Answer:
So that you have the full facts and aren't biased.
Explanation:
Context is key.
Final answer:
Considering the historical context is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of historical events, as it includes various backgrounds and factors that influence why events occurred and provides a more accurate interpretation.
Explanation:
It is important to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation because context provides depth and understanding to why and how an event occurred. The historical context includes a variety of factors such as the historical, literary, cultural, socioeconomic, religious, and political background of the time.
Ignoring this context can lead to a skewed or incomplete understanding of the past. For example, understanding the socioeconomic conditions that led to the French Revolution helps us comprehend the reasons behind the revolt, beyond just knowing that it happened.
By considering all available information and the different aspects of causation, historians can get closer to uncovering the true nature of historical events and avoid the danger of interpreting them through a single lens.
This contributes to a multifaceted view of history that values the complexity and interconnectedness of past events, thus allowing for a clearer picture of those who lived before us and allowing us to critically engage with our shared human past.
how did problems in America affect the power struggle of the soldiers in the Vietnam War (include in your answer the availability of money, support, and care for the soldiers fighting)? 5-7 Sentences
Answer:
The Vietnam War had a profound effect on America. Domestically, the unpopularity of the war led to the end of the military draft in 1973 and since then the U.S. has yet to conscript troops from the general population again. The war also drastically decreased Americans' trust in political leaders.
Explanation:
Explain the drawbacks or negative consequences, of the invention of the cotton gin
Final answer:
The invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793 had negative consequences such as reinforcing the economic foundation of slavery, infringement of Whitney's patent rights, and the displacement of Native American communities due to the expansion of cotton farming.
Explanation:
While Eli Whitney's invention of the cotton gin in 1793 was a significant technological breakthrough, it also had several unintended negative consequences. One major drawback was that it revitalized the institution of slavery in the South. The cotton gin made it profitable to grow short-staple cotton, which was previously less valuable due to the difficulty of removing its seeds. Consequently, the gin spurred a massive growth in cotton production, leading to an increased demand for enslaved labor to cultivate and harvest the expanding cotton fields. This counteracted Whitney's original hope that the gin would make slavery obsolete and instead entrenched the practice further into the southern economy.
Another adverse outcome was the widespread infringement of Whitney's patent rights. Southern cotton planters replicated his invention with minor modifications, which when challenged in court, Whitney found the southern legal system unwilling to uphold his patent rights. This not only impacted Whitney's profits but also demonstrated the challenges inventors faced in protecting intellectual property in the early United States.
Lastly, the cotton revolution, fueled by the cotton gin, contributed to the displacement of Native American communities. As the demand for land to grow cotton surged, it led to the forcible removal of Native American populations from their ancestral lands, particularly in the Old Southwest. This was a grave social consequence that reflects a darker side of this agricultural innovation.
The free trade agreement between the United States,Canada,and Mexico is called
Answer:
North American Free trade agreement or NAFTA
Answer:
- NAFTA
-EU
-WTO
Explanation:
What was a result of hiring too many mercenaries to protect areas in rome?
•Mercenaries refused to fight other people.
•Mercenaries helped generals fight one another.
•Mercenaries tried to expand the empire further.
•Mercenaries joined together to fight the emperor.
Answer:
the answer is b
Mercenaries helped generals fight one another
Explanation:
i got it right
The answer is Mercenaries helped generals fight one another.
What do mercenaries mean in ancient Rome?Mercenary, hired professional soldier who fights for any state or nation without regard to political interests or issues. From the earliest days of organized warfare until the development of political standing armies in the mid-17th century, governments frequently supplemented their military forces with mercenaries.
Why was the hiring of Germanic mercenaries by Western Roman emperors a mistake?The Germanics were poor soldiers who could not handle Roman weapons. The Germanics lacked loyalty to Rome and sometimes fought against the empire. The regular Roman army rose up against the mercenaries and killed many of them.
