What might happen if there were no checks and balances built in to the Constitution?

The Populist Party was a short-lived political party established in 1891 in the United States of America during the populist period that took hold in the late nineteenth century. It culminated between 1892 and 1896, then quickly vanished.

It appealed to the poorer classes, mainly cotton farmers in the south (particularly in North Carolina, Alabama and Texas) and wheat farmers in other states (such as Kansas and Nebraska). It represented a form of radical struggle against a form of ruralism (called agrarianism) and hostility towards banks, railways, and the elites in general.

Correct answer choice is :

B) Middle of the 18th century

Explanation:

In the 18th century Germany, the story of candles on cakes can be followed back to Kinderfest, a birthday celebration for children. This culture also does the use of candles and cakes. German children were taken to an auditorium-like space. For the Ancient Greeks, placing candles on a cake was a unique way to pay praise to the Greek moon goddess, Artemis. They cooked round cakes to signify the moon. People may have thought that the smoke from the candles carried their wishes and prayers to gods who lived in the skies.

The Virginia Company attracted settlers to Jamestown with the headright policy, providing land incentives and leveraging the tobacco crop's profitability.

The Virginia Company initially struggled to profit from the Jamestown settlement and entice settlers to the New World. To overcome these challenges, the Virginia Company established the headright policy in 1618, which granted 50 acres of land to any person who migrated to Virginia, and an additional 50 acres for every immigrant they sponsored. This policy, coupled with the profitability of tobacco cultivation as a cash crop, incentivized many to move to Jamestown, dramatically increasing the settlement's population and contributing to its ultimate survival and success.

The Pale of SettlementRussian:  was a western region of Imperial Russia with varying borders that existed from 1791 to 1917, in which permanent residency by Jews was allowed and beyond which Jewish permanent residency and in a certain period even temporary stay was mostly forbidden. However, Jews were excluded from residency in a number of cities within the Pale, and a limited number of categories of Jews—those ennobled, with university educations or at university, members of the most affluent of the merchant guilds and particular artisans, some military personnel and some services associated with them, as well as the families, and sometimes the servants of these—were allowed to live outside it. The archaic English term pale is derived from the Latin word Palus, a stake, extended to mean the area enclosed by a fence or boundary.

The Pale of Settlement included all of Belarus, Lithuania and Moldova and much of present-day Ukraine, a part of eastern Latvia and some parts of western Russia, roughly corresponding to the modern western border of Russia. It extended from the eastern pale, or demarcation line, to the western Russian border with the Kingdom of Prussia (later the German Empire) and with Austria-Hungary. Furthermore, it comprised about 20% of the territory of European Russia and largely corresponded to historical lands of the former Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, Cossack Hetmanate, and the Ottoman Empire (with Crimean Khanate).

I just want to say, that this might not be the correct answer, the question needs a little more detail

The 'free silver' idea aimed to alleviate financial pressures on farmers by increasing the money supply through the minting of silver alongside gold, which would create inflation and raise prices for agricultural products. However, measures like the Sherman Silver Purchase Act failed to achieve these goals, and political support for free silver eventually emerged within the Democratic Party.

The idea of free silver emerged as a solution to provide relief for indebted American farmers by increasing the money supply. As tariffs raised the cost of purchased items without benefiting farm prices, the constrained money supply due to adherence to the gold standard left farmers struggling. The free silver concept meant the government would print money backed by both gold and silver, thus placing more money into circulation, easing the ability to obtain loans, and creating inflationary pressure that would raise farm product prices, helping farmers to pay their debts and afford higher-priced goods.

Despite legislation like the Sherman Silver Purchase Act of 1890, which mandated the government to purchase silver monthly, emergent problems such as the depletion of gold reserves due to the preference of gold-backed currency over the silver certificates, resulted in deflation rather than inflation, exacerbating the financial woes of farmers. The Populist movement and the Ocala Demands sought to remedy this by advocating for federally subsidized warehouses and a monetary policy that backed US currency with both gold and silver to ensure at least $50 per capita in circulation.

In 1896, the notion of free silver gained substantial political support when the Democrats adopted it as part of their platform, with William Jennings Bryan as a prominent advocate, though its practicality and the resulting economic consequences became subjects of heated debate.

Lincoln and King's speeches evoked inspirational and unifying emotions, utilizing compelling rhetoric to encourage hope, unity, and the pursuit of equality. Their masterful oratory appealed to the better nature of their audiences, highlighting the power of words in driving societal change.

Emotionally charged words typically describe the emotions evoked by Lincoln's speeches. His speeches, like his inaugural address and other public orations, aimed to stir patriotism and unity in a divided nation.

The emotions evoked by Lincoln's speeches, particularly his inaugural address and remarks such as the Gettysburg Address, can best be described as inspirational and unifying. Lincoln's ability to stir profound feelings of hope, reconciliation, and the urgency for equality is evident through his delicate choice of words and compelling rhetoric. While addressing the nation's wounds and divisions, Lincoln appealed to the 'better angels of our nature,' urging his audience towards unity and mutual respect amidst the backdrop of a torn nation. Equally, Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'I Have a Dream' speech, resonating with Lincoln's ideals, was powerful in its emotional appeal, evoking feelings of hope and determination toward racial equality and justice. Both speeches, delivered at critical moments in U.S. history, demonstrate the potency of words in rallying for positive change and the realization of American ideals of freedom and equality.

