What has the u.s. supreme court ruled with regard to high-speed police pursuits?

         The constitution of the United States establishes the arms of government. It clearly states  that all powers which are not granted to the federal government is exclusively reserved for the states and Americans.

    The individual state government in the United states are created and designed after the federal government and they are made up of three branches.

   The executive is the governor of the state while the legislature is made up of elected representatives. The judiciary is headed by the Chief judge by virtue of appointment by the governor and subject to confirmation by the legislature.

    This model is enshrined in the United states constitution.

   According to the question, the US constitution is establishes the branches of the state government.

Learn more about the branches of government at https://brainly.com/question/1163843

Prohibited powers, as mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, are the powers that are denied to both the national and state governments to maintain a balanced federal system. They include prohibited actions such as granting 'titles of nobility' and passing laws favoring one state over another. Powers other than these are classified into enumerated, implied, shared, and reserved powers based on the nature of their allocation.

Prohibited powers are powers that are denied to both the national and state governments and can be found in the U.S. Constitution. For instance, Article I, Section 9 prohibits the government from denying a citizen the right to a trial by jury and forbids the federal government or the states from granting 'titles of nobility.' Also, laws that favor one state over another, known as ex post facto laws, are prohibited. Powers denied are intended to establish a balanced federal system. Additionally, the 10th Amendment furthers this by stating that 'The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.'

Powers can be classified into several types: enumerated powers, which are explicitly stated in the Constitution; implied powers, which are not explicitly stated but derive from the 'necessary and proper clause' in the Constitution; shared powers, held by both the national and state governments; and those powers reserved for the states by the 10th Amendment. This balance of powers is a cornerstone of our governmental system and the principle of limited government.

Furthermore, there is a concept of reserved powers, which refers to the powers not expressly given to the national government and, hence, intended to be executed by the states. For example, states can pass laws regarding intrastate commerce and marriage. Some powers, such as the right to levy taxes, are given to both the state and federal governments.

https://brainly.com/question/30516829

#SPJ3

The Epic of Gilgamesh

Answer: In 2013, there were 855,000 doctors of medicine, which includes active doctors of medicine and doctors of osteopathy, and 191,000 dentists working in the United States (Figure 2). In 2015, there were also 2.7 million registered nurses, 2.3 million health technologists, and 2.5 million nursing and other aides.

Explanation:

The correct answer is European threats to take over Latin American colonies.

The Monroe Doctrine became one of the most famous ideas of the 19th century. This doctrine would shape American foreign policy for roughly a century.

The Monroe Doctrine stated that the Western hemisphere was off limits to further European colonization. The US promised not to interfer with already established colonies. However, any new attempt to create a colony in the Western hemisphere would be viewed as an aggressive act. According to Monroe, the US would respond with military force if needed.

This helped to put America on a path of isolationism that would continue throughout the 19th century.

a.       Attendees are hoping to talk about reversal of the protectionist trade barriers.

b.      They are motivated by the sustenance for a wider constitutional convention

c.        They hope that more states would be represented and that their delegates authorized to examine wider areas.

Answer:C

Explanation:

The issue that divided the Framers of the Constitution into two parties was the scope that the central government should have.

The writers of the Constitution strongly disagreed on ideology, and this led to the formation of two marked parties: The Federalist and the Anti-Federalists (The Democratic-Republican party). On one hand, the Federalist party, which was mainly supported by bankers, businessmen and merchants, deemed necessary a strong national government and a national bank to lead the nation.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, mainly consisting of planters, small farmers, and artisans, promoted a weak central government and leaned to give more power to the states and local governments instead. They also opposed the creation of a national bank.

The period of shogunate rule in japan lasted from the end of the 1100s to the middle of the 1800s. during this time, Japanese artists focused on painting in ink painting, also known as sumi-e.

Shogunate Rule and Artistic Focus: From the Kamakura to Edo periods, Japanese artists emphasized various art forms, notably ink painting (sumi-e), influenced by Zen Buddhism's spread from China.

Characteristics of Ink Painting: Sumi-e utilized black ink in varying concentrations, employing minimal strokes to depict landscapes, figures, and animals, prioritizing essence over detail.

Ink Painting Aesthetics: The monochromatic style of ink painting mirrored the simplicity and discipline valued in samurai culture, reflecting the ethos of the time.

Flourishing of Japanese Art in Edo Period: The Edo period witnessed a surge in Japanese art, notably woodblock prints (ukiyo-e), depicting everyday life, landscapes, and historical scenes.

Continuation of Ink Painting: Despite the rise of ukiyo-e, ink painting remained a significant art form throughout the shogunate era, serving as a foundational tradition in Japanese painting.