Learn more about Roman Empire here https://brainly.com/question/1892495
#SPJ2
35. What was the policy of appeasement?
a. The British and French decision to give into aggression to keep peace.
b. The move that Mussolini made to form an alliance with Germany.
c. The U.S. desire to stay out of foreign affairs.
d. Two peas get together to watch some entertainment.
Answer:
A.
. The British and French decision to give into aggression to keep peace.
Explanation:
Appeasement. Appeasement, the policy of making concessions to the dictatorial powers in order to avoid conflict, governed Anglo-French foreign policy during the 1930s. It became indelibly associated with Conservative Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.
Appeasement. Appeasement, Foreign policy of pacifying an aggrieved country through negotiation in order to prevent war. The prime example is Britain's policy toward Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany in the 1930s
Appeasement is most often used to describe the response of British policy makers to the rise of Nazi Germany in the 1930s. ... Chamberlain hoped that it would bring a quicker end to the crisis created in Europe by the Nazi clamour for revision of the Treaty of Versailles.
Given the world political situation in 1947, who do you think are the "armed minorities" and "outside pressures" who are trying to take over Greece and Turkey?
In 1947, the 'armed minorities' in Greece and Turkey likely referred to local communist insurgents. 'Outside pressures' point to powerful external communist forces, especially the Soviet Union, aiming to broaden their influence. This political context formed part of the Cold War period.
Explanation:In the context of the year 1947, the term "armed minorities" likely refers to communist insurgents in Greece and Turkey. After World War II, these nations experienced a rise in communist movements, compelled in part by the significant political and economic turmoil post-war.
"Outside pressures" would refer to external communist influences, particularly the Soviet Union, which sought to expand communism in Europe. This was an epoch in history known as The Cold War. Hence, these countries were being confronted by internal communist movements as well as international communist forces, creating fears of a political takeover.
https://brainly.com/question/23021319
#SPJ2
In 1947, the 'armed minorities' in Greece were communist rebels, while the 'outside pressures' on Turkey came from the Soviet Union. The Truman Doctrine was introduced by the U.S. to counter these communist threats.
These rebels were largely supported by other communist countries in Eastern Europe, reflecting the wider concerns about Soviet expansion.
For Turkey, the "outside pressures" referred to the influence and demands from the Soviet Union, which was interested in controlling strategic areas like the Dardanelles strait.
U.S. President Harry Truman, in response to these threats, formulated the Truman Doctrine in 1947. This policy aimed to provide political, military, and economic assistance to democratic nations under threat from external or internal authoritarian forces, specifically addressing the situations in Greece and Turkey.
2. European troops invaded because Mexico was broke
After the war, Mexico had a lot of debt. It owed tens of millions of dollars to foreign lenders.
Mexico didn't have enough money to pay its debts. So newly elected President Juárez decided to delay paying foreign debts for two years. The move caused an immediate backlash from Spain, France and Great Britain. They had lent Mexico money and now they wanted it back.
Troops from these three European countries began arriving in Veracruz in late 1861. Spain and Great Britain almost immediately withdrew, but about 6,000 French troops pushed inland toward the capital. They were backed by Mexico’s defeated conservative leaders.
The United States might have intervened, too, had it not been fighting its own Civil War.
Question: Which option BEST describes the structure of the section "European troops invaded because Mexico was broke"?
A
problem and solution
B
compare and contrast
C
question and answer
D
cause and effect
Answer:
i think b
Explanation:
Answer:
D cause and effect, this is because Mexico was in debt so they were invaded.
Which of these events occurred first?
the Siege of Boston
the Battle of Concord
the Declaration of Independence
Answer:
The Battle of Concord
Explanation:
The battle of concord happened first, before the siege of Boston.
1. Battle of Concord, April 19, 1775
2. Siege of Boston, April 19, 1775-March 17, 1776
3. Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
Writing Prompt:
What is the tone of Lincoln's 2nd Inaugural Address? Cite the
specific word choices and their connotative meaning which
create the overall tone of the address.
