Which aspect of the African slave trade is illustrated by this passage?

The next morning we left the house, and continued travelling all the day. For a long time we had kept the woods, but at last we came into a road which I believed I knew. I had now some hopes of being delivered; for we had advanced but a little way before I discovered some people at a distance, on which I began to cry out for their assistance: but my cries had no other effect than to make them tie me faster and stop my mouth, and then they put me into a large sack. They also stopped my sister's mouth, and tied her hands; and in this manner we proceeded till we were out of the sight of these people.1

A. African families were often torn apart by capture and enslavement.

B. Africans were often secretly kidnapped before being sold into slavery.

C. Slave traders were mainly interested in capturing grown men who could perform heavy labor.

D. The treatment of African slaves was often uncomfortable and unjust, but rarely violent.

The statement conflates the distinct biblical lineages: the Hebrew civilization descends from Shem, not Japheth. Biblical narratives assign unique fates to Noah's sons' descendants, with the Hebrews being Shem's descendants bound to a special covenant with God. The fortunes of Japheth's lineage are unrelated to the Hebrew people's religious and national identity.

The statement that the Hebrew civilization was part of God's blessing upon Japheth's descendants is a reflection of biblical accounts rather than an established historical fact. According to the passages provided, the descendants of Japhet, identified as the older son of Noah, are seen as inhabiting extensive lands and are associated with the Caucasian race, known for their influence from ancient times through the periods of Greek and Roman supremacy. However, the Hebrew people descend from Shem, Noah's other son, who was also given a special religious blessing. This distinction is based on scriptural narratives, particularly from the Bible, where Noah's sons Shem, Ham, and Japhet are described as progenitors of different peoples in the post- world.

In these narratives, each son's lineage is associated with different fates and blessings. Shem's descendants became the Hebrew people, recipients of a covenantal relationship with God. Promises of nation-building, including the one given to Abraham, typically pertain to Israel rather than the other nations. The biblical text emphasizes that the outward evidence of fecundity, such as the one seen in the lineage of Canaan, Ham's son, is not always a sign of divine favor. This perspective reflects the theological worldview that ultimate prosperity and blessings come from adherence to divine commandments and covenants.

The reference to the Hebrew civilization being part of Japheth's blessing seems to conflate the distinct scriptural lineages and overlooks the unique heritage and religious role attributed to the descendants of Shem, which includes the Hebrews. The Hebrew narrative is deeply tied to the idea of monotheism and the special relationship between Yahweh and the Hebrew people, as codified in various sacred writings that arose from their history and experiences.

The trade-offs between free enterprise and government intervention in U.S. antitrust policies involve balancing market freedom and regulation to ensure healthy competition.

Free enterprise allows businesses to operate with minimal government interference, promoting entrepreneurship and innovation. This system encourages competition, leading to a variety of goods and services and competitive prices for consumers.

However, without government intervention, monopolies can form, limiting competition and leading to higher prices, lower quality, and less innovation. Antitrust policies are designed to prevent these market failures by regulating mergers, breaking up monopolies, and ensuring fair business practices.

The federal government enforces antitrust laws through agencies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ), which monitor and challenge anti-competitive practices. These measures aim to maintain a competitive market environment while supporting economic growth and consumer welfare.

Public disclosure requirements also play a role in preventing market failures. By mandating transparency, they enable consumers and investors to make informed decisions, fostering a competitive market by ensuring that companies operate fairly and ethically.

Answer:

roman

Explanation:

Answer: the correct answer is C. They had straight, wide roads  

Explanation: Harappans had cities with wide roads.

The correct option is C). They had straight, wide roads.

Harappan is well known for its achievements of the Indus valley civilization, impressive, organized and regular layout.

The Harappan site was discovered in 1921 at the modern site of Harappa which is situated in the West Punjab in Pakistan.

The Harappans carried on trade in stone, metal, shell etc. within the Indus civilization zone.

Learn more about the Harappan here:-

https://brainly.com/question/5018306

#SPJ2

The correct answer is, two Americans that supported annexation were John Tyler and James Knox Polk.

U.S. President John Tyler established negotiations with the inhabitants of the Texas territory. In April, 1844 he signed a Treaty of Annexation, and the relationships with Mexico ended. But the Senate did not accept the Treaty. Then, James Knox Polk won the election and before assuming the Presidency, helped Tyler to work a resolution with the House of Representatives and the Senate on March 1945. Finally, Texas became a part of the United States in December.

Answer:

The answer to the question: How might Douglass´s reliability as an author be called into question for his piece "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass", would be, B: He writes the story years later and many of his memories may be skewed.

