The major reason the mauryan empire collapsed was

Answer:

was Israel becoming a nation, the. to mind was, “Why did the first book of Psalms end with chapter 41 instead of chapter 480. Now, you have two consecutive patterns; from 1935 to 1941 and. This timeline effect is not given to us so we can predict the future.

Explanation:

The virtue of humility gave Benjamin Franklin the most trouble, as it was added to his list later after a friend pointed out his prideful behavior. Franklin believed personal virtues like humility, frugality, and diligence were essential for success and integral to republican virtue. However, his virtues list primarily focused on individual morals and behaviors without fully considering broader societal influences.

The virtues that gave Benjamin Franklin the most trouble were presumably those he later added to his list, such as humility, which was suggested to him by a Quaker friend after Franklin was told that he appeared proud and somewhat insolent in conversation. Franklin's list of virtues, initially containing twelve, was an effort to guide personal behavior towards moral perfection, with the additional thirteenth virtue of humility addressing his own self-recognized failings.

Franklin's acceptance of humility into his virtues reflects the challenging nature of achieving true modesty and meekness, especially for individuals who are accomplished and hold themselves in high regard. The broader question of how Franklin's virtues addressed topics such as the inheritance of wealth versus acquiring it through hard work delves into his belief in the importance of personal virtues like frugality, diligence, and a strong moral compass to achieve success in life.

Franklin's virtues were not exclusively meant for personal development but also served as a foundation for republican virtue. In his view, these virtues supported the idea of a populace capable of self-governance and civic responsibility, which is the backbone of a successful republic. While Franklin focused on individual behaviors and qualities such as sincerity, temperance, and tranquility, he may not have fully addressed the societal factors that could influence a person's ability to live up to these ideals, such as inherited wealth or differing social conditions.

Congress's inability to stop inflation was due to the lack of credible commitment to reducing the budget deficit and President Grant's veto of the inflation bill that sought to increase the money supply, reflecting limited Congressional power over monetary policy.

The limitation that directly led to Congress being unable to stop inflation can be traced back to structural issues with Congress's power during the Continental Congress era and later during President Grant's administration. Initially, Congress did not make a credible commitment to end inflation because its announcements did nothing to end the large and chronic budget deficit or to prevent the states from issuing more bills of credit, leading to more money in circulation without the backing of tangible goods or production.

Further, during President Grant's tenure, despite facing pressure from constituents to address financial crisis through currency inflation, Grant preferred a tight money policy. In March 1874, Congress passed an inflation bill to add about $100 million to the amount of money in circulation, but Grant vetoed it. This presidential veto further constrained Congress's ability to address the financial crisis through currency inflation, thereby highlighting the limited powers Congress had in directly managing monetary policy and inflation.

In summary, too many dollars chasing too few goods is a fundamental cause of inflation, observable particularly after wartime spending when government outlays are high but consumer goods are scarce. Price controls during wartime further exacerbate this issue once they are lifted and pent-up demand surges. Inflation can decline or turn into deflation when economic activity slows down, leading to too few dollars chasing too many goods, as was seen during major recessions and the Great Depression.

Final answer:

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a landmark Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy and recognized implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause. The decision prevented Maryland from taxing the Second Bank of the United States and set precedent for the broad exercise of federal legislative powers.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case of McCulloch v. Maryland was a foundational case in United States constitutional law that determined the scope of the federal government's legislative powers and the relationship between the federal government and the states. The state of Maryland had placed a prohibitive tax on the Second Bank of the United States, which Maryland wanted to drive out in favor of state-chartered banks. James McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States, refused to pay the tax, leading to a chain of court cases that culminated in the Supreme Court.

Two significant constitutional questions arose from this case:

The legitimacy of Congress chartering a bank, given it was not an enumerated power in the Constitution.

The ability of a state to tax a federal operation.

The Court's decision, delivered by Chief Justice John Marshall, first affirmed that under the Necessary and Proper Clause, Congress had implied powers to create the bank, even if not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. Second, the Supremacy Clause was cited to strike down Maryland's tax, asserting that the states could not tax or impede valid exercises of power by the federal government.

This historic decision in 1819 established the principle of federal supremacy over the states and underscored the breadth of congressional powers through the interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause.

Ptolemy theory fit the churches view of the world. The bible at the Catholic Church taught that god created the earth and people that's on it. Then it made sense to the church that the sun, moon, planets, and stars all revolved around the earth.

