The Sedition Act of 1798 which punished individuals for publishing “false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government is now infamous and thought to have violated the right of freedom of expression. What agency had the responsibility for enforcing the Sedition Act when it was in effect?

1.the Secret Service
2.the US Marshals Service
3.the local police
4.the United States Postal Inspection Service

Answer:

an executive agreement is the agreement between 2 or more executives where as a treaty is the agreement between the states

Explanation:

The primary difference between an executive agreement and a treaty lies in their formation and ratification process. A treaty is a formal agreement between countries that requires negotiation by the president, consent by a two-thirds vote in the Senate, and ratification by the president. An executive agreement, which is more commonly used in recent times, is negotiated and approved by the president alone, or in the case of congressional-executive agreements, requires a simple majority vote in both the House and Senate.

The U.S. Constitution outlines a specific process for treaty-making in Article II, stressing the formalities involved, including Senate approval by a two-thirds vote. However, the majority of international agreements the U.S. enters today are in the form of executive agreements because they are less onerous to enact. Executive agreements have the same force as treaties while in effect, but unlike treaties, they do not require the Senate's approval, making them more flexible and easier to implement or rescind by subsequent administrations. For instance, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Paris Climate Agreement were both executive agreements rather than treaties. In the landmark United States v. Pink case, the Supreme Court deemed executive agreements as legally equivalent to treaties, as long as they do not change federal law.

One of the main clues that it gives are what caused the fire, and could give if the fire was started on purpose or was accidental. This, in turn, can provide them with what caused the fire, and then they can figure out who had the product which the fire was started by.

I hope this helped. If so, please mark brainliest!

Flames and smoke are probably two of the main things that investigators use to judge an investigation. The color of the flames can indicate many different things like temperature and use of particular accelerants. The direction of the burn patterns left by the flames can also tell a great deal.

The "willful or malicious" part of the definition for arson is what truly determines whether the crime of arson has occurred.

They also look for things like the direction of the smoke, the flames, and the distance.

Learn more about arson investigation here-https://brainly.com/question/14317242

#SPJ2

Answer:

Popular Sovereignty.

Explanation:

The principle of popular sovereignty state that it is the consent of the people that creates and sustains the state and its government through the elected representatives.

The people are source of all political power. this principle is associated with Thomas Hobbs, Rousseau and John Locke, all three were social contract philosophers. Declaration of independence also reflects this principle because it declare that it is the prole who instituted the government for themselves and it derives power from their consent.

Answer:

Speaker of the House

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is c: Voter ID laws.

Explanation:

To begin with, it is necessary to define what voter ID laws are. They are laws which require voters to evidence their identity before a ballot is cast. In other words, the voter must provide some kind of official identification in order to be allowed to vote. Many say that this system avoids fraud. Others, like Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, claim that these laws are used as a tool so as to discourage the poor and disabled from voting. Requiring a voter ID discriminates against minority groups, such is the case of African Americans, Hispanic people, the elderly, and transgender individuals, among other minorities. It appears that it is not as easy as it seems to get an ID or another type of document you need to present when you vote.

Some states require a Photo ID, others a Non-Photo ID, and some others states do not require any ID whatsoever.

Final answer:

A fraternity handling a theft internally with their own tribunal instead of turning to formal law enforcement illustrates an example of an alternative legal structure.

Explanation:

The situation described where a fraternity brother who has stolen a valuable piece of jewelry is judged and punished by his peers rather than by formal legal authorities is an example of an alternative legal structure. This type of system operates alongside or outside the official legal system and relies on the community or group to enforce its own rules and norms. It stems from the society's desire to maintain order and address wrongdoings based on shared values rather than relying exclusively on formal laws and external enforcement. Such informal systems can be effective in small, close-knit groups where there is a strong consensus about values and expectations.

Answer:

Yes it is lawful.

Explanation:

A sentence of probation is actually an alternative of a jail sentence. The Courts have found that probationers have reduced expectations of privacy so  they don't have the same Fourth Amendment rights as others. Courts can require probationers to submit to warrantless searches not supported by probable cause. The goal is only to help rehabilitate the probationer, protect society, or both.

Although officers usually need warrants or probable cause before they can search a person or home, a search condition eliminates this requirement. In some states, an officer must have reasonable suspicion before conducting a probation search, but in others, an officer can conduct  searches at any time, even without reason to believe that the probationer committed a crime. Some  of these search conditions allow only probation officers to search, while others authorize both probation and police officers to do the same

The Fourth Amendment typically prevents police from searching someone’s body, belongings, or home without a warrant or probable cause. But judges gives a condition of sentencing someone to probation, that the probationer agree to warrantless searches. Since this condition does not entitled the probationer’s normal Fourth Amendment rights, it’s sometimes called a “Fourth waiver.”

The legality of Parole Officer Stone's search of Jack's apartment depends on the specific conditions of Jack's parole arrangement. While parolees often have conditions that allow searches by a parole officer without the need for a warrant or probable cause, the exact terms of Jack's parole would need to be assessed to determine the lawfulness of the search.