Answer: B.Time zones sometimes follow the borders of countries.

Explanation:

the answer is...

Answer:

the colonists lost, but the British had a lot of casualties

Explanation:

Persians were not like the Assyrians and Babylonians in many ways.

Explanation:

Persians, Assyrians and Babylonians were some of the ancient empires of the middle east that flourished and conquered many of their territories to expand their power.

Therefore we can conclude that the Persians were different from other empires because of their aggressiveness and warfare with standing military.

Learn more about "Persians" here:

brainly.com/question/17790669

The Persians were known for their effective administrative system and tolerance of local customs, unlike the Assyrians, who were notoriously harsh conquerors, and the Babylonians, who are most renowned for their contributions to law and science. For example, the Persian Empire under Cyrus the Great was known for respecting the cultures and religions of conquered peoples.

The Persians, under leaders like Cyrus the Great, implemented policies of tolerance and respect for local traditions. This approach helped them to maintain control over a vast and diverse empire, facilitating peace and stability.

The Assyrians, on the other hand, ruled through terror and military might. Their capital, Nineveh, is often remembered for its grandiose and grim monuments, symbolizing their ruthless methods of control and punishment.

The Babylonians contributed significantly to the fields of law and astronomy. Hammurabi’s Code is one of the earliest and most complete written legal codes, establishing guidelines that influenced many subsequent legal systems.

In conclusion, while the Persians are remembered for their administrative prowess and inclusivity, the Assyrians are noted for their militaristic dominance, and the Babylonians for their intellectual advancements.

The correct order, from highest to the lowest is the following. 1) monarchs, 2) clergy, 3) nobles, 4) knights, 5) merchants, 6) artisans, 7) serfs.

The most powerful man in Medieval times was the King. He amassed great power and territories due to his many conquests. The clergy was the members of the church, influential priests that supported the king and somewhat controlled the lower classes by the element of faith. Nobles were wealthy men that owned property and supported the King in a convenient relationship. Knights were brave men at the loyal service of the Nobles and the King. The lower classes in Medieval times were merchants, peasants, and serfs, that worked for the King or the Nobles. Their living conditions were so different than the other classes and worked hard to make a living.

Answer

A concurring judgment is in some legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the judgment made by the bulk of the court but states different reasons as the basis for his or her judgment. The United States Congress is the bicameral parliament of the Federal government of the United States. The legislature consists of two bodies, the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Congress meets in the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C.

In any minor change by one house of Congress, the next usual step is for the legislation to go back to the first house for concurrence. Once the bill is promulgated back to the committee from where it was originated, it will be installed in the sequential form on the legislative calendar.

Further Explanation:

When the bill relinquishes the floor of the Senate, there are particular rules which dictate the debate on legislation. These rules determine the provisions and expense of time allocated for the debate. Now the legislature will accompany the concurring vote method. In the Senate, a concurrent analysis is normally nominated which is utilized for the elements concerning the circumstances of both houses. However, the concurring vote does do not apply to the President for his sign nor enforceable by law.

A concurring decision is in several legal systems a formulated opinion by one or more judges of a court which coincides with the determination executed by the bulk of the court but asserts several reasons as the foundation for the decision.

Learn More:

1. Rome was considered a republic because? https://brainly.com/question/5796574

2. Why the Supreme Court ruling important in Gitlow v. New York? https://brainly.com/question/1908150

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Topic: US Parliament

Keywords:

Senate, Congress, legislature, bicameral, parliament, Washington, Senate, debate, concurrence, debate, procedure, nomination, president, signature.

Provides them with a list of instructions

Before jurors discuss a criminal case, the judge provides them with a list of instructions. These instructions typically cover legal principles, burdens of proof, and the elements of the charges against the defendant.

A criminal case is a lawsuit the state brings against someone they believe has violated the law. Typically, they are brought by the district attorney (commonly known as the "DA"), who stands in for the state and accuses one or more defendants.

The purpose of the instructions is to help jurors understand the law and how it applies to the case they are considering. The judge's role is to be impartial and ensure that the trial is conducted fairly, and it is not appropriate for the judge to give an opinion of the case or choose a foreperson before deliberations. The judge's role is to preside over the trial and make rulings on legal issues that arise during the trial.

Learn more about the criminal case here:

https://brainly.com/question/30278728

#SPJ7

Answer:

A. Men

Explanation:

The cartoon doesn't seem to represent the middle class or the working class specifically, since it has few cues besides the fact that we can see a man. Also, there is a saying "The Ballot Box is Mine Because it's Mine". Men were already allowed to vote, back then, so putting those two together, we can reach the conclusion that men were the ones opposing to women's suffrage.