As you prepare to write, be sure to analyze the speech to:
Determine the appropriate meaning of multiple meaning words;
Explain the relevancy of the word choice to reflect or respond to the original setting, occasion, or
audience;
Trace the cumulative effect of the author's words on the purpose, setting, meaning, or tone.
Answer:
:V
Explanation:
Muchas de las personas que se están preparando para este examen GED® en ... opción múltiple se referirán a un pasaje de lectura. A ... nar el significado de las palabras desconocidas? ... esta, analice ambas posturas para determinar cuál es ... recer de varias formas, como discursos, cartas, leyes o
Whats the biggest difference between a empire and republic?
Answer:
An empire expands while a republic mostly focuses on its people.
Explanation:
Answer:
republic is a state where sovereignty rests with the people and a empire is a political unit having an extensive territory or comprising a number of territories or nations and ruled by a single supreme authority.
Explanation:
hope we can be friends
can i please get brainliest
PLZ HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
what is the best way to begin a summary of this story?
A) A miller has a teenage son who is a wise guy and likes to tease him.
B) There's a flea market in town, a few miles from the miller's home.
C) These days, modern machines grind grain into flour quickly and easily.
D) A miller and his son are taking there donkey to the flea market to sell.
Answer:the answer is D “ A miller and his son are taking there donkey to the flea market to sell.”
:)
Explanation:
Why is obeying the law an obligation of citizenship?
A.
Obeying the law ensures that police officers are happy.
B.
Obeying the law ensures that businesses make money.
C.
Obeying the law is necessary to maintain order and protect people's safety and property.
D.
Obeying the law is necessary to ensure that religious authorities are happy with public behavior.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It's not about what police officers, businesses or religious authorities want. Laws are not in place to please specific groups of people. They are in place in order to keep things under control and protect the citizens of the United States. It's important to obey the law to keep everyone around you safe.
the correct answer is option c. Obeying the law is an obligation of citizenship to maintain order and protect safety and property within a society. It is a reflection of democratic principles where citizens adhere to rules established by their collective will. While generally crucial for societal harmony, there may be instances where the law conflicts with individual conscience, which then must be addressed within legal frameworks.
Obeying the law is a fundamental obligation of citizenship because it is essential for maintaining order and protecting the safety and property of individuals within a society. Laws are established by the collective will of the people in a democratic society, and thus, all citizens, regardless of their social status, are expected to adhere to them. This ensures that society functions smoothly, and that the rights and liberties of all its members are secured. Rule of law is a critical principle in which everyone, including government officials, is accountable under the law, and it is vital for upholding justice and equality. Citizens submit to laws, understanding that they are, in effect, submitting to rules of their own creation. As such, when citizens obey the law, they are acting in their interests and the broader interests of societal harmony and order. It is important to recognize that while obedience to law is fundamental for public order, there may be occasions where obeying an unjust or immoral law may conflict with individual conscience. In such situations, it is imperative for citizens to push for change through legal and constitutional means, respecting the democratic process and the structure of the legal system.
Which of the following is true about the civil rights era in the 1950s and 1960s?
a. The Supreme Court became more active in its rulings regarding civil rights.
b. Congress was active in making laws to support civil rights.
c. President Johnson was strongly against the civil rights movement in order to get support from Southern states.
d. African Americans used violence as their primary tactic to achieve civil rights.
Answer:
a. The Supreme Court became more active in its rulings regarding civil rights
Explanation:
The civil rights movement was a struggle for social justice that took place mainly during the 1950s and 1960s for blacks to gain equal rights under the law in the United States. ... By the mid-20th century, African Americans had had more than enough of prejudice and violence against them.
1956. In January and February, whites angry about the Montgomery Bus Boycott bomb four African American churches and the homes of civil rights leaders King, Ralph Abernathy, and E.D. 13, the Supreme Court upholds an Alabama district court ruling in favor of the Montgomery bus boycotters
The death toll for the Civil War varies between 680,000 and 800,000 casualties, which makes the war more devastating than the _______________ , WWI, WWII and _________________ combined.
