The correct answer is: C. Marshall believed the law that gave the court the power to issue the writ of mandamus was not a constitutional law, and therefore the court did not really have that power.
Which of the following contributed to European imperialism?
A. a desire to spread industrialization
B. a desire to learn about other cultures
C. a desire to acquire manufactured goods from other places
D. a desire for new sources of raw materials
i think the answer is d beacuse europe is growing very quickly i hope you are happy
HELP ASAP!! In the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment did not give the right to let Native Americans to vote. true or false?
False. The Fifteenth Amendment gave all Americans no matter what race the ability to vote.
In what ways do the ottomans seem to have been selective borrowers of cutting-edge technologies from Europe? How do you explain the selectivity?
Answer:
In many ways the Ottomans seem to borrow cutting edge technologies from Europe selectively. Like as military system, education system,health system.
Explanation: Ottomans are one of longest reigned empire in the world.They were self-improved by themselves until 17th century.But at 17th century they started to get information from their agent in Europe about the improvement of various technology by Europe. Then the sultan of ottoman invited many European specialists to help them with the technology. Like he was interested about handgun and cannon developed by European.
They also borrowed the modern war and military knowledge and technology from Europe.
Ottomans were also impressed by the education system of Europe as they used to have the old master-apprentice system of education. Europe provided them new models of higher education system.
So we can say that ottomans borrowed selectively military and education technology from Europe.
HELP ME NOW!!! BRAINLIEST!!!
approximately which percentage of white Arkansans did not own any slaves during mid 1800?
a. 32
b. 52
c. 62
d. 82
i would say D plz mark brainliest
Answer:
d. 82
Explanation:
England
13 Colonies
Population
About 12,000,000
About 2, 800,000
Money
Very wealthy, established nation with a treasury
New government with very little money
Industry
Developed and growing industry
Almost no industry
Military
Large, well trained army with mercenaries too
Volunteer forces that were poorly equipped
Leaders
Many well-trained officers
Few trained officers
Geography
Fighting in a far-away, unfamiliar land
Familiar with the landscapes
Chart by John Spicer
Which conclusion about the American Revolutionary War is most clearly supported by information in this chart?
England had few advantages in a war with her American colonies.
The colonies had few advantages in the war with England.
The colonies had more advantages England than upon entering the war.
England did not believe the colonies were worth the expense of a war.
According to the information in the chart, The colonies had few advantages in the war with England. In fact, they had only one advantage, which was familiarity with the land. In every other aspect such as population, wealth, technology and military formation the colonies were far inferior and this represented some serious difficulty for them. Despite of this fact, the colonies eventually achieved independence from Britain on the 4th of July, 1776.
how much national debt did texas acquire after the texas revolution
The Republic of Texas inherited from the provisional and ad interim governments a debt estimated at $1.25 million. Of this, $100,000 was in the form of loans and the remainder in the form of claims for services and supplies.
Hope this helps!!!
Answer:
1.25 million
Explanation:
Which natural process combined with the cruel treatment of the Spanish to devastate the peoples of the Americas?
the inability of the Native Americans to eat Spanish food
the spread of European diseases to the Americas
the lack of similar technology to the Spanish
climate change to which the Native Americans could not adjust
Lacking immunity to Old World pathogens carried by the Spanish, indigenous inhabitants of the Americas fell victim to terrible plagues of smallpox, influenza, and other viruses.
B is the correct answer.
Answer:
ya boooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Explanation:
Who were the mound builders
a) hunter gatherers who built mounds
b) farmers near the Mississippi
c) the Iroquois
d) the Navajo
a) hunter gatherers who built mounds
The various cultures collectively termed "Mound Builders" were inhabitants of North America who, during a circa 5,000-year period, constructed various styles of earthen mounds for religious, ceremonial, burial, and elite residential purposes.
the answer is A..hope this helps :))
PLZZZ help worth 25 points
Your teacher has told you that:
The fall of the Roman Empire was not due to one event but due to many events combined.
Write a paragraph of five to eight sentences in which you explain what your teacher means by this statement. You must provide at least five well-developed examples, organize your response carefully, and check for accurate spelling and grammar.
There are many reasons for the fall of the roman empire. One reason is government corruption, the size of Rome alone made it hard to control Rome. It also lost all of its tradition and value to the sudden growth in Christianity. Barbarian tribes were also a problem, because this was about the time the Huns became a threat to nearby countries. Rome was eventually overthrown by a German barbaric leader, meaning that Rome's rule had officially come to an end.
Hope this helps :) if you need to elaborate you can, there's plenty of room for describing each disaster.