Social Darwinism applies 'survival of the fittest' to society and was used to justify the social inequality by assuming that the wealthy were biologically 'fittest.' Herbert Spencer and others popularized it, but it was discredited in the mid-20th century and not supported by Darwin himself.

Social Darwinism is a theory that applies Darwin's principle of 'survival of the fittest' to societal structures, implying that societies evolve with the 'strong' prospering while the 'weak' remain disadvantaged. An example of social Darwinism is the belief that helping the poor or less fortunate goes against the natural order because it hinders the 'natural' competition and evolution of society.

This idea was championed by political philosopher Herbert Spencer and became particularly influential in the late 19th century.

Spencer coined the phrase 'survival of the fittest,' and along with others like William Graham Sumner, argued that societal advancement would occur if those less capable did not receive artificial assistance. This controversial viewpoint suggested that success in society was an indication of biological fitness and was used by the wealthy to justify their position in the social hierarchy.

However, critics argued that opportunities were not evenly distributed, debunking the fairness suggested by social Darwinism.

The prominence of Social Darwinism saw its decline in the mid-20th century, especially as eugenicists misused it to reinforce their racist ideologies.

Darwin himself disagreed with the application of his theory of natural selection to human societies, making it clear that social Darwinism was a distortion of his scientific work.

From 616-439 all the rulers in order

Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, Servius Tullius, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus,

Titus Lartius Flavus, 

Manius Valerius, 

Aulus Postumius Albus Regillensis, 

Manius Valerius Maximus, 

Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus, 

The kings who ruled the Italian peninsula from 600-265BC were primarily the Etruscan and Roman monarchy. The Etruscan kings dominated from 600-509BC. The Roman monarchy lasted from 753-509BC with seven different kings.

The rulers of the Italian peninsula from 600-265 BC were mainly the Etruscan kings and the Roman Kings. The Etruscans dominated from 600 to 509BC, and the most famous of these kings was Lucius Tarquinius Superbus. After the end of Etruscan rule, the Roman Republic era began, but before that, Rome was ruled by Roman kings. The Roman Monarchy period, which lasted from 753-509 BC, had seven kings in total, of which the last three were Etruscan. The Roman kings included Romulus, Numa Pompilius, Tullus Hostilius, Ancus Marcius, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, Servius Tullius, and Lucius Tarquinius Superbus.

https://brainly.com/question/180958

#SPJ3

The U.S. Constitution embodies the democratic ideals, belief in the natural rights of all men, and the concept of participatory democracy as envisioned by Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence. Contradictions regarding slavery were recognized but not fully resolved due to political compromises. Finally, the inclusion of mechanisms for constitutional amendments reflects Jefferson's idea of needing flexibility to adapt to changing times.

The U.S. Constitution can be seen as fulfilling Thomas Jefferson's vision as expressed in the Declaration of Independence in several ways. First, Jefferson's belief in natural rights, as stated in the Declaration of Independence with the momentous phrase, 'all men are created equal', and are entitled to 'Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness' was embodied in the Constitution and its amendments, despite its imperfect application especially in the context of slavery.

Secondly, Jefferson's vision of a participatory democracy, the belief in majority rule and his trust in the ordinary citizen were in essence reflected in the Constitution's principles. However, it must be pointed out that Jefferson's vision extended primarily to the white male population. Also, although Jefferson recognized the contradictions of his time, such as the coexistence of the fight for liberty and the institution of slavery, practical political compromises were made during the framing of the Constitution.

Lastly, the Constitution includes mechanisms for amendments that resonate with Jefferson's idea of periodic constitutional conventions. This characteristic demonstrates a trust in the people's ability to revise laws as needed, embodying the flexibility Jefferson hoped for.

https://brainly.com/question/32837031

#SPJ3

The governor of California provides several services. They have influence over the legislative process, oversee public policy, manage crises, represent the state and their party, and promote the state's interests.

The governor of California serves in a variety of roles and provides many services. Primarily, three of the governor's chief functions include influence over the legislative process through an executive budget proposal, policy agenda, and vetoes.

These tasks are instrumental in carrying forward the state's economic and political interests.

In addition, they manage crisis situations and oversee public policy implementation. Governor of California is also responsible for initiating a budget proposal, indicating where funding should be allocated and managing the state's tax revenue.

