C. the twenty-first amendement
Final answer:
Prohibition ended with the ratification of the Twenty-first Amendment in 1933, which repealed the Eighteenth Amendment, signaling the close of the prohibition era that had started in 1919.
Explanation:
Prohibition ended in 1933 primarily due to the passage of the Twenty-first Amendment. This Amendment repealed the Eighteenth Amendment, which had been in effect since its ratification in 1919 and marked the start of the prohibition era. The prohibition era made the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors illegal, although it didn't ban the consumption of alcohol outright.
Different factors contributed to the eventual repeal, including economic reasons such as the need to increase government revenue during the Great Depression, and the realization that prohibition was tough to enforce and led to widespread illegal activities. The Beer and Wine Revenue Act, which amended the Volstead Act by allowing the production and sale of beverages with an alcohol content of no more than 3.2 percent, also played a role as a step towards ending prohibition.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question of what caused prohibition to end in 1933 is c. the Twenty-first Amendment.
Churches and religious groups had a moral connection to
A.) Their advocacy of change.
B.) Politicial issues.
C.) Foreign policy.
D.) The economy and development of the nation.
a their advocacy of change
hope this helps
Answer:
A.) Their advocacy of change.
Explanation:
Religious groups had a moral connection to their adovacy of change, religious groups, churches and all groups of society that have a certain feeling of trying to make a change on the society they live in and try and transform their surroundings for a better way of life, where all people are morally correct according to their beliefs.
What forced King John of England to grant rights to the nobility, respect the rights of his subjects, and accept limitations to his powers as king?
The relationship of King John and his nobility was not good at all, the king was very unpopular among the barons. There were constant troubles between them, because the king restricted their rights by their own arbitrariness. In order to establish a kind of peace between the king and rebellious barons, Archbishop of Canterbury has drawn up a charter of rights under the name Magna Carta. Magna Carta was signed by King John in 1215. and it was the first document that imposed the legal frameworks for royal power. According to Clause 61 of this Charter, a 25 baron committee would be able to reject the Royal Decree. This would result in the protection of church rights, protecting the barons against unlawful imprisonment, quick justice, and limiting feudal taxes.
According to the law, this document forced King John to accept the rights of the nobility and the limitations of his royal power. In reality, none of the parties have literally adhered to the charter.
Answer:
the correct answer is manga carta
Explanation:
i took the test
do the primaries usually lead to the nomination of the best available candidates? why or why not
This is a complex question with the short answer being that they can but often do not.
Primaries, by their nature, put politicians through the ringer and make it so that their ideas are vetted by different types of citizens as they go along.
Our primary system has some flaws though, primarily that the early primaries are dominated by rural states.
So, candidates who may appeal to more citizens are often knocked out early because they may not appeal to white voters in New Hampshire and Iowa.
The counter to this argument is that the candidate that makes it through is the best candidate simply because they made it through the gauntlet of the American people. As a result, they represent a broad coalition.
Which of the following statements best summarizes the central idea of Woodrow Wilson’s speech? The United States has no choice but to enter the war because of hostile actions by the Germans. The Central Powers have declared war on the United States. The United States is responsible for protecting democracy throughout the world. The United States must enter the war to protect its right to free trade.
The answer is A) The United States has no choice but to enter the war because of hostile actions by the Germans
Answer:
A) The United States has no choice but to enter the war because of hostile actions by the Germans.
Explanation:
When a Germany U-boat torpedoed the Lusitania in 1915, killing 1198 people including 128 Americans, President Woodrow Wilson believed that America should enter WWI. He asked the Congress for a declaration of war against Germany and in four days Senate and the House supported the President. In his speech, Wilson listed the aggressions that the Americans faced, and he pointed out that the motives of the US entering the war would be the vindication of human rights.
What was one of the aims of the Social Security Act of 1935? to ensure the elderly had income to limit the reach of private pension funds to provide job opportunities for people with disabilities to allow people to retire earlier
Answer:to insure elderly people had income
Explanation:
The aim of the Social Security Act of 1935 is to ensure the elderly had income.