Your teacher's statement means that the collapse of the Roman Empire was the result of a complex set of factors rather than a singular event. This multifaceted decline included economic troubles, military overstretch, political corruption, the migration of the barbarian tribes, and the division of the empire. It's important to see this downfall as a progressive deterioration over time rather than a swift fall.
The fall of the Roman Empire was a protracted process influenced by numerous issues. Firstly, the economy suffered greatly due to overspending on wars, leading to debasement of currency and inflation. The military was overextended as Rome tried to defend its vast borders, which caused logistical strains and made it vulnerable to outside attacks, especially from various barbarian groups. Political corruption and the instability of the jump between leaders weakened the government's ability to respond effectively to these challenges. Add to that the separate administrations of the Western and Eastern Empires, which diluted the power and resources each could command. Lastly, the steady incursion of barbarian tribes into Roman territory, culminating in the sacking of Rome, exemplified the inability of the Roman legions to protect the empire's frontiers.
How is the position of Muslim women problematic in the West? To what extent is this an inherent part of Islam?
Answer: The experiences of Muslim women vary widely between and within different societies.
Explanation:I think
Conduction does not work in a fluid because the molecules _____.
A. are too close together
B. are too far apart
C. do not move fast enough
D. do not have enough energy
B - are too far apart
Conduction in fluids doesn't work as the molecules are loosely packed as opposed to conduction in solides where the molecules are tightly packed.
the correct answer is b
Which is true about indentured servants in colonial America?
Is There Any Choice's?
A
B
C
D?
wheres the multiple choice ??
How did the number of factories in the North affect the Civil War?
It gave the South an economic advantage.
It gave the South a military advantage.
It gave the North a military advantage.
It gave the North a political advantage.
C, factories don't help with politics but can make guns, ironclads, gatling guns, and more.
C it gave the North a military advantage.
A change or improvement; in this case, to the Constitution of the United States
That's an amendment, Hope this helps, have a great day
What is the Evolution of the American identity ?
The American identity has changed over time, but many of the same beliefs that were held before the founding of the country are still relevant and influence who Americans are today.
The country's identity was further shaped by significant events such as the Great Depression, the civil rights movement, and the counterculture of the 1960s.
The evolution of the American identity is a complex and multifaceted process that has been shaped by a variety of historical, social, and cultural factors.
At its core, the American identity is rooted in the principles of liberty, equality, and individualism, which were enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. Over the centuries, this identity has undergone significant transformations.
The early American identity was forged through a struggle for independence from British colonial rule and the expansion westward, with pioneers embodying the rugged individualism and the spirit of manifest destiny.
As the United States grew, so did its identity, marked by the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the ongoing struggle for civil rights, which led to a more inclusive and diverse vision of America.
The 20th century saw the emergence of the United States as a global superpower, and the American identity evolved to encompass a sense of responsibility on the world stage.
In the 21st century, the American identity continues to evolve, as the nation grapples with issues such as immigration, technology, and climate change.
It remains a dynamic and ever-changing concept, reflecting the ongoing aspirations and challenges of a diverse and democratic society.
For similar questions on country's identity
https://brainly.com/question/8007960
#SPJ3
Why did the allies propose a “Europe first” strategy
Germany posed the most serious, long-term threat to all Allied countries. The Allies were unified in thinking that Germany posed the most severe threat of the Axis Powers. Only Germany had the resources to challenge Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union.
Why did the Allies propose a "Europe First" strategy?
Germany posed the most serious, long-term threat to all Allied countries. The Allies were unified in thinking that Germany posed the most severe threat of the Axis Powers. Only Germany had the resources to challenge Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union.
Which of the following did not contribute to the dust bowl conditions in the plains states?
A) overplanting if wheat
B) stripping of natural grasses
C) severe drought
D) clear cutting of the region’s forests
clear cutting of the region’s forests
Clear-cutting of the region's forests was not responsible for the dust bowl conditions in the plains states. Option D is correct.
What is the significance of dust bowl conditions in the plains states?The Southern Plains region of the US, that was seriously drought-stricken and fully fledged knockout dust storms during a dry period in the 1930s, was known as the Dust Bowl.
The plains state dust bowl-like conditions were not caused by clear-cutting the region's forests.
Therefore, option D is correct.
To learn more about the dust bowl, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/12458721
#SPJ2
Which of the following is not a potential problem of using more nuclear energy
The spent nuclear fuel is easy and safe to dispose of is not a potential problem of using more nuclear energy.
This isn’t a potential problem because the disposal is straightforward and can be done safely almost anywhere. However, final disposal would be best if done in a deep geological area.
another answer: The spent nuclear fuel is easy and safe to dispose of.
SOMEONE HELP ME IM TAKING A TEXT YOU GET 12 POINTS IF ANSWER THANK YOUUUUU
1 Which of the following statement is true about fossils?
A. Fossils are only made from living organisms.
B. Both living and nonliving things can be fossilized.
C. Human bones buried in cemeteries are fossils.
D. Large animals cannot be fossilized.
Choose all the right answers.
