The most important thing to understand about note-taking is that you need to do more than simply listen and write. You need to:

Answer: Part A: Pulls  Part B: It conveys a sense of fascination.

Explanation: Took the test.

Part A: The connotative meaning developed by the words "Draws men up" in the second stanza is C) pulls.

Part B: The connotative meaning of "Draws men up," identified in Part A, affects the tone of the poem by conveying B) a sense of fascination.

Connotative meaning refers to the emotional or cultural associations that a word carries with it, in addition to its literal definition (denotative meaning). It is the extra layer of meaning that words can have based on the context, cultural background, or personal experiences of the reader or listener.

Connotations can be positive, negative, or neutral, and they contribute to the overall tone, mood, and interpretation of a word or phrase. For example, the word "home" may have positive connotations of warmth and comfort for many people, while the word "snake" might have negative connotations of danger or deceit.

Learn more about connotative meaning on https://brainly.com/question/37565198

#SPJ3

The three conflicts presented in this excerpt are:

-Mollie is in conflict with herself because she wants to leave the farm.

-Mollie is in conflict with Clover because Clover sees Mollie with the farmer.

-Mollie is in conflict with the farm because she does not like her living conditions.

Mollie is a mare who lives in Animal Farm and works pulling Mr. Jones' carriage, but is not happy.  She longs for the attention of humans and likes pretty things, like colorful ribbons, rather than hard work. She is easily persuaded to escape from the farm lured by the sugar cubes the neighbor man constantly gave her.  

Answer:

A B D

with herself

with clover

with the farm

Explanation:

Im pretty sure that the answer is C

The correct option is b.

The nonstandard word in the sentence 'The thief stoled my wallet' is 'stoled'. The correct past tense of the verb 'steal' is 'stole'.

In the given sentence, the nonstandard word is 'stoled'. This is a grammatically incorrect form of the past tense of the verb 'steal'. The correct past tense of 'steal' is 'stole'. Therefore, the corrected sentence would be: 'The thief stole my wallet.'

Remember, in English language, every verb has a base or infinitive form, present tense, past tense, and past participle. For the verb 'steal', these are: to steal (infinitive), steal/steals (present), stole (past), and stolen (past participle).

https://brainly.com/question/2026506

#SPJ3

The Relative Clause is “who are five in number”. It is a type of dependant clause (it need the main clause in order to convey its meaning properly) that has the same function of an adjective; that is to say, it modifies a noun “friends”.

I think the relative clause would be who are five in number. Hope this helped

"Mark but this flea, and mark in this,

How little that which thou deniest me is;

Me it sucked first, and now sucks thee,

And in this flea our two bloods mingled be;"

Summary:

pay attention to this little thing

it sucked for me not it sucks for you

now are joined

"Thou know'st that this cannot be said

A sin, or shame, or loss of maidenhead;"

Summary:

the little thing is bad

"And pampered swells with one blood made of two;

And this, alas, is more than we would do."

Summary:

2 became 1 and its more than it should be

"And pampered swells with one blood made of two;

And this, alas, is more than we would do."

SUMMARY:

because 2 became 1 it a big deal

"The Flea" by John Donne is a poem that talks about the concept of love. The flea is symbolic of the love that the two characters have for each other.

The above answer is discussed in further detail as given below:

Therefore, the poem talks about physical relations by symbolizing it through a flea.

Learn more about the poem “The Flea” here:

https://brainly.com/question/11917040

“whose father worked for the railroad” is a subordinate clause as it is a relative clause beginning with the pronoun “whose”. It is particularly used in written English and it refers to possession of things or to make association or connections with other things or people.

The supporting details should be included in the Body Paragraphs of an essay. The introduction is an introduction of what you plan to write about, and the thesis is included in the introduction where you specifically mention your main topics/points. However you elaborate on these in the body paragraphs and these elaborations are your supporting details. The conclusion is a summary of your essay and should not be introducing any new information.

Answer:

Its is the body of the essay

Explanation: thesis goes in the introduction so you need information in the following paragraph to give evidence and supporting reasons

D. The author pleads with the people that they should not get influenced by empty promises made by politicians.

The correct answer would be option B, since it is the only one that makes complete sense.  Whereas the other options are missing puctuaction signs or some words to give order to the sentnces. For instance, in option A, it would be necessary to change some words or add some linkers to make the sentence correct. In option C, it would be necessary to have some commas to give better understanding to the reader of the phrase. Lastly, option D needs to have a question mark, since it is a question, and it is necessary to understand the sense of the sentence.  

GRACEFULLY is an adverb that modifies the verb “dance”.

