Answer:
Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut
Explanation:
How was the Three-Fifths Compromise like the Great Compromise?
Like the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise also dealt with how much representation each state would have in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.how do the unalienable rights compare to the natural rights
Final answer:
Unalienable rights and natural rights are concepts that stem from Enlightenment thinking, emphasizing inherent human freedoms that cannot be surrendered to any government. These rights, such as 'Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness,' are rooted in the belief that they are fundamental and not subject to legal or government control. While some philosophers have dismissed the existence of natural rights, their significance in forming modern democracies and human rights law is undeniable.
Explanation:
The concepts of unalienable rights and natural rights are deeply intertwined with the philosophical underpinnings of individual freedoms established during the Enlightenment. Unalienable rights, as reflected in the United States Declaration of Independence with the phrase "...law of nature and nature's god", are rights that cannot be taken away or denied. They were famously encapsulated by Thomas Jefferson as "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness," mirroring John Locke's enumeration of "Life, Liberty, and Property" as the crucial natural rights. Locke and other Enlightenment thinkers, such as Francis Hutcheson and John Lilburne, argued that these rights are inherent to all human beings and infractions upon them are beyond the legitimate scope of governmental control.
While natural rights are similarly foundational and not subject to governmental grant or restriction, the notion has been debated throughout history. Philosophers like Jeremy Bentham have dismissed natural rights as 'nonsense upon stilts,' arguing against the existence of any rights prior to the establishment of a government or a legal framework. On the contrary, Enlightenment philosophers like Locke believed that natural rights are pre-societal and provide a justification for the formation of governments through a social contract aimed at protecting these rights. The discussion about whether property is an aspect of natural rights continues to be a topic of debate.
In essence, unalienable rights and natural rights form the ethical foundation which argues that some rights are so fundamental to human beings that no authority can take them away. These concepts have played a critical role in shaping modern democratic governance and the legal understanding of human rights. The distinction between these terms and their association with features traditionally linked to them can sometimes vary, but their core principle of inherent and intransgressible rights remains a cornerstone of liberal democracy.
Which is true of both the paleolithic era and the age of agriculture?
How many deaths were the nazis responsible for?
What are President Roosevelt’s primary purposes in his State of the Union address? Check all that apply.
to convince the public to support an idea
to showcase his strong speaking skills
to encourage the public to unite
to generate votes for the next election
to motivate the public to take action
The correct answers would be:
"To convince the public to support an idea" - Obviously, the president would like to have the support of the public on his plans.
"To encourage the public to unite" - It's ideal for a country to be united, focused on the goal of doing good for the country, as well as understanding the plans of the government, and being patient while they progress and start showing results.
"To motivate the public to take action" - This one is related to the previous one. Again he's motivating the public to get on board with his plan.
Answer:
To convince the public to support an idea
To encourage the public to unite
To motivate the public to take action
Explanation:
United States President Roosevelt delivered his state of the Union address in 1945, during World War II to convince, encourage and support the American people about the United States success and to ensure the country was on the right track regarding the war and that the possibilities to win were favorable. Roosevelt's speech successfully appealed to a sense of nationalism in all Americans, which was a key point on winning because every American wanted to contribute in anyway the could.
which of th following is an ongoing problem in brazil
Answer: a highly educated population with no job market
Explanation:
In this 1742 battle, Georgia forces under James Oglethorpe were successful in turning back a Spanish attempt to invade Georgia. Example: Oglethorpe's daring actions during the battle proved to be a huge boost to the morale of his young colony.
Answer:
Battle of Bloody Marsh.
Explanation:
Acording to the treaty virsiles what country was expected to pay the damages of the war
What was a major difference between the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Rhode Island?
A) There was virtually no difference between the two colonies, since both were founded by Puritans.
B) Rhode Island practiced the idea of religious toleration while Massachusetts Bay Colony did not.
C) The majority of Rhode Island colonists were American born.
D) Massachusetts Bay Colony allowed complete religious freedom while Rhode Island required everyone to follow the Catholic religion.