2. The image of bird feathers left in a rock is:
A. a cast
B.a mold
C.a burrow
D. an imprint
E.a trace fossil
question number one is A
question number two is D
The Federal Reserve System and the Security and Exchange Commission were both established to
The Federal Reserve and the SEC were both established to stabilize and to provide order in the financial system after financial collapse brought glaring weaknesses to the forefront.
an example of this is the president can appoint judges
The above power is an example of an Executive power.
One of the Executive's powers is that they can appoint judges. A check on this power is that the Senate has to approve the appointment.
what systems and events led to the outbreak of the first world what the fan in Europe
The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand from Austria-Hungary by Serbian's. He was assassinated because Serbia wanted more land (Imperialism)
The First World War was caused by a range of factors, including imperialism, colonialism, international alliances, arms races, and nationalism. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand acted as the catalyst for the conflict that involved major world powers and reshaped global politics.
The outbreak of the First World War was the result of a complex interplay of systems and events. One driving factor was the geopolitical landscape shaped by imperialism and colonialism, with European powers competing for global dominance. This tension was heightened by the intricate web of international alliances and the arms race that ensued. Additionally, nationalism stoked the fire that would ultimately ignite into full-scale conflict following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary in 1914, which acted as the immediate catalyst for war.
Understanding the causes of World War I requires acknowledging the historical context, including the evolution of the European international system, the impact of prior empires and trade networks, and the shifting balance of power on the continent. These factors combined to create a powder keg of instability, which required only a spark to explode into a global conflict, changing the course of history.
What is an example of speech that the government limits?
Answer
Hi, examples include;
Violation of copy right rules, child sex videos, obscenity and fighting words
Explanation
Most of the restrictions that we encounter on day to day life are require us to apply common sense to avoid conflict with others.Restrictions on speech include those that could result to harm on kids or other persons,defamatory remarks and lies.Other restrictions are not easy to categorise as hate speech or not yet they have the potential of causing harm, for example use of abusive words that could result to fighting. A person has the right to speak up if he or she does not agree with restriction on speech.
Best of luck!
Final answer:
The government can limit forms of speech such as obscenity, libel and slander, fighting words, subversive speech, and certain types of symbolic speech. These limitations must be content neutral, not vague, and use the least restrictive means necessary. The government may also limit speech that poses a clear harm to national security, particularly during wartime.
Explanation:
One example of speech that the government limits is obscenity, which includes materials that the courts have determined lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value and are meant to appeal to prurient interests.
Libel and slander, forms of defamation that involve making false statements that harm someone's reputation, can also be restricted.
Additionally, speech that incites violence or criminal activities, such as making threats or promoting the violent overthrow of the government (subversive speech), is not protected under the First Amendment.
Laws regulating speech must be content neutral, not vague, and must represent the least restrictive means necessary to achieve a legitimate government interest without unduly infringing on the freedom of expression. Speech during wartime may also be curtailed if it presents a clear harm to the nation or its military forces.
Symbolic speech, which involves actions rather than words to convey a message, can also be limited under certain circumstances. For instance, cross burning may be an expressive act, but it can be restricted when it violates other laws, such as no trespassing or prohibition on open fires.
Why was the Republican Party established in 1854?
Founded in 1854 as a coalition opposing the extension of slavery into Western territories, the Republican Party fought to protect the rights of African Americans after the Civil War.( i did the quiz and research the answer
The Republican Party was established in 1854 mainly to oppose the expansion of slavery into the U.S. territories. This was a response to the Kansas-Nebraska Act and earlier anti-slavery parties. The party gained traction in the Northern states and represented a move away from more personal politics to party platform-focused approaches.
Explanation:The Republican Party was established in 1854 primarily to oppose the expansion of slavery into the territories of the United States. This stance was a response to the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the parties that originated before it, like the Liberty Party and the Free-Soil Party, that were also against the spread of slavery. The Republican Party wanted to limit slaveholders' control of their 'human property', arguing that allowing further expansion of slavery would infringe upon American property rights.
Among Republicans, there was a belief in what they characterized as the Slave Power conspiracy, suggesting that there was a plot to extend slavery throughout the nation. This became a deeply sectional issue, with the Republican Party largely gaining traction in the Northern states that were industrializing and less reliant on slave labor. Southern leaders, on the other hand, vehemently disagreed with these principles, leading to further strife between the North and the South.
Additionally, the formation of the Republican Party represented a shift from the more personal politics of the Democratic Party. Instead, the Republicans focused on presenting a clear party platform that addressed specific issues, such as opposition to the expansion of slavery and promotion of more national authority.
