Just before the end of act 2, Thea says, “Let me go! Let me go! I am afraid of you, Hedda!” Is she right to feel that way? Why or why not? Your answer must be at least 50 words.
Yes, Thea is right to feel afraid of Hedda because Hedda exhibits manipulative and destructive behavior throughout the play.
In Henrik Ibsen’s play, Hedda Gabler, Thea Elvsted's fear of Hedda Gabler is justified. Hedda is a complex and manipulative character who demonstrates a capacity for cruelty and control over others.Throughout the play, Hedda's actions are driven by a desire for power and influence, and she exhibits a clear disdain for Thea. In Act 2, Hedda's behavior and implied threats make Thea's fear quite understandable. For example, Hedda's manipulation of Eilert Løvborg and her willingness to destroy what Thea holds dear show her dangerous and unpredictable nature. Therefore, Thea's fear reflects a reasonable response to Hedda's intimidating presence.what is real but fake and can feel but no feelings and in the dark but in the sun and we can't see them but they can see us? my teacher gave me this riddle I don't get it
Karen and her team share ideas about how their team should approach work, and they spend some time debating which ideas to adopt. What stage is the team at?
The Celtic form for seven is _____.
Secht
Sapa
Sept
Answer:
Secht
the other guy is wrong
Read the sentence below and use context clues to determine the meaning of the word enthralled: I thought I would be bored by the Shakespeare play, but I was enthralled the whole time. Which person is most likely to be enthralled? Someone who is
Context clues refer to the surrounding information of an unknown word in a text or a speech that helps us infer the meaning of that word. In the sentence, we can find out the meaning of the word “enthralled” by contrast: the word “but” introduces an idea that contrasts with the preceding clause “I thought I would be bored.” Therefore, “enthralled” refers to something captivating, entertaining and interesting, in other words, the opposite of something “bored.”
What are the similarities and differences between the words Laud and Welcome?
The differences between a draft and published poem focus on the exclusion of one stanza and the introduction of another, with careful word choice adjustments made for effect. 'Laud' and 'Welcome' are both positive in nature but differ in meaning; 'laud' is for praising, while 'welcome' is a friendly greeting.
Explanation:The question seems to deal with literary analysis, focusing on the changes between the draft and the published version of a poem, likely referring to William Blake's 'The Tyger.' The primary difference noted is the absence of stanza four in the final version and the introduction of a new stanza discussing the Lamb, symbolizing innocence in contrast with the Tyger's formidable power. Both versions consist entirely of rhetorical questions, emphasizing the mystery of creation. However, revisions within the manuscript indicate Blake's thoughtful consideration in his choice of words, ultimately leading to a more powerful final stanza.
As for the use of the words 'Laud' and 'Welcome,' these might be related to the interpretation of poems, but in a general sense, 'laud' means to praise or glorify, often used for exceptional achievements, while 'welcome' is a greeting or acceptance of someone's arrival or presence. They share a positive connotation but are different in their typical contexts and uses.
What is the theme of the poem "The Wild Swans at Coole"?
Explain the relationship between liberty and factionalism in the federalist papers
Answer:
In the opinion of James Madison, there were only two ways in order to keep control over a faction: removing the faction's causes and controlling its effects. However, it is nigh impossible to remove the causes of a faction, but Madison recognized that there were indeed two ways to do so: destroying and removing the freedoms and liberties of the individuals or have it that every individual bears the same interests, personality, and passions. Removing liberty from the lives of any individual, no matter who they might be, would be immoral and cruel, therefore it is not an option. Forcing every person to, essentially, be the same person is also a nonviable solution. As a result, there is no way to remove the causes of a faction without infringing on the liberties of all citizens. Thus, the effects of these factions roaming about in America must be accepted; factionalism and liberty share a close relationship.
Explanation:
Write your answer in your own words please :)
Choose the best option from A,B,C or D to complete the following sentences:
1. He finished the paintings ... for the exhibition.
A. in good time B. for the time being C. from time to time D. time after time
2. Hello. Is that 21045? Please put me ... to the manager.
A. across B. up C. over D. through
3. So little ... that the neighbors could not settle their differences.
A. they agreed B. agreed did they C. did they agree D. they did agree
The main character in a story, usually the one who sets the action in motion round character
We the people of the United States in order to form a more perfect nation established justice ensure domestic tranquility provide for the common defense promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish the constitution for the United States of America
Answer: The Government is responsible for protecting citizens.
Match the characters to the traits they display. Tiles Olivia Orsino Viola Malvolio Pairs lovesick arrowBoth stubborn arrowBoth resourceful arrowBoth self-absorbed arrowBoth
Orsino: Lovesick.
Duke Orsino, count of Illyria, despite being the object of Viola's affection, desires Countess Olivia.
Olivia: Stubborn.
Feste, the fool, would call her a fool for spending all her time mourning rather than living her life.
Viola: Resourceful.
Viola is not only attractive but also very clever, charming, and intelligent as she manages to disguise herself as Cesario sto be able to find work in Illyria.
Malvolio: Self-absorbed.
Malvolio attempts to court Countess Olivia even though she doesn't acknowledge it because she is mourning her dead brother.
Please help
Rewrite this paragraph, correcting any mistakes in italicized plurals or possessives.
Much to Bradfords amazement, Samoset spoke to the Pilgrims in broken English. Samoset convinced his fellow Indians’ to return the settler’s tools. He persuaded Massasoit to pay his respects to the Pilgrims and introduced them to one of his friend’s, Squanto.
Which form of Jazz first introduced nonconventional instruments
The correct answer is:
B.swing
Explanation:
The swing was the first form of Jazz that started with conventional instruments.Swing uses a secure anchoring swing section which maintains a lead section that can accommodate brass instruments, including horns and trombones, woodwinds including saxophones and clarinets or stringed instruments including violin and guitar; means to fast tempos; and a "lilting" beat time rhythm.
I believe that the answer is free jazz
What was Betty Smith’s primary purpose in writing A Tree Grows in Brooklyn?
A.
to inform
B.
to persuade
C.
to entertain
D.
to report
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
I just took a test about it
C- To entertain
100% sure
Which of these helps qualify Beowulf as an epic poem?
A. It reflects a Christian influence
B. It's Protagonist is a god-like-hero
C. It contains pagan references
D. It's characters seldom speak
The following sentence(is not or is) a simple sentence.
May I leave or do you still need my help?
Answer:
The correct answer is that the sentence is not a simple sentence.
Explanation:
A simple sentence basically has a noun or pronoun and the predicate and sometimes it has a complement. But these types of sentences do not have coordinating conjunctions. The word "or" is a coordinating conjunction and the sentence has more than one predicate. So, this sentence is not a simple sentence.
How do you know that Charles killed mrs.huffington?
Because he had the key to the house and he also gave her a letter because the letter said that only I can be the one you love meaning that he haven’t gave up on her yet.
Charles had duplicate keys to Mrs. Huffington’s house attached to the chain he was wearing and also the mail which he wrote to Mrs. Huffington proved that Charles was the murderer.
Further Explanation:
The murder of Mrs. Huffington was committed by Charles who was working as a pool cleaner in her house. We know this fact that Charles was the one behind her murder because when police were investigating Charles about this serious offense, He had a key to Mrs. Huffington’s home which was attached to a chain which he was wearing on his neck. During the questioning session by police in the investigation, he told police that he was out of town from 4 PM from the day before the murder took place to 11 PM on the day of the murder.
But police investigations showed that there was a love letter from Charles which was in the mailbox of Mrs. Huffington which said, “I know Mr. Huffington is in the town, Don’t let him come back to you as only I can be the one to love you”. Mrs. Huffington also had restraining order on Charles but he kept meeting her breaking restraining orders. This is when police found out that Charles was the one who murdered Mrs. Huffington.
Learn More:
1. At the beginning of "the world on turtle's back," why did the husband become "terrified"?
https://brainly.com/question/2785255
2. A sentence that includes an independent clause and at least one dependent clause is called a sentence.
https://brainly.com/question/1233339
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Murder of Mrs. Huffington
Subject: English
Keywords: Mrs. Huffington, Murder, Charles, Police, Investigation, Keys, Restraining, Mailbox, Attached, Committed, Offense.