Explanation:

"Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass" is a memoir written by Frederick Douglass, about his life as a slave, and it was first published in 1845. It also became a treatise on slavery and the need for abolition. When the book was first published, many former slave owners criticized it, especially arguing that the reason for this book not being able to be from Douglass is that they thought he was not smart, and uneducated, and thus, could not have been the author. But one of the bigger issues that can be said is that the memoirs are written down after Douglass finally manages stability and is free, years after these experiences have happened, so many question if all the memories that he writes down in the book are real, or if some are embellished, or maybe they did not happen.

The compromise of 1850 was referred to as the final solution as it restricted a system of making slaves states in the nation.

The Southern states were in favor of slavery states while the North was opposing this rule. Wilmot Proviso was the one who started a protest against slavery states by bringing a compromise of 1850, which made California a free state. California was occupied after the completion of the Mexican-American War, which increased the US territory along with the abolishment of the slavery system from that state.

It was achieved by fugitive laws and provided voting rights but the restricted movement of people from north to south regions. Therefore, the balance was achieved at the cost of violence between the North and South regions.

Learn more about the compromise of 1850  here:

https://brainly.com/question/16937478

Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois were influential black leaders with differing approaches to achieving equality for black Americans.

Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois were two prominent black leaders at the turn of the century who had different perspectives on the challenges faced by black America. Washington believed in a gradual approach to achieving equality through education and entrepreneurship, while Du Bois advocated for immediate social and political equality. However, both men were influential in paving the way for future generations of African American leaders and activists.

Early mill owners had different visions for maintaining social control in the ideal industrial community. Some embraced utopian ideals, while others implemented strict rules and regulations or practiced welfare capitalism.

Early mill owners during the Industrial Revolution had a vision of maintaining social control in the ideal industrial community through various approaches. Some mill owners, like Robert Owen, believed in creating utopian communities where workers lived in decent housing, worked an eight-hour day, and raised their children communally. Others, like the Boston Associates, established strict rules and regulations to ensure discipline and control among workers, with restrictions on behavior and close monitoring of their conduct. Still, there were business owners who embraced the concept of welfare capitalism, offering certain benefits and improving workers' welfare to reduce labor militancy and turnover.

Early mill owners had a vision of creating ideal industrial communities based on sharing and cooperation, implementing shorter work hours and communal raising of children. However, these communities faced challenges and were ultimately unsuccessful.

In the early nineteenth century, utopian socialism dominated and sought to create ideal societies based on sharing and cooperation. Some mill owners, like Robert Owen, implemented these ideals in communities such as New Lanark and New Harmony. These communities aimed to provide decent housing, shorter work hours, and communal raising of children. However, despite their aspirations, these communities faced challenges and ultimately failed.

Answer:

powerful central government

Explanation:

reasons may vary please select I AM NOT ROBOT and verify to contiue

Answer:

A) Initiated standardized time and consolidation of materials.

Answer:

Ten Percent Plan

Explanation:

Ten Percent plan of 1863 proposed by Lincoln, was not a just a reconstruction plan but to persuade the South to surrender. As the Union won major victories at the battles of Gettysburg and Vicksburg, it want supporters of Confederacy to surrender. He carefully planned this to pardon all the people of Southern states except for high army and political officials to gather support for the peaceful unity after the war comes to an end.

Final answer:

The alliance system that developed in the early 1900s helped cause WWI by creating mutual defence obligations that led to the rapid escalation and spread of conflict following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. The system created a domino effect where any regional conflict could quickly involve multiple nations due to their alliance commitments.

Explanation:

How the Alliance System Contributed to the Outbreak of WW1

The alliance system developed in the early 1900s, with its intricate web of mutual defence pacts, was intended to promote peace through collaborative agreements. Instead, the alliances exacerbated the situation when World War One (WWI) began, leading to a swift escalation and spread of the conflict across Europe and beyond.

Key alliances were the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente, which pitted the major powers against each other. Spirited nationalism and a collective determination to back allies, regardless of direct interests, meant that smaller incidents had the potential to trigger a broader war. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was such an event, rapidly drawing in allies of the affected powers and cascading into global conflict.

The alliance system effectively set the stage for a domino effect, where an issue between two nations quickly involved their respective allies due to the military obligations established by these alliances. The opposing blocs of major powers had also developed relationships with smaller nations, further complicating the web of treaties.

The assassination in 1914 was the spark that ignited these pre-existing tensions, resulting in warfare that the complex alliance obligations amplified into a total war.

Germany found itself in a particularly precarious position, facing potential two-front hostilities and thus forming alliances to mitigate this risk - a move that contributed significantly to the atmosphere of mutual distrust amongst the great powers. The subsequent aggressive military postures and political decisions based on alliance commitments inevitably pushed Europe over the edge into the Great War.

Answer:

it is, Though when looking up the green door of "American History" the door is meaningful of hope.

Explanation: