The book slides from you to beth and then from beth to carlos, along the lines connecting these people. what is the work done by friction during this displacement?

Acceleration is another term for change in motion, referring to changes in velocity due to an applied external force.

Another word for change in motion is acceleration. This term refers to a change in velocity, which includes changes in speed, direction, or both. When an object experiences acceleration, it means there has been a non-zero net external force applied to it, as stated by Newton's first law of motion.

Acceleration is quantified as the rate of change of velocity over time and is observed in everyday phenomena such as the breaking of a car or the circular motion of a rotating wheel.

Final answer:

The speed of the raindrops relative to the ground is 12.7 m/s and the angle is 90°.

Explanation:

To determine the speed and angle of the raindrops relative to the ground, we can use the concept of relative velocity. When driving north at a speed of 21 m/s, the observer sees the raindrops at an angle of 36° with the vertical. This means that the raindrops are falling at a velocity perpendicular to the observer's motion.

Using trigonometry, we can find the vertical component of the raindrop's velocity:

Vertical Component: vvertical = v x sin(θ) = 21 m/s x sin(36°) = 12.7 m/s

Since the raindrops are falling straight down when driving in the opposite direction, the vertical component of the raindrop's velocity relative to the ground is 0. Therefore, the speed of the raindrops relative to the ground is 12.7 m/s, and the angle with respect to the ground is 90°.

By equation of equilibrium and friction:

Fb = Kx = 15(0.175) = 2.625 kN.

The wedge is on the verge of moving right then slipping will have to occur at both contact surfaces.

Fa = usNa = 0.35Na

Fb = 0.35Nb

Nb = 2.625 = 0; Nb = 2.625 kN

Nacos10 – 0.35Na sin 10 = 2.625 = 0

Na = 2.841 kN

P – (0.35 * 2.625) – 0.35 (2.841) cos 10 – 2.841 sin 10 = 0

P = 2.39 kN

The minimum force required to move wedge A can be approximated as slightly higher than the force of static friction, which can be calculated using the coefficient of static friction and the force exerted by the spring at its compressed state.

To calculate the minimum applied force required to move the wedge A to the right, we first need to obtain the force of static friction, (μs) which resists motion. The force of static friction (F_s) can be calculated using the relation F_s = μs * N, where N is the normal force.

In this case, the normal force can be determined from the compression of the spring which follows Hooke's Law, stating that the force (F) exerted by a spring is proportional to its compression (x), i.e., F = kx, where k is the spring constant. Although k is not provided here, we can assume the spring force equals the normal force due to the system's equilibrium, which occurs before moving A.

Thus, the minimum applied force (p) to make A move would be slightly higher than the force of static friction, i.e., p > F_s. To get an exact value, we need additional data such as the spring constant (k).

For more such questions on static friction, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/13000653

#SPJ6

Answer : The incorrect option is (b) They can be reversed by physical changes.

Explanation :

Chemical change : It is a change where changes occurs in the chemical composition and thus resulting in the formation of new compound or substance. It is an irreversible reaction.

The indication of chemical changes are :

Formation of gas bubbles.

Formation of precipitate.

Change in color.

Change in temperature.

Change in volume.

Change in smell or taste.

Evolution of heat, light and sound.

Physical change : It is a change in which shape and size of a substance changes. In this there is no change in the chemical composition of the substance and no new substance is forming. It is a reversible reaction.

The indication of chemical changes are :

Change in shape.

Change in form.

Change in size.

Change in phase.

From the given options we conclude that the option (b) is incorrect option while all the options are correct for chemical changes.

Hence, the incorrect option is (b)

a. The rate at which the tank is filled is 16.5 gallons per second. b. The rate at which the tank is filled is 0.0273 cubic meters per second. c. It would take approximately 36.6 seconds to fill a 1.00 m³ volume at the same rate.

a. To calculate the rate at which the tank is filled in gallons per second, we need to convert the time from minutes to seconds and divide the volume of the tank by the time taken to fill it.
1 gallon = 231 cubic inches

30 gallons = 30 x 231 cubic inches = 6930 cubic inches

Rate = Volume / Time

= 6930 cubic inches / (7 minutes x 60 seconds/minute)

= 16.5 cubic inches/second

b. To calculate the rate at which the tank is filled in cubic meters per second, we need to convert the volume from gallons to cubic meters and divide it by the time taken to fill the tank.