B. Rhode Island practiced religious toleration while Massachusetts Bay Colony did not.
Roger Williams (1603-1683) firmly believed in freedom of conscience. He founded the Rhode Island colony after being banished from Massachusetts in 1636 because of his views. He advocated keeping church and state separate. Rhode Island became a safe place for various religious dissenters and minorities to find a place to exist peacefully -- Baptists, Quakers, Jews and other religious minorities. Years later, when colonial America became the United States of America and the US Constitution was being written, Roger Williams idea of maintaining a “wall of separation” between church and state influenced the framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Freedom of religion was not the case in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, dominated by Puritan law. The Puritans came to America so they could practice their religion, but did not allow freedom for others within their colony. Those who did not follow the Puritan ways were often sent away (as Roger Williams was).
The founder of Rhode Island believed in religious toleration, meanwhile, the founders of Massachusetts were Puritans and wanted strict obedience to their beliefs. Therefore, it can be concluded that the major difference between the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Rhode Island was that Rhode Island practiced the idea of religious toleration while the Massachusetts Bay Colony did not have religious toleration or freedom.
EXPLANATION:
In 1630, eleven ships ran by John Winthrop came in New England with more than 700 Puritan settlers. They founded the Massachusetts Bay Colony and inhabited near the current area of Boston. John Winthrop worked as the new colony’s governor. He desired it to be a "city on a hill" (a Bible’s passage) which would be a model for Europeans of how Protestant society could develop.
The Puritan superiors from the Massachusetts Bay Colony had very firm rules and regulations concerning their church. People who opposed them were usually pushed to quit the colony. Some of these people developed new colonies in southern Massachusetts including Connecticut and Rhode Island.
Roger Williams, a Puritan religious leader, believed that the government must separate from the church. He also considered that people must have greater religious freedom. He was expelled from Massachusetts and established his own settlement so-called Providence in 1636.
Another Puritan leader, Anne Hutchinson, argued the Puritan leaders in Massachusetts. She said they focused on "works" for redemption and not "faith." She was exiled too and began the settlement of Portsmouth in 1638.
Portsmouth and Providence, together with two other settlements, joined together to form the British Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations in 1644.
LEARN MORE:
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• Which of the following best summarizes the role of religion in the Massachusetts Bay Colony? https://brainly.com/question/319151
KEYWORDS : Massachusetts Bay Colony, Rhode Island
Subject : History
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : Puritans in Early New England
The english crown gave connecticut and rhode island many freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. do you agree with historians who say that the revolution may have never happened if all colonies enjoyed the same freedoms
While the English Crown did grant Connecticut and Rhode Island certain freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. It attributed the avoidance of the American Revolution solely to these freedoms oversimplifies the complex factors that led to the revolution.
While these freedoms may have helped maintain a degree of colonial loyalty, various other issues, such as taxation without representation, economic disparities, and growing desire for self-governance, were instrumental in fueling the revolutionary sentiment.
It's unlikely that equal freedoms for all colonies would have entirely prevented the revolution, as broader ideological, political, and economic tensions were deeply rooted in the colonial experience and played a significant role in the movement toward independence.
Learn more about Connecticut, from:
brainly.com/question/11980534
SPJ12
The English crown granted Connecticut and Rhode Island many freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. Historians believe that if all colonies had the same freedoms, the American Revolution might not have occurred.
Explanation:According to historians, the English crown gave Connecticut and Rhode Island many freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. If all colonies had enjoyed the same freedoms, some historians believe that the American Revolution may not have happened. The provision of these freedoms allowed Connecticut and Rhode Island to develop systems of self-government, expanded suffrage, and religious toleration, which moved them towards democracy.
Learn more about Connecticut and Rhode Island here:
https://brainly.com/question/28750226
#SPJ3
Why would the supply curve of a dog-walking business be considered elastic?
because the demand for dog-walking services fluctuates
because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises
because the supply of dog walking isn’t easily expanded or reduced
because the supply of dogs changes quickly
The correct answer is: "because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises"
The elasticity of supply measures the percentage change in the quantity supplied cause by a certain price variation. According to the law of supply, price and quantity supply are directly related hence, when price increases so does the quantity supplied.
When there is a % increase in the price of the product, if the quantity supplied increases in a larger proportion, then the supply curve is elastic. Meanwhile, if the % change in the quantity supplied is smaller than the price variation then the supply curve is inelastic.
The supply side in the dog-walking business is constituted by the number of dog-walkers that are willing to do this job at the different prices paid for this service. If this supply is elastic, it means that when the price increases, there is a quick increase in the number of people available for the job.
Answer:
because it can hire workers quickly if the price rises
Explanation:
I look it up OK
Which was the earliest civilization in the Americas?
Final answer:
The Olmec civilization, which arose in Mesoamerica around the third century BCE, is considered the earliest complex civilization in the Americas. Prior non-complex societies, such as those associated with the Clovis culture, existed over 13,000 years ago. In South America, the Caral culture stands as one of the earliest urban centers.
Explanation:
The earliest civilization in the Americas is widely regarded as the Olmec civilization. Emerging in Mesoamerica around the start of the third century BCE, the Olmec culture is often referred to as the mother culture to later Mesoamerican civilizations. Its influence is evident in the domains of religion, art, architecture, and writing, among others. The Olmecs are notable for their extensive trading networks, their complex agricultural society, and their religious practices that involved blood sacrifices. Mesoamerica, a region that stretched from north of Panama to central Mexico, was a fertile cradle for the rise of civilizations due to its diverse terrain and climate that supported the domestication of important crops like corn (maize).
In North America, prior to the Olmec, there were indigenous peoples such as those associated with the Clovis culture, and other non-complex hunter-gatherer societies dating back over 13,000 years. However, these were not considered fully developed civilizations like the Olmec. Another early complex society emerged in the Ohio River valley around 1000 BCE with mound-building cultures such as those in the Eastern Woodlands. Part of this development came from the agricultural revolution, with early plant domestication greatly influencing the rise of permanent settlements and complex societies.
In South America, one of the earliest urban centers, the Caral culture in Peru, dates back five thousand years. Subsequent civilizations, such as the Moche, Nazca, Wari, and Chimor, contributed to the legacy of civilization in the Americas long before European contact.
Thus, the history of the Americas is rich with multiple centers of advanced civilization development, characterized by their unique agricultural, sociopolitical, and cultural advancements. These civilizations laid the groundwork for later societies, such as the famous Inca Empire, which would eventually come into contact with European explorers and settlers.
A 50 acre grant of land given to colonial settelers who paid their own way
The 50-acre grant of land given to colonial settlers who paid their own way was called Headright.
The 50-acre land grants called headright referred to in the question were part of a system to encourage settlement in the American colonies. Colonists who were able to pay for their own passage, or the passage of others, to the New World, often received land as a reward. This practice was common among Jamestown colonists and later extended to groups such as Revolutionary War soldiers. The headright system was a key aspect of colonial land policy in the Southern colonies, serving as both a mechanism for encouraging immigration and a means of distributing land to individuals willing to settle and develop the frontier.What two factors influenced the life of early humans?
Differences between the first generation design and the final generation design of the gossamer condor
The Gossamer Condor's final generation design addressed issues with airfoil pitching moments, incorporated ergonomic cockpit designs, and used advanced lightweight materials, resulting in improved aerodynamics, comfort, and overall performance.
The Gossamer Condor is renowned for its innovative design in human-powered flight. The first generation design had basic structural features and aerodynamic properties, but several key issues needed to be addressed.
Airfoil design: The initial airfoil design exhibited an excellent range of flight characteristics; however, it suffered from a large pitching moment due to its aft lower camber. Subsequent designs addressed this by tweaking the airfoil shape to reduce this pitching moment, enhancing overall stability and control.Cockpit design: The early versions of the cockpit were relatively simplistic and did not take human factors thoroughly into account. The final designs incorporated digital elements and ergonomics, significantly improving pilot comfort and control.Materials and construction: Early constructions of the Gossamer Condor used heavier and less durable materials. Final designs utilized advanced, lightweight composites that increased strength and reduced weight, improving overall performance and flight duration.The evolution from the first to the final generation design of the Gossamer Condor highlights significant advancements in aerodynamics, human factors, and materials, culminating in a far more efficient and effective aircraft.
What two decisions did constantine make that changed european history?
Who serves as the chief tax collector for the state?
The Comptroller of Public Accounts usually serves as the chief tax collector for a state. In addition to maintaining the state's accounting records and collecting state taxes and revenues, the Comptroller is responsible for preparing annual financial reports and verifying the availability of funds before the Governor can sign any appropriations bill.
Explanation:The chief tax collector for a state is typically the Comptroller of Public Accounts. This individual is elected for a term of four years and is largely responsible for maintaining the state's accounting records and collecting taxes and other revenues due to the state. However, other state officials may share some of these responsibilities.
The Comptroller's duties also include preparing an annual statement of state funds, the state's revenues, and its expenditures for the previous fiscal year. In addition, the state Constitution requires the Comptroller to provide the governor and Legislature with an itemized estimate of the anticipated revenues that will be received by the state during the succeeding biennium, based on existing laws. Before any appropriations bill passed by the Legislature can be sent to the Governor's desk for signing, the Comptroller is required to certify that the bill falls within available revenues.
In recent years, the comptroller's responsibilities have been expanded to include overseeing the start-up of the Texas Lottery, the administration of the Texas Tomorrow Fund, and the tasks and responsibilities of the state treasurer, among other duties.
Learn more about the Comptroller of Public Accounts here:https://brainly.com/question/36832139
#SPJ12
The __________ refers to the shipment of african slaves across the atlantic ocean to the americas.
How did the french and indian war lead to problems between the colonies and great britain?
What form of democracy did ancient athens have?
Oregon state university is a land grant institution, meaning that through a grant of land, the college was started. what tribe ceded land to the us government in 1855, which would later make corvallis state agricultural college, a land grant institution?
The question specifically refers to a tribe that ceded land for Oregon State University, which requires further research. However, it was federal laws like the Morrill Acts that provided the structure for land grants to establish universities like Oregon State University as affordable institutions of higher education.
Explanation:Unfortunately, the information about which tribe ceded the land used to establish Oregon State University as a land-grant institution requires additional research. We can discuss, however, how the federal government used land grants to influence state actions, as highlighted by the Morrill Acts of 1862 and 1890. These acts set aside public land and federal funds to create affordable land-grant colleges useful in the professions, trade, commerce, industry, and agriculture.
Oregon State University, then Corvallis State Agricultural College, would have benefitted from these provisions. The federal government did this by donating land or by using funding from the sale of granted lands. These Land-Grant colleges were integral to expanding access to higher education and created a contrast to the private Ivy League universities catering to the elite.
Learn more about Land Grant Institution here:https://brainly.com/question/5482447
#SPJ13
Territorial changes of 1763
Frederick douglass was known not only for supporting the freeing of slaves but also for
Frederick Douglass an African American social reformer could be credited as a supporter of the right for women to vote in election or as popularly known women suffrage beside his help on liberating the slaves. His works of writing were among the motivations of the American individuals, one of which is his diary.
Answer:
Equality for all people.
Explanation:
apex
6. The list of complaints makes up the largest part of the document's structure, or pattern of organization. What does its structure contribute to Jefferson's argument? How does it reinforce his main idea?
Jefferson’s basic elements of the argument for separation were lack of respect. Furthermore, he framed the arguments in a way that shows that the violation of economic and political rights that the Colonists have had to suffer were the result of a lack of respect. Jefferson is empathizes with the British government in how they have refused to "assent" to the basic principles of dignity and decency that would eventually enable a successful relationship and partnership to develop.
The 1954 decision of brown v. board of education was one of the most important decisions of the us supreme court. the court argued that ___.