Answer:

he is right

Explanation:

Answer:

d. He believed uneducated masses could not make good decisions.

Explanation:

Plato disagrees with Athenian democratic model, since he considers uneducated people are unable to make good decisions.

Plato advocated a goverment ruled by a philosopher, as the guide for the people who is solely entrusted to carry out this responsability in full.

He then concives workers necessary in worrying for producing what is neccesary fo life, a group of soldiers and warrios to concern about the defense of the city state.

With these necessary divisions , the Plato portrays people as lacking the necessary education or intellectual capability of selecting and chosing what is best for them.

Plato will go on in his Dialogues to argue against the concept of Democracy, and favor the position of philosophers in the political realm.

The government seeks to convert disorder into an orderly society through laws and regulations that minimize change and promote stability. Strategies for maintaining order differ, whether through economic measures like a convertible currency or historical examples of rulers managing newly acquired territories. Even essential government services contribute to societal order despite facing criticism.

To maintain order, the government has a stake in converting disorder into regulated systems whenever possible. In order to create an orderly society, governments often establish rules and legal frameworks that promote stability and predictability. This process includes implementing laws that are adhered to by the populace, ensuring the continuation of societal norms and minimizing change, which is something human beings typically resist. At the same time, governments must balance the control they exert with the freedom and autonomy of their citizens.

For instance, governments may establish a convertible currency to ensure a stable and predictable financial system, compared to an inconvertible currency which may be subject to lax enforcement and over issuance in times of financial strain. Similarly, historical examples show that rulers have had various strategies for maintaining control over newly acquired states that are accustomed to their own laws and freedom, such as drawing tribute while allowing local laws to prevail, as long as certain universal norms and obligations are met.

Additionally, government services like the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), public transportation, and government-run hospitals, though sometimes criticized, are part of the effort to maintain public order and provide essential services to citizens. When the government invests in areas like military or agriculture, it shows a directed effort to support specific parts of society or the economy.

Yet, government interventions and rules are not without criticism, as there can be periods when governments and/or religions are overthrown, or when leadership changes, leading to shifts in how order is maintained and society is structured.

I think the answer is the first choice but I'm not 100% sure

The President can appoint cabinet members and deploy troops without Congressional approval. However, the signing of treaties and declaration of war requires Congress' consent.

The President of the United States has certain powers they can utilize without the need for Congressional approval. Among the provided options, the President can appoint cabinet members and deploy troops without the requirement of Congress' consent. However, the Senate must approve cabinet appointees. Additionally, the President has authority as the commander-in-chief of the military and may deploy troops as part of defense strategies.

On the other hand, declaring war and signing treaties both require Congressional approval. While the President has the power to negotiate initial foreign agreements and treaties, the ratification of these needs to be approved by the Senate. Furthermore, the power to declare war is not vested in the President but in Congress.

https://brainly.com/question/32861493

#SPJ3

The answer is no. The Articles of Confederation were insignificant in administering good interstate relations because they did not bestow Congress with the power to control interstate trade or to interfere in questions of interstate disagreements, but as a last resort. The Articles also made it too hard for Congress to effortlessly pass legislation useful to the common good. Also, the Congress was so overwhelmed by low confidence and poor interstate relations that it was frequently powerless to address parts that did fall under its direct control.

The 1773 repeal of the Townshend Acts was not a cause for rising colonial anger against the British parliament and the King. Instead, it was the debts acquired through the French and Indian War, the Proclamation of 1763, and the Sugar Act of 1764 that fueled colonial anger.

The 1773 repeal of the Townshend Acts was not a cause for rising colonial anger against the British parliament and the King. The Townshend Acts, which imposed a tax on consumer goods in British North America, had indeed generated anger and protests among colonists. However, their repeal in 1773 did not contribute to rising colonial anger. Instead, it was the debts acquired through the French and Indian War, the Proclamation of 1763, and the Sugar Act of 1764 that fueled colonial anger.

https://brainly.com/question/27819220

#SPJ2

Answer: The Indians were made to walk over 1200 miles and this resulted or caused them different diseases or illneses which also brought about an epidemic killing over 5000 people.

Explanation:

Julius Caesar was a great military general who, after having been removed from his governorship of Gaul by the Roman senate, staged a coup and took control of Rome by force, the person with whom he was once aligned to take control of the empire. Although he is often portrayed as a tyrannical dictator, Julius Caesar was somewhat of a champion of the people. He eliminated the heavy taxes levied on farmers and granted any Roman citizen with three or more sons land. He also made the dealings of the Roman senate public by posting an account of them for the public to read and realigned the Roman calendar to coincide with the seasons. He also declared himself ruler for life.

Since his lineage could be traced to the founding of Rome, the role of the Caesars came to be associated with the role of the gods, who had more power than senators in the eyes of Romans. All of these actions infuriated the senate, which felt that he had compromised its power. This ultimately led to the senate attack on Julius Caesar that killed him.

To counteract racist attitudes, Pan-Africanists pursued unity, political activism, and cultural reclamation of African history and heritage. Key figures like W. E. B. Du Bois led efforts for African self-determination and utilized African art to challenge narratives of primitivism. This continued into the Civil Rights Movement, which further pushed for African American rights and representation.

In response to the racist attitude that Africans were primitive, as displayed in the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair, Pan-Africanists took several measures. Although the exact actions taken at the 1900 World's Fair are not detailed in the reference material, it is known that Pan-Africanism in the early twentieth century focused on unity and the fight against colonial rule and racial discrimination. W. E. B. Du Bois, a key figure in the movement, organized the first Pan-African Congress in 1918 to push for African self-determination. Pan-Africanists also reclaimed elements of African heritage, like Egyptian art, to counter the narrative of Africans being uncivilized.

Exhibits at various World’s Fairs showcasing indigenous peoples in a spectacle of supposed evolutionary stages were used to justify imperialist and racist beliefs. However, the Pan-African movement, by championing African nationalism and reclaiming African history and culture, worked against these stereotypes and contributed to the global acknowledgment of Africa’s legacy, as seen in The Metropolitan Museum of Art's show 'The African Origin of Civilization'. Moreover, African American activists and leaders continuously fought for their rights and recognition, particularly highlighted during the Civil Rights Movement.

Prior to the advanced time, kids who perpetrated violations got no particular treatment and were arbitrated, rebuffed, and detained nearby adults. Starting a couple of hundred years prior, Britain (from which we infer a large number of our legitimate customs) adjusted the standard of parens patriae. That rule enabled the legislature to replace guardians in managing kids who violated the law. Around the center of the nineteenth century, the child savers movement started in the US. It embraced a reasoning of profitability and shunned inaction and corrupt conduct. Not long after, the 1899 codification of Illinois juvenile law turned into the model for juvenile court statutes all around the US. It made an juvenile court isolate in frame and capacities from adult criminal courts and in view of the rule of parens patriae. To avoid the enduring disgrace of guiltiness, the term delinquent (as opposed to criminal) was connected to young guilty parties. Soon, juvenile courts the nation over concentrated basically on the best advantages of the children as a guide in their considerations. Today most jurisdictions perceive the accompanying six classes of youngsters subject to juvenile court jurisdiction: delinquent, undisciplined, dependent, neglected, abused, and status offender

The juvenile justice system has evolved from treating children the same as adults to focusing on rehabilitation. It began with the establishment of the first juvenile court in the 19th century. The six categories of children recognized by most states include delinquent, dependent, neglected, abused, status offenders, and those with mental health needs.

The evolution of the juvenile justice system began in the early 19th century when reformers advocated for the separation of juveniles from adults in the legal system. The first juvenile court was established in Cook County, Illinois, in 1899, under the premise that children and adolescents needed guidance and rehabilitation rather than strict punishment. This court's creation marked a pivotal shift towards individualized justice for young offenders.

The system has undergone numerous reforms to address the varying needs of juvenile offenders. Today, modern juvenile justice systems emphasize treatment, education, and social services to rehabilitate and reintegrate youth into society. Policies have also been put in place to ensure fair treatment and to protect the rights of juveniles during legal proceedings.

Categories of Children Recognized by Law

The six categories of children recognized by most state laws include:

The eastern half of the Roman Empire lasted longer than the western half due to factors such as geographical differences and the influence of the Roman Church. The eastern half had a shorter and more manageable frontier to defend against invaders, while the western half faced more challenges due to its extensive and chaotic frontier. Additionally, the Roman Church played a role in the western half by securing military assistance and promoting Christianity.

The eastern half of the Roman Empire lasted longer than the western half due to several factors. One significant reason was the geography of each region. The eastern half had a shorter stretch of the Danube River to guard against invaders, allowing them to pay off these groups with their wealth to discourage them from entering their territory. In contrast, the western half had a more extensive and chaotic frontier with more foreign groups to contend with. Another factor was the influence of the Roman Church, which worked to secure military assistance from kings in the west and convert various groups to Christianity, resulting in the emergence of medieval culture in this region.

https://brainly.com/question/28190507

#SPJ2

When the economy is shrinking, the total output is decreasing and total income is decreasing.

Output is the total value of goods and services produced in an economy. By measuring the output in different period of times, it is possible to measure if the economy of a country is growing or shrinking.

The total income is the amount earned by a individual or organization in a year. the more the economy shrinks, the less people have to spend.

Answer:

city-state

i took a quiz and it was right