Malcom suffered the dissolution of his family as a consequence of white violence. His father was killed by white men, and he was taken away from his mother and placed in a foster home when she proved unable to bear the strain of providing for all her children after the her husband's death. It must be noted that the insurance company argued that her husband had comitted suicide in order to avoid paying her what she was due. At school, he was disencouraged from pursuing a career in law, since it was "no realistic goal" according to one professor. We can see how at every turn, white people and white society destroyed his chances of a happy, healthy life. This made him believe that black Americans could not expect anything from white Americans.

The correct answer is option D. “Once dead what matter how their souls may fare?”. "The Pardoner’s Tale" by Geoffrey Chaucer narrates the point of view of The Pardoner a false healer that makes money with supposily healing "relics", but he doesn't care for the correction of sin or for the souls of the people. Taking into account the way The Pardoner tricks people to make money, the line that best fit his attitude towards those who he sees for spiritual guidance is “Once dead what matter how their souls may fare?”.

Answer:

Once dead what matter how their souls may fare

Explanation:

The sentence with proper subject-verb agreement is B. The student as well as the teacher want to go to the museum. In this sentence, the subject is what we call a compound subject, meaning that the verb refers and agrees with more than just one singular word. The compound subject is "student" and "teacher" and they are connected by "as well as", which functions as a coordinating conjunction would. That's why the verb should conjugate in its plural form.

Option A is incorrect because the structure inside parentheses is not related to the verb and does not influence its conjugation. Options C and D have a verb in the singular form for a compound subject - that would demand a plural conjugation.

I'm not going to write the answer for you, but think about the emotions we all share. Does everyone think differently and have the same sadness? But do they share the same external struggles? Can people work together even though they come from different walks of life? Make sure to talk about differences and similarities and if you think these would prevent co-existing.

Answer:

A. The author.

Explanation:

The correct option is C. Character vs. character.

There is conflict between the two characters and both are struggling to beat one another. Walter's fantasies are a way to battle his wife's reprimands. In literature there are many examples of this conflict in which prevails a strong antagonism between some characters, for instance: Harry Potter vs. Lord Voldemort.

Option A. is not correct because there's no nature involved in the conflict.

Option B. is not correct because the conflict between the two characters is not related to society.

Option D. is incorrect since there's no self-struggle involved.

The two sentences that indicate that Sir Walter Scott's Ivanhoe is a work of historical fiction are B. Princess Matilda, though a daughter of the King  King of Scotland, and afterwards both Queen of England, niece to Edgar Atheling, and mother to the Empress of Germany, the daughter, the wife, and the mother of monarchs, was obliged, during her early residence for education in England, to assume the veil of a nun, as the only means of escaping the licentious pursuit of the Norman nobles, and D. It was a matter of public knowledge, they said, that after the conquest of King William, his Norman followers, elated by so great a victory, acknowledged no law but their own wicked pleasure, and not only despoiled the conquered Saxons of their lands and their goods, but invaded the honour of their wives and of their daughters with the most unbridled license.

The works of Sir Walter Scott represent the foundations of historical fiction. In Ivanhoe (1820), the author depicts medieval England and the conflicts between Jews and Christians. The story is set in 12th-century England, it is set in the past, an important characteristic of the historical novel. Furthermore, these two sentences include notable historical figures, Princess Matilda and King William, another essential element of this type of fiction. In these fragments, there are allusions to real history. As the first sentence establishes, Princess Matilda was the daughter of Henry I and the claimant to the English throne during the Anarchy and, as the second sentence states, there was a strong feud between Normans and Saxons, an struggle for the control of England, after the Norman Conquest and William the Conqueror's claim to the throne in the 11th century. Ivanhoe tells the story of a remaining Anglo-Saxon noble family at a time when most nobles in England were Normans.

Answer:

B and D

Explanation:

In the excerpt from chapter 6 of Animal Farm, humans, even though they are sure that the windmill won't ever be successful, have a sense of recognition and respect for what the animals have done, for their hard work and persistence to manage their own affairs, which granted them independence. This recognition of effort regardless of what the results can be is something natural of humans, and that is why the answer is D. They value efficiency and accomplishment.

Answer:

They value efficiency and accomplishment.

Explanation:

George Orwell's allegorical novella "Animal Farm" shows the animals of 'Manor Farm' rebelling against their human masters. They did succeed and began managing their own affairs, but also under the dictatorial power of a pig named Napoleon.

The excerpt given in the text from Chapter 6 shows the animals working hard to repair the windmill. And even though the humans were looking forward to seeing the farm collapse, and to see their failure, they were also impressed about the form of unity the animals showed in building the windmill. This is evident in the line "against their will, they had developed a certain respect for the efficiency with which the animals were managing their own affairs." This shows that even the humans value the efficiency and accomplishment of the animals, even though they had expected and wanted them to fail.