How did nationalism in Japan differ from nationalism in Italy?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Nationalism in Italy was born from the desire of people to establish one solid identity that unified people through the same traditions, culture, and customs. Guizzepe Massini, in 1830, was the leading force behind Italian nationalistic ideas.
Nationalism in Germany was born on the idea of the pride and strength many people had from their barbaric ancestors and the idea of being more powerful in becoming one state. Pan-Germanism started to increase after the Napoleonic Wars. It was the idea of the unification of the Germanic territories to eliminate the possibility of being invaded again.
what was the major achievements of the middle stone age
Final answer:
The major achievements of the Middle Stone Age include the development of sophisticated stone tools, the transition to agriculture, and the emergence of early symbolic thought.
Explanation:
The major achievements of the Middle Stone Age include the development and use of more sophisticated stone tools, the transition from a hunter-gatherer culture to agriculture, and the emergence of early symbolic thought.
During the Middle Stone Age, humans began to create stone tools with more precision and complexity, such as grinding tools, chopping tools, and cutting tools. This allowed them to perform more specialized tasks and improve their daily lives.
Another significant achievement was the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to agriculture, where people started growing crops and domesticating animals for food. This shift led to the establishment of settled communities and the development of early farming practices.
Lastly, the Middle Stone Age saw the emergence of early symbolic thought in modern humans. The Apollo 11 cave stones in southern Africa, for example, demonstrate that humans possessed the capacity for modern symbolic thought as early as 25,000 years ago.
Compare and contrast the approaches of Chandragupta and Asoka to ruling the Mauryan empire.
Can someone help?
Chandragupta Maurya's rule emphasized military conquest and centralized bureaucratic governance, while Ashoka's rule focused on Buddhist principles, non-violence, and public welfare.
The Mauryan Empire, one of the greatest empires in ancient India, was founded by Chandragupta Maurya in 322 BCE and was later ruled by his grandson, Ashoka. Chandragupta's approach to ruling involved military conquests and centralized bureaucratic governance. He secured control over central and northern India through diplomacy and warfare, supported by the advice in Kautilya's Arthashastra, which detailed statecraft, governance, and warfare.
Chandragupta's rule was characterized by a strong, efficient administration supported by a large military and a civilian bureaucracy overseeing various industries and tax collection. Conversely, Ashoka, who ruled from 268-232 BCE, is renowned for adopting Buddhist principles following the bloody Kalinga War. His governance reflected a shift towards non-violence, compassion, and welfare, including the establishment of hospitals, schools, and infrastructure improvements. He promoted values like respect, forbearance, and truthful living across his diverse empire to ensure peace and harmony.In summary, while Chandragupta Maurya's rule focused on expansion and centralized power through military strength and administrative efficiency, Ashoka's rule emphasized moral governance, peace, and public welfare, embodying Buddhist ethics.How were africans affected by the growth of the spanish plantation system?
How long did the attack on pearl harbor last?
The attack on Pearl Harbor lasted just under two hours on December 7, 1941. It resulted in significant loss of life and damage to the US Pacific Fleet, but failed in its strategic goal of crippling the US fleet due to the absence of American aircraft carriers.
Explanation:The attack on Pearl Harbor occurred on the morning of December 7, 1941, and lasted just under two hours. The surprise assault was executed by the Japanese navy using over 350 planes from six aircraft carriers. This meticulously planned operation decimated the US Pacific Fleet, with 21 ships damaged or sunk, including eight battleships, and resulted in the destruction of 188 US aircraft, with another 150 damaged. The human cost was significant, with 2,403 Americans killed and 1,178 wounded. Among these, nearly half of the fatalities were aboard the USS Arizona. The Japanese, on the other hand, suffered minimal losses.
Although the attack was a tactical success for Japan, it failed to achieve a strategic victory by missing its primary target, the American aircraft carriers, which were not present in the harbor at the time. This event led President Franklin Roosevelt to refer to December 7 as a "date which will live in infamy," as he declared war on Japan the following day, propelling the United States into World War II.