While on parole, individuals may have conditional rights compared to the general public, often subject to terms that can include regular searches by a parole officer. With no evidence of ongoing criminal behavior by Jack, the legality of the search could depend on the specific conditions of Jack's parole, which typically allow for searches without the need for a warrant or probable cause.

In a similar educational context, school officials were found justified by the District Court to conduct searches based on reasonable suspicion, as per the question's reference to the search of Savanna's belongings. This principle may extend to parole scenarios where the law provides parole officers certain liberties to conduct searches to ensure parole compliance. However, it's vital to consider whether the search was in accordance with the conditions stipulated in Jack's parole agreement, as well as state and federal laws concerning parolee rights. If the conditions did allow such searches, Officer Stone's action could potentially be lawful. Nevertheless, without specific information on Jack's parole conditions, a definitive answer cannot be provided.

Answer:

Yes all are liable.

In many states, LLCs can have a limited life. When a member joins or leaves an LLC, some states may require the LLC to be dissolved and re-formed with new membership — unless they have already an agreement in place within the LLC for buying, selling, and transferring ownership.

Explanation:

An LLC has advantage of both the corporation and partnership business structures.

LLCs protect business owners from personal liability in most instances, their personal assets — like vehicles, house, and savings accounts — won't be at risk in case LLC faces bankruptcy or lawsuits.

Profits and losses can get passed through to your personal income without facing corporate taxes. But, the LLC members are considered self-employed and must pay self-employment tax contributions towards Medicare and Social Security.

in many states, LLCs can have a limited life. Some states may require the LLC to be dissolved and re-formed with new membership when a member joins or leaves an LLC. This will not be required however if there is already an agreement in place within the LLC for buying, selling, and transferring ownership.

LLCs are a good choice for medium- or higher-risk businesses, owners with significant personal assets that they want to be protect, and owners who want to pay a lower tax rate than they would with a corporation.

Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law.

Explanation:

The equality before the law is the primary focus of the Magna Carta. Magna Carta still has a great respect in the legal communities of British and Americans. The legal fraternity’s term this has one of the supreme constitutional documents of all times which laid the foundation of freedom for the individual.

The US Constitution is one oldest constitution which has a major influence of the Magna Carta and formulation the legislation on the basis of the rights of the individuals, right to justice and right to have a fair trial.

Answer:

A: The non-resident must be licensed in their home state for a minimum of 2 years before Illinois will grant non-resident producer status.

Explanation:

For a non-resident, there isn't a requirement that one must meet a particular minimum licensing experience, but then holding a license in good standing their home state makes it, in relation to granting a non-resident licensing status is 'Illinois'.

The question asks which of the given options Illinois does not grant to non-resident licensing authorities. The correct answer is option (A): The non-resident must be licensed in their home state for a minimum of 2 years before Illinois will grant non-resident producer status.

This is not a requirement for Illinois to grant licensing authority to non-residents. Instead, Illinois focuses on ensuring that non-resident producers are in good standing in their home state and comply with procedural requirements such as filing an affidavit for service of process and paying the relevant license fee.

Options (B), (C), and (D) reflect actual requirements, where a non-resident must indeed file an affidavit, pay a licensing fee, and be in good standing in their home state. These regulations aim to maintain professional and ethical standards within the industry, ensuring that only qualified and reputable professionals are granted license privileges. This adherence to quality and legal compliance is crucial in fostering trust and safeguarding interests within the sector.

Answer: It means the United States has determined towards improving how to take over all states or countries

Explanation:

When the united states' use of military force is successful in maintaining national security, the United States : It means the United States has determined towards improving how to take over all states or countries by Occupying them.

The military force did this purposely to prevent any occurrence of threat, war or destruction in the nearest future. After the national security has been duly maintained, fixing of the problems shall follow suit in a peaceful way.

Answer: Bankruptcy

Explanation:

Bankruptcy is a legal process for someone or an organization that can not repay its debts and seek opportunities for part or all of the debt to be forgiven so the person can start afresh.

Bankruptcy can be filled by a creditor or someone can personally declare bankruptcy.

Legal proceedings for declaring bankruptcy differs from one country to another.

In the united states, bankruptcy cases are heard in a federal court.

Answer: Option B -- The lack of social conflicts

Explanation:

Copycat crime is defined as one of the criminal acts, that's imitated by the previous crime committed. Copycat effect started in 1916 when a crime was imitated or modeled by Jack the Ripper. It was affected by the level of media distribution of the criminogenic content and by social context factors, which include:

(i) Social norms regarding deviance and violence

(Ii) The number of opportunities available to the potential offender to copy a crime technique

(iii) The nature, credibility, and pervasiveness of the mass media

Answer:

Home:

School:

City:

State:

basically the same thing as for the city.

Nation:

Hope I helped answer the question!