Answer:
I'm guessing the vietnam and korean war.
Explanation:
This is because the US has been in so many wars its pretty hard to figure out which wars the question is specifically asking for
What kinds of court cases are heard by federal courts? Name at least three.
Answer:
Federal courts hear criminal, civil, and bankruptcy cases
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
Federal court jurisdictions only hear cases in which the United States is a party, cases involving violations of the Constitution or federal law, crimes on federal land, and bankruptcy cases.
Explanation:
E2020:)
Which term best describes a list of principles and beliefs held by a political party?
A. public agenda
B. party platform
C. primary election
Reset
Submit
Answer:
B. Party Platform
Explanation:
Not all members share the same beliefs about every single issue. Instead, it's a big picture issue, an overview of how you believe. And as a result, they work together to create a party platform. And a party platform basically describes what the beliefs of the political party are. There are two major political parties in the United States today, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.
Which man was a Union general known for attacking his opponent’s resources?
Answer:
Jefferson Davis
Explanation:
summarize the video in 1 paragraph (5 to 8 sentences) in your own words and be sure to answer the following questions in your paragraph.
What is gravity?
Who is Sir Issac Newton?
What did he learn about gravity?
How do you think gravity is related to space and our current unit?
comment on the question if u need the video
Answer:
Gravity, or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy—including planets, stars, galaxies, and even light—are brought toward one another. On Earth, gravity gives weight to physical objects, and the Moon's gravity causes the ocean tides. Sir Isaac Newton PRS was an English mathematician, physicist, astronomer, theologian, and author who is widely recognized as one of the most influential scientists of all time and as a key figure in the scientific revolution. Newton learned that set forth the idea that gravity was a predictable force. ... Newton publicized his Theory of Universal Gravitation in the 1680s. It basically set forth the idea that gravity was a predictable force that acts on all matter in the universe, and is a function of both mass and distance. Gravity is what holds the planets in orbit around the sun and what keeps the moon in orbit around Earth. The gravitational pull of the moon pulls the seas towards it, causing the ocean tides. Gravity creates stars and planets by pulling together the material from which they are made.
Explanation:
List all “Border States.” in the civil war
Answer:
The border states during the Civil War were the slave states that didn't leave the Union. These states included Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri. West Virginia, which separated from Virginia during the war, was also considered a border state.
Explanation:
Answer:
-Kentucky
-Maryland
-Missouri
-Delaware
-West Virginia
Explanation:
Kentucky - President Abraham Lincoln considered Kentucky's loyalty to the Union as an important factor in the Union winning the Civil War. Kentucky began the war as a neutral state, but later came under Union control.
Maryland - Maryland was also very important for the Union. The land of Maryland was the only thing standing between Virginia and the Union capital at Washington D.C. The war would have gone very differently had Maryland seceded from the Union. Maryland voted to abolish slavery during the war in 1864.
Missouri - At the start of the war Missouri decided to remain with the Union and not secede, but many people in the state felt that the war against the Confederacy was wrong. As the war progressed, the Missouri state government split into two rival governments. One of the state governments voted to secede from the Union while the other wanted to stay. As a result, the state was claimed by both the Union and the Confederacy for a period of time.
Delaware - Although Delaware was a slave state, few people in the state owned slaves at the outbreak of the war. The state didn't actually border any Confederate states and was always loyal to the Union.
West Virginia - When the state of Virginia seceded from the Union, West Virginia broke away and formed its own state. It remained loyal to the Union, however, the people of West Virginia were split. Around 20,000 West Virginia men fought on the side of the Confederacy.
Where is the Great Wall of China located
which of the following best represents the place of comes in the three branches of government
Answer:
The Executive, The Judiciary, The legislative
Explanation:
Federal government has three parts.
They are the Executive, Legislative (Senate and House of Representatives) and Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts). The President administers the Executive Branch of our government.