In no fewer than three sentences, critique the following paragraph. Explain where it could be improved. Then, in your own words, rewrite the paragraph to make its writing stronger. Make sure you include a hook, supporting evidence, and a topic sentence. Use correct spelling and grammar.
Learning to swim is one of my happiest childhood memories. The beach offers more than a place to develop strong swimming skills. There are many things to do at the beach. It is unfortunate that so many people spend every day indoors. More people should take time to visit their local beaches. I am glad I learned to swim at the beach.
Answer:
For a topic sentence, or the beginning sentence that signifies the main idea of the paragraph, you could focus on the fact that there are a variety of things to do at the beach (perhaps the 3rd sentence). To create a hook, or an eye-catching sentence, you can use the childhood memory of learning to swim, but perhaps in more detail. In other words, recreate the scene rather than just saying it was a happy memory (i.e. I'm five years old and am amazed by how weightless I feel in the water). Once you create the hook and topic sentence, you can talk about other activities at the beach as your supporting evidence.
Compare and contrast morrie's family with mitch's family. anwsers.com
Morrie's family, despite their lower economic status, was emotionally fulfilling and supportive. On the other hand, Mitch's family was financially successful but lacked deep emotional connections. These contrasting family lives underline the difference between material and emotional wealth.
Explanation:The families of Morrie and Mitch in the book 'Tuesdays with Morrie' have unique similarities and differences. Despite coming from a lower economic background, Morrie's family prioritized love and emotional fulfillment. Morrie remembered his family as being warm and supportive. Although they had significantly less wealth than Mitch's family, they were richer in emotional wealth.
On the other hand, Mitch's family was affluent, but lacked the emotional depth that characterized Morrie's family. Mitch's family was somewhat disconnected and appeared to emphasize material success. Despite their financial prosperity, there was a degree of emotional poverty.
In conclusion, although Mitch's family and Morrie's family come from different socio-economic backgrounds, both families highlight the contrast between material wealth and emotional wealth.
Learn more about Family contrast here:https://brainly.com/question/6256383
#SPJ12
Read the excerpt from Chapter 3 of Wheels of Change . Repeated injuries to women riding in long, full skirts propelled female cyclists to look for new clothing options and others to at least consider the need for them. But for every suggestion of a cycling outfit that was comfortable and safe, there seemed to be a corresponding warning to women not to overstep their bounds. Which statement best fits in the "Cause” portion of this chart? Women created new styles of clothing to wear while cycling. Society rejected women’s ideas for new cycling styles. Women often suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing. Society embraced new styles of clothing for women who cycled.
The correct answer would be option C: "Women often suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing". In the excerpt, it is said that women that cycled would often have injuries because of the long skirts that were inadequate to use while cycling, this was the cause, the reason, women started creating new types of clothes to prevent injuries while cycling.
Option A is a result of the situation, not the reason they started creating new clothes, and option B is another result, not the cause. Option D did not happen or at least, it wasn't mentioned in the excerpt, therefore it is also incorrect.
"Women frequently suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing," is the correct response.
Thus, According to the excerpt, women who rode frequently suffered injuries since long skirts were insufficient for the activity. As a result, women began developing new clothing to reduce the risk of cycling-related accidents.
Option A is a consequence of the circumstance; it is not the reason they began making new clothing.
Option B is another consequence; it is not the cause. Option D is likewise inaccurate because it did not occur, or at least it was not mentioned in the text.
Thus, "Women frequently suffered injuries while cycling due to their clothing," is the correct response.
Learn more about Wheels of change, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/13982942
#SPJ6
Which of the following words is an example of an adverb. A) actually. B) lively. C) oily. Silly
Chesterton writes that Aquinas rejected Monism and quietism. In at least 150 words, define each of these views, and explain why, according to Chesterton, Aquinas's thinking and writing rejects them. Use details from the text to support your responses.
Quietism is the concept that defends the inactivity of the mind and the loss of control of the thoughts that turn completely to divine control.
Monism is the concept that defends the non-existence of plurality and diversity of thoughts and realities.