Another significant service that a governor provides is representing the state and their political party on various platforms, this might involve raising money for other political figures, making campaign appearances, and promoting the state's virtues to attract investments and encourage tourism. In essence, the governor is not only a decision-maker but also a spokesperson and ambassador for the state.

https://brainly.com/question/16968449

#SPJ12

Final answer:

Frederick Douglass used his powerful speaking skills and published his autobiography, 'Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave,' to improve American life by raising awareness about the horrors of slavery and inspiring others to fight for freedom.

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass used various methods to improve American life, particularly in the fight against slavery. One of his key contributions was his powerful speaking skills, which he used to provide public lectures on slavery, electrifying his listeners and raising awareness about the horrors of slavery. He also published his autobiography, 'Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave,' in which he exposed the brutalities of slavery and identified by name the whites who had mistreated him. This book became a powerful tool in the abolitionist movement, spreading awareness and inspiring others to fight for freedom.

Answer: used the power of the Federal government to enforce law.

The Whiskey Rebellion was a tax protest in the United States between 1791 and 1794 during the presidency of George Washington. The "whiskey tax" was the first tax imposed by the newly formed federal government, and was intended to generate revenue for the war debt of the Revolutionary War.

Washington responded by sending peace commissioners to negotiate with the rebels, while also calling on governors to enforce the tax. The rebellion was significant because it demonstrated that the new federal government had the will and ability to suppress resistance to its laws.

Answer:

yes yes yes yes tea

Explanation:

get your stuff together

Final answer:

The Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own and carry guns, primarily for self-defense within the home, as interpreted in key Supreme Court cases District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010). However, this right is subject to limitations, such as restrictions on felons, the mentally ill, and firearm possession near schools and government buildings.

Explanation:

The interpretation of the Second Amendment has been a subject of controversy and debate. The core of the amendment, as part of the United States Bill of Rights created on December 15, 1791, stipulates, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This has been interpreted in recent significant Supreme Court cases, notably District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010), to protect an individual's right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.

However, these rights are not without limitations. The Supreme Court has explicitly mentioned that this right does not extend to felons, the mentally ill, firearm possession near schools and government buildings, or the commercial sale of firearms. Thus, while the Second Amendment does protect the right of individuals to own and carry guns, there are specific legal stipulations on how these rights can be exercised, highlighting that the right is not unlimited or unconditional especially in relation to how firearms are used.

Answer:

In the process of Independence of the Latin American countries, the influence of the wars waged by the army of Napoleon Bonaparte was of vital importance. You can even say that the movements of the French leader's troops in the Iberian Peninsula were one of the triggers of the revolutions in the area.

In 1808, Napoleonic forces invaded Spanish territory and King Ferdinand VII abdicated before the French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. Ferdinand VII was arrested, which generated a power vacuum in the Spanish crown. The invasion and the subsequent power vacuum led Spain to war. This was the Spanish War of Independence.  

As a result of all these facts, the people in the Spanish colonies of America, already influenced by the ideas of the French Revolution, began to glimpse that there was a way to suppress colonialism and achieve independence in the long term. In this context, the first government boards appeared in the main Latin American cities. Thanks to these meetings, which initially recognized the royal authority in Ferdinand VII, the beginning of the independence process in the Hispanic colonies was favored.

Answer:

D) a governor declares a new state religion

Explanation:

This is against the Free Exercise Clause, where it allows individuals to choose for themselves what religion they shall believe in based on their conscience, but restricts any state or government religion being created or made final, because that would restrict religious freedom. Via Amendment I.

A governor declares a new state religion this example violates this portion of amendment 1. Option (d) is correct.

"Share" or "an entity cut (or as if cut) away from the total" are common definitions of the word "portion." However, the definition of part is "a vital component of the whole."

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or abridging the freedom of speech, of the press, or the right of the people to congregate in peace and petition the Government for a redress of grievances," states the Constitution.

This is against the Free Exercise Clause, which prevents any state or government religion from being founded or made official since it would limit religious freedom. It lets people to choose for themselves what religion they shall believe in based on their conscience. through Amendment I.

Therefore, Correct option is (d). A governor declares a new state religion

Learn more about Portion, here;

https://brainly.com/question/15228292

#SPJ2

Your question is incomplete, may be your question is;

Which example violates this portion of Amendment I?

(a) A student is allowed to read the Bible in class.

(b) A woman is allowed to hold a religious meeting in a park.

(c) A mayor attends a different church than his employees.

(d) A governor declares a new state religion.