The Constitution clearly makes the Congress the most powerful of the three branches of government. Depending on the circumstances, however, the President might have more influence on Congress than one would think based on the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution.
Which of the following is a claim about ancient Rome that a historian could
build an argument around?
O
A. Julius Caesar was born into a somewhat influential family in 100
BCE
O
B. Julius Caesar was assassinated by members of the Roman senate
in 44 BCE
O
C. Julius Caesar's death led to a war that eventually destroyed the
Roman Republic
O
D. Julius Caesar's assassination was the single most important
event in Roman history.
D
Explanation:
It's just like saying basketball is the best sport in the worl
When some people reacted negatively to Jackie Robinson presence on the Brooklyn Dodgers,baseball officials
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "actively worked to stop the dissent".
Explanation:
The popularity of Jackie Robinson throughout Major League Baseball caused whites to affect their opinions regarding minorities.Whenever some people have responded adversely or harshly to the involvement of Jackie Robinson on either the dodgers, baseball authorities were working aggressively to avoid the opposition.So that the above is the right answer.
Northwest Coast society was characterized by its ?
declining population.
growing poverty
social equality.
strict social classes.
The Northwest Coast society was highly stratified, organized in strict social classes based on lineage and wealth. The society comprised of nobles, commoners, and slaves.
Explanation:The Northwest Coast society was characterized by its strict social classes. This hierarchical structure was established based on lineage and wealth, not unlike societies we see across the globe. For instance, those who had accumulated wealth could organize potlatches, a traditional feast during which the host hands out gifts to display the wealth and reinforce their upper-class status.
This stratified society comprised of classes such as nobles, commoners, and slaves, demonstrating the clear social distinction prevalent in the Northwest Coast society.
Learn more about Northwest Coast here:https://brainly.com/question/11347578
#SPJ12
Which of the following ideas was Bush attempting
to express in his speech?
Answer: which Bush are you talking about
Explanation:
George W. Bush or George H. W. Bush
and what are the following ideas
Which answer choice MOST accurately expresses how the British affected the political development of South Africa?
(A) When the British and the Dutch instituted apartheid, the system was simply meant as a way to separate
races. Unfortunately, it also became a way to enforce white power and violence toward non-whites, and
that painful history influences current South African politics.
The British wanted to create policies of segregation throughout all of Africa as a way to control the
people within each of their colonies. With the help of the Dutch, apartheid was created to separate
people by race. However, this system was eventually defeated through the leadership of modern British
anti-apartheid activists.
(C)
When the British attempted to colonize South Africa, they were met with another European force. Both
the British and the Dutch supported racial segregation, but the British insisted that the Dutch and their
descendants create a detailed class hierarchy which is still present today, despite the formal end of
apartheid.
(D)
The British protected prior Dutch laws around race in South Africa and further created a stringent
system of racially segregated laws. This segregated system and its backlash led to the formation of
apartheid and has contributed to some of the modern political turmoil and complexities.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
The correct option is D. The British protected prior Dutch laws around race in South Africa and further created a stringent system of racially segregated laws. This segregated system and its backlash led to the formation of apartheid and has contributed to some of the modern political turmoil and complexities that would most accurately express how the British affected the political development of South Africa.
How did the British influence, South Africa?The three reasons the British decided to colonize South Africa were to expand their lands, to compete with other European Empires for colonial dominance, and to seize control of South Africa in order to establish trade routes to India. For its strength, these three reasons led the British to colonize South Africa.
The Slavery and Forced Labor Model was introduced with colonialism, which got its start in South Africa in 1652. This was the initial colonialism that the Dutch introduced in 1652 and later exported from the Western Cape to the Zuid-Afrikaanse Republiek and the Afrikaner Republics of the Orange Free State.
Thus, The best choice is D since it accurately describes how the British influenced South Africa's political evolution.
Learn more about The Britishers Influence in South Africa here:
https://brainly.com/question/931272
#SPJ2
What challenges did the United States face after the Civil War ended? Check all that apply.
