Final answer:
Since the 1960s, Native Americans have achieved gains in tribal autonomy and land rights, highlighted by significant protests and legal victories. Asian Americans, driven by increased discrimination during the Vietnam War, unified to demand equal rights, notably achieving a significant Supreme Court victory in Lau v. Nichols for equal educational opportunities.
Explanation:
The question explores the civil rights gains achieved by Native Americans and Asian Americans since the 1960s. For Native Americans, significant achievements include increasing tribal autonomy, the right to self-government, and successful cases for land restoration or compensation, especially for Alaskans and Native Hawaiians. Notable events like the occupation of Alcatraz and Wounded Knee spotlighted these efforts on a national scale. For Asian Americans, the aftermath of discrimination during the Vietnam War spurred a unifying pan-Asian identity, leading to the formation of the Asian American Political Alliance and the demand for ethnic studies courses. The landmark Lau v. Nichols case in 1974 was a pivotal moment, as the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Chinese American students in San Francisco, affirming their right to equal educational opportunities, thereby setting a precedent for language rights.
I need help on 7 and 8
Answer:
1.Icarus
2. impulsive and prideful
The Lincoln-Douglas debates occurred during
the House election of 1854.
the presidential election of 1856.
the Senate election of 1858.
the presidential election of 1860.
In the 1950s, Chinese immigrants established Chinatowns in cities
mainly on the western coast of the United States.
mainly on the eastern coast of the United States.
primarily in the midwestern United States.
primarily in the southern United States.
Answer:
Chinese immigrants established Chinatowns mainly on the west coast of the U.S.
Answer:
Chinese immigrants established Chinatowns mainly on the west coast of the U.S.
Explanation:
Which method is used to measure public opinion in the United States? A. polls and surveys B. campaign advertisements C. press releases D. presidential addresses
Answer:
The answer would be A.
Explanation:
Why were people in the 1820's attracted to factory work?
Answer:
a lot of the people who worked at factories were attracted to them, because most of them were immigrants who were searching jobs and religious freedom
Explanation:
Ninety percent of the American people in the 1820s still lived and worked on farms, and many urban residents were skilled artisans who were not likely to flock to factory jobs. The beginnings of an industrial labor supply came instead from the transformation of American agriculture in the nineteenth century. In the Northeast, and especially in New England, where poor land had always placed harsh limits on farm productivity, rural people began leaving the land to work in the factories. Two systems of recruitment emerged to bring this new labor supply to the expanding textile mills. One, common in the mid-Atlantic states, brought whole families from the farm to the mill. The second system, common in Massachusetts, enlisted young women (the Lowell or Waltham system). Many of these women worked for several years in the factories, saved their wages, and returned home to marry and raise children. Others married men they met in the factories or in town and remained part of the industrial world. Labor conditions in these early years of the factory system were significantly better than those in English industry. The employment of young children created undeniable hardships. Immigrants became increasingly desirable to work in factories because they were willing to take the menial jobs that other Americans refused to take
if a packet of rice was $36.80 and now is $34.50. how much would be saved?
Answer:
$2.30
Explanation:
Answer: $2.30
Explanation: So, we know the packet of rice was $36.80 and is now $34.50. To figure out how much we saved, all we have to do is...
$36.80 - $34.50 = $2.30
There was a 1.06% discount...I hope this helps!
The Texas “Petticoat Lobby” ____________.
a.
made the state legislature aware of the laws wanted by hotel owners
b.
worked with schools to make sure girls were properly educated
c.
convinced stores to sell more fashionable clothing
d.
talked with lawmakers about issues that were important to women
Answer:
d. talked with lawmakers about issues that were important to women.
Explanation:
After the ratification of the 19th Amendment, women in Texas began to exercise their political rights to vote and to lobby their elected officials. In 1922, a group of women formed the Joint Legislative Council in order to lobby the Texas Legislature.
