This energy change corresponds to the energy of the emitted photon when the electron transition occurs. The energy of the photon can be connected to its wavelength through the equation E = hf, where 'h' is Planck's constant, and 'f' is the frequency, which is related to the wavelength (λ) by the speed of light (c) as f = c/λ. Therefore, you can first calculate ∆E using the given energy equation, then use the result to find 'f' using E = hf, and finally substitute 'f' in f = c/λ to find λ, the wavelength of the emitted light.
Learn more about Bohr Model here:https://brainly.com/question/3964366
#SPJ11
An oil film with index of refraction 1.64 is trapped between two pieces of glass with index of refraction 1.43. No light is reflected by such a film when 578 nm light falls on it at normal incidence. What is the nonzero minimum thickness of the oil film that will satisfy these conditions? Answer in units of nm.
Final answer:
The minimum nonzero thickness of an oil film with index of refraction 1.64, between glass with index 1.43 to achieve no reflection for 578 nm light at normal incidence, is approximately 88 nm. This results from the condition for destructive interference.
Explanation:
When light of wavelength 578 nm hits the film at normal incidence and no light is reflected, it means that the reflected light waves from the top and bottom surfaces of the oil film are exactly out of phase, causing destructive interference.
For destructive interference to occur, the path difference between the two reflected waves must be an odd multiple of half the wavelength in the medium, which is given by the formula:
Path Difference (in the medium) = 2 × n × thickness of the film = [tex](m + \(\frac{1}{2}\)) \times \(\frac{\lambda}{n}\)[/tex], where m = 0, 1, 2, ...
Considering that there is a [tex]\(\frac{\lambda}{2}\)[/tex] phase shift when light reflects off a medium with a lower index of refraction to a higher one, and the film's index of refraction is greater than that of the surrounding glass, we take m = 0 for the smallest non-zero thickness. Thus, the minimum thickness of the oil film is:
Thickness = [tex]\(\frac{\lambda}{4 * n}\)[/tex] = [tex]\(\frac{578 nm}{4 \times 1.64}\)[/tex] = 88.16 nm
The nonzero minimum thickness of the oil film that will satisfy the conditions of no reflected light is therefore approximately 88 nm.
In 1995 a research group led by Eric Cornell and Carl Wiemann at the University of Colorado successfully cooled Rubidium atoms to the 20-200 nK temperature range. Assuming (incorrectly) that the Rubidium atoms behave like particles of a classical ideal gas, calculate the RMS speed of a Rubidium atom at a temperature of 85.0 nK. In the experiments one particular isotope of Rubidium was used, Rubidium-87. The molar mass of this isotope is 86.91 g/mol.
Answer:
0.00493 m/s
Explanation:
T = Temperature of the isotope = 85 nK
R = Gas constant = 8.341 J/mol K
M = Molar mass of isotope = 86.91 g/mol
Root Mean Square speed is given by
[tex]v_r=\sqrt{\dfrac{3RT}{M}}\\\Rightarrow v_r=\sqrt{\dfrac{3\times 8.314\times 85\times 10^{-9}}{86.91\times 10^{-3}}}\\\Rightarrow v_r=0.00493\ m/s[/tex]
The Root Mean Square speed is 0.00493 m/s
Final answer:
The RMS speed of Rubidium-87 atoms at 85 nK can be estimated using the ideal gas approximation and the formula 'Urms = √(3kBT/M)'. The molar mass is converted to kg/mol and the temperature to kelvins before calculation.
Explanation:
To calculate the root-mean-square (RMS speed) of Rubidium-87 atoms at a temperature of 85.0 nK assuming classical ideal gas behavior, we can use the formula:
Urms = √(3kBT/M)
Where Urms is the root-mean-square speed, kB is Boltzmann's constant (1.38 × 10-23 J/K), T is the absolute temperature in kelvins, and M is the molar mass in kilograms per mole. First, we convert the molar mass of Rubidium-87 from grams per mole to kilograms per mole by dividing it by 1000:
M = 86.91 g/mol ∖ 0.08691 kg/mol
Next, we convert the temperature from nanokelvins to kelvins:
T = 85.0 nK = 85.0 × 10-9 K
Substituting the values into the RMS speed equation gives us:
Urms = √(3 × (1.38 × 10-23 J/K) × (85.0 × 10-9 K) / 0.08691 kg/mol)
After calculating, we find that the RMS speed of Rubidium-87 atoms at 85.0 nK is:
Urms ≈ ... m/s
Note that the calculation here assumes that the Rubidium atoms behave as a classical ideal gas, which is not an accurate assumption for atoms at such low temperatures.
A horizontal tube consists of a 7.0-cm-diameter pipe that narrows to a 2.0-cm-diameter throat. In the pipe, the water pressure is twice atmospheric pressure and the water flows with a speed of 0.40 m/s. What is the pressure in the throat, assuming that the water behaves like an ideal fluid? The density of water is 1000 kg/m3 , and atmospheric pressure is 1.01 × 105 Pa.
Answer:
[tex]1.9\times10^{5} Pa[/tex]
Explanation:
[tex]d_{p}[/tex] = diameter of the pipe = 7 cm
[tex]v_{p}[/tex] = speed of water in the pipe = 0.40 m/s
[tex]A_{p}[/tex] = Area of cross-section of pipe = [tex](0.25)\pi d_{p}^{2}[/tex]
[tex]d_{t}[/tex] = diameter of the throat = 2 cm
[tex]v_{t}[/tex] = speed of water in the throat
[tex]A_{t}[/tex] = Area of cross-section of throat = [tex](0.25)\pi d_{t}^{2}[/tex]
Using equation of continuity
[tex]A_{p} v_{p} = A_{t} v_{t} \\(0.25)\pi d_{p}^{2} v_{p} = (0.25)\pi d_{t}^{2} v_{t} \\(7)^{2} (0.40) = (2)^{2} v_{t}\\v_{t} = 4.9 ms^{-1}[/tex]
[tex]P_{o}[/tex] = atmospheric pressure = 1.01 x 10⁵ Pa
[tex]P_{p}[/tex] = Pressure in the pipe = [tex]2 P_{o}[/tex] = 2.02 x 10⁵ Pa
[tex]P_{t}[/tex] = Pressure in the throat
Using Bernoulli's theorem
[tex]P_{t} + (0.5)\rho v_{t}^{2} = P_{p} + (0.5)\rho v_{p}^{2}\\P_{t} + (0.5)(1000) (4.9)^{2} = 2.02\times10^{5} + (0.5)(1000) (0.40)^{2}\\P_{t} + 12005 = 202080\\P_{t} = 190075 Pa\\P_{t} = 1.9\times10^{5} Pa[/tex]
The pressure in the throat of the pipe, assuming that the water behaves like an ideal fluid, can be obtained using the continuity equation and Bernoulli's equation. The velocity at the throat is first calculated using the continuity equation and then Bernoulli's equation is used to find the pressure. The pressure comes out to be 1.94 x 105 Pa.
Explanation:This problem can be resolved using the continuity equation and Bernoulli's equation, both of which refer to the conservation laws of mass and energy respectively in fluid dynamics. Bernoulli's equation states that, along a streamline, the sum of all forms of fluid energy is constant with respect to any increase in height. The continuity equation states that the mass flow rate must remain constant in the pipe i.e., the velocity of fluid at the wide end of the pipe multiple by its area will be equal to the velocity at the narrow end multiplied by its area.
The velocity at the throat can be found using the continuity equation: (7)^2 x (0.40) = (2)^2 x V2. Solving this gives V2 = 2.45 m/s.
Next, we'll use Bernoulli's equation, P1 + 0.5 x rho x (V1)^2 = P2 + 0.5x rho(V2)^2, where P1 is the pressure at the wide end (which is given as twice of atmospheric pressure), rho is density of water, V1 is velocity at the wide end, P2 is the pressure at the narrow end (which we are to find), and V2 is the velocity at the narrow end.
Substituting the given values, we have (2 x 1.01e5) + 0.5 x 1000 x (0.4)^2 = P2 + 0.5*1000*(2.45)^2. Solving this equation gives P2 = 1.94 x 105 Pa.
https://brainly.com/question/30504672
#SPJ11
The emission of x rays can be described as an inverse photoelectric effect.
What is the potential difference through which an electron accelerates to produce x rays with a wavelength of 0.10 nm?
Answer:
The potential difference through which an electron accelerates to produce x rays is [tex]1.24\times 10^4\ volts[/tex].
Explanation:
It is given that,
Wavelength of the x -rays, [tex]\lambda=0.1\ nm=0.1\times 10^{-9}\ m[/tex]
The energy of the x- rays is given by :
[tex]E=\dfrac{hc}{\lambda}[/tex]
The energy of an electron in terms of potential difference is given by :
[tex]E=eV[/tex]
So,
[tex]\dfrac{hc}{\lambda}=eV[/tex]
V is the potential difference
e is the charge on electron
[tex]V=\dfrac{hc}{e\lambda}[/tex]
[tex]V=\dfrac{6.63\times 10^{-34}\times 3\times 10^8}{1.6\times 10^{-19}\times 0.1\times 10^{-9}}[/tex]
V = 12431.25 volts
or
[tex]V=1.24\times 10^4\ volts[/tex]
So, the potential difference through which an electron accelerates to produce x rays is [tex]1.24\times 10^4\ volts[/tex]. hence, this is the required solution.