Firstly, it is important to understand that the concept of culture for Pattanaik, “Culture is a reaction to nature, and this understanding of our ancestors is transmitted generation from generation in the form of stories, symbols and rituals, which are always indifferent to rationality”, so in this way, every distinctive culture has its own group of symbols, images and language referents which provide a sense of belonging and uniqueness to the individuals who live into the aura of a particular culture. This principle shows that each particular culture has its own way of understanding the world and as a result its particular point of view.

Pattanaik presents how this different angle on the appreciation of reality could bring subjective points of view depending on local values and this situation may modify the perception of what is right or not and the acceptation of this, “there is my world and there is your world, and my world is always better than your world, because my world, you see, is rational and yours is superstition. Yours is faith. Yours is illogical. This is the root of the clash of civilizations”. So this distance on the appreciation of reality is not so evident in a culturally unified society where most of the values are commonly shared by the citizens.

But in a world that is inevitably suffering the influence of globalization, where parameters from an unified world without the inclusion of local systems of beliefs have not been included in its development would tend to confront western and eastern values in its implementation. So Pattanaik exposes the concept of the clash of cultures in his culture, the one which is diverse, full of mythological meaning and the one that is emerging from internet and massive media content, “you see, this is what India is today. The ground reality is based on a cyclical world view. So, it's rapidly changing, highly diverse, chaotic, ambiguous, unpredictable. And people are okay with it. And then globalization is taking place. The demands of modern institutional thinking is coming in. Which is rooted in one-life culture. And a clash is going to take place, like on the banks of the Indus. It is bound to happen”.  

Devdutt Pattanaik: East vs. West -- the myths that mystify. Taken from: https://en.tiny.ted.com/talks/devdutt_pattanaik

Appadurai suggests that cultural clashes are inevitable in today's world, especially in India. This is primarily driven by the effects of globalization that induce increased cultural mixing and economic inequality, and the concept of global cultural flows, contributing to an unpredictable and fluctuating global cultural economy.

The scholar in question is Devdutt Pattanaik, an Indian mythologist, but the provided text refers to Arjun Appadurai, an Indian American anthropologist. Assuming we are discussing Appadurai's theories, he suggests that a clash between cultures is inevitable given the reality of India (and, indeed, the world) today for several reasons. The primary cause lies in the concept of globalization. Globalization leads to an increase in transnational flows, resulting in an increased cultural mixing and pressures for change.

Structural changes brought about by immigration, for instance, may compel national communities to reevaluate their common language, practices, and values. While some citizens embrace this multicultural identity, working-class and disadvantaged groups might experience economic inequality and threats to their way of life. This can incite a reaction from dominant cultural, racial, and ethnic groups, who might resort to violence against minority populations in a bid to reassert control and attain an illusory sense of national 'purity.'

Another aspect addressed by Appadurai's theory is what he calls global cultural flows, with -scapes as drivers of these. Therein, the global cultural economy is seen as a fluid exchange of goods, ideas, and people; a continuous ebb and flow with various pushes and pulls. This interaction can sometimes lead to unpredictable results and contradictions, thereby further increasing the chances of cultural clashes.

https://brainly.com/question/31930333

#SPJ3

The sentence that shows proper parallel structure is B) Judith dislikes people who are rude, selfish, and self-centered.

It is called parallel structure to the repetition of a grammatical form within the same sentence. In other words, it refers to the use of the same grammatical pattern in order to make the sentence clearer for the reader.

In sentence B) "people" is modified by a defining relative clause ("who are rude, selfish and self-centered"). The defining relative clause includes three adjectives ("rude", "selfish" and "self-centered") and that is what makes the sentence a parallel structure.

Sentence B) is the only sentence where grammatical forms have not been mixed. Sentence A) presents two independent clauses  ("Judith dislikes people who are rude, selfish" and "they are self-centered"), which results in the separation of the last adjective and a breakdown in the parallel construction. In sentence C) "self-centered" is premodified by the adverb "very",  which also creates a faulty parallelism. Sentence D) does not show a proper parallel structure either since it includes a verb ("act") in the defining relative clause.  

Given that the definition of parallelism is a sentence that has several of the same speech pattern, Option B is the only option that correctly applies parallelism since it’s the only option that describes the three adjectives in the same form, "rude, selfish and self-centered" the other options have an addition to the self-centered part "and, who are rude, they are self-centered" so that is what makes them incorrect at least doesn’t applies to the parallelism rule.

I believe the answer is D

Answer:

Change concur to concurrently.