Learn more about Formation of the Republican Party here:https://brainly.com/question/26247206
#SPJ3
How did Jesus use the fig tree during the Olivet discourse to assure His disciples that the kingdom would be fulfilled?
Answer:
In the Olivet Discourse, Jesus was reported to have told his disciples, "Truly I tell you, this generation [greek: genea] will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away." What is the meaning of the parable of the fig tree?
In either case, the parable reflects Jesus offering a chance for repentance and forgiveness of sin, showing his grace toward his believers. "These three years" logically refers to the period of Jesus' ministry, or simply that is the period it took for a fig tree to bear fruit.
Why did Jesus curse the fig tree if it wasn't in season?
By a show of leaves, it was like many people, pretending to have fruit which was not there. It was like the Pharisees who professed to be very religious, but whose lives were fruitless. Therefore, Christ cursed the fig tree as an object lesson to all not to be hypocritical.”
Explanation:
In the final of Matthew's five discourses, the Olivet discourse, which comes shortly before the account of Jesus' passion, Jesus used the fig tree to reassure His disciples that the kingdom would come to pass.
What do you know about the Olivet ?The Olivet Discourse, also known as the Olivet prophecy, is a biblical text that may be found in the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew 24 and 25, Mark 13, and Luke 21.
Jesus warns his people that they would face adversity and persecution before to the eventual triumph of God's Kingdom, which is why it is also called as the Little Apocalypse since it uses apocalyptic terminology. The Olivet talk, the final of Matthew's Five Discourses, comes right before the account of Jesus' suffering, which begins with his anointing.
It's not apparent if the tribulation Jesus speaks of will occur in the current, this moment, or in the future.
Learn more about Olivet , from :
brainly.com/question/14045769
#SPJ3
sometimes known as the spoiler effect a third party candidate has been known to
The answer is: split votes with a candidate from the major party that has similar ideology resulting in the opposing party candidate to win.
Why is it likely that there will be discoveries in the future that change what we know about the fossil record?
Technology is constantly evolving as the years go on. When you compare the fossil finding from just 60 years ago there is a huge difference compared to the ones from 10 years ago. Technology will continue improving and so will the records being obtained.
It is likely that there will be discoveries in the future that change what we know about the fossil record because the fossil record is inherently incomplete.
What is the fossil record?Fossilization is a rare and stochastic process that only preserves a small fraction of the organisms that have ever lived on Earth. As a result, many organisms and ecosystems are poorly represented or missing entirely from the fossil record.
Additionally, new technologies and methods are constantly being developed that allow us to extract more information from fossils than ever before. For example, advances in imaging and chemical analysis have allowed scientists to study the internal structures and composition of fossils in unprecedented detail.
Furthermore, there are still many unexplored regions of the world, such as deep-sea environments and polar regions, that may hold important clues about the evolution of life on Earth.
Overall, the fossil record will likely continue to evolve as new discoveries are made and our understanding of the history of life on Earth deepens.
Learn more about fossil record here
https://brainly.com/question/4163844
#SPJ2
what was the job of thomas Jefferson when George Washington was president
He was the Secretary of State
Final answer:
During George Washington's presidency, Thomas Jefferson served as the first Secretary of State. He was responsible for foreign affairs and was also a leader of the nascent Republican Party, which laid the groundwork for his future presidency. His role contributed to shaping early U.S. diplomacy and the political divide of the era.
Explanation:
During George Washington's presidency, Thomas Jefferson held the position of the first Secretary of State. Jefferson was an influential figure in Washington's cabinet, handling foreign affairs and playing a critical role in shaping the nation's early diplomatic policies. Before becoming the Secretary of State, Jefferson had an extensive political career including being the author of the Declaration of Independence, a U.S. Minister to France, and a delegate to the Continental Congress. His tenure as Secretary of State was significant, as it laid the foundation for his future role as the third President of the United States, following his vice presidency under John Adams.
Jefferson's time as Secretary of State was characterized by his leadership of the emerging Republican Party and his differing views from Washington's Federalist leanings, particularly on foreign policy towards France and Britain. This dissonance between Federalist and Republican ideals shaped the political landscape of the time and ultimately contributed to Jefferson's success as a viable alternative presidential candidate in the election of 1800.
why do you think congress considers bills in committee before they are brought to the floor for debate
Committees provide space for expert debate before being brought to the floor for more general opinions. They give politicians who truly care about the issue a chance to refine their bill so it has the best chance of being passed. It's also much easier to write, construct, and edit the bill in committees as they consist of a much smaller group of people than Congress as a whole.
In the late 1800s, which of the following did the People’s Party believe would give the people more political power?
Answer: choosing senators through direct election