Why did Chesterton believe that Aquinas adhered to these concepts?Because Aquinas' works stimulated proactivity.Because Aquinas' works considered diversity and pluralism.Because Aquinas stimulated reasoning and individual thinking.Quietism encouraged a passivity that was condemned by Aquinas because this passivity did not provoke changes and neglected the most important characteristic of human beings, which is the capacity to reflect, think and act according to one's conclusions.
For Chesterton Aquinas ignored this concept because he was in favor of advancement and change and not passivity.
These preferences of Aquinas also showed how he was not a follower of monism, because human thinking was diversified, society was diversified and life is subject to constant changes that would cause serious problems if they were ignored.
Learn more about Aquinas:
https://brainly.com/question/12062985
#SPJ1
Monism is a philosophical view that denies distinction such as between mind and body, which Aquinas rejected by emphasizing metaphysical distinctions. Quietism is a mysticism that values passive contemplation, in contrast to Aquinas's active engagement with empirical data and rationality in establishing the existence of God.
Explanation:Monism and quietism are philosophical views that St. Thomas Aquinas rejected according to G.K. Chesterton. Monism is a view that attributes oneness or singleness to a concept e.g., asserting that the mind and body are not distinct. Quietism is a form of religious mysticism advocating that spiritual peace is achieved through passive contemplation and surrender of the will to God. Aquinas opposed Monism by embracing a metaphysical distinction between essence and existence, and between the soul and the body, as evidenced by his Aristotelian-influenced composite of form and matter modified for Christian teachings. He rejected Quietism by emphasizing active intellectual engagement and ethical action, consistent with Aristotle's virtue ethics.
As Chesterton suggests, Aquinas's philosophy gives significant weight to empirical data, supporting the belief that the mind requires sensory experience to acquire knowledge, in contrast to quietistic withdrawal from the senses. Furthermore, his Five Ways rely on active rational engagement with the world to establish the existence of God as a philosophical and theological necessity, contrary to monistic reductions or quietistic passivity.
In Summa Theologica, Aquinas underscores these distinctions and his commitment to an intellectually active and rationally engaged form of Christianity. His approach towards metaphysics, the natural world, and ethics shows an incorporation and modification of Aristotelian thought into Christian doctrine, providing clear rejections of both Monism and Quietism.
Rhetorical devices used at the word level include:
A. Similes and metaphors
B. Inflections, syntax and similes
C. satires, parodies and allegories
D. Adjectives, adverbs and allegories
E. Tone, diction and style
Which excerpt from Part 2 of The Odyssey best supports the conclusion that Odysseus’s fate is doomed?
- The Cyclops bellowed and the rock roared round him, and we fell back in fear.
-But I kept thinking how to win the game: death sat there huge; how could we slip away?
-Ahead of our black prow it struck and sank whelmed in a spurning geyser,
- But Zeus disdained my offering; destruction for my ships he had in store
✔ But Zeus disdained my offering;
destruction for my ships he had in store.
The correct option is D. The excerpt from Part 2 of The Odyssey best supports the conclusion that Odysseus’s fate is doomed when Zeus disdained my offering; destruction for the ships he had in store.
How does Zeus punish Odysseus?One afternoon while Odysseus is sleeping, they do so; when the Sun learns of it, he requests Zeus to punish Odysseus and his troops. Zeus causes another storm shortly after the Achaeans leave Thrinacia, which causes the ship to be destroyed and sends the entire crew to their deaths beneath the seas.
Odysseus is accepting that his ships will be destroyed and that all of his shipmates will perish, which makes it foreshadowing. When people talk, make jokes, or reflect on the past, they tell stories. The majority of written works, such as personal essays, fairy tales, short stories, novels, dramas, screenplays, memoirs, and histories, all contain narratives.
Learn more about Zeus Odysseus here:
https://brainly.com/question/13555518
#SPJ2
Read the sentence.
Digging to the bottom of my suitcase, my passport stayed hidden under a pile of dirty clothes.
Which options most effectively revise the sentence to eliminate the dangling modifier?
(Select all that apply.)
a:Digging to the bottom of my suitcase, I failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes
b: I was digging to the bottom of my suitcase, but hidden under a pile of dirty clothes was my passport
c: digging to the bottom of my suitcase, under a pile of clothes, my passport stayed hidden.
d: I was digging to the bottom of my suitcase but failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes
Options A and D effectively revise the original sentence to eliminate the dangling modifier by correctly attaching the action of digging to the subject 'I' who is carrying out the action.
The sentence in question contains a dangling modifier, which happens when a descriptive phrase does not sensibly modify the noun or noun phrase that follows it. In this case, the phrase 'Digging to the bottom of my suitcase' should logically refer to the subject performing the action, not the passport.
To correct a dangling modifier, the sentence should be revised to clarify who is performing the action of digging. The two options that effectively revise the sentence to eliminate the dangling modifier are:
Option A: 'Digging to the bottom of my suitcase, I failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes.'
Option D: 'I was digging to the bottom of my suitcase but failed to locate my passport, which was hidden under a pile of dirty clothes.'
Both revised sentences properly link the action of digging with the subject 'I' who is performing the action. Options B and C still contain dangling modifiers or are awkwardly structured.
Which is an example of a rhetorical question?
Who does she think she is?
Where did you go last night?
How old is your dog?
What is the following an example of? O LOVE, my queen and goddess, come to me; My soul shall never cease to worship thee; Come pillow here thy head upon my breast, And whisper in my lyre thy softest, best, And sweetest melodies of bright Sami, Ishtar and Izdubar, translated by Leonidas Le Cenci Hamilton, 1884 Invocation Argument Epic Simile Epic Catalogue
Answer:
The following is an example of invocation.
Explanation:
Invocation is the process of invoking or arousing a certain feeling in the reader while reading a piece of writing. It is an appeal or request done to the higher authority or powerful for help. Prayer is a form of invocation to plead before the god to help or guide in any particular situation. Also, it is a process of forgiving someone.
The narrator of the scarlet ibis compares naming doodle, william armstrong, to "tying a big tail on a small kite." what does this mean?
Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat
by Winston Churchill (excerpt)
On Friday evening last I received His Majesty's commission to form a new Administration. It was the evident wish and will of Parliament and the nation that this should be conceived on the broadest possible basis and that it should include all parties, both those who supported the late Government and also the parties of the Opposition.
I have completed the most important part of this task. A War Cabinet has been formed of five Members, representing, with the Liberal Opposition, the unity of the nation. The three party Leaders have agreed to serve, either in the War Cabinet or in high executive office. The three Fighting Services have been filled. It was necessary that this should be done in one single day, on account of the extreme urgency and rigour of events. A number of other key positions were filled yesterday, and I am submitting a further list to His Majesty tonight. I hope to complete the appointment of the principal Ministers during tomorrow. The appointment of the other Ministers usually takes a little longer, but I trust that when Parliament meets again, this part of my task will be completed and that the Administration will be complete in all respects.
. . . I considered it in the public interest to suggest that the House should be summoned to meet today. . .
. . . to form an Administration of this scale and complexity is a serious undertaking in itself, but it must be remembered that we are in the preliminary stage of one of the greatest battles in history, that we are in action at many points in Norway and in Holland, that we have to be prepared in the Mediterranean, that the air battle is continuous and that many preparations have to be made here at home. In this crisis I hope I may be pardoned if I do not address the House at any length today. I hope that any of my friends and colleagues, or former colleagues, who are affected by the political reconstruction, will make all allowances for any lack of ceremony with which it has been necessary to act. I would say to the House, as I said to those who have joined the government: "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat."
We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land, and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark and lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: victory. Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realised; no survival for the British Empire, no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal.
But I take up my task with buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. At this time I feel entitled to claim the aid of all, and I say, “Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength.”
Winston Churchill made the speech in the passage to the house of commons(the elected wing of the British parliament) shorty after he took office in 1940, during world war II. what was the purpose of Churchill speech?
A-to threaten British enemies in the war with dire consequences
B-to criticize the previous government for its anti-war stance
C-to express Churchill's government's resolve to wage war
D-to assure the British public that Britain would soon win war