What was the Social Security Act of 1935?President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law on August 14, 1935. In addition to several provisions for general welfare, the new Act established a social insurance programme to provide a continuing income to retired workers age 65 and older after retirement.
The primary goal of this Act was to provide for the general welfare by establishing a system of Federal old-age benefits and allowing the various states to make more adequate provisions for the elderly, blind people, dependent and crippled children, maternal and child welfare, public health, and unemployment administration.
This Act aims at establishing a Social Security Board, to raise revenue, and had many other purposes.
Therefore, to ensure the elderly had income was one of the aims of the Social Security Act of 1935.
To learn more about the Social Security Act of 1935, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2813409
#SPJ5
What was the eventual problem with the 1929 rise in stock prices?
Stocks became overvalued.
Profits continued to increase.
People began paying their debts.
The Dow Jones Index closed
Answer: Stocks became overvalued.
Detail/context:
There was much speculative buying on the stock market in "the Roaring '20s," as the decade was known. In the 1920s, people were so eager to invest and earn profits through the stock market that they bought stocks "on margin." In other words, they paid for only a marginal percentage of the stocks with their own funds, and borrowed bank funds for the rest of the purchase. That meant the banks were complicit in this arrangement too, by allowing those sorts of loans. By the late 1920s, 90% of the purchase price of stocks was being made with borrowed money. This inflated the market in a way that spiraled out of control, with stock values growing much higher than was in line with reality. In 1929, the market crashed. This was the event that initiated the Great Depression that took hold during the 1930s.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Select all that apply. The four factors that caused New England manufacturers to start spinning mills were
-power from waterfalls
-available cotton
-the Embargo
-available labor
Why did some in the northwest and some antislavery forces call the agreement a "base betrayal by the South"
Final answer:
Some in the Northwest and antislavery forces viewed compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 as a 'base betrayal by the South' because they facilitated the extension and perpetuation of slavery, which the North believed was a contravention of the nation's values.
Explanation:
Some in the Northwest and antislavery forces called the agreements such as the Compromise of 1850 a "base betrayal by the South" because they saw these legislative efforts as a way for southern slaveholding interests to extend their influence and perpetuate the institution of slavery. The antislavery critics in the North believed that slaveholders had usurped federal government power, leading to the dominance of a "Slave Power" in Washington D.C., which sought to enforce and spread slavery across the entire nation. Northerners and abolitionists feared that the political concessions given to the South in agreements like the Missouri Compromise and later the Compromise of 1850 were a betrayal of the nation's founding principles of liberty and equality, as they perceived them as bowing to pro-slavery pressures at the cost of moral integrity and potential freedom for the enslaved.
Antislavery leaders contended that the federal government was working in favor of slaveholders, neglecting the interests of non-slaveholding whites, including white working men. The irrepressible conflict outlined by William H. Seward suggested that the nation could not exist as half slave and half free, fueling the idea that such compromises were temporary and were ultimately betrayals of the moral stance against slavery. Thomas Jefferson himself worried that the Missouri Compromise was "the knell of the Union," signaling the deepening rift over slavery.
What do sellers do if they expect the price of goods they have for sale to increase dramatically in the near future? store the goods indefinitely regardless of when the price rises store the goods until the price rises and then try to sell them sell the goods now and try to invest the money instead of resupplying sell the goods now but try to get the higher price for them
Answer:
The correct answer is B) store the goods until the price rises and then try to sell the goods.
Explanation:
If a seller expects the price of the goods they have for sale to rise, the seller will want to sell them at a higher price than he or she is currently doing. Thus, the seller will store them instead of keep selling them, and he or she will try to sell the goods when the price rises.
Answer:
store the goods until the price rises and then try to sell the goods.
Explanation:
gradpoint
Which river valley civilization shows evidence of urban planning due to its orderly streets and plumbing system?
The Indus River Valley shows evidence of urban planning.
The signed and submitted by the police describes the nature of the crime and the probable cause, stating the role of the suspect.
I think the answer is the evidence or statement. I am not really sure what you are trying to ask but if this was a question he answer would be either evidence or statement.