1 cubic meter = 1000 liters
1 gallon = 3.785 liters
30 gallons = 30 x 3.785 liters = 113.55 liters
1 liter = 0.001 cubic meters
113.55 liters = 113.55 x 0.001 cubic meters = 0.11355 cubic meters
Rate = Volume / Time

= 0.11355 cubic meters / (7 minutes x 60 seconds/minute)

= 0.0273 cubic meters/second

c. To determine the time interval required to fill a 1.00-m³ volume at the same rate, we need to divide the volume by the rate.

Time = Volume / Rate

= 1.00 m³ / 0.0273 cubic meters/second

= 36.6 seconds

Answer:

A. Shale

Explanation: Sedimentary rocks are converted into metamorphosed rocks under high temperature and pressure. Shale is a sedimentary rock which get converted into slate under high temperature and pressure. Shale is a sedimentary rock made up of volcanic ash or clay while slate is a fine- grained , homogeneous metamorphosed rock. Slate can be found in many colors such as- grey, green, pale to brown.

The velocity of the car at s = 550 ft is 2,904,166.67 ft/s and the acceleration at s = 550 ft is 1512.5 ft/s^2.

The velocity of the car can be determined by finding the integral of the acceleration function with respect to time. In this case, the acceleration function is v' = 0.05t^2. Integrating this function gives the velocity function v = (0.05/3)t^3 + C, where C is the constant of integration. To find the value of C, we can use the fact that the car is originally at rest, so v(0) = 0. Plugging in the values, we get C = 0, so the velocity function is v = (0.05/3)t^3.

To find the magnitude of the velocity at t = 550 ft, we can plug in the value of t into the velocity function. So, v = (0.05/3)(550)^3 = 2,904,166.67 ft/s. Therefore, the magnitude of the velocity at s = 550 ft is 2,904,166.67 ft/s.

The acceleration can be determined by taking the derivative of the velocity function with respect to time. In this case, the velocity function is v = (0.05/3)t^3. Taking the derivative, we get a = (0.05)t^2. Plugging in the value of t = 550 ft, we get a = (0.05)(550)^2 = 1512.5 ft/s^2. Therefore, the magnitude of the acceleration at s = 550 ft is 1512.5 ft/s^2.

People who have color vision deficiency typically lack one or more of the three cones that are sensitive to a particular wavelength is the true statement.

Color vision deficiency is the inability to distinguish certain shades of color. Color blindness is used to describe this visual condition, but very few people are completely color blind.

Color vision is possible due to photoreceptors in the retina of the eye known as cones. These cones have light-sensitive pigments that enable us to recognize color.

Each cone is sensitive to either red, green or blue light. The cones recognize these lights based on their wavelengths.

The pigments inside the cones register different colors and send that information through the optic nerve to the brain.

Most people with color vision deficiency can see colors. The most common form of color deficiency is red-green. It does not mean people with this deficiency cannot see these colors altogether, they simply have a harder time differentiating between them, which can depend on the darkness or lightness of the colors.

Another form of color deficiency is blue-yellow. It is a rarer and more severe form of color vision loss than just red-green deficiency as people with blue-yellow deficiency frequently have red-green blindness, too. In both cases, people with color-vision deficiency often see neutral or gray areas where color should appear.

To learn more about color vision deficiency here

https://brainly.com/question/11705305

#SPJ2

The maximum magnitude of F for which the door will remain at rest is about 265 N

[tex]\texttt{ }[/tex]

Let's recall Moment of Force as follows:

[tex]\boxed{\tau = F d}[/tex]

where:

τ = moment of force ( Nm )

F = magnitude of force ( N )

d = perpendicular distance between force and pivot ( m )

Let us now tackle the problem !

Given:

weight of the door = w = 145 N

direction of the force = θ = 20°

distance between hinge and the applied force = d = 2.50 m

length of the door = L = 3.13 m

Asked:

magnitude of the force = F = ?