Explanation:

The festival and the public conference will run concurrently with each other. To concur is a verb and cannot be used along with another verb, in this case the verb to run. The verb to run is the main verb and this is linked to a compound subject which has two heads: festival and public conference. The two events will take place simultneously or concurrently, therefore an adverb derived from to concur has to be used. To concur means to take place at the same time.

no - “Is it not crystal clear, then, comrades . . .?”

yes - “Only get rid of Man, and the produce of our labour would be our own.”

yes - “Almost overnight we could become rich and free.”  

no - “What then must we do?”

yes - “That is my message to you, comrades: Rebellion!”

The evidence that best supports the idea that Old Major thinks that animals should be treated equal are-

B) “Only get rid of Man, and the produce of our labour would be our own.”

C) “Almost overnight we could become rich and free.”  

E) “That is my message to you, comrades: Rebellion!”

George Orwell's "Animal Farm" is an allegorical story about a group of farm animals rebelling against their human masters with the desire to govern themselves. The novel deals with themes of power, greed, ideology, class, control, etc.

Old Major played an important part in the development of the story. He was the first to declare that the animals needed to rebel to be free and have their own governing power. Thus, the correct answers are options B, C, and E.

Learn more about "Animal farm" here:

brainly.com/question/6792093

Answer: (C) The three boarders

Explanation: Big trust

The three boarders in The Metamorphosis serve as the most clear representation of society's abandonment of Gregor due to their unemotional and dismissive reaction towards him and his unusual condition.

In Franz Kaf ka's The Metamorphosis, the characters that most clearly represent society's abandonment of Gregor, in my opinion, are D. The three boarders. Although Gregor's family also alienates him, the three boarders stand as a stronger symbol of general societal abandonment.

They are not directly connected to him and their reaction of disgust, fear, disrespect, and complete ignorance of Gregor's condition display an unemotional societal response to anyone deemed anomalous or different. Their immediate decision to leave the house once they discover Gregor could highlight society's inclination to rather ignore or abandon than try to understand and accommodate such situations or individuals.

https://brainly.com/question/31408356

#SPJ2

35)

A) A working man who isn't well educated and likes to gossip.

36)

D) The luggage arrived, the dog bit the stranger, the dog went under the wagon, the stranger went upstairs.

37)

D) 29th

38)

B) He was pushed out of the room.

Answer:

The following are the correct answers to each question:

Q35: Option A. The carrier Hall's profession, dialogue, and actions all characterize him as a working man who isn't well-educated and likes to gossip.

Q36: Option D. The basic sequence of events in paragraphs 1 to 4 is: the luggage arrived, the dog bit the stranger, the dog went under the wagon, the stranger went upstairs.

Q37: Option D. The events occurred on the 29th day of February.

Q38: Option B. When Mr.Hall went to check on the stranger he was pushed out of the room.

Explanation:

The Invisible Man is a science-fiction novel written by English author H.G, Wells and originally published in 1897. It tells the story of a mysterious man that unexpectedly arrives to a small village called Iping during a snowstorm. The mysterious man, called Griffin, is staying in a small Inn managed by a couple; Mr. and Mrs. Hall, who soon will find out that Griffin is a scientists that makes crazy experiments, and Griffin will soon understand how he is now the center of attention of a very small and gossipy community.

A, because it says if, which is implying that it is still possible.

The answer is: My mistress is not a perfect beauty.

Shakespeare's "Sonnet 130" is a parody of traditional sonnets at the time, in which poets compared their lovers to beautiful things like diamonds, fine pearls, flowers or goddesses. In the first four lines, Shakespeare expresses his lover does not possess a conventional beauty: her eyes are not like the sun, her lips are not red, her breasts are brownish or yellowish, and her hair looks like wires.

The phrasal verb "to stay put" (in bold) is an intransitive verb as it does not need or have an object.

The verb "ask" on the other hand is a transitive verb since it has an object, which in this case is "class". The object of a transitive verb can be a noun, a noun phrase or a pronoun.

The answer would be D the year the source was published.

Answer:

D. the year the source was published.

Explanation:

When you are writing an academic paper, you will use many other papers as a source of research. All of these works should be referenced at the end of your work, ie you should show which sources of research were used and leave references for others to find these works. In relation to these references, you should put, the author's name, the name of the work, where the work was published, which pages you used and what was the year of publication of this work.

With this, we can say that the year in each of the entries of works cited, probably refers to the year in which the source was published.

C. Can't is the father of feeble endeavor

A metaphor is a figure of speech that describes an object or action in a way that isn't literally true, but helps explains an idea or make a comparison.

According this theoretical  explanation the option is D.

It rings in our ears like a timely sent warning.

The expression like a timely sent warning is not literally true but try to explain the idea indicated at the   The pronoun " it"  and verb " rings"