Read the quotation.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident: that men and women are created equal."
Which of the following best describes the origins of this quotation as it relates to women’s equality?
It is from the US Constitution, written during the Second Continental Convention by Abigail Adams.
It is from the Declaration of Independence, written by the founders of the United States.
It is from the Seneca Falls Convention, using language from the Declaration of Independence.
It is from the National Woman Suffrage Association’s charter, written by Susan B. Anthony.
Answer:
It is from the Seneca Falls Convention, using language from the Declaration of Independence.
Explanation:
The Seneca Falls Convention was the first convention on women's rights in the United States, held from July 19 to July 20, 1848, in Seneca Falls, New York. It was organized by Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. The result was the publication of the Declaration of Seneca Falls (or Declaration of Feelings, as they called it), a document based on the Declaration of Independence of the United States in which they denounced the restrictions, especially policies, to which they were submitted women: not be able to vote, or stand for election, or hold public office, or affiliate with political organizations, or attend political meetings. The text is considered the founding text of the feminist movement.
How did sloat take control of california? he marched across new mexico and fought his way to the capital. he helped lead a revolt in the major cities and took over. he used the armed forces and took control. he held a vote for the citizens to join a provisional government?
Sloat took control of California by using the armed forced.
So the correct answer should be "he used the armed forces and took control"
Hope this helps,
Davinia.
Answer:
he used the armed forces and took control
Giuseppe garibaldi wanted to unify italy and install what form of government?
Garibaldi, Mazzini and Cavour were the most prominent revolutionaries of Italian’s unification process, that took several years and attempts. Garibaldi was a revolutionary, anti-Catholic and liberal nationalist, widely considered as an Italian war hero. Both Mazzini and Garibaldi wanted to install a Republic as a form of government.
Each of the following events occurred during the Cold War, place them in order from earliest (1) to most recent (4).
Vietnam War
China becomes communist
North Korea becomes communist
Cuban Missile Crisis
The events occurred during the Cold War, place them in order from earliest to most recent North Korea becoming communist, China becoming communist, Vietnam War and Cuban Missile Crisis.
What is communist state?A communist state is a one-party state that is administered and governed by a communist party guided by Marxism–Leninism. Marxism–Leninism was the state ideology of the Soviet Union, the Comintern after Bolshevization and the communist states within the Comecon, the Eastern Bloc, and the Warsaw Pact.
Marxism–Leninism currently still remains the ideology of a few parties around the world. After its peak when many communist states were established, the Revolutions of 1989 brought down most of the communist states, however, it is still the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, Vietnam, and to a lesser extent, North Korea.
During most of the 20th century, before the Revolutions of 1989, around one-third of the world's population lived under communist states.
Learn more about communist, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23716206
#SPJ2
PLEASE HURRY!!1
How has technology directly benefited consumers? Check all that apply.
1.It has created brand-new industries.
2.It has increased employment opportunities.
3.It has given access to online banking and electronic pay.
4.It has created the ability to purchase goods with the click of a button.
5.It has introduced new products, such as smartphones.
i would say 3 because it has given access to online banking and eletronic pay people who dont have cars need that.
They all have direct benefits except 1. but 3 and 4 have the most direct benefits
PLEASE CHECK IF IM RIGHT
let me know if you have a different answer
i also need help on the last one...
One (extreme left)
This is one of those questions that almost everything could be defended. The main people who benefited were those in the Northeast and Northwest. In the South, not much was needed: all they required were roads that got to the shore (which they already had). They would be paying for what they already had. I don't think it was a direct threat to their way of life: Americans have always been sensitive to problems with taxation. You could choose AD and in distant 3rd would be C. It really depends on what you've been told. My choice is probably D, but I'm a bit cynical.
Two
The only one I would dispute is the Klan Entry. People became quite afraid of what the Klan was doing and in about 1870 to 1880, or so it was ordered disbanded. I would put that over in the other side. The other 4 I agree with.
Three
Another one of those wording problems. Which 4 are you talking about? And what do you mean by between. There were actually five; the one you have not mentioned is likely Kansas (came in January 1861). I believe it was a free state but I have to check it.It was in theory a free state, but there was disruptions and rebellions particularly along the border with Missouri. This went on for most of the war (Missouri was a slave state). If all you were talking about was Wisconsin California Minnesota and Oregon then your answer was correct. I'm not disputing anything else. The compromise of 1850 is what you should pay most attention to.
Four
It also hurt the South's economy which was an objective of Lincoln's. I guess your answer is correct, but it is not complete. Go with it.
Five
The guidelines of 5 are that Lincoln was filled remorse by the need to have fought the war in the first place. His private and public thoughts (but particularly his private ones) sided on mercy. He was all for accepting the south back into the union and giving the vote to the colored. He is quoted as saying "The army must not leave the south until the colored have the vote. It is their only protections."
Congress was much less merciful.
So the top middle one is under Lincoln. And so is the comment about rebellion and not secession. The other two go under congress. I don't guarantee any of the answers to 5.
How was William Howard Taft’s administration different from that of Theodore Roosevelt
Even though William Howard Taft and Theodore Roosevelt were progressivists, their politics and administration were different.
Roosevelt prefered rough-and-tumble politics, had many ides and schemes, but he ususally left all the details of administering to others.
Taft were calmer and approached things slower. He finished Roosevelt`s job dealing with big businesses, prosecuting twice as many as Roosevelt had.
He came to the White House promising to hold Roosevelt`s legacy but decided to execute the existing law than demanding new legislation from the Congress.
Generally, it is known that the Taft`s administration is considered a failure because he changed the course of the progressive program started by Roosevelt to reactionary conservatism.
The main differences between the presidencies of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft lie in their approach to foreign affairs and their handling of domestic policies. Roosevelt's 'big stick' diplomacy and emphasis on worker's rights and land preservation contrasted with Taft's 'dollar diplomacy' and his less popular decisions in areas like land conservation and tariff laws.
Explanation:The administrations of William Howard Taft and Theodore Roosevelt had distinct differences, in spite of Taft being handpicked by Roosevelt as his successor.
Theodore Roosevelt, with his 'big stick' diplomacy, believed in using military prowess as a show of strength. His presidency was transformative for the office, particularly with his confrontations against big businesses, dispute resolutions in favor of workers, and commitment towards federal land preservation.
William Howard Taft, on the other hand, chose to use the USA's economic might, rather than military power, to influence foreign affairs. This approach was known as ‘dollar diplomacy’. Taft’s administration also pursued policies of antitrust and expanded federal oversight, like Roosevelt. Yet, Taft faced criticisms as his political skills were comparatively seen as deficient and he was not as focused on public good. During Taft's presidency, he endorsed the Payne-Aldrich Act of 1909, which raised tariff rates and alienated Progressives within his own party. On the matter of land conservation, he was also criticized for approving the sale of federal land, a move which led to division within the Republican party.
Learn more about Roosevelt and Taft Administrations here:https://brainly.com/question/11797211
#SPJ3
Who commanded the British attack on Quebec?
General Louis de Montcalm
General William Pitt
General George Washington
General James Wolfe
it is general james wolfe
Which of the following statements about the Ming dynasty is false?
Select one:
a. Chinese civil servants created commercial relationships with Europeans and Arabs from foreign lands.
b. Ming art was often more colorful than the stark black ink-brush paintings of earlier dynasties.
c. The scholar-gentry were once again appointed to high positions in the Chinese administration.
d. Imports from Spanish and Portuguese merchants in the 16th century, as well as later crops from the Americas such as corn and sweet potatoes, helped to increase the Chinese agricultural economy.
EXPLAIN IN DETAIL PLEASE
Answer by YourHope:
Hi! :)
Which of the following statements about the Ming dynasty is false?
C) The scholar-gentry were once again appointed to high positions in the Chinese administration!
:)
Why were Europeans eagerly searching for sea route to Asia in the 15th century?
Question 2 options:
They needed to find an alternative to the silk road due to the rise of the Ottoman Empire.
They wanted to explore strange new lands and seek out new life and new civilizations.
They wanted to boldly go where no one had gone before.
There was a competition between Europe and the Islamic Empires to see who could get.
20 POINTS
Assuming you are looking for a single answer, the best answer is:
They needed to find an alternative to the silk road due to the rise of the Ottoman Empire.
The Ottoman Turks were involved in trade and merchant traffic themselves, and they often charged high rates for travel through the territories they now controlled. Also, as religious and cultural opposites, European Christian culture and Islamic culture often came into conflict. So finding an alternate route was appealing to Europeans who sponsored exploration by sea.
Curiosity was also a factor, but they were not so much about "seeking out new live and new civilizations." If anything, they wanted to find further possibilities for extending their own civilization and profiting from trade with others.
To "boldly go where no one has gone before" is the theme for exploring the universe set forth in the Star Trek television and film series.
For what reason might a wealthy merchant or large landowner remain a Loyalist?
They feared that a revolt against Britain would cause the British to tighten restrictions on business.
They feared that a war would increase prices for their products.
They feared that the revolutionists would not be able to control the revolt, so their property might be damaged or destroyed.
They feared a change in government would cause them to lose their property.
Heyyyy!!!! I think the answer would be the last one "They feared a change in government would cause them to lose their property." because, (in my history class) we learned that loyalist would often be given land and money as well as protection in order for their loyalty.
Under what circumstances with protest of the students in tinker versus Des Moines be deemed unprotected speech
Judging by the opinion, if the students in Tinker v. Des Moines had done more than wear black armbands and had instead engaged in "disruptive" speech that got in the way of their classmates learning, they likely would have been ruled against. This is the type of analysis that the Court had to do in cases like the infamous "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case wherein a student relayed that message during a school event.
what does thomas jefferson mean when he describes the right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness as unalienable in the declaration of independence
rights that cant be taken away
Thomas Jefferson meant that the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are fundamental and cannot be taken away, highlighting the ideal that governments should protect these unalienable rights.
When Thomas Jefferson describes the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as unalienable in the Declaration of Independence, he means that these are rights that cannot be taken away or denied, as they are inherent to all human beings. Jefferson was influenced by the English philosopher John Locke, who originally wrote of natural rights to life, liberty, and property, which Jefferson modified to 'pursuit of happiness.' Jefferson affirming these rights as unalienable suggests that they are fundamental and should be protected by the government, regardless of social status or political inclination.
It is important to note that despite the aspirational language of the Declaration, there existed a stark contradiction in Jefferson's personal life and the societal norms of the time, as he, along with many other founding fathers, were slave owners who did not extend these unalienable rights to the people they enslaved. The document idealized equality and the protection of natural rights, yet did not immediately rectify the systemic injustices of slavery and inequality.
Ultimately, the Declaration served as a foundational text on which the United States based its values of democracy and freedom, establishing that governments are created to protect these rights and that they derive their powers from the consent of the governed. This principle has continued to shape American political philosophy and practice.
Which historical event BEST demonstrates the operation of checks and balances? A) The Senate approved the appointment of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. B) South Carolina seceded from the Union over the issues of slavery and States rights. C) President George Washington used the Army to suppress a tax rebellion by Pennsylvania farmers. D) President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent Federal troops to enforce the integration of public schools in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Sorry to editorialize but at the outset I just need to say that this is a terribly constructed question.
The correct answer is A.
Checks and Balances refers to the design of the US Federal Government wherein each branch is responsible to other branches in addition to being reliant on other branches for particular actions.
A is an example of the US Senate acting in their advise and consent role on the Executive Branch's power of appointment, which is a check that the Senate has on the Executive branch.
A better example would be the rejection of Robert Bork as a SCOTUS nominee.
Answer:
A
its right ur welcome
60 POINTSSSSS!!!!!!!! The chief complaint of conservatives against the New Deal was that it A. promoted free enterprise and individualism. B. made the government too powerful. C. brought changes that were too radical for most Americans. D. was concerned only with saving the banking system.
B. made the government too powerful
Answer by YourHope:
Hi! :)
The chief complaint of conservatives against the New Deal was that it:
B) Made the government too powerful!