Solution:

If the door is in equilibrium position , then :

[tex]\texttt{Total Clockwise Moment at Hinge = Total Anticlockwise Moment at Hinge }[/tex]

[tex]F \times d \times \sin \theta = w \times \frac{1}{2} L[/tex]

[tex]F \times 2.50 \times \sin 20^o = 145 \times \frac{1}{2} (3.13)[/tex]

[tex]\boxed {F \approx 265 \texttt{ N}}[/tex]

[tex]\texttt{ }[/tex]

[tex]\texttt{ }[/tex]

Grade: High School

Subject: Physics

Chapter: Moment of Force

Light is actually both a particle and a wave. It is essentially made of particles called photons which move or flow in waves. Due to it being a particle, its movement can also be hindered by other particles, hence the answer is:

D) The gas would transmit the fastest because there are the fewest particles to interfere with the waves.

Answer: D.The gas would transmit the fastest because there are the fewest particles to interfere with the waves.

Explanation: Usatestprep

The color in metal compounds is primarily due to the metal ion and how it interacts with light. This is evident in emission spectra and color patterns seen in flame tests. A flame test can specifically prove this by displaying characteristic colors for each metal ion.

The color observed in metal compounds is often due to the metal ion involved in the compound - a phenomenon made apparent by changes in the relative energies of the electron orbitals. To illustrate, compounds of a variety of metals (including alkaline earth metals like calcium and strontium) produce different colors when exposed to flame - a feature of their emission spectrum. Furthermore, the color of coordination compounds, like the iron(II) complex [Fe(H₂O)6]SO4 that appears blue-green, depends on the specific ligands coordinated to the metal center, which influences the absorption of light.

A simple test to confirm that the color is due to the metal ion is to perform flame tests on the compounds. This test involves introducing the compound to a flame and observing the color of the flame. Each metal ion can produce a characteristic flame color; hence the flame test serves to confirm the presence of a specific metal ion in a compound.

https://brainly.com/question/35064323

#SPJ12

Final answer:

Increasing the temperature and decreasing the solvent density are two processes that increase the motion of molecules, facilitating increased diffusion rates.

Explanation:

The two processes that increase the motion of molecules are raising the temperature and decreasing the solvent density. When the temperature is increased, it provides more energy to the molecules, thus making them move faster and increasing the rate of diffusion. On the other hand, a lower solvent density means that the molecules have fewer obstructions to navigate through, allowing them to move more freely and thus increasing diffusion rate.

For instance, heating water can increase the kinetic energy of its molecules, leading to a faster spread of those molecules through the environment. Conversely, if water is very dense, such as saltwater compared to fresh water, molecules of a solute would diffuse more slowly due to the increased resistance.

Final answer:

The impulse delivered by the karate expert's hand to the stack of bricks is 2.6 × 102 N·s, which can be calculated using the force of 520 newtons multiplied by the impact time of 5.0 × 10-4 seconds.

Explanation:

The student is asking about the concept of impulse in physics. The impulse experienced by an object is the product of the average force applied to the object and the time interval over which it is applied. According to the given information:

The impulse (J) can be calculated using the formula:

J = F × t

By substituting the given values:

J = 520 N × 5.0 × 10-4 s = 0.26 kg·m/s

To express it in scientific notation, we can write it as 2.6 × 102 N·s (Newtons second), which is the value of the impulse delivered by the karate expert's hand to the stack of bricks.

The velocity  of object at halfway is 7.67 m/s.

Given data:

The mass of object is, m = 4.5 kg.

The height from the ground is, h = 6.0 m.

When an object falls or is dropped from rest it's initial velocity is zero.

(u = 0). Using the second kinematic equations for a motion, find the time it takes to reach 3.0 m down (half way).

x = ut - 1/2gt²

x = ut - 1/2 (9.8) t²

x = ut - 4.9t²

-3 = 0 - 4.9t²

-3/-4.9 = t²

0.6122 = t²

0.7825 sec = t

Now, apply the first kinematic equation of motion as,

v = u + (-g)t

v = 0 - 9.8(0.7825)

v = -7.67 m/s

the negative denotes downward direction.

Thus, we can conclude that the velocity of object at halfway is 7.67 m/s.

Learn more about the kinematic equation of motion here:

https://brainly.com/question/11298125

Mass is neither created or destroyed.