However, some opponents of the group nicknamed it the "Petticoat Lobby" in order to minimize the women's petitions. Nevertheless, the women achieved significant progress, including school and labor laws, a board of education, day nurseries, children's homes and adoption agencies.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
This is the name of the nonprofit special interest group who attempts to unhold the second amendment to the us constitution
Answer:
The answer is the National Rifle Association (NRA).
What is the lowest point in Asia?
Death Valley
Grand Canyon
Great Wall of China
Dead Sea
Answer:
dead sea
please mark it brambliest.
have a good day and be safe
-Hops
Answer:
Dead sea
Explanation:
What was the purpose of creating mosaic artwork? What do
present-day artists make with glass that is similar to mosaics?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It is the right answer
How did the Protestant churches began
Answer:
Protestant church began in Germany in 1517 when Martin Luther published his Ninety-five Theses as a reaction against abuses in the sale of indulgences by the Roman Catholic Church, which purported to offer the remission of the temporal punishment of sins to their purchasers.
Explanation:
Protestantism began in Germany in 1517 when Martin Luther published his Ninety-five Theses as a reaction against abuses in the sale of indulgences by the Roman Catholic Church, which purported to offer the remission of the temporal punishment of sins to their purchasers.
ARGUMENT Write a dialogue between two people in Nebraska who are expressing their views on the issue of popular sovereignty. Have one person defend the policy and the other oppose it.
Answer:PRO-Yes, this is a great idea...
OPPOSE- No people will make wrong decisions and then our economy will fall apart because people will get greedy.
PRO- You don't know that, let the people show what they got in store instead of accusing them right away.... That could happen, but people care about where they live.
OPPOSE-I am telling you letting people have a choice with the government you need just a few people with good heads to govern the area is a better than everyone.
PRO- But....
OPPOSE-But no.... Think of the classes. If you have rich people and poor people trying to get along deciding what is better than what it is just chaos waiting to happen.
PRO-You should give people a chance, I believe there is good in everyone and that poor or rich they can come to a decision together and we can govern ourselves and all live in harmony for centuries to come.
OPPOSE-Wake up to reality!!! There are stupid and bad and greedy people in the world not everything is good so you need to realize that not everyone is perfect and going to live up to that expectation.SO get over it...
What’s more Important: doing the right thing or doing things right?
Answer:
doing the right thing
Explanation:
Answer:
Doing the right thing is a lot more important. Doing what u feel is right shows your character. You might never get aproblem wrong if you always do things right, but your character is what matters the most.
I hope this helps
Explanation:
Which of these empires would go last in a timeline of world civilizations
Answer:
Persian Empire
Hope this helps:)
HElP 20 POINTS ON THE LINE !!!! PLUS will put Brainliest
The 3-day battle considered by many to be a turning point in the war because it crippled the Confederate Army bad enough that they would never again be able to invade a northern state:
A. The victory at Gettysburg.
B. The Battle of Antietam.
C. The taking of Atlanta by Sherman
D. The siege of Vicksburg by Grant.
16) __________ All of the following were some of “Lincoln’s Problems” EXCEPT:
A. Justification of War
B. Slavery existing in the US
C. Most of the Northern states wanted to secede from the Union.
D. Difficulties with Union Generals
Answer:
A. Gettysburg
C. Northern states wanted to secede
Explanation:
The Battle at Gettysburg was a massive failure for the Confederacy, since Robert E Lee planned to invade the North and end the war, but instead suffered an unrecoverable amount of casualties.
Northern states weren't the ones that wanted to secede- it was the Southern states states that felt Lincoln (or abolition) threatened their way of life.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
A. The victory at Gettysburg.
C. Most of the Northern states wanted to secede from the Union.
After the Civil War, President Grant wanted to prevent acts of against blacks in the South. He believed that blacks should be treated as equals. President Grant also wanted to curtail the power of .
After the Civil War, President Grant wanted to prevent acts of violence and discrimination against blacks in the South. He believed that blacks should be treated as equals and granted full civil and political rights.
What are political rights?Political rights refer to the rights that individuals have to participate in the political process of a country or society. These rights include the right to vote, the right to hold public office, and the right to express political opinions and beliefs freely.
In many countries, these rights have been won through social and political movements that have fought for greater democratic representation and the extension of political rights to previously excluded groups.
Political rights are usually guaranteed by law and protected by constitutional provisions or international agreements, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Political rights are an important component of human rights and are essential for the promotion of social justice, equality, and the rule of law.
Learn more about political rights, here
https://brainly.com/question/13410117
#SPJ3
Compared with before the war, the level of manufacturing in Texas during WWII _______. a. remained almost the same b. increased slightly c. increased greatly d. decreased greatly Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answer:
c. increased greatly
Explanation:
Answer:
c. increased greatly
Explanation:
Compared with before the war, the level of manufacturing in Texas during WWII increased greatly.
What are three facts that you know about Cold War
Answer:
It was a postwar rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union, as well as each of their allies.No direct battle occurred between the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War.During the Cold War, there was a nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union.This is the right answer for Edmentum and Plato users.
Like and Rate!
PLZ HELP I GOT 5 MIN left Bantu migration resulted in:
a homogeneous civilization
benefits for many local farmers
crowded cities in the east
bigotry among southern Africans
Answer:benefits for many local farmers
Explanation:
Answer:
Bantu migration resulted in:
a homogeneous civilization
benefits for many local farmerscrowded cities in the east
bigotry among southern Africans
Explanation:
Why were “separate but equal” schools often unfair to African Americans?
Answer:
They were in poor condition and did not have proper funding is the correct answer.
Can I get Brainliest? Thx Peace...
Can you guys answer the first question thanks will give brainliest
Answer:
D, He was not a wealthy landowner.
Explanation:
Which of the following statements about the Gault case is NOT true? A. It changed the rights of juveniles in American courts. B. It involved a child who was arrested for making prank phone calls. C. At the child’s original hearing, the child had an attorney. D. The child's parents were not notified when the child was brought into custody.
Answer:
CccccccccccccccccCCCC
Understand different types of trusts.
Final answer:
Trusts can historically be groups controlling multiple companies to avoid monopoly laws or, more commonly today, tools used in estate planning to transfer assets to heirs outside of probate court. These trusts are managed by trustees and can become irrevocable upon the creator's death. Furthermore, trusts are important in the nonprofit sector as financial instruments for charitable purposes.
Explanation:
To understand different types of trusts, it's essential to recognize that a trust can be established for various purposes. Historically, trusts were used in business to control multiple companies through a single unit, often to circumvent monopoly laws. These were groups that controlled stock and were able to own and manage multiple companies under one umbrella. Today, trusts are commonly used in estate planning. They serve as a mechanism for transferring assets of the deceased to heirs, governed by the terms laid out by the trust creator.
In estate planning, trusts are akin to 'the family bank,' where assets are managed by trustees for the benefit of beneficiaries. Upon the creator's death, an executor and trustee(s) carry out the asset transfer process outside of probate court. Additionally, there are irrevocable trusts, which cannot be changed after the creator's death, ensuring the directives are executed as intended.
There's also a broader context regarding trusts in the nonprofit sector and how these organizations manage their funds. Trusts in this sense can be foundations or endowments that hold assets for charitable purposes. Understanding the many forms trusts can take is critical in recognizing their impact on business, estate planning, and the nonprofit sector.
how to write 3-5=
what is the sum
Answer:
The sum is -2. You can rewrite it as 3 + (-5) = -2
Explanation:
In this statement, the author suggests that terrorism will
Answer:
D; end because the activities have alienated people
Explanation:
Final answer:
The author suggests terrorism is a self-defeating strategy that may gain short-term attention but ultimately leads to the discrediting and defeat of the cause. It is highlighted as a flawed political strategy due to underestimating the adaptive responses of states and the international community. The text also discusses the role of conflict in aiding terrorist growth and the impact of counter-terrorism measures.
Explanation:
The author suggests that terrorism, through its methods and consequences, is ultimately a self-defeating strategy. The passage implies that terrorist groups may initially achieve publicity and cause disruption by employing violence and fear, yet in the long run, their actions can lead to the discredit of their cause, loss of support, and ultimate defeat. This perspective is informed by historical outcomes and the acknowledgement of terrorism as a form of warfare that must be met with calculated responses, not with excessive force that could be viewed as more terrorism and potentially generate sympathy for the terrorist cause among some populations.
When terrorist acts are motivated by a rational choice or political calculation, it suggests that groups choose this method because they believe the benefits outweigh the costs. However, the passage highlights that this calculation often overlooks the capacity of states and the international community to adapt and respond to terrorism, ultimately leading to the weakening or destruction of the terrorist group itself. This failure to achieve long-term objectives, despite short-term tactical successes, underlines the inherently flawed nature of terrorism as a political strategy.
The growth of terrorist groups has, in part, been facilitated by the link between conflict and terrorism, particularly in regions where state control is weak. This provides a breeding ground for organizations to recruit, train, and operate with impunity. However, the state and international response to terrorism, which includes comprehensive counter-terrorism measures, can mitigate this threat. The understanding is that although terrorism leverages human fear, it does not guarantee the achievement of the desired end goals when met with a disciplined and proportional response.
Where did friars live?
a monasteries
b. among the public
C.
d.
universities
churches
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Oo oo
Answer: the answer would be churches
Answer:
B. among the public
Explanation:
This is correct on e2020.
What was the result of the court case brown vs. board of education
Answer:
It ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional
Explanation:
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.
hope this helps
In both Japan and China, __________. A. elections are not free or fair B. only one political party is allowed C. there is no freedom of speech D. women face discrimination
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer would be B.
Explanation:
Who represents you in the House of Representatives??
Answer:
The congressmen / women that live in your state
How did the Persian Wars negatively affect Greece?
Greek city-states lost land.
Many Greeks lost their lives.
The ruler of Greece was killed.
Greece suffered its final defeat.
Persian Wars negatively affect Greece: Greek city-states lost land. Thus, option A is the correct option.
The Persian Wars had a negative impact on Greece as some Greek city-states lost land during the conflict. The wars, particularly the Persian invasions of Greece in the early 5th century BCE, resulted in territorial losses and the destruction of certain regions.
The city-states that were directly affected by the Persian campaigns experienced devastation and disruption, leading to a decline in their economic and political power. However, it is essential to note that the wars also served as a catalyst for uniting the Greek city-states against a common enemy, fostering a sense of Greek identity and resilience that ultimately played a significant role in repelling the Persian invasions.
Thus, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about Persian Wars here:
https://brainly.com/question/11027063
#SPJ6
Final answer:
The Persian Wars negatively affected Greece primarily through the loss of many lives, including notable figures such as King Leonidas. The wars also strained Greek resources and societal structures, which contributed to future internal conflicts such as the Peloponnesian War, subsequently weakening Greek military and political power.
Explanation:
The Persian Wars had several negative effects on Greece, although ultimately the Greeks were victorious. Many Greeks lost their lives, including at the famous Battle of Thermopylae where King Leonidas and 300 Spartans, among other Greek allies, were killed after holding off the Persian forces. While it is often the valor and the ultimate Greek victories that are highlighted, the heavy toll of life cannot be understated.
Although the Persian invasions were repelled, with battles such as Salamis and Plataea marking turning points, the prolonged conflict and efforts to safeguard Greek liberty from Persian dominance led to significant strain on Greek resources and society. This strain fomented seeds of discord among the Greek city-states and paved the way for future conflicts, notably the Peloponnesian War. This subsequent internal Greek conflict was even more devastating and had a profound and enduring impact on Greek society and its military and political power.