:)
Some historians believe that the Civil War was caused by a failure of the American political system, during the fifty years before the war, to solve problems arising from states' rights and the expansion of slavery into the west. Other historians believe that the causes of the Civil War reside in a basic failure of the constitution to provide a framework for solving these problems. Evaluate the strength of both interpretations and explain which interpretation is more valid.
I am 7, I have a pen and paper, and I noticed something. It was a warm sunny day.You could hear the sweet voices of birds chirping from the far distance. It was white like pearl, and I noticed something to do so with a democratic and a half years ago, and
The Civil War was fought over the moral issue of slavery. In fact, it was the economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict.
What was the Civil War?The American Civil War took place between the United States of America and the Confederate States of America, a group of eleven southern states that broke away from the Union in 1860 and 1861. The battle was sparked principally by a long-standing debate about the institution of slavery.
The moral question of slavery lay at the heart of the Civil War. In reality, the economics of slavery, as well as political control over that institution, were fundamental to the battle.
Northern and Southern states had been discussing the topics that would eventually lead to war: economic policies and practices, cultural values, the scope and reach of the Federal government, and, most critically, the role of slavery in American society.
Learn more about the Civil War here:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ2
What is not a reason Lewis and Clark were sent on there expedition A) To look for gold and silver B) Establish trade relations with the Native Americans C) strengthen the United States claim to the lands in the Northwest D) Scientific research
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Which factor contributed to favorable interactions among Muslim, Jewish, and Christian societies in Europe during the Middle Ages?
The coexistence between Muslims, Jews and Christians was normal during the Middle Ages.
Jews lived in both areas, in harmony with Muslims and Christians.
Despite their consequent struggle, Muslims and Christians have always lived together, since some Christians lived in the Muslim zone.
The interest of the European countries to know the philosophical and scientific works of the Greek and Latin authors, brought by the Arabs, made creation in the Christian Spain of schools of translators. In these schools the three cultures coexisted (Arabs, Jews and Christians). they translated literary texts and treatises of scientists.
The Mozarabs were the Christians who lived in the Islamic zone. when they went against Muslim laws and practiced another religion they had to pay taxes.
Medieval Spain has often been presented as a peaceful coexistence between cultures. but not always has this harmony been, since one of these cultures always dominated so there have been revolts and episodes of violence between them.
The final breakdown of harmony occurred in the s. xiv, ending with the expulsion of the Jews in 1492.
The favorable factor was that Jews participated and contributed in the sphere of the Islamic community. They made contact with Muslim philosophers and theologians as well as Muslims had had contact with Christians before. In commerce areas, trade world was dominated by trading associations composed by Jews, Muslims and Christians from Islamic lands.
Which statement is not true about the victory at Fort Ticonderoga?
A. It proved colonial soldiers could endure through a long, drawn-out battle.
B. It provided cannon and weapons General Washington later used in Boston.
C. It proved colonial soldiers would take orders from a citizen military commander.
D. It proved that Ethan Allen’s Green Mountain Boys were an effective fighting force.
A is the correct answer.
The Battle of Ft. Ticonderoga wasn't much of a Battle. Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys surprised the garrison at the Fort and quickly worked to capture the Fort and loot the ammunition. The cannons and weapons were later used at the Battle of Bunker Hill.
Originally known as Fort Carillion, it was built in 1755 by French settlers, as a military base. Due to the important position linking Canada and the valley of the Hudson River, the British attempted to conquer it in 1758, having suffered great losses from the fewer French troops. However, next year, British manage to conquer and rename it to Fort Ticonderoga. In May 1775 during the French and Indian wars, Benedict Arnold joined Ethan Allen and Mountain Boys of Vermont, and at dawn attacked and won the fortress from the small and sleepy garrison of the British.
Although it was a small conflict, this was the first victory of the colonialists in the revolutionary war against the British, it had to be a morale booster and enabled key artillery for the continental army in the first year of the war. Next year. this artillery was used during the successful siege of Boston.
The right answer is B. It provided cannon and weapons General Washington later used in Boston.