The resistance [tex]\( r_2 \)[/tex] is greater than the resistance [tex]\( r_1 \)[/tex] by the square of the turns ratio of the transformer.

Let's denote the turns ratio of the step-up transformer as [tex]n[/tex], which is the ratio of the number of turns in the secondary winding [tex]\( N_s \)[/tex] to the number of turns in the primary winding [tex]\( N_p \)[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\( n = \frac{N_s}{N_p} \).[/tex]

Since it is a step-up transformer, [tex]\( n > 1 \).[/tex]

The voltage across the secondary winding [tex]\( V_s \)[/tex] is equal to the voltage across the primary winding [tex]V_p[/tex] multiplied by the turns ratio [tex]n[/tex]. Thus, [tex]\( V_s = n \cdot V_p \).[/tex]

The current in the secondary winding [tex]\( I_s \)[/tex] is related to the current in the primary winding [tex]\( I_p \)[/tex] by the inverse of the turns ratio, due to the conservation of power in an ideal transformer (neglecting losses). Therefore, [tex]\( I_s = \frac{I_p}{n} \).[/tex]

The power delivered to both resistors must be the same because the current in both cases is measured to be the same, and power is the product of voltage and current. Hence, [tex]\( P = V_s \cdot I_s = V_p \cdot I_p \).[/tex]

Now, let's calculate the resistance of the resistors using Ohm's law, which states that [tex]\( V = I \cdot R \)[/tex], where [tex]V[/tex] is the voltage, [tex]I[/tex] is the current, and [tex]R[/tex] is the resistance.

 For resistor 1 connected across the secondary:

[tex]\( R_1 = \frac{V_s}{I_s} \)[/tex]

Substituting [tex]\( V_s = n \cdot V_p \) and \( I_s = \frac{I_p}{n} \)[/tex] into the equation, we get:

[tex]\( R_1 = \frac{n \cdot V_p}{\frac{I_p}{n}} = n^2 \cdot \frac{V_p}{I_p} \)[/tex]

For resistor 2 connected directly across the wall socket:

[tex]\( R_2 = \frac{V_p}{I_p} \)[/tex]

Since the currents are the same [tex](\( I_s = I_p \))[/tex], we can equate the powers:

[tex]\( V_s \cdot I_s = V_p \cdot I_p \)[/tex]

Substituting [tex]\( V_s = n \cdot V_p \) and \( I_s = I_p \),[/tex] we get:

[tex]\( n \cdot V_p \cdot I_p = V_p \cdot I_p \)[/tex]

This simplifies to:

[tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]

However, this is not possible since [tex]\( n > 1 \)[/tex] for a step-up transformer. The mistake here is that we assumed [tex]\( I_s = I_p \)[/tex] without considering the turns ratio. The correct approach is to use the power equation:

[tex]\( P = V_s \cdot I_s = V_p \cdot I_p \)[/tex]

Since [tex]\( V_s = n \cdot V_p \) and \( I_s = \frac{I_p}{n} \),[/tex] we have:

[tex]\( n \cdot V_p \cdot \frac{I_p}{n} = V_p \cdot I_p \)[/tex]

This simplifies to:

[tex]\( V_p \cdot I_p = V_p \cdot I_p \)[/tex]

Now, using the resistance formula for both resistors, we have:

[tex]\( R_1 = \frac{V_s}{I_s} = \frac{n \cdot V_p}{\frac{I_p}{n}} = n^2 \cdot \frac{V_p}{I_p} \)[/tex]

[tex]\( R_2 = \frac{V_p}{I_p} \)[/tex]

Comparing [tex]\( R_1 \) and \( R_2 \), we find: \( R_1 = n^2 \cdot R_2 \)[/tex]

Since [tex]\( n > 1 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( R_1 > R_2 \)[/tex]. However, we are asked how [tex]\( r_2 \)[/tex]compares to [tex]\( r_1 \)[/tex], which means we need to express [tex]\( R_2 \)[/tex] in terms of [tex]\( R_1 \)[/tex]:

[tex]\( R_2 = \frac{R_1}{n^2} \)[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]\( r_2 \) is less than \( r_1 \)[/tex] by a factor of [tex]\( n^2 \)[/tex],