Answer:
Check Explanation
Explanation:
After the civil war between the United states of America and the Confederation of America States, the whole country faces a lot of hardships.
Following the 1860 election to the presidency of Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln whom the south label as the Anti slave president, eleven southern states declare Independence from the Union and a civil war began. The war Ended after four years of fighting between the two sides with many Americans dead
Some people in the North who are Carpetbaggerss, scalawags took advantage of the southerners by manipulating and decieving them.
Many ports were also destroyed in the south, plantations were burned during the war, destruction of the land, homes, and cities also made reconstruction to be much more harder in the Southern part of The country. Also there was the Asasination of Abraham Lincoln.
Prompt: Evaluate the extent to which rulers of the early modern period (1450-1750) differed in their
methods of establishing authority.
During the early modern period (1450-1750), rulers employed various methods to establish authority. In Europe, authorities often used divine right theory, such as Louis XIV, while in the East, rulers like the Ottoman Sultans relied on military and administrative superiority. In the Americas, rulers used a combined approach.
Explanation:The rulers of the early modern period (1450-1750) employed different strategies and methods to establish their authority. The primary distinctions were often framed by geographical location, historical contexts, and cultural norms.
For example, in Europe, the rulers often relied on divine right theory, portraying themselves as appointed by God. This theological justification was critical to solidifying their reign. Louis XIV of France is a renowned example of this approach.
Alternatively, in the East, rulers like the Ottoman Sultans used military conquest and administrative efficiency to cement their authority. Successful military campaigns and effective laws played a crucial role in consolidating power and creating a sense of legitimacy.
In the Americas, figures like Montezuma of the Aztec Empire ruled through a combination of military might, religious authority, and social hierarchy manipulation.
Learn more about Establishing Authority here:https://brainly.com/question/32835796
#SPJ3
How would Law III help guarantee a person's rights under Roman law?
The first type of procedure in Roman law was known as the legis actions (legal actions) procedure. It was broken down into three stages: an oral summons, a preliminary hearing before a magistrate, and a complete trial before a judge.
Why is Roman law important?The legal system in Europe is constructed on a shared basis known as Roman Law. It can therefore be used as a source of laws and legal standards that will easily mesh with the national laws of the numerous and diverse European states.
The full citizen was entitled to vote, engage in civil unions, and engage in business. While maintaining their other rights, certain residents were not permitted to vote or occupy public office. A third category of citizens was able to vote and engage in business but was not allowed to run for office or wed freeborn women.
Learn more about Roman law here:
https://brainly.com/question/26613053
#SPJ3
Final answer:
Law III, as a principle of Roman law, safeguarded individual rights by extending citizenship benefits and ensuring that laws were public and fair. The Romans introduced key legal concepts such as the presumption of innocence and the use of precedent, which still influence modern legal systems.
Explanation:
Law III refers to the principles enumerated by the Roman law, which played a crucial role in protecting the rights of individuals in ancient Rome. With the extension of citizenship by Emperor Caracalla in 212 CE to all free men and women, nearly everyone in the empire could appeal to the comprehensiveness of Roman law which guaranteed a level of legal protection and certain liberties. These liberties included exemptions from the crueler punishments like crucifixion and were based on what was seen as universal standards of justice.
One significant legal achievement of Rome was the establishment of the Twelve Tables, which made laws visible and accessible to all by publicly displaying them in the Roman Forum. This act was instrumental in reducing corruption and ensuring that everyone was aware of the laws that governed them. The idea that an accused person was presumed innocent until proven guilty and the tradition of using precedent in legal decisions were both radical and transformative principles introduced by Roman law that have continued to influence legal systems throughout the world.
Overall, the structure of Roman law, consisting of private law, public law, and the Law of Nations along with a system of checks and balances, sought to ensure that the legal system was fair and just, protecting individual rights and laying down a foundation for future legal frameworks.
what unintended effect did the cultural revolution have on china
Answer:
it paved the way for western style economic